Roy Moore the pedophile

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:05 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:
schmick wrote:Moore isn't even accused of pedophilia, perhaps the high end of hebephilia but certainly not accused of being a pedophile.
Age of consent is 16 in Alabama, imbecile.

You moving there soon to get it on that ? You must have a spreadsheet on that I presume..

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:11 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:Rack Sam for his reasoned and sensible take.

Fuck the rest of you, you know who you are.
So far it looks like 88pedos, Left Seated pedo, smackapedo and Dupedo all want more child sex predators to vote for.
Am I missing anyone?
If you have ever fucked (and that's a big IF), you'd be a pedo by default - simply because you're too small to fuck an adult of any kind.

Yeah, he might even have trouble dropping the hammer on these skanks.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:19 am

Derron wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
schmick wrote:Moore isn't even accused of pedophilia, perhaps the high end of hebephilia but certainly not accused of being a pedophile.
Age of consent is 16 in Alabama, imbecile.
You moving there soon to get it on that ? You must have a spreadsheet on that I presume..

I'm not the one supporting the child molester.

Just sayin...

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:23 am

I am NOT ranking this...

Derron wrote: Yeah, he might even have trouble dropping the hammer on these skanks.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:47 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: I'm not the one supporting the child molester.

Just sayin...

Who is supporting the child molester ??

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:36 pm

Yeah, when you admit to forging some of the documents you claim prove that a guy was stalking you, it weakens the case against him. That she did it suggests that she had an axe to grind when Moore ruled against her in the divorce she was involved in. And by extension, it weakens the other claims against him as well, since it makes them appear as “me too!” attacks.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:45 pm

schmick wrote:Appears the Gloria Alred represented accuser has admitted to lying about Moore and forging her proof.
Gloria Alred is involved, nobody is shocked

Nobody forged anything. Stop lying, but I guess with you, that would mean stop breathing.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:46 pm

Rooster wrote:Yeah, when you admit to forging some of the documents you claim prove that a guy was stalking you, it weakens the case against him. That she did it suggests that she had an axe to grind when Moore ruled against her in the divorce she was involved in. And by extension, it weakens the other claims against him as well, since it makes them appear as “me too!” attacks.

Keep dreaming, asswipe.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:59 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
schmick wrote:Appears the Gloria Alred represented accuser has admitted to lying about Moore and forging her proof.
Gloria Alred is involved, nobody is shocked
Nobody forged anything. Stop lying, but I guess with you, that would mean stop breathing.

So this:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -yearbook/
...means Brietbart is full of crap on this particular story? Is that the tale you’re sticking with? You sure you want to do that?

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:00 pm

double post

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:10 pm

Rooster wrote: So this:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -yearbook/
...means Brietbart is full of crap on this particular story? Is that the tale you’re sticking with? You sure you want to do that?

Yep. Fake news.

Breitbart

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:20 pm

Then we can add ABC to the list of fake news since that story was the base of the breitbart link.

Nevermind her own words that says she added things to it.

trev · Post by **trev** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:30 pm

From the beginning I saw this woman, I thought something was not quite right. Turns out, she has lost her credibility. I'm sure Roy Moore is your typical lying, corrupt horn dog politician though. I don't care if he gets elected or not.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:52 pm

Beacuse you are a fucking POS.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 9:26 pm

She didn't forge anything. She "annotated" it.

As for her motive, if she just wanted to sink Moore, she'd have done it during the primary. This was a democrat/MSM hit piece timed to steal a seat from the republicans. Plain and simple. This bitch should sit in a cell for a stretch.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 9:27 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Beacuse you are a fucking POS.

Once again, screwey goes deep.....in his own Colon.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:09 pm

Two things:
1) If the yearbook entry was real, Allred would have released it to the media to examine. That she hasn’t says she is concerned about its’ veracity, and
2) now that know that what’s-her-name is changing her story on the yearbook, it calls into question everything about her story. If she wanted the full impact to be felt, she’d have given us the full truth about the yearbook. As it is, like your teenager who tells the “whole truth” and then little bits leak out about the highly edited parts they chose to omit, the story stinks.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:19 pm

We can add roostpedo to the list.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:47 pm

Can we all just agree that all diddlers need the rope?

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:18 pm

God damn man, really?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:22 pm

Bucmonkey wrote:God damn man, really?

Your entire posting history here seems to reflect a perpetual state of bewilderment.

Which is extremely reasonable.

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:23 pm

At least you care...

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Dec 09, 2017 12:55 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Bucmonkey wrote:God damn man, really?
Your entire posting history here seems to reflect a perpetual state of bewilderment.

Which is extremely reasonable.

Well, this thread is certainly turning out to be a nothingburger...

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Dec 09, 2017 12:55 am

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 12:58 am

Sudden Sam wrote: Jones, the Dem, on the other hand, has had a lot of GOP support here and seems to be a reasonable man. He's worked well with the Repubs in the past. He doesn't appear to be tied to any specific agenda.

Sounds like a solid southern democrat of my grandparents era. To bad few of those exist anymore. They either quit or joined the R’s. Would be nice to have a few around today to balance out the lib side of the Democratic Party.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 1:53 am

Left Seater wrote:Sounds like a solid southern democrat of my grandparents era.

Gramps was in the klan?

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:13 am

Too bad Jones likes dead babies.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:58 am

Rooster wrote:Too bad Jones likes dead babies.

Too bad for them you couldn't care less about them after birf

atmdad · Post by **atmdad** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:50 am

I'm just glad to see the beginning of the 2-party system going up in flames. The screw-michigan's and the schmick's are way too partisan out of touch fucknuts.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 1:17 pm

^^^^^^^ That right there will rack!!!

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 1:48 pm

smackaholic wrote:
Left Seater wrote:Sounds like a solid southern democrat of my grandparents era.
Gramps was in the klan?

Nope. But he did vote Democratic until the last few years. He could never understand how his party started pimping abortion and wanted him to pay more taxes. Not sure if he ever voted for an R or just stopped voting.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:58 pm

Left Seater wrote:pimping abortion

Gramps must have been pretty slow on the draw.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:50 pm

You should fight them.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:13 pm

Moving Sale wrote:You should fight them.

You should fight gravity.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:39 pm

Just not in Michigan.

Gravity has proven itself a pussy there.

I hear even the SEC has considered scheduling OOC away games with gravity in Michigan.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:00 am

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

You should fight gravity.

Are you suggesting he uses some sort of mechanical device to get into his high chair?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:07 am

Please stop thinking about my body. That is so gay.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 2:19 am

So sorry -- you lost the privilege of playing that card when you became pathologically obsessed with a certain politician's skin tone... which is super-creepy.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 3:30 am

Nice post.

Sin,
KC

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 4:13 am

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:gravity.

The opposite of comedy.