Rick Perry for President!!

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:45 am

88 wrote:The burden on the State to prove that the crime has been convicted by the accused is very high: beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused is entitled to one appeal.

willingham was convicted on evidence that was later proven to be bullshit, and Perry was presented all of this data.....at the very least Perry could have stayed the execution for 30 days to actually read and understand the data presented.....apparently he thought it better for his image that he kill the guy....

when did the texas justice system take a 180 degree spin?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:50 am

Felix wrote:at the very least Perry could have stayed the execution for 30 days to actually read and understand the data presented.....apparently he thought it better for his image that he kill the guy

Why would he give two shits? The criminal justice system in Tejas is great unless you're poor, black, retarded or some combination of all three. Many of those types aren't voting, anyway.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:51 am

Felix wrote:willingham was convicted on evidence that was later proven to be bullshit,

No such thing was proven.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 2:11 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Felix wrote:at the very least Perry could have stayed the execution for 30 days to actually read and understand the data presented.....apparently he thought it better for his image that he kill the guy
Why would he give two shits? The criminal justice system in Tejas is great unless you're poor, black, retarded or some combination of all three. Many of those types aren't voting, anyway.

young black men make up about 6 percent of our population, YET, they committ nearly 47 percent of all violent crimes. That is a very sobering fact. And a fact that liberals lie about, and say its not true. OH, and liberals say that if you talk about that, you must be a racist.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:46 pm

mvscal wrote: No such thing was proven.

http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Ar ... Report.pdf

The State’s expert witnesses relied on interpretations of “indicators” that they were taught constituted evidence of arson. While we have no doubt that these witnesses believed what
they were saying, each and every one of the indicators relied upon have since been scientifically proven to be invalid. In the cases of individuals already convicted using what is now known to be bad science (or no science), the Courts should treat the “new” knowledge as “newly discovered evidence.” It was resistance to this concept that allowed the State to execute Mr. Willingham, even though it was known that the evidence used to convict him was invalid.

There was more than enough evidence presented to Perry that warranted reinvestigation of the case, but for some reason Perry thought it best to kill him as quickly as possible....

In 2009, The Texas Forensic Science Commission had scheduled a meeting to discuss a report prepared by Dr. Craig Beyler, who the Commission had hired to reexamine the case and who had determined that "a finding of arson could not be sustained". Two days before the scheduled meeting Perry replaced the chairman and two other members of the commission and the newly appointed chairman promptly canceled the meeting. Perry knew what Beyler's report said, and in an effort to avoid the embarrassment of it, tried to quash it....In July of 2010, the Texas Forensic Commission issued a report that said Willingham's conviction was in fact, based on flawed science....

in the final analysis the "scientific" information used to convict Willingham was not only proven to be bullshit, but the state of Texas admitted as much....

"better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer"
William Blackstone

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:19 pm

You're confusing opinions with facts.

The issue here is whose opinion carries more weight. Is it the two different departments who actually examined the scene and concluded the fire was arson or people with a questionable agenda who show up ten years later and examine paperwork and photos? You will note that the newcomers cannot rule out arson as a cause and fail to offer any alternative explanation of the origins of the fire.

On a further note, the governor of Texas does not have the authority to commute death sentences or issue pardons without the consent of the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:26 am

mvscal wrote:You're confusing opinions with facts.

The issue here is whose opinion carries more weight. Is it the two different departments who actually examined the scene and concluded the fire was arson

based on analysis techniques that the state admitted were wrong

or people with a questionable agenda

beyler had a questionable agenda? fuck dude, The state of Texas hired him to reexamine the evidence, what was this questionable agenda he was carrying? as for project innocence how is trying to prevent the execution of people that don't deserve it a "questionable agenda"?

who show up ten years later and examine paperwork and photos? You will note that the newcomers cannot rule out arson as a cause and fail to offer any alternative explanation of the origins of the fire.

you didn't read the chicago tribune story nor the project innocence report did you? there were clear cut and precise alternate explanations for every assertion made by the original investigators using the techniques that the state of Texas admitted were in error.....

