T1B

Just giving you your own medicine.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

But when I say it it is true. Just spiting it out at the wrong time just makes you look dumber than you already do.

Hard to be much dumber than the guy who asks how fewer unemployed citizens affects poverty numbers. While I am sure there are some employed people who are in poverty, that is certainly not the norm.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

So in other words you have no idea how unemployment effects poverty. That makes you the dumb one... again.

I do agree I'm a dumb ass for trying to have a discussion with you, a Jerry Lewis idiot.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Now THAT is a nice white flag.

Nice white flag.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Idiot.

Nice white flag.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Are you brain dead? Do you even know how English works?

Jsc810 wrote:And so now there is established election fraud, so much so that they have to hold another congressional election in North Carolina.

Guess the political party!

Oh it cuts both ways for sure. All the more reason for voter ID laws.

Left Seater wrote: Oh it cuts both ways for sure. All the more reason for voter ID laws.

No, it doesn't cut both ways and the NC case had nothing to do with voter ID.

Try to keep up, Left Behind.

Idiot, if voter ID laws were stronger what happened in NC wouldn’t be possible.

And keep burying your head in the sand.

Sure, make the question so narrow that you can eliminate all other examples.

I'll take that as a no you fat greedy fuck.

Following state law is not fraud you stupid fuck. The GOP harvested too, apparently they just suck at it.

schmick wrote:

Jsc810 wrote:And so now there is established election fraud, so much so that they have to hold another congressional election in North Carolina.

Guess the political party!

The same thing happened in California, specifically in Orange County where the Republicans were declared winners on election day and in the following 2 weeks 300 thousand Democrat votes only ballots showed up and flipped at least 3 house seats

Dumbfuck. . .

Left Seater wrote:Sure, make the question so narrow that you can eliminate all other examples.

The Grand Canyon would be too narrow for you, fat ass.

Pedo says what?

Nice white flag you fat greedy fuck.

Bucmonkey wrote:

The worst

Look impeach him now if you can. I won’t lose a single minute of sleep over it. Corporate and individual tax cuts were already passed. Lock him up if he is tried and found guilty of something.

Just know though that the game has seriously changed and has been for awhile. Expect the same level of scrutiny for the next Dem in the White House. And expect the same defense of him/her from you Liberals. We the people get what we have sown. Blow hards like Hillary and Don were our choices for President.

Jsc810 wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Corporate and individual tax cuts were already passed.

Yes, and now that they've added $1 trillion to the national debt with the redistribution of even more wealth to the billionaires "tax cuts," now all of a sudden Republicans are becoming concerned about the national debt.

I have been on record for quite some time as saying the Budget should be cut 20% across the board today, Defense included. Further so cabinet level Depatments should be sunset over the next 5 years.

Are you onboard? Or do you only want to cut certain spending like most other liberals?

Uhhh what is going to fund your spending spree?

L45B wrote:Uhhh what is going to fund your spending spree?

The $350 billion a year the DoD should be cut.

L45B wrote:Uhhh what is going to fund your spending spree?

Can you please provide a link to where you expressed concern as to how Trump would pay for his Space Farce?

Again--- is it really possible to have "income equality" in any world? If not, then what range of incomes --high to low--would be acceptable? Hmmmm----- guess it isn't possible. I don't COVET anyone's income, even Bryce Harper.

88 wrote:Do you think we have a society that will put down their iPhones and grab shovels and start digging ditches while living in work camps for peanuts?

I remember that happened once. It was called...

WORLD WAR II


:|

So JSC is bitching about deficits and debt but wants to go on a massive spending spree. :doh:

That is Softball Bat level stupidity. Spending is the issue.

Further you want to go to a marginal 70% tax rate and guess what, I just amend my contact with my own company where they pay more and more of my daily living expenses. The company already pays for my cars, cell phones, cable, some of my electricity, etc.

You jack my tax rate up further and soon the company will be paying my mortgage and giving me a food and spending allowance. That just means I pay myself less and therefore my tax bill goes down even further instead of increasing as you planned for.

You liberal Democrats have lost most of your grip on reality.

Lefty wrote:That is Softball Bat level stupidity.

LOL

You are a disaster, and your butt must hurt a lot by now.


1. You keep cheering about the tax cut you got, yet don't realize (or care, immoral as you obviously are) that Donald is running up deficits as large (or larger) than what Barry ran up to pay for your "good time."
You are a joke.

