T1B

Kierland wrote:No you tiny fuck it was easy. Calling someone tiny over and over is the easiest thing there is you tiny fuck. Any stupid fuck can call someone tiny repeatedly you stupid tiny fuck. Now take your stupid tiny thoughts and stick them up your stupid tiny ass you stupid tiny fuck.

Nice job kicking your own ass there.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

smackaholic wrote:People are inherently self centered.

No, people are inherently collective. Two million years of primate evolution provides plenty of evidence to this.
Greedy fucks are outliers...they tend to get swept away at some point in time.

People are social. We will inherently do what is best for our family or maybe a small tribe. As the group grows larger, the tendency to take care of self interests first becomes stronger.

The 20th century was the proof that large scale communism fails. If large collectivism worked, the Soviets would have taken over the planet. Instead they crashed and burned.

Look, I wish you were right. I wish there was a way to get hundreds of millions of people to work together for the common good. How many times to you want to take a mulligan on a political system before you come to the realization that we simply ain’t up to it?

I think one Stalin and one Mao was enough. Might as well throw Adolph in there too. Despite what today’s lefties like to say, Adolph was a socialist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kierland wrote:Assuming she lied then all she needs is a few thousand more lies and she catches your orange hero. Sauce for the goose you fat greedy fuck.

Whataboutism. Another thing you liberals said was off the table, but use it yourself all the time.

Another example of the hypocrisy, do what I say not what I do eh, racist angry snowflake.

Left Seater wrote:So a lady who couldn’t even manage her own household budget in the later part of 2018 is now a financial expert?

At least she never bankrupted a casino (which usually make money hand over fist)....

Whataboutism is not allowed per you liberals.

It’s not whataboutism you stupid fuck. I was comparing how you treat the red menace compared to AOC. I haven’t even conceded it was a lie.

Left Seater wrote:Whataboutism is not allowed per you liberals.

It's not whataboutism when I'm talking about the one person who has the ability to veto or sign the budget.

Thanks for making my point. Whataboutism is ok when Libs/Dems use it and no other times.

Can you even read you fat greedy fuck?

Poor angry little racist snowflake.

Peddo in Seattle wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Whataboutism is not allowed per you liberals.

It's not whataboutism when I'm talking about the one person who has the ability to veto or sign the budget.

Of course it is not. Because you say so. When it is convenient for your position to not be, or to be then it is OK. You fucking liberals are the biggest lying, truth twisting pieces of shit there is, and you, the queer midget, Screwed in the Ass and Softdick are the biggest ones out there.Props to you guys for being the best fucked up morons there is. You represent the liberal cause well.

Duh wrote:You fucking liberals are the biggest lying, truth twisting pieces of shit there is, and you, the queer midget, Screwed in the Ass and Softdick are the biggest ones out there.Props to you guys for being the best fucked up morons there is. You represent the liberal cause well.

You are extremely confused, Duhrron.

I am a conservative.
My conservative view are well documented on this board, for 13 yrs.


If you want to talk about a liberal, start with the president you elected.
Fiscally irresponsible -- running up massive deficits.

Leans toward being an authoritarian.

https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/do ... ideologies


I lean toward freedom and balanced freaking budgets, asswipe.

Ah yes, a man who can’t even read briefings written in full sentences is providing literary criticism of a House Resolution.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/o ... n-new-deal

AOC was on a Showtime program last night and was asked about her Green Leap Forward plan where the kulaks and intelligensia are gathered together and forcibly made to work on a collective farm... uh, sorry, that's Phase II according to the Little Green Book that Missus Mao recently published. No, instead she was specifically asked to address exterminating cattle, thus eliminating the awful climate destroying methane they produce while chewing their cud. Miss Ocasio-Cortez demurred and told her host that bovine genocide was not in the plan, because completely dismantling agriculture and inducing famine-- while a perfectly acceptable Maoist option --is not a completely good idea.

Her words:
“And so it’s not to say you get rid of agriculture, it’s not to say we’re gonna force everybody to go vegan or anything crazy like that. But it’s to say, ‘Listen, we gotta address factory farming. Maybe we shouldn’t be eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Like, let’s keep it real.”

Well then.
At least she's keepin' it rill. And reality apparently involves eating hamburgers like you're Wimpy from Popeye the Sailor Man morning, noon, and night. Of course, in keeping with the true spirit of capital S Socialism she'll pay you on Tuesday for the utter destruction of our economy today. No, in her Bronx worldview, there are many people out there in this great big land who exclusively dine on beef for their three square meals each and every day. However, in her defense she claims that even while in re-education camps participating in self criticism classes, none of these enemies of the State will be forced to publicly denounce themselves and proclaim the validity of veganism-- because that's never happened before anywhere in the world in a Communist country and would be crazy, right? --but if their strength were to fail due to a lack of sufficient nutrition, well, you gotta break some hypothetical (and ethically unclean) eggs to make an omelet, an omelet that no one can eat because being vegan doesn't allow it. Unless maybe you're one of those pigs who are more equal than others. Then it'd be OK.

