Page 4 of 4

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:07 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Joe in PB wrote: Trump wanted to, but was advised against it, because Hillary is done.
:lol: x10000000000

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:09 pm
by Goober McTuber
Joe in PB wrote:Be objective for once in your life screwy. Politics is a dirty business largely because of the campaign money needed to run. I don't doubt Trump like Hillary bent some rules of law. But because both parties are guilty of such, I don't see Trump being impeached for those issues.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tardtalk
Let's just impeach both of them.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:10 pm
by Joe in PB
Or none of them.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:20 pm
by Goober McTuber
Bullshit. Burn 'em both if they're both guilty.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:23 pm
by Joe in PB
Can't stop there, bring down the entire congress, certainly there is even more corruption there.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:17 pm
by Goober McTuber
Softball Bat wrote:
Derron wrote:Of course you shit slinging monkeys want the economy to fail so you can parade around stroking your tiny dicks saying " I told you so". Fuck you.

The economy is a joke, you stupid hillbilly jackoff.



Federal budget deficit increases 79% in July

The numbers: The federal government ran a monthly budget deficit of $77 billion in July, up 79% over the
same month a year ago. For the first 10 months of fiscal 2018, the shortfall totals $684 billion, according
to the Treasury Department. That’s an increase of 21% compared to the same period in 2017..


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/feder ... 2018-08-10



Don keeps yappin' about "the greatest economy ever," and of course he is is totally full of shit.
As usual.

I can make my own household look damn good if I max out a bunch of credit cards.


Derron, dislodge head from -----> @ss.
Mitch McConnell Blames the Poor for Trump’s Trillion-Dollar Deficit

“It’s disappointing, but it’s not a Republican problem,” says the man who just passed a $1.5 trillion tax cut.

In a life filled with uncertainty, there are a few things you can always count on. First, that death comes for everyone. Second, that the current president of the United States will call an adult-film star he paid to keep quiet about an alleged affair “horseface” on social media. And third, that after passing a $1.5 trillion tax cut they insisted would pay for itself and then some, Republicans would blame social services like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security for exploding deficits and debt and insist that such “entitlements,” sadly, have got to go.

As a reminder, the Grand Old Party put on a big show of pretending to care about “fiscal responsibility” when Barack Obama was in office and mouth-watering tax cuts weren’t on the line. “Only one thing can save this country, and that’s to get a handle on this deficit-and-debt issue,” Majority Leader Mitch McConnell insisted after the 44th president won his second term. “The federal fiscal burden threatens the security, liberty, and independence of our nation,” the Republican Party platform warned in 2016. “You’re bankrupting our grandchildren!” was a common refrain, as were proclamations such as, “I won’t endorse a bill that adds one penny to the deficit!” Then Donald Trump won the election, and all those worries about crippling the next generation and the country going to hell in a handbasket vanished overnight—almost as though it was feigned in the first place!—with Republicans not only demanding that Congress pass a deficit-busting piece of legislation so that the president and his children could pay even fewer taxes than they already do, but maintaining—laws of math, physics, time and space be damned—that the bill once known as the “Cut Cut Cut Act” would actually help shrink the deficit.

But as the G.O.P. surely knew, that was never going to happen. Instead, as we learned this week, the U.S. budget deficit increased to $779 billion for the fiscal year, a 17 percent increase from the year prior, which is extra bad considering the economy is doing well, a scenario in which the federal deficit typically falls. Luckily, Mitch McConnell knows exactly who and what to blame:

“It’s disappointing, but it’s not a Republican problem,” McConnell said Tuesday in an interview with Bloomberg News when asked about the rising deficits and debt. “It’s a bipartisan problem: unwillingness to address the real drivers of the debt by doing anything to adjust those programs to the demographics of America in the future.”

The “real” drivers of debt, according to McConnell, are “Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid,” “entitlements” from which the Senate majority leader would cut off the old and poor if only he could get Democrats to sign on. (That’s probably unlikely to happen, given Nancy Pelosi’s statement today that, “Like clockwork, Republicans in Congress are setting in motion their plan to destroy the Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security that seniors and families rely on, just months after they exploded the deficit by $2 trillion with their tax scam for the rich,” and Chuck Schumer’s that suggesting cuts to “middle-class programs like Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid as the only fiscally responsible solution to solve the debt problem is nothing short of gaslighting.”)

