T1B

Posted: **Thu May 30, 2024 10:52 pm**

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:35 pmI will bet you $100 (payable to the charity of the winner's choosing) that SCOTUS will not reverse any of the convictions by the date of sentencing.
May not happen before sentencing, but SCOTUS will overturn, 6-3, probably before the case is heard by any lower appeals courts. They'll cite the upcoming election as reason for bypassing the lower courts, the $35 donation made by the judge as cause for why he should've recused himself, and possibly jury instructions as reasons for overturning. This doesn't make PenisEater any less of a pinhead; he'll always be one. But Dems must be realistic before doing any celebrating.

Best thing that could happen for Dems is for Biden to pardon him. Outcome will be the same - no punishment for the conviction - but it will show Biden to be the bigger man. He likely won't do it, but should.

Only reason I post this is cuz I'm always wrong.

You almost got it.
It won't be 6-3.
It will be 9-0. Unanimous.
And this is due to the fact that the constitution was violated.
Do your research.
All nine justices DON'T have any tolerance for those kinds of egregious violations.
Did you see the Supreme Court TODAY, unanimously strike down NY in their case against the NRA?
9-0.

Posted: **Thu May 30, 2024 10:55 pm**

The NRA Isn't loved by the 3 dems on the Supreme Court.
So a 9-0 unanimous decision against New York today, foreshadows what's coming.

Posted: **Thu May 30, 2024 10:58 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:19 pm JPG, you were the one who brought up the bet.

Try to phrase it in a clear and unambiguous manner, and I may accept it.

Ok.
First,
The trump verdict today will be overturned.
And second,
On November 5th, #45. Becomes #47.

Is that CRYSTAL CLEAR for you?

Posted: **Thu May 30, 2024 11:02 pm**

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:35 pmI will bet you $100 (payable to the charity of the winner's choosing) that SCOTUS will not reverse any of the convictions by the date of sentencing.
May not happen before sentencing, but SCOTUS will overturn, 6-3, probably before the case is heard by any lower appeals courts. They'll cite the upcoming election as reason for bypassing the lower courts, the $35 donation made by the judge as cause for why he should've recused himself, and possibly jury instructions as reasons for overturning. This doesn't make PenisEater any less of a pinhead; he'll always be one. But Dems must be realistic before doing any celebrating.

Best thing that could happen for Dems is for Biden to pardon him. Outcome will be the same - no punishment for the conviction - but it will show Biden to be the bigger man. He likely won't do it, but should.

Only reason I post this is cuz I'm always wrong.

That 2 justices who we know accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts from donors w/business before the court & a third who has had debts paid off by unknown individuals would vote to overturn this conviction because the trial judge accepted a $35 gift is the very essence of what a corrupt Supreme Court is.

Posted: **Thu May 30, 2024 11:23 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 11:02 pm
Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:35 pmI will bet you $100 (payable to the charity of the winner's choosing) that SCOTUS will not reverse any of the convictions by the date of sentencing.
May not happen before sentencing, but SCOTUS will overturn, 6-3, probably before the case is heard by any lower appeals courts. They'll cite the upcoming election as reason for bypassing the lower courts, the $35 donation made by the judge as cause for why he should've recused himself, and possibly jury instructions as reasons for overturning. This doesn't make PenisEater any less of a pinhead; he'll always be one. But Dems must be realistic before doing any celebrating.

Best thing that could happen for Dems is for Biden to pardon him. Outcome will be the same - no punishment for the conviction - but it will show Biden to be the bigger man. He likely won't do it, but should.

Only reason I post this is cuz I'm always wrong.
That 2 justices who we know accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts from donors w/business before the court & a third who has had debts paid off by unknown individuals would vote to overturn this conviction because the trial judge accepted a $35 gift is the very essence of what a corrupt Supreme Court is.

Everything you just said is BS.
The chief justice John Roberts, who gave the country obamacare, has already weighed in on these matters. And all the justices have been cleared of any wrongdoing.

As for you?

You're a complete and utter laughing stock.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:12 am**

Mikey wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:20 pm
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2024 9:46 pm In talking to multiple small business owners this week, I’m finding that several intend to close their businesses if Biden is re-elected.
Don’t count on it. If they do they’re just being stupid.
Are they planning to leave the country, too? Seems like we’ve heard that one before.

