T1B

War Wagon wrote:

Mace wrote:Your link was from the Family Research Council, a right wing religious lobbying organization who promote an anti-gay agenda. And whose link was self-affirming?

This coming from the guy who recently posted a link to the Daily Kos, so yes, one would tend to view any link you post as self-affirming.

Let's see, you profess a hatred of homosexuals but yet you always find time to suck mvscal's dick. Interesting.

mvscal wrote:

Mace wrote:Your link was from the Family Research Council,

Their article was provided with footnotes to the studies referenced in the article.

You remain almost pitifully stupid.

Footnotes makes it a valid study? Okay, if you say so. :roll:

Footnotes link to studies not you have the intelligence or the intellectual honesty to read or comprehend them.

Mace wrote:Let's see, you profess a hatred of homosexuals but yet you always find time to suck mvscal's dick.

You got a link for that, Nancy boy?

and no, I don't hate necessarily homosexuals. I hate them flaunting it in my face and demanding acceptance as if they weren't somehow just as defective as a pedophile, which they are. Keep it in the closet, don't draw too much attention to yourself, and go about your business.

What's even worse than a defective, demented, demanding homosexual is supposedly enlightened asswipes like you and Jsc who defend them.

Why don't you, he, and PiS get a room and give each other reach arounds.

The only thing I'm defending, dumbass, is that homosexuals are no more likely to be pedophiles than a hetero, and I posted a legitimate study to validate that point. Mvscal either isn't man enough to admit he linked us to a bullshit "study" stating otherwise or he's stupid enough to actually believe what he posted.

Hey Mace do you read that article in the papers the other day about the big problem the Presbyterian Church is having with its Clergy buggering kids?

Neither did I.

Wonder if it might have something to do with a predominantly hetero Clergy.

Mace wrote:The only thing I'm defending, dumbass, is that homosexuals are no more likely to be pedophiles than a hetero,

You are defending a position which has absolutely no factual underpinning. Homosexuals are far more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. The numbers speak for themselves. You are deluding yourself by "adjusting" the definition of homosexual to suit your deeply cherished and carefully nurtured preconception of homosexual virtue.

It's really very simple. Cock + Cock = Faggot. If you shove your (erect) cock up a dude's ass, you are a homosexual. It doesn't matter if that dude is ten years old or fifty years old. It doesn't matter if you are a prison tough guy establishing your dominance or a newly minted Boy Scout troop leader nervously fumbling with the tiny penis of your first victim. You are a fucking fag.

Clear?

Just realized that Van is probably hurting himself with laughter over this thread.

Jsc810 wrote:children, who are not capable of giving consent.

That is a legal construct with absolutely no meaning in objective reality.

Jsc810 wrote:

War Wagon wrote:demanding acceptance as if they weren't somehow just as defective as a pedophile, which they are.

One day, maybe, you will be able to distinguish consenting adults from sex with children, who are not capable of giving consent.

On the same day you'll have a pig singing opera.

schmick wrote:adults consenting to faggotry are just as defective as pedophiles, one day, maybe, you will be able to understand that

All humans are defective in some way. As long as they're lawful and mind their own business, so should you. By your logic lesbians are also defective, and I'm guessing you enjoy watching a couple hot sluts get it on. So I guess by proxy you're also defective.

Actually, some would argue that asshole Pony Ball coaches who think they're Tommy Lasorda and live vicariously through 12 year olds are pretty defective.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As long as they're lawful

And whose morality should determine what is lawful?

Mace wrote: My link was from the American Psychiatric Association whose study results are

... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Cuda wrote:

Mace wrote: My link was from the American Psychiatric Association whose study results are

... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Got a link to that, dumbfuck, or are you just pulling numbers out of your fat ass?

mvscal wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As long as they're lawful

And whose morality should determine what is lawful?

Not the thumpers'.

Sin,
Thomas Jefferson

"I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ."

- Thomas Jefferson

Truman wrote:"I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ."

- Thomas Jefferson

BFD.

Considering what he wrote in the Establishment Clause & his interpretation of it in his letter to Danbury Baptist Association in 1802 I'd say that his being religious in his own beliefs has nothing to do with how he felt churches should have no say in the affairs of government. Thumpers have no special say in what's considered moral.

Diego in Seattle wrote:BFD.

Considering what he wrote in the Establishment Clause

Jefferson was in France when the Constitution was written, you kiddy-diddling fucktard. He didn't write squat. The Establishment Clause does nothing more and nothing less than what it says in plain English.

Thumpers have no special say in what's considered moral.

But perverts do?

Diego in Seattle wrote:Thumpers have no special say in what's considered moral.

Actually, if they comprise an "aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community" (the definition of "society", Diego), they do. Here's another one:

The term “morality” can be used either
1.descriptively to refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a society or, a. some other group, such as a religion, or
b. accepted by an individual for her own behavior or

2.normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/

Truman wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Thumpers have no special say in what's considered moral.