2. You think that if Cohen perjured himself this week, it makes all else, including the check (and other docs) he produced mean nothing.

3. You think kids coming to your door for a few pieces of candy are running roughshod over you.


Sack up, clown.

Softhead,

I have been calling for a 20% across the board spending cut. Keep up.

Great, dude brought a check. But as has been pointed out it could be for anything. Just because a liar says it is for x doesn’t make it so.

You ready to take one of those nonstop Southern Hemisphere flights yet? Yeah didn’t think so.

Diego in Seattle wrote: Can you please provide a link to where you expressed concern as to how Trump would pay for his Space Farce?

I'm concerned...$2 billion! Air Force Space Corps says what?

https://nypost.com/2019/03/01/trump-adm ... ive-years/

Left Seater wrote:Softhead,

I have been calling for a 20% across the board spending cut. Keep up.

Great, dude brought a check. But as has been pointed out it could be for anything. Just because a liar says it is for x doesn’t make it so.

You ready to take one of those nonstop Southern Hemisphere flights yet? Yeah didn’t think so.

1. Since spending cuts did not accompany the tax cuts, you should not be repeatedly chirping about how happy you are about the tax cuts.
Face it, you got yours and you don't really care who the schleps are who are paying for it.

2. Cohen's check could be for anything?
rotf...
This is the extent to which you choose to be a bootlicker.
What, in your opinion was it for?
Do you really think Cohen would roll in, put up a check, and fabricate a total lie about what it was for?
Knowing that Don, Weisellberg, or someone else could refute it by producing evidence showing what it was really for.
You've got to be joking with this shit.
Are you on mushrooms?

3. Flat earth.
Love it!

Please link us up to how universal health care is going to help everyone. Include in it how it will be paid for and how you prevent the quality of care from declining.

And sure repairing our infrastructure is a great idea. However it is one the States should handle. Why should the Feds get involved in any of that?

As for the tax breaks, that is your money and my money. Why do you have a problem with me wanting to keep more of what I earned? When you do your taxes do you include any deductions? Do you request a refund of any extra that you loaned the government during the year? How is this any different than me wanting to keep more of what I earned? I also want to see massive spending decreases by our government. Yet you keep harping on this debt burden for future generations, but want to increase spending. WTF!

Why do you assume that if the government suddenly had more money coming in that they would somehow find fiscal responsibility? You can’t be that gullible.

.088 wrote:Good God, you are stupid. No one pays for a tax cut.

Of course they do.
You really are one of the dimmest bulbs I have ever encountered.

The "schleps who are paying" for Don's tax cut are your kids, grandkids, and great grandkids.

The whole economy is fake, and they're going to be the ones who suffer the most.

But at least you and Lefty got your tax cut.


If this con man that you voted in to office was a conservative who was really going to do something constructive with the economy he wouldn't have cut taxes while increasing spending like a damn madman.

Do you think Don would have operated his Trump Organization this way?

Escalating the spending of the Organization way beyond the amount of revenue taken in.

He was all over Barry about the deficits and the debt.
Remember?

Now look at him.
He's another irresponsible lunatic.

Wtf is wrong with you?

He kept the bloat and signed the bill but you will still suck his cock at every turn you are a fucking POS.

.088 wrote:Congress has the power of the purse, not Trump. Congress authorized all spending that has occurred. And one half of Congress is controlled by Team D.

Moving Sale wrote:He kept the bloat and signed the bill but you will still suck his cock at every turn you are a fucking POS.

.088 tries to pretend like Donald can't do anything about it.
Totally laughable.

Why would Donald campaign so vigorously on Barry's crazy deficits if he, the new guy, would be neutered and helpless to do anything?


I thought the Barry sycophants were off the chart mentally ill, but they've got nothing on the Trump kneepad crew.

They will stop at nothing to prop the loser up.

Oh, so Don did have an option.

Beyond that obvious fact, Don had two full years to work in DC with the party that he leads in total control.

This "woe is me, I had to sign it" act is total bullshit.

Only slurped down by the knee pad crew.


Thank for playing.

88 wrote:Barrel Fish

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49003&hilit=Dead

And yet you have done almost nothing else but suck his dick for the last year. I would say actions speak louder than words, but that seems inappropriate in this circumstance.