Or maybe they’ll set themselves on fire in front of the White House. That would be something worth watching.

Two doctors I know well intend to retire if Biden wins. I don’t expect them to self-immolate. Yeah, I don’t bfeel sorry for their “struggles” either, but their decision is based on the ineptitude that is affecting us all.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:15 am**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:12 am
Mikey wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:20 pm
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2024 9:46 pm In talking to multiple small business owners this week, I’m finding that several intend to close their businesses if Biden is re-elected.
Don’t count on it. If they do they’re just being stupid.
Are they planning to leave the country, too? Seems like we’ve heard that one before.

Or maybe they’ll set themselves on fire in front of the White House. That would be something worth watching.
Two doctors I know well intend to retire if Biden wins. I don’t expect them to self-immolate. Yeah, I don’t bfeel sorry for their “struggles” either, but their decision is based on the ineptitude that is affecting us all.

What specific complaints (besides ineptitude) do they have and how do they imagine it would be different under Trump?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:25 am**

I’m really wondering because, personally, I feel a lot better off than I was four years ago. And doctors have a much different set of concerns than your average worker. They probably have pretty extensive retirement savings and, with the markets all being at all time highs, maybe they’re motivated to retire and cash in some of their holdings before Trump crashes the markets?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:32 am**

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:58 pm First,
The trump verdict today will be overturned.
And second,
On November 5th, #45. Becomes #47.

Is that CRYSTAL CLEAR for you?

Today, trump was convicted of 34 felonies. On appeal, it may be possible that some or all convictions get overturned.

So to understand your bet offer, what happens if for example 33 convictions get overturned but 1 conviction stands. Who would win the bet in that scenario?

Also, what happens if the Gov of NY pardons him? Who wins?

Additionally, are you proposing two bets, one on the outcome of the convictions and another one on the election?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:52 am**

Mikey wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:25 am I’m really wondering because, personally, I feel a lot better off than I was four years ago. And doctors have a much different set of concerns than your average worker. They probably have pretty extensive retirement savings and, with the markets all being at all time highs, maybe they’re motivated to retire and cash in some of their holdings before Trump crashes the markets?

We haven’t had in-depth conversations about it as of yet. But you raise interesting points. I’ll try to get up with at least one of them this weekend and see what they’re thinking.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 1:54 am**

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:35 pmI will bet you $100 (payable to the charity of the winner's choosing) that SCOTUS will not reverse any of the convictions by the date of sentencing.
May not happen before sentencing, but SCOTUS will overturn, 6-3, probably before the case is heard by any lower appeals courts. They'll cite the upcoming election as reason for bypassing the lower courts, the $35 donation made by the judge as cause for why he should've recused himself, and possibly jury instructions as reasons for overturning. This doesn't make PenisEater any less of a pinhead; he'll always be one. But Dems must be realistic before doing any celebrating.

Best thing that could happen for Dems is for Biden to pardon him. Outcome will be the same - no punishment for the conviction - but it will show Biden to be the bigger man. He likely won't do it, but should.

Only reason I post this is cuz I'm always wrong.

You are double wrong. No chance in hell that SCOTUS would take any action on this case before the NY state court system has a chance to review it, and Biden has no power to pardon convictions under state law. Only the batshit crazy Guv’nor of NY has that power. Trump is going to get shit-hammered on 7/11 (probably no jail time, but bigly probation terms).

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 4:34 am**

The jury witnessed a 'systematic dismantling' of the prosecution's case: Will Scharf

Holy shit, just found this fox news clip from two days ago. This dumb as shit commentary and its ilk is why MAGA is so apoplectic right now.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 5:14 am**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:54 amBiden has no power to pardon convictions under state law.