McConnell’s take on the situation echoes that of the White House, whose National Economic Council director, Larry Kudlow, said last month that he doesn’t “buy” the argument that tax cuts increase the deficit, and that the real problem is “principally spending too much.” (Kudlow, who has a penchant for never being right about anything, also claimed in June that the deficit was “coming down rapidly.”) Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was even more blunt while telling his assessment to CNN last week, “People are going to want to say the deficit is because of the tax cuts. That’s not the real story.” (The report out of his own department suggests otherwise.) Incidentally, in June, reports circulated that the Trump administration was trying to figure out a workaround to cut another $100 billion from the tax bills of the wealthiest Americans, and in late September, House Republicans passed a piece of legislation that would add more than $600 billion to the debt over the next decade. Neither measure will come to fruition, but on the off-chance that one does, we’re sure McConnell stands ready to blame the poor and elderly freeloaders who clearly hate America.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:01 pm
by Imus
Goobs, goobs, these AD fukkers here will never read all that.

tldr:

It ain't my fault


Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:03 pm
by Kierland
The Grand old Con.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:06 pm
by BSmack
Papa Willie wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:THE TALE OF THE TAPE

Pled guilty:

1. Trump's National Security Adviser

2. Trump's longtime attorney and fixer

3. Trump's deputy campaign manager

4. Trump's foreign policy adviser

Convicted on 8 felony counts:

1. Trump's campaign manager

Seriously - how many times do you think you think about Trump per day? We already know that it's just god damned beyond normal comprehension, but maybe you should let us know.
His job is to write about national Defense issues. I'm going to say he thinks about the executive branch quite a bit.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 5:23 pm
by Screw_Michigan
BSmack wrote:His job is to write about national Defense issues. I'm going to say he thinks about the executive branch quite a bit.
Amen, brother. The Trump crime family is definitely a national security threat.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:03 pm
by smackaholic
The deficit really is the only thing the dems can point to with any credibility. With 4% growth, we should not be running the deficit we are. The fact that it is in large part to their giveaway programs is besides the point. TGOF is in charge. It is "his" deficit.

But, by all means, continue the distraction away from this point with "RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!"

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:12 pm
by Dinsdale
The worst example of obstruction of justice is red lights while Screwey is in the crosswalk.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:06 pm
by Kierland
The Proud Facists are really rubbing off on you.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:09 am
by Screw_Michigan
Dinsdale wrote:The worst example of obstruction of justice is red lights while Screwey is in the crosswalk.
Can't beat me in the marketpalce of ideas so you wish death on my instead. Pathetic.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:14 am
by Left Seater
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Can't beat me in the marketpalce of ideas so you wish death on my instead. Pathetic.
Care to link us up to where you are winning with your ideas? This should be good.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:59 pm
by Kierland
The proof is the Proud Facist’s post wishing death on him. You can read right?

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:11 pm
by Left Seater
Even for a public defender that is a weak argument.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:17 pm
by Kierland
Nice white flag

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:20 am
by Derron
Kierland wrote:Nice white flag
You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:30 am
by Kierland
That’s right is MY fault he won’t address the point at hand.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:41 am
by Screw_Michigan
Derron wrote: You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??
Why are you obsessed with penis?

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:53 am
by BSmack
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Derron wrote: You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??
Why are you obsessed with penis?
His first book was Penthouse Letters. It informs his style still.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:22 am
by Derron
BSmack wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Derron wrote: You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??
Why are you obsessed with penis?
His first book was Penthouse Letters. It informs his style still.
Better than some primary reader "Jack and Jill went up the mother fucking hill" shit you tools started on.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:26 pm
by Mikey
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Derron wrote: You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??
Why are you obsessed with penis?
Notice that he doesn’t bother denying it. He just attempts to rationalize it and then returns to ‘sessing.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:31 pm
by Mikey
Derron wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Why are you obsessed with penis?
His first book was Penthouse Letters. It informs his style still.
Better than some primary reader "Jack and Jill went up the mother fucking hill" shit you tools started on.
Duhron’s version of the classic nursery rhyme:

Jaquez and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water.
Jaquez took a dump and threw it at Jill
And showed his huge balk cahk to her daughter.

Re: Obstruction of justice

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:51 pm
by Derron
Mikey wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Derron wrote: You got an orange cock or black cock blast to go along with that lame ass white flag shit ??
Why are you obsessed with penis?
Notice that he doesn’t bother denying it. He just attempts to rationalize it and then returns to ‘sessing.
Classic Alinsky spin there. I bring up a clear connection to the troll Queerland and Moving Fails schtick, and you two are the ones who jump on the " he is obsessing with penis" thing. Which proves that you two, card carrying members of the Shit Slinging Monkeys, gleefully rub your hands together, thinking you can do a deflect on this and turn it around. Classic Saul all the way. Carry on comrade Socialist's.