I don't know about youse guys (gotta affect the proper dialect if you're going to move up in the Democratic Socialist Party hierarchy), but I myself am perfectly comfortable giving the reins of power to a girl who was never seen a farm in her life, much less been on one to dictate policy on agriculture and other niggling problems. After all, kale and soy are simply mass produced in the back storerooms of supermarkets. Everyone knows this.

She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

Left Seater wrote:She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

Is she a Russian asset too?

She didn’t need to be. Hillary had that locked down and was supposed to be President right now. Remember?

Left Seater wrote:She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

She is nothing of the sort you stupid fat fuck. You just don’t like her cause she is not on team corporate capitalism like you and the rest of the fat greedy assholes that infect America.

Kierland wrote:

Left Seater wrote:She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

She is nothing of the sort you stupid fat fuck. You just don’t like her cause she is not on team corporate capitalism like you and the rest of the fat greedy assholes that infect America.

I don't care for her becuase she is dumber than you. And yes, she is very much like the Don. They both say stupid shit, without an basis in fact, and members of their own party want them gone yesterday.

Left Seater wrote: I don't care for her becuase she is dumber than you. And yes, she is very much like the Don. They both say stupid shit, without an basis in fact, and members of their own party want them gone yesterday.

You obsess over her, so she must be doing something right.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote: I don't care for her becuase she is dumber than you. And yes, she is very much like the Don. They both say stupid shit, without an basis in fact, and members of their own party want them gone yesterday.

You obsess over her, so she must be doing something right.

Says the guy who wrote the book on obsession. Do you have any self awareness?

How many threads have I started with her as the subject? Thought so.

Sudden Sam wrote:
C'mon now...that's funny whether you like her or not! :grin:

Jokes are funny when they have truth to them not when they are based on political misconceptions. So no it's not funny in the least it's just another right wing tard with too much time on their hands.

Left Seater wrote:

Kierland wrote:

Left Seater wrote:She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

She is nothing of the sort you stupid fat fuck. You just don’t like her cause she is not on team corporate capitalism like you and the rest of the fat greedy assholes that infect America.

I don't care for her becuase she is dumber than you. And yes, she is very much like the Don. They both say stupid shit, without an basis in fact, and members of their own party want them gone yesterday.

How did you come to the conclusion that she is dumb?
That Dems hate her is a positive not a negative you fat greedy fuck.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:She is simply the Team D version of Trump.

Is she a Russian asset too?

Seeing that she’s a Commie, most likely yes.

She is a communist like you are a Rhodes scholar.

Kierland wrote:She is a communist like you are a Rhodes scholar.

So she is a Commie then!

A semester at OCC does not make you a Rhodes scholar.

The latest stupidity coming from AOC is she is going full Mao— introducing the American version of the Commie Chinese One Child policy. She had taken to asking if it is ethical to bring children into this world since they are resource users and carbon footprint makers. I think she should put her money where her mouth is and get sterilized.

Papa Willie wrote:One thing I’ve noticed in here and everywhere else. The conservatives will rag on Trump or any other conservative that deserves it.

Any chance the liberals will
rag on a Democrat when they deserve it? Bwahahaha! Not a chance in hell.

Go fuck yourself, Melty.

Feinstein arguing with Occasional-Cortex's peers. You seriously can't make this shit up!

Link?

Rooster wrote:The latest stupidity coming from AOC is she is going full Mao— introducing the American version of the Commie Chinese One Child policy. She had taken to asking if it is ethical to bring children into this world since they are resource users and carbon footprint makers. I think she should put her money where her mouth is and get sterilized.

Because overpopulation is not a problem.

Screwed in the Ass wrote:
You obsess over her, so she must be doing something right.

Rack our POTUS, you obsess over him so he must be doing something right.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KD2hD_PZlZ8[/youtube]
I see you workin’.

Kierland wrote:

Rooster wrote:The latest stupidity coming from AOC is she is going full Mao— introducing the American version of the Commie Chinese One Child policy. She had taken to asking if it is ethical to bring children into this world since they are resource users and carbon footprint makers. I think she should put her money where her mouth is and get sterilized.

Because overpopulation is not a problem.

You're right. It's not.

Derron wrote:

Screwed in the Ass wrote:
You obsess over her, so she must be doing something right.

Rack our POTUS, you obsess over him so he must be doing something right.

He's the president, a felon in the Oval Office. She's a freshman representative. Idiot.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
He's the president, a felon in the Oval Office.

Link? Or do you mean felon like a Bubba Clinton or Obama?

But of course not Bush. Hack. Sad.

Kierland wrote:But of course not Bush. Hack. Sad.

Correct. Had I offered Bush, Screwy would have most likely replied with something along the lines of, “yes, just like Bush.”

But since Screwy loves him some Dems, the choices needed to be more narrow.

Uppitty little Commie, isn’t she?