Yeah, shoulda remembered that from the hundred or so times it was mentioned during the trial that Trump couldn't pardon himself if re-elected. At least I was right about:

I'm always wrong.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 9:52 am**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:54 am
Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:35 pmI will bet you $100 (payable to the charity of the winner's choosing) that SCOTUS will not reverse any of the convictions by the date of sentencing.
May not happen before sentencing, but SCOTUS will overturn, 6-3, probably before the case is heard by any lower appeals courts. They'll cite the upcoming election as reason for bypassing the lower courts, the $35 donation made by the judge as cause for why he should've recused himself, and possibly jury instructions as reasons for overturning. This doesn't make PenisEater any less of a pinhead; he'll always be one. But Dems must be realistic before doing any celebrating.

Best thing that could happen for Dems is for Biden to pardon him. Outcome will be the same - no punishment for the conviction - but it will show Biden to be the bigger man. He likely won't do it, but should.

Only reason I post this is cuz I'm always wrong.
You are double wrong. No chance in hell that SCOTUS would take any action on this case before the NY state court system has a chance to review it, and Biden has no power to pardon convictions under state law. Only the batshit crazy Guv’nor of NY has that power. Trump is going to get shit-hammered on 7/11 (probably no jail time, but bigly probation terms).

Check your facts again, 88.

The prosecution violated legal precedent.
After careful checking, the Supreme Court does have the legal standing to reach down and take this appeal ASAP.

AND from the looks of things THEIR ruling.will be unanimous. 9-0.
That's how egregious this judge and prosecution was.

How a brilliant legal mind like you is unaware of this, is mind boggling to me.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 12:26 pm**

Hungus bet me, smart guy.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 12:35 pm**

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:52 am
Check your facts again, 88.

The prosecution violated legal precedent.
After careful checking, the Supreme Court does have the legal standing to reach down and take this appeal ASAP.

He didn’t say it couldn’t, anus brain. He said it wouldn’t.

Do some more of your careful checking to learn the difference.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 2:47 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:32 am
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:58 pm First,
The trump verdict today will be overturned.
And second,
On November 5th, #45. Becomes #47.

Is that CRYSTAL CLEAR for you?
Today, trump was convicted of 34 felonies. On appeal, it may be possible that some or all convictions get overturned.

So to understand your bet offer, what happens if for example 33 convictions get overturned but 1 conviction stands. Who would win the bet in that scenario?

Also, what happens if the Gov of NY pardons him? Who wins?

Additionally, are you proposing two bets, one on the outcome of the convictions and another one on the election?

JPG?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 3:25 pm**

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 7:44 pm**

FiatLux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 3:25 pm

Be nice if migs could slingshot his cum in her eyes nose and mouth.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 7:46 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 2:47 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:32 am
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 10:58 pm First,
The trump verdict today will be overturned.
And second,
On November 5th, #45. Becomes #47.

Is that CRYSTAL CLEAR for you?
Today, trump was convicted of 34 felonies. On appeal, it may be possible that some or all convictions get overturned.

So to understand your bet offer, what happens if for example 33 convictions get overturned but 1 conviction stands. Who would win the bet in that scenario?

Also, what happens if the Gov of NY pardons him? Who wins?

Additionally, are you proposing two bets, one on the outcome of the convictions and another one on the election?
JPG?

Ok.
Update.
After reading 88's brilliant legal takes, I now defer.

President trump's conviction WILL be overturned upon appeal 100%.
However, when and where remain to be seen.
I rushed my opinion.

As usual. 88 is the final legal authority of this board.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 7:48 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 12:26 pm Hungus bet me, smart guy.

88.
After careful consideration, you are CORRECT.
HIS convictions will be overturned. Where and when of course, remains to be seen.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 8:05 pm**

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 7:48 pm
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 12:26 pm Hungus bet me, smart guy.
88.
After careful consideration, you are CORRECT.
HIS convictions will be overturned. Where and when of course, remains to be seen.

Please articulate the reasons that the convictions will be overturned.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 8:11 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 8:05 pm
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 7:48 pm
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 12:26 pm Hungus bet me, smart guy.
88.
After careful consideration, you are CORRECT.
HIS convictions will be overturned. Where and when of course, remains to be seen.
Please articulate the reasons that the convictions will be overturned.

Did you not read 88's brilliant articulations on the numerous reasons why the convictions will be overturned?

