T1B

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:42 pm It can, but it wasn’t.

Yup. There's multiple reporting stations in SF. Every last one of them tells us Stoolio is a liar (like we didn't know already).

We have micro-climates,too. This afternoon, it varied between 96 and 100 on my way home. At least the electronic control for the mixing door on my car's climate control took a dump. Hot air. At least the sunroof and windows work.

One of the largest temp gradients (easily experienced) on earth is driving from Atascadero to Morro Bay on the 41 (15mins max) when it is 100+ in Atascadero and 60 and foggy on the coast.

Still waiting on you necks to provide the data.

Better yet... were you in The City ?

The answer on both counts... will be a resounding , no.

Country boys should Never... play in the deep end.

Stick to cow tipping... or whatever you necks do.

65 degrees with an ocean breeze.


.
California and good times.

Heading to Tahoe City for the week. Should be fairly pleasant up there.

I am headed to Vegas. It should not be very pleasant there this week.

The flights to London will probably end up taking a weight penalty due to the runway and reported air temps.

Dinsdale wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:58 pm

Huh ???


58 degrees at 11 pm.


Fantastic sleeping weather... in heaven.


m2

It’s some perfect temperature here in Cabo, if I get the time I will check the number.

Trivia: Only one US state has never had a triple-digit temp day since modern records have been kept.

And you won't be able to guess which one.

It used to be Hawaii and Alaska till Alaska had a 100• day recently.

How about the second hottest place in USA ever?

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:18 pm It used to be Hawaii and Alaska till Alaska had a 100• day recently.

Did you mean "till Alaska had a 100 degree day 114 years ago"?

But at least you're half right.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:19 pm How about the second hottest place in USA ever?

The state with the second-highest extreme temp (after California, which runs laps around the others) is quite predictably... wait for it... Arizona.

The second highest is also in California.
As for Alaska it wasn’t a part of the US in 1915 which is 104 years ago not 114.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 11:06 pm As for Alaska it wasn’t a part of the US in 1915 which is 104 years ago not 114.

Got me, both on a math error, and a technicality.

But odd when you look at the historic highs -- you'd think they all occurred in the last 5 years. Most were in the 1930's... despite NASA/NOAA's attempt to scrub those records. "They didn't know how to read a thermometer back then"... which if you buy into, you need to go back to junior high.

OK -- go sign up for a college lab class. Make a prediction about your experiment. When you're laughably wrong... go back and alter all of the observed data, and explain to the prof how you were reading the data wrong, so you had to "smooth" it.

Then, see what grade you get after he gets done laughing. Then, demand a bunch of taxpayer money to prove you were right.

I'm still waiting on an explaination about Scotish Vineyards planted by the Romans. Proof that they had a warmer CLIMATE.....2000 years ago.

It isn’t proof of shit to anyone that knows anything about viticulture.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:13 am It isn’t proof of shit to anyone that knows anything about viticulture.

Agreed. For one, it wasn't 2000 years ago -- more like 750. And there was a huge warming at the time. What was the Brix of those grapes? I'm sure mildew wasn't a problem, either.

But regardless -- what, you think the booze they drank back then was anything other than horrific garbage?

Anyone who knows an iota about enology/microbiology/fermentation knows they were drinking to get drunk, and what they produced would be considered "undrinkable" today. No sulfur? No specific yeasts? No filters? No spray? No disinfecting? No lab analysis? No... this could go on all night -- and if any one of those things is lacking, you just made undrinkable garbage.

Mvscal posted about the US being behind in winemaking compared to Europe. Possibly marginally true, simply due to "hard knocks"knowledge. But frankly, until ~120 years ago, it was all nasty by today's standards. Then it got all sciencey and stuff.

You were only off by a factor of 2.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:57 am You were only off by a factor of 2.

No, I was correct. I actually went off shit I know, rather than 5 seconds of dwarf googling. The "renaissance" of Northern European viticulture that the Smackoholics like to cite was in the Medieval Warming Period, and peaked around 750 years ago. And yes, the Gods of the Cult have also tried to erase that period from history... wonder why?

Regardless, the heathens back then thought they could grow grapes anywhere... which is technically almost-correct.

And per your stupid (and shitty) link, they produced wines of 10% alcohol...after adding honey. Pretty much speaks to the point of shitty grape growing climate. Would probably have the Brix in the low teens -- aka "unharvestable garbage."

