T1B

Left Seater wrote:Refusal to answer the question and quoting the Bible in reference to questions about proof of the Bible? Par for the course for you I guess.

Bottom line, you are applying a double standard and don’t really care to learn despite your claims.

See this is why you are the GOAT of trolls.

When did I say I was going to prove the Bible?
This is a bizarre scenario you set up due to your desperation and inability to prove your dumb globe.

God's Word stands on its own.
None of it is in error.

It is already known that you don't believe it.

Dinsdale wrote:More fake bullshit.

Right.

1. Did this prove your globe? LMAO!

2. There is no way to put this delicately. Only a gullible fool watches this ridiculous show and buys into it as reality.

Do better.

Hey, I was just noting that Jeff Bezos is now in on the conspiracy (spent a ton of dough to join the club, too).

Jeff Bezos net worth - 132.8 billion.

He'll be okay.

Softball Bat wrote: God's Word stands on its own.

Which codification specifically?




You can dance around that question as you've typically done previously. I'll accept that as a form of answer.

God's Word = Jesus Christ

God's Word = the Bible I have on my desk

Softball Bat wrote:God's Word = Jesus Christ

God's Word = the Bible I have on my desk

Proof ??

Read only m0de is your best bet, Derron.

Trust me.




<3

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Refusal to answer the question and quoting the Bible in reference to questions about proof of the Bible? Par for the course for you I guess.

Bottom line, you are applying a double standard and don’t really care to learn despite your claims.

See this is why you are the GOAT of trolls.

When did I say I was going to prove the Bible?
This is a bizarre scenario you set up due to your desperation and inability to prove your dumb globe.

God's Word stands on its own.
None of it is in error.

It is already known that you don't believe it.

Wrong. I have said multiple times that I consider myself a Christian.

We are where we are in this because you refuse to answer simple direct questions. But troll on troll, troll on.

Left Seater wrote:Wrong. I have said multiple times that I consider myself a Christian.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49007

Left Seater wrote:I consider myself to be a Christian. I believe their is some sort of higher power, but who knows if Christians, Jews, Islams, etc have it correct.

Who knows who has it right??

And you're a Christian?
lol



Acts 11:26
And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a
whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And
the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

The people at Antioch knew and confessed that Jesus is the promised Christ.
That is why they were Christians.

That is what Christian is today, also.

If that's you, yes, you are one.

If you're in here saying, "Well, maybe the Jews have it right. Maybe Islam does..." then you've got a pretty big issue to work out.


Get your story straight.

Softball Bat wrote:God's Word = Jesus Christ

God's Word = the Bible I have on my desk

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: Which codification specifically?

Do you need help with a dictionary? There are many available on-line.

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Wrong. I have said multiple times that I consider myself a Christian.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49007

Left Seater wrote:I consider myself to be a Christian. I believe their is some sort of higher power, but who knows if Christians, Jews, Islams, etc have it correct.

Who knows who has it right??

And you're a Christian?
lol



Acts 11:26
And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a
whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And
the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

The people at Antioch knew and confessed that Jesus is the promised Christ.
That is why they were Christians.

That is what Christian is today, also.

If that's you, yes, you are one.

If you're in here saying, "Well, maybe the Jews have it right. Maybe Islam does..." then you've got a pretty big issue to work out.


Get your story straight.

And still no answer to a question. Troll on troll.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:God's Word = Jesus Christ

God's Word = the Bible I have on my desk

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: Which codification specifically?

Do you need help with a dictionary? There are many available on-line.

You want to know if the NIV and the KJV are both God's Word?
They are.

I could take either of them to a person who has never heard the gospel, show them the Word, and lead them to Christ.

Jesus Christ is the Word.

Left Seater wrote:So for probably the 20th time, why do you apply Faith to the Bible despite lack of physical proof and refuse in the event of a globe earth?

1. Your question is stupid, irrelevant, and full of fallacious assumptions.

2. Despite that, was has been answered at least two different ways. You don't like the answers. That's your problem.

Papa Willie wrote:Prove you've ever ridden in a car, 'Tardt.

The desperation and outright zaniness is off the charts.




Here is the proper question...

poptart wrote:Almost everything that can be filmed... is filmed.

Why wouldn't they (NASA) film a rocket going all the way to space?

They never thought of it?
Didn't think it would kool or interesting?
Just didn't give a damn?


Seriously, what's your theory on that?

Why do you think they have never filmed a rocket going from earth to space?

Provide your theory.

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:So for probably the 20th time, why do you apply Faith to the Bible despite lack of physical proof and refuse in the event of a globe earth?

1. Your question is stupid, irrelevant, and full of fallacious assumptions.

2. Despite that, was has been answered at least two different ways. You don't like the answers. That's your problem.

Link to your answers? Quoting the Bible isn’t an answer by the way.

There are no assumptions in my question. You can call it stupid and irrelevant all you want, mostly because you don’t want to answer. You have said you have faith in the Bible. You have also said there is no physical proof to support the Bible. Yet in other things you have/apply zero faith despite there being ample physical evidence, similar to the Bible.

Simple question, why the double or different standard?

shutyomouth wrote:I'm simply mirroring what you're doing. See how fucking stupid you look?

No.

I am asking a realistic question.


I find no rational explanation for NASA never filming a rocket going from land to space.
Not to mention other things NASA has never filmed -- which they would have LONG ago, if they could.

They can't film a rocket going from land to space because a rocket can not go from land to space.
That is my conclusion.