I recommend you pour yourself a strong cup of coffee and start reading.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 9:20 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 8:05 pm
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 7:48 pm
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 12:26 pm Hungus bet me, smart guy.
88.
After careful consideration, you are CORRECT.
HIS convictions will be overturned. Where and when of course, remains to be seen.
Please articulate the reasons that the convictions will be overturned.

Are you willing to take the Hungus bet, Diego? You seem pretty confident that the trial was as squeaky-clean as the 2020 election.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 9:31 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:20 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 8:05 pm
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 7:48 pm

88.
After careful consideration, you are CORRECT.
HIS convictions will be overturned. Where and when of course, remains to be seen.
Please articulate the reasons that the convictions will be overturned.
Are you willing to take the Hungus bet, Diego? You seem pretty confident that the trial was as squeaky-clean as the 2020 election.

88, there is NO CHANCE Diego will take that bet.

At least I've got the CACK AND BALLS to humbly admit that I was wrong.
I rushed my opinion on the Supreme Court reaching down.

But every legal scholar worth THEIR SALT, have ALL said that upon appeal, the convictions will be overturned.

Diego is a sniveling tribal left-wing hack.
NO WAY in hell he takes your hungus bet.

IN FACT, I'll wager a Hungus bet that NEITHER Diego, screwy, Mikey, or ANY democrat on this board, will take you up on the hungus bet.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 9:54 pm**

Depending on exactly what the bet is, I'll take it.

88, would you state your offer?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 10:36 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:54 pm Depending on exactly what the bet is, I'll take it.

88, would you state your offer?

The Hungus bet is whether Trump's conviction will or will not be overturned on appeal. I say it will.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 10:42 pm**

He was convicted 34 times.

What happens if 33 are overturned but 1 remains?

What happens if there is a pardon?

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:08 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 10:42 pm He was convicted 34 times.

What happens if 33 are overturned but 1 remains?

What happens if there is a pardon?

He was convicted once, of 34 felony counts.

If any remain, I lose (and they are all basically the same - I cannot believe there could be a split in this case).

He won't be offered a pardon by Jochul (it would be political suicide for her), and even if he was, he wouldn't accept it. She cannot do it unilaterally. But if that occurs, we will call it a draw.

Statistically speaking, you have an 80% chance of winning. Only 1 in 5 criminal convictions is overturned on appeal in New York.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:10 pm**

$100 to the charity of the winner's choosing.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:13 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 11:10 pm $100 to the charity of the winner's choosing.

The offer is Hungus. The counter-offer could be tacked on. But it will not replace the Hungus bet.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:14 pm**

Well I'm sorry, but I do not know exactly what Hungus is.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:20 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 11:14 pm Well I'm sorry, but I do not know exactly what Hungus is.

Lifetime self ban from T1B.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:21 pm**

I'm not going to do that with you.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:22 pm**

You are wise.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:24 pm**

I don't want you to be gone.

I would do it with JPG though.

Then again, a board needs its tards. Damn.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:25 pm**

I offered him a Hungus bet on whether the SCOTUS would take the Trump case before the NY appellate courts had a chance to weigh in. My odds were like 8 Trillion to 1. So I would have felt bad for him on that one (at least for a millisecond). The tards are safe, for now.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:28 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 11:21 pm I'm not going to do that with you.

NO ONE will do it.

And the fact that you weren't aware of the multiple violations of the prosecution and the judge, tells me you're just a duped and manipulated sheep, just going with the flow. The mob mentality.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:29 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 11:25 pm I offered him a Hungus bet on whether the SCOTUS would take the Trump case before the NY appellate courts had a chance to weigh in. My odds were like 8 Trillion to 1. So I would have felt bad for him on that one (at least for a millisecond). The tards are safe, for now.

For now. But ultimately, the Supreme Court will take it.
They realize that our constitutional republic depends upon them taking it.

Posted: **Fri May 31, 2024 11:30 pm**

Yes, I was aiming for that as a $100 charity bet.

He doesn't have a clue, and but for it going to charity, I would have felt sorry for him.

JPG, I'm not sure where you're getting your shifty takes from, but it is not a replacement for actually graduating from law school and being a practicing attorney for a few decades.

T1B

Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money

Re: Game Thread: Bragg v Trump - Business Records / Election Interference / Hush Money