On a further note, the governor of Texas does not have the authority to commute death sentences or issue pardons without the consent of the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

the governor has the power to grant a one-time thirty-day reprieve of execution in capital cases based on new evidence....nine experts on fires examined the SAME evidence the original investigators used and said the analysis of the original investigators used outdated methodologies which led to questionable conclusions...that's NEW EVIDENCE...yet Perry deemed the conclusions of the two investigators and the testimony of a witness that recanted his testimony not once, but twice, was sufficient reason to put this guy to death.....

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:20 am

Under Feeldix' moniker it should be renamed to : "Currently Holding nut Bags and 2 Big Black Dicks" IMHO.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:23 am

IndyFrisco wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:

This map tells me that the lowest teen birth rates are in states where ~~it's too damn cold to fuck~~ the population is predominantly pale.

Its more than that. It's a combination of paleness/economic status. White rich girls don't get knocked up much. Poor ones do. And seeing as paleness and wealth kind of go together like PBJs and milk, you can prolly toss out the paleness factor all together.

Rich folks are smart, as a rule. Smart folks realize that starting a family at 16 ain't too smart.

end of story.

and if you think that instructing 16 year olds on proper birf control works any better than telling them to keep it in your pants, you are a fool.

it comes down to a few things.

the kid themselves, are they smart or dumb?

the parent(s) what example did they set?

their culture. unfortunately, this is what has changed for the worse in the last 50 years. in some cases it is pretty much expected that ~~Sue~~ Shaliqua will be knocked up by the time that she's 18. it is also expected than quantrel won't have much to do with the upraising of the kid. because, financially, it makes sense to stay out of the picture thanks to our welfare state.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:47 pm

smackaholic wrote:it is also expected than quantrel won't have much to do with the upraising of the kid. because, financially, it makes sense to stay out of the picture thanks to our welfare state.

Yeah, I'm sure all the little Shaniquas of the world are telling their men to take a hike so they can collect welfare and live in squalor.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:30 am

Atomic Punk wrote:Under Feeldix' moniker it should be renamed to : "Currently Holding nut Bags and 2 Big Black Dicks" IMHO.

so I guess this is where you drop your steaming pile drive-by on your way to the Jenna Leigh lingerie trunk show....dude, you are without a doubt, the worst fucking poster I have had the misfortune to read....and there's not even a close second

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:28 am

Felix wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Under Feeldix' moniker it should be renamed to : "Currently Holding nut Bags and 2 Big Black Dicks" IMHO.
so I guess this is where you drop your steaming pile drive-by on your way to the Jenna Leigh lingerie trunk show....dude, you are without a doubt, the worst fucking poster I have had the misfortune to read....and there's not even a close second

Hey I thought we were cool. Page 6 is mine.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:05 am

Felix wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Under Feeldix' moniker it should be renamed to : "Currently Holding nut Bags and 2 Big Black Dicks" IMHO.
so I guess this is where you drop your steaming pile drive-by on your way to the Jenna Leigh lingerie trunk show....dude, you are without a doubt, the worst fucking poster I have had the misfortune to read....and there's not even a close second

really felix? is that what he is? He's the worst poster? SORRY PAL, you are a clueless left wing lib, who lives in fantasy land. in other words, you suck.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:56 pm

bradhusker wrote:
Felix wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Under Feeldix' moniker it should be renamed to : "Currently Holding nut Bags and 2 Big Black Dicks" IMHO.
so I guess this is where you drop your steaming pile drive-by on your way to the Jenna Leigh lingerie trunk show....dude, you are without a doubt, the worst fucking poster I have had the misfortune to read....and there's not even a close second
really felix? is that what he is? He's the worst poster? SORRY PAL, you are a clueless left wing lib, who lives in fantasy land.

I'm on your side, brad. You are unquestionably the worst fucking poster in the history of the interwebs. Rack you for sticking up for yourself.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:25 pm

hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:28 pm

bradhusker wrote:hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.

