T1B

You are so full of shit. The only sting you felt was cock in your ass.

Moving Sale wrote:You are so full of shit. The only sting you felt was cock in your ass.

Why are you here? Everyone hates you. I guess it's better than down at county where you get physically bitch slapped before downing multiple helpings of man seed.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Feeling a need for validation? Why do you care what other people think? Can't you defend yourself snowflake?

Moving Sale wrote:You are so full of shit. The only sting you felt was cock in your ass.

What color was the cock ?? You have failed to designate that once again. Your smack sucks.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Derron wrote:But go ahead and continue your denial that the economy is doing well. What about terrorists fucking with the US ??

We should deport them.

Where should we have sent Stephen Paddock?

Remove your head from your ass and get your oxygen sat levels back into the normal range there. I would be referring to foreign terrorists, not domestic ones, although Nancy Pelosi is still breathing air. We can wait and see what happens in Niger after that shit show went down.

Moving Sale wrote:Feeling a need for validation? Why do you care what other people think? Can't you defend yourself snowflake?

What is he to defend against? You doing a drive by and throwing a cup of shit piss on him ?

Moving Sale wrote:Feeling a need for validation? Why do you care what other people think? Can't you defend yourself snowflake?

My point which easily sailed over you head like everything else, you contribute nothing, zero, zilch, nadda.

Most of your postings resemble a diatribe from a 10 year old having a temper tantrum.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Derron wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Derron wrote:But go ahead and continue your denial that the economy is doing well. What about terrorists fucking with the US ??

We should deport them.

Where should we have sent Stephen Paddock?

I would be referring to foreign terrorists, not domestic ones

How many people have foreign terrorists killed in the last five years, compared to how many domestic ones have killed?

Diego in Seattle wrote: How many people have foreign terrorists killed in the last five years, compared to how many domestic ones have killed?

I see your spin here. Clever enough, but since you want to label these various acts of violence as "domestic terrorism " instead of the various types of violence that they were, so you can spin some pussy bleeding slant on it, knock yourself out. Post the numbers, causes and the official "terrorism" pronouncement and we can go from there.

Joe in PB wrote:when Obama was president I felt the sting of reverse discrimination.

Wait, what? Were you discriminated against because you're old, or because you're, presumably, white?

If it's the former, that sucks, but it's not Obummer's fault. If it's the latter, I laffed. Can't a white man get a break in today's America?

Screwy you get a break every day.

Most people try not to spew their drinks watching you dance around to hip hop like Gomer Pyle.

Joe in PB wrote:Screwy you get a break every day.

Most people try not to spew their drinks watching you dance around to hip hop like Gomer Pyle.

Your smack sucks. Try again.

Yeah, it was off the mark.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

And if you don't think there is reverse discrimination, take a look at who is working at any government facility or office building.

That carries over to the defense and aerospace industries when it comes to promotions.

The market has improved a lot since Trump has been president, unemployment is lower, and there are more good opportunities than there was during Obama"s tenure.

Although maybe nothing has changed down at the county correctional center, or the janitorial service at DC's liberal news & propoganda network.

Joe in PB wrote: The market has improved a lot since Trump has been president, unemployment is lower, and there are more good opportunities than there was during Obama"s tenure.

Complete garbage

Joe in PB wrote:unemployment is lower

Interesting how the GOP lost interest in the number of people no longer looking for work since 1/20/17...

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:unemployment is lower

Interesting how the GOP lost interest in the number of people no longer looking for work since 1/20/17...

Same with deficit spending. Surprising, huh?

Exactly the response I'd expect from a janitor.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:unemployment is lower

Interesting how the GOP lost interest in the number of people no longer looking for work since 1/20/17...

Once people fall off unemployment they're no longer counted, just like it was when Obama was president. Still the unemployment numbers are lower in California and I believe across the nation than they were during Obama's tenure. That's something in California considering all the businesses that have left the state because of the screwed up politics.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:unemployment is lower

Interesting how the GOP lost interest in the number of people no longer looking for work since 1/20/17...

Same with deficit spending. Surprising, huh?

Or looking at it the other way. Interesting how the Dems want to avoid discussing unemployment numbers since 1/20/2017.

Left Seater wrote:
Or looking at it the other way. Interesting how the Dems want to avoid discussing unemployment numbers since 1/20/2017.

Name one.

We can play this game all day. Why don’t you name a Democrat that is touting unemployment numbers now?

But again since I am not you I will play your childish game, Christopher Lu.

MY childish game? You really are a dumb fuck.
But anyways, go ahead and post his comment history on unemployment.

You bring little other than curse words and anger. Just like a child.


"It is hard to imagine a more stark contrast between the economy that we are passing off to our successor and the economy we inherited," said Christopher Lu, the deputy secretary of the Labor Department. “Unemployment is down to 4.9% last month in stark contrast to where we started.”

“When the president came into office in January 2009, we were in the middle of the greatest recession in our lifetime. Since that period of time, because of the actions that the president took, we've now had 75 consecutive months of job growth. We've created 14.5 million jobs.”

“I think there are a couple of pieces of data to put into context. I think the 38,000 jobs we created last month also need to be seen in the light of the fact that we were in the middle of a major strike going on at that period of time involving Verizon and the Communications Workers of America.

It's estimated that [that strike] cut job growth by about 35,000 jobs, so when you add that back in, we are about 80,000 jobs created, and that's basically the number of jobs we needed to keep pace with increasing population.”

“We have had 63 consecutive months of growth that has produced 12.6 million jobs. Our unemployment rate has fallen to 5.5 percent,”


You were saying?

Praise Trump...

Left Seater wrote:

“We have had 63 consecutive months of growth that has produced 12.6 million jobs. Our unemployment rate has fallen to 5.5 percent,”

It would go down even farther if all the worthless pieces of shit hanging out all over town would go fill some of the jobs that there are signs up all over town begging for workers, the ones who got used to not doing fuck all in the last 8 years.

You really suck at this.

Chris Lu Retweeted
Best Guest Media
Best Guest Media
@bestguestmedia
·
Nov 3
.@ChrisLu44 will be talking jobs numbers during the 1pm ET hour with @davidgura on @BloombergTV. We hope you’ll tune in!

And what did he say? He said the numbers over the last 12 months were pretty good and agreed with the host that the economy was chugging along with a good head of steam.

Now go fuck off you stupid orange fuck.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2 ... 2017-video

First of all if you always vote party lines every election (Republicans & Democrats) you're part of the problem, that is part of the reason why presidential candidates are terrible and continue to get worse. Party leadership knows whoever gets the nomination will do the party's bidding, and most party voters will tow the line.

Secondly if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself why did Obama beat Hillary the first go around?

Then, why did Obama get elected for for two stints?

Most of the democratic faithful here want to blame republicans for Trumps election, when in fact people who vote candidates and issues over party lines voted for Trump.

Hillary was a poor candidate, worse than Trump, end of story.

It's about time the Democratic party figures out what they stand for, sanctuary party, soft on terrorism, diversity visa's, & a welfare state or UK 2.0 is not what America wants.

Then they need to find moderate candidates with a vision and who have leadership.

The daily whining here is a microcosm of the democratic party problem, it's not them, it's everyone else's fault.

More proof of just how stupid you are.

They also need to ask themselves if Sanders would have beaten “Her” in a fair primary.

Nice white flag LS. So once again you are full of shit.

The former leader of the DNC is the one who claims it wasn’t fair, not me. Go take it up with her, not “Her.”

I was talking about you dodging your inane Chris Lu assertion.