Actually, if they comprise an "aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community" (the definition of "society", Diego), they do. Here's another one:

The term “morality” can be used either
1.descriptively to refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a society or, a. some other group, such as a religion, or
b. accepted by an individual for her own behavior or

2.normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/

So go ahead & explain why pron is legal in the U.S. when you thumpers allegedly make up the "moral" majority.

Tru always gets so clinical and stuff...

'twere up to me, I woulda' posted a pic of Mgo's candy bus to get the point across about whom should or should not set moral standards.

Pretty sure I wouldn't arrive at a "PedoinSeattle" conclusion.

Diego in Seattle wrote:So go ahead & explain why pron is legal in the U.S. when you thumpers allegedly make up the "moral" majority.

Since you so mightily struggle understanding the 2nd and 14th Amendments, I suppose it should come as no surprise that the 1st would completely baffle you as well.

Oh, and fwiw, I'm no more a "thumper" than you are a "pedo," but if you're bent on a hair-pulling contest, I would be happy to accommodate you...

mvscal wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As long as they're lawful

And whose morality should determine what is lawful?

What are homos doing that you believe should be unlawful? I'm talking about the laws by which we all abide. You know, like don't steal, murder, rape, etc.

Mace wrote:

Cuda wrote:

Mace wrote: My link was from the American Psychiatric Association whose study results are

... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Got a link to that, dumbfuck, or are you just pulling numbers out of your fat ass?

If the shoe fits, ram it up your poop chute, dicknose

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

mvscal wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:As long as they're lawful

And whose morality should determine what is lawful?

What are homos doing that you believe should be unlawful?

That wasn't the question.

Papa Willie wrote:So next on the agenda will undoubtedly be to allow gay Scout Leaders. Who seriously doesn't see this coming?

And you don't think there are not already ?

Like an large group they tend to be a sample of society in general, and the numbers say out of that many people, they has to be a faggot or two in there, regardless of them signing a double secret pledge, that says, " Nope, I am not gay".

mvscal wrote:That wasn't the question.

Well, you're asking the wrong guy. I'm not the one trying to push my beliefs and morality onto others. I'm a fan of live and let live.

schmick wrote:They should not be allowed to be within 100 feet of children

Stop cherry picking and answer my question. Are you defective if you rub one out to a couple of hot bitches chowing clam?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:...rub one out to a couple of hot bitches chowing clam?

"I don't know about rubbing one out, but I definitely bang on the ceiling with a broom when things sound like they're getting a little crazy up there."

Sincerely, Dad Wagon

I see nothing wrong with a Scootmaster who's also a Foghat.

What the flamin' fook, man

Cuda wrote:

Mace wrote:

Cuda wrote:... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Got a link to that, dumbfuck, or are you just pulling numbers out of your fat ass?

If the shoe fits, ram it up your poop chute, dicknose

Okay, so you have no link to verify your bullshit claim (that's a real shocker) and you were simply pulling numbers out of your ass whenever mvscal took a cigarette break and pulled his dick out (no surprise there either).

schmick wrote:

Mace wrote: Okay, so you have no link to verify your bullshit claim (that's a real shocker) and you were simply pulling numbers out of your ass whenever mvscal took a cigarette break and pulled his dick out (no surprise there either).

Since there are no links that provide proof that god exists, he must not exist then

That's right, idiot, he doesn't.

So..you guys didn't see Happiness--you know, where the abused cute kid actually liked it? Of course I'm referring to this accurate fake quote by the fake poster, etc..

schmick wrote:what kind of retarded dork kids join the scouts anyway?

And..the current rule is that it's perfectly okay to be be a gay young scout--even earning the Eagle sash. But the day you turn seventeen, you're a pervert and a criminal?

Anyone aware of Baden-Powell's bromance with brawny brownshirts? Surprised?

schmick wrote:

Mace wrote:

schmick wrote:
Since there are no links that provide proof that god exists, he must not exist then

That's right, idiot, he doesn't.

I was agreeing with you

"You're my Blue Sky
You're my sunny day
Lord, ya know it makes me high when you turn your love my way
Turn your love my way"

This song has always elevated my spirit whether I'm feeling good or down in the dumps.


Glad that I take their meaning to heart and that I don't have to look at the lyrics as a bunch of horseshit.

Mace wrote:

Cuda wrote:... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Okay, so you have no link to verify your bullshit claim (that's a real shocker) and you were simply pulling numbers out of your ass whenever mvscal took a cigarette break and pulled his dick out (no surprise there either).

oh, right... you're the social worker and a wanna be psychologist, aren't you? You're exhibit A and I rest my fucking case.

Cuda wrote:

Mace wrote:

Cuda wrote:... self affirming bullshit.

90% of Psychiatrists (and 99% of Psychologists) need Psychiatric treatment themselves.

Okay, so you have no link to verify your bullshit claim (that's a real shocker) and you were simply pulling numbers out of your ass whenever mvscal took a cigarette break and pulled his dick out (no surprise there either).

oh, right... you're the social worker and a wanna be psychologist, aren't you? You're exhibit A and I rest my fucking case.

Just as I thought....total bullshit. Situation normal for Cuda.