Is that right? How many points did your beloved pinkshirts give up on Saturday? Russellmania gonna make you cry, bitch.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:44 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
bradhusker wrote:hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.
Is that right? How many points did your beloved pinkshirts give up on Saturday? Russellmania gonna make you cry, bitch.

really pussy boy? make me cry? Let me tell u something fairy, your defense isnt what u think, you've played pussies thus far, and your defense is really a paper tiger, so, in short, like ur dick, come two weeks, your team is gettin hospitalized PUNK!!

ya got that?

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:03 pm

Well I've watche Nebraska the last 2 weeks play subpar west coast teams they should have easily beat by 50 points. They struggled against Fresno State who actually had to run the clock out to beat North Freak'n Dakota at home this weekend and will at best come in 4th in the WAC. UW will be a bottom dweller in the Pac 12. UN is gonna get curbstomped a few times this year, by far a way overrated football team but keep the faith Huskerfan, hell what else is there to do in Nebraska this time of year?

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:24 pm

88 wrote:I predict a Karl Hungus bet in the near future, which I will enforce if the loser re-appears.

88, this is in response to your quote by the great ben franklin, "when the people find they can vote themselves free money" WOW, how prophetic a statement by the great ben, IT HAS COME TRUE, and its the sick ass liberals and the democrats and the left wing sicko pigs like corrine brown and sheila jackson lee, and john conyers, and barney frank, and nancy pelosi, who all get stupid poor cockroaches to vote for them, and in return, they get free money by sleepin in all day and making more cockroaches.

wow, ben was a genius, and today, the liberals are the cockroaches, who get cockroaches to vote for them by giving free money to them. Dont get a job, sleep in, smoke some crack, open your legs and pop out some more roaches, and we will write you a free check.

wow, Mr ben was a wise man indeed.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:30 pm

bradhusker wrote:hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.

bradley, could you name more than 2 players on your own team...without Googling?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:35 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
bradhusker wrote:hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.
bradley, could you name more than 2 players on your own team...without Googling?

Nmdonkeykong Suh and Tommy Frazier

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:36 am

Papa Willie wrote:Let me tell you about Goober's grandchildren!

goober is old enough to have grandkids??? holy crap!

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:15 pm

bradhusker wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:Let me tell you about Goober's grandchildren!
goober is old enough to have grandkids??? holy crap!

Grandchild. Singular. Hey brad, should I tell you about how Papa Willie’s wife left him for a large black man? He’s cool with it as it freed up a lot of time for posting shit takes.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:21 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
bradhusker wrote:hey GOOBER, so im the worst? ok, BUT, dont forget, Nebraska would beat the fuckin piss outta you fairies, and you know thats the truth buddy boy.
Thats a truth that you cant handle.
bradley, could you name more than 2 players on your own team...without Googling?
Nmdonkeykong Suh and Tommy Frazier

That new freshman fullback they have is pretty good...

I think his name is Tom Rathman, or some shit.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:25 pm

Papa Willie wrote:
bradhusker wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:Let me tell you about Goober's grandchildren!
goober is old enough to have grandkids??? holy crap!

His real name is Adam.

See, brad? What'd I tell you?

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:07 pm

Adam? By the way, michelle bachmann is one hot MILF. can you imagine a hot 3 way with michelle and sarah? why is it that prominent democratic women are ugly and lesbo?? And prominent republican women are sexy and hot?

dems, janet reno, madeline albright, hilary, claire mcaskill, shelia jackson lee, maxine waters, chelsea clinton, ugly ugly ugly

repubs, michelle bachmann, sarah palin, monica crowley, the bush daughters, condy rice, halle berry, the very hot blonde who was bush's press secretary? hot hot hot.

Imus · Post by **Imus** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:25 pm

CornHolerHusker, I think 755 is your lucky number. So you should retire the weak troll when you hit that number of posts.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:29 pm

Imus wrote:CornHolerHusker, I think 755 is your lucky number. So you should retire the weak troll when you hit that number of posts.