I agree it was probably shitty you downsy fuck. That doesn’t mean it started 750 years ago. I have a link you have a horrible record for being right, just in this thread. I’ll take the link thank you.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 11:06 pm The second highest is also in California.
As for Alaska it wasn’t a part of the US in 1915 which is 104 years ago not 114.

Well, where is it dipshit ?


You can't say Death Valley trice.


Needles or Blythe ??

Santa Barbara
133•

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 7:50 am Santa Barbara
133•

When asked, Professor Joel Michaelsen commented: “I have never found any outside source to validate Tompkins’ story, and I am highly skeptical of its veracity. I don’t doubt that strong hot, dry downslope winds could kick up lots of dust and produce very high temperatures – but in the 110 F – 115 F range at most. The 133 F just isn’t physically reasonable,

https://geog.ucsb.edu/goletas-great-simoon-of-1859/

Dinsdale wrote:

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:57 am You were only off by a factor of 2.

No, I was correct. I actually went off shit I know, rather than 5 seconds of dwarf googling. The "renaissance" of Northern European viticulture that the Smackoholics like to cite was in the Medieval Warming Period, and peaked around 750 years ago. And yes, the Gods of the Cult have also tried to erase that period from history... wonder why?

Regardless, the heathens back then thought they could grow grapes anywhere... which is technically almost-correct.

And per your stupid (and shitty) link, they produced wines of 10% alcohol...after adding honey. Pretty much speaks to the point of shitty grape growing climate. Would probably have the Brix in the low teens -- aka "unharvestable garbage."

You know way more about Vineyard crap than I. I was referring to something I saw on the inter webs or perhaps a TV show that referred to Vineyards planted by the Romans. They also benefitted from a warming of the climate caused by something other than humans burning stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote:I'm still waiting on an explaination about Scotish Vineyards planted by the Romans. Proof that they had a warmer CLIMATE.....2000 years ago.

They have vineyards in Canada and Upstate New York. What you need is a steady layer of moisture to cover the grape and a hardy grape. That's why you don't see too many cabs coming out of Western New York but a hell of a lot of Riesling.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

The bad boy.... of weather extremes in California is... wait for it.

Yreka, Ca.


124 degrees F. for a (high temp)

-16 degrees F. for a (low temp)


miles away... In Cedarville, Ca.

It once reached -65 degrees below zero.

They've recently discovered two Wolf Packs that have made this region home.


California is a badass state.

bump for the midget.

His 133 degree call has been laughed out of the park... by scientists.



Fucker has been quiet... since I called him out on this.





the truth

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:20 am This thread is failing. All I pretty much see is ignored posts.

That's because EVERYONE on the board has you on ignore.


The fact you haven't figured this out... is Comedy Gold.



the truth

BSmack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:07 am

smackaholic wrote:I'm still waiting on an explaination about Scotish Vineyards planted by the Romans. Proof that they had a warmer CLIMATE.....2000 years ago.

They have vineyards in Canada and Upstate New York. What you need is a steady layer of moisture to cover the grape and a hardy grape. That's why you don't see too many cabs coming out of Western New York but a hell of a lot of Riesling.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Sort of the same reason they produce white wines in Germany and Northern Europe from grapes that thrive in cool weather, while red wines are more dominant in France and Italy.

I don't recall the details of the video but I believe it may have mentioned the type of grape grown. Whatever it was, it claimed it proved that the climate in the area was significantly warmer at the time.

For the second time. That’s all bullshit you bullshit loving dumbfuck.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:18 am bump for the midget.

His 133 degree call has been laughed out of the park... by scientists.



Fucker has been quiet... since I called him out on this.





the truth

Learn to read your own damn post you stupid tard.

BSmack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:07 am What you need is a steady layer of moisture to cover the grape and a hardy grape.

What you need in that climate is an early-ripening grape that thrives in a short growing season, and resists moisture.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:45 pm

FiatLux wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:18 am bump for the midget.

His 133 degree call has been laughed out of the park... by scientists.



Fucker has been quiet... since I called him out on this.





the truth

Learn to read your own damn post you stupid tard.

Nice white flag, midget.

That’s it, blame me because you can’t even read your own post.

Sizzling in the Bay.

In the North Bay today. Should hit triple digits.

93 degrees at noon in San Rafael.



the truth

The Bay is roasting.

California sizzle.


102 degrees in the North Bay.

So hurry up and die already.