Sorry to have to be the square peg.

You'll probably get over it.

Left Seater wrote:You have also said there is no physical proof to support the Bible.

Physical evidence for the truth of the Bible is overwhelming.

Beyond that, there is matter and there is spirit.

It is my determination (and the determination of millions of others) that there is a spiritual world.

Yes, because we have experienced it.


Give it a shot.

poptart wrote:John 3:3
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be
born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Exodus 3:14
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the
children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.




Romans 1:20

Got it you don’t want to answer. The double standard just is.

This is one of the main reasons debate and discussion with you is nearly impossible.

But my offer still stands if Norwegians flights are approved.

You keep saying this, and it becomes more nonsensical each time it is repeated.

You base this comment on some hypothetical map of the earth -----> which I have never given endorsement to.

You pull some imaginary thing out of thin air, attribute it to me, and then say, "See, your model makes no sense."

LOL


What model?

When did I ever show you my model of the earth?

Never.

Admiral Richard E. Byrd

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_E._Byrd



A very well put together video.
15:43 long.
Give it a watch if you don't have ADHD -- and/or you are interested in the earth.





Mountains?

Papa Willie wrote:If the earth was flat, 'tardt, Antarctica's climate would be just like everybody's climate. In fact, the entire planet would have the same climate.

The globe side needs smarter people arguing their position.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:If the earth was flat, 'tardt, Antarctica's climate would be just like everybody's climate. In fact, the entire planet would have the same climate.

The globe side needs smarter people arguing their position.

Don't worry, Goobs. There's no chance that you would have ever thought about this.

You're right. Because I'm smart and you're a moron. Your climate argument is idiotic.

Understand what? Your misguided drivel? You said if the world was flat, it would all have the same climate. That's not really logical.

Elevation! What do I win?

Nothing.

It's as m0ronic as barking "GRAVITY!!"

Wait...what?

Elevation has nothing to do with climate? Ever been to Denver? The top of a very large mountain, like Everest?

Oh yes.

GRAVITY!!!!!!!

It exists. As does space. As do satellites. As does weightlessness. As do globular shaped planets and moons and stars.

And all of that gibbering is supposed to move someone to what conclusion?

I conclude that you are making no sense.
As usual.

Did you or Lefty watch the video?

We have made more sense in two posts than you have made over every thread over the last two plus years.

Why do you hate the truth?

I'm not interested in the back-and-forth between Goober and shutyomouth.

shutyomouth produced a very bad take.
Goober pounced on it.

Their dialogue is based on speculation, anyway.
Then Lefty's "elevation" bark just adds speculation on top of speculation.

There is nothing to be known from the idiotic dialogue.


I'm interested in the video I posted.
It talks about tangible realities.

Like Byrd's multiple expeditions.
Byrd's findings.
Google Earth in contrast to Byrd's findings.

So yeah...

This is very interesting to me.

Because I am interested in FACT.


Watch the video.
It's why I posted it.

I haven’t watched it yet. Was waiting to do so in a pilots lounge one day when really bored.

But your track record on videos is crap Softball. You link us up to things where a guy hides objects behind boards, or blankets are some other arbitrary item. Or they are straight out of the flat earth talking points and have been debunked by 5th graders.

So I will watch it at some point and I am guessing I will get a good chuckle out of it. Just like you claiming elevation has no bearing on climate.

I counted four lies.




#par

Just because it is inconvenient for your narrative doesn’t make them lies.

Point the alleged lies exactly troll.

1. My track record on videos is excellent.

2. I don't link you to arbitrary things.

3. My points have not been debunked by 5th graders.

4. I did not claim elevation has no bearing on climate. As I said, the conversation between Goober and shutyomouth involved speculation, and it was pointless. Then you piled more speculation on top of it. Hence, my short remark.


1, 2, 3, 4.

I shoot straight and accurately.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Understand what? Your misguided drivel? You said if the world was flat, it would all have the same climate. That's not really logical.

And why wouldn't it be? Think, dumbfuck.

I did. You obviously didn't. Dumbfuck.

Softball Bat wrote:1. My track record on videos is excellent.

2. I don't link you to arbitrary things.

3. My points have not been debunked by 5th graders.

4. I did not claim elevation has no bearing on climate. As I said, the conversation between Goober and shutyomouth involved speculation, and it was pointless. Then you piled more speculation on top of it. Hence, my short remark.


1, 2, 3, 4.

I shoot straight and accurately.

Wow you really are delusional.

1) You posted a video where a guy hid an umbrella behind a board placed directly in front of the camera lense and tried to claim that explained perspective. In fact all it did was block the cameras view.

2). See # 1. A video proving nothing is totally arbitrary.

3) Ok, I embellished to make a point. But most 5th graders could see what is wrong with your video.

4) My comment wasn’t directed at you. It was a bit of shade in the Goobs Spray discussion. But you made it about you and you and are now trying to walk it back.

I am not a flat-earther. Period. I just pointed out that you offered one of the dumbest arguments supporting the globe model. Jay and Seater noted the same. You truly are a fat fucking retard.

You just showed me you are every bit as stupid as I assumed. Take a look at page 5 of this thread. You and four other people have posted. You are the only one who believes that if the earth was flat, the entire planet would have the same climate. No one agrees with you, you stupid fat fuck. Get a clue.

Papa Willie wrote:Regardless, my climate theory is correct, unless the sun is very close and adjustable. Go fuck self.

No it's not, and everyone has tried to point that out to you, you obstinate douchenozzle.