Shit troll, I finally got word who your main nic is. Do you want to continue to be a pussie and hide? At TNW Mild7 didn't allow trolling. It's cool if a troll is funny, but you are that bitter cunt that signs back in and you can't smack yourself out of a wet paper bag.

Cuda can even run you.

Imus · Post by **Imus** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:39 pm

You don't have a clue about what went on at TNW. And if you think trolling was not allowed well

and :doh:.

And there are other pictures . . .

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:48 pm

bradhusker wrote:michelle bachmann is one hot MILF.

nigga please. she is married to a faggot. bitch could look like Brooklyn Decker wearing a wet t-shirt and licking a popsicle, and the fact that she is trying to ungay some chubby cock craver automatically disqualifies her. thoroughly unsexy.

she's a MILTAWTF: mother I'd like to ask "WHAT THE FUCK?!?"

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:02 am

Atomic Punk wrote: I finally got word who your main nic is.

congrats are in order....you've made it into my sig with this abomination

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:15 am

Felix wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote: I finally got word who your main nic is.
congrats are in order....you've made it into my sig with this abomination

That's a bit of a stretch.

Here's a hint, Feeldix...nobody gives a flame-broiled, hand-breaded, carefully seasoned rat's fukken cock what you think is clever or witty.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:28 am

Didn't At Least I'm Not Him claim to be sitting on his big secret who Imus was like 2 fucking years ago?

Anatomically Punked, do you ever think before you post?

See, the reason I ask is because you're a fucking idiot, which is readily evident from your ongoing "I know who every troll is, but I won't say" act.

Seriously?

"I know who runs this troll..."

Fast forward two fucking years...

"I just found out who this troll is!"

Which is it, assbrain? Were you lying then, or now? It's an either/or proposition, no gray area here -- which time were you lying?

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:24 am

Martyred wrote: Here's a hint, Feeldix...nobody gives a flame-broiled, hand-breaded, carefully seasoned rat's fukken cock what you think is clever or witty.

you know, your right.....i think I should probably change it....thanks for the help marty

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:08 pm

Dinsdale wrote:Were you lying then, or now? It's an either/or proposition, no gray area here

Not necessarily. Could be both.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:22 pm

Since we're on page 6, I know for sure that somebody has been drilled up the @ss.

I'm not reading 638 posts to learn who it is.

I just want to give MY take, which is:

The death penalty is an arrogant form of justice.

Good day.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:01 pm

I would consider a life sentence to be less arrogant, yes.

Btw, Tejas is set to execute Lawrence Brewer on Wednesday ---> for the dragging death of James Byrd back in 1998.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44605916/ns ... ?GT1=43001

Question: What were James Byrd's last words?

Answer: What a drag!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:16 pm

Felix wrote:
you know your right

Do they only get one in Canada?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:37 pm

poptart wrote:The death penalty is an arrogant form of justice.

Why? God is a big fan of capital punishment.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:41 pm

I dont feel sorry for someone who committs pre-meditated first degree murder. That is the bottom line here. Its really quite simple, If you plan out and carry out the murder of an innocent human being, you lose your right to life. The simplicity of it is quite brilliant.

There are other kinds of killing like accidental, and crimes of passion, and 2nd and 3rd degree, BUT, in my humble opinion, the absolute planning and clear intentions of taking someone's life?? I see no problem at all in you forfeiting your own life.

Society does not need killers walking amongest us who enjoy murder. This is why the MOB doesnt exist like it used to, you know, gangsters and mafia types who killed and slaughtered entire families. Those days are gone, society wont tolerate a Gotti or capone or Joe pesci anymore.

Mobsters are the same as serial killers, they LOVE killing, they get off on it, YES SIR, got no problem with the death penalty, its a cool thing if implemented properly.
Life in prison without the possibility of parole is also a cool thing, provided the perp is raped and sodomized on a daily basis by a much larger perp, thats a good punishment indeed.