T1B

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well how come no one has ever been seen actually making a crop circle? What "rollers"? Show us a "roller." How come besides some silly expose site, there's never been an actual video or picture of anyone actually making one--at night in the dark?

Here's a whole website dedicated to how it's done. Enjoy idiot.

http://www.swide.com/art-culture/how-to ... 2014/07/02

As for the Phoenix Lights, the witnesses in the video testify quite clearly. They were there and they certainly report something much different than " flares." How can you possibly suggest that "flares" would not only hang in place for several hours, but move together in perfect formation for hundreds of miles? Yes, actual witnesses described this. You're not only a coward, but a total liar.

As you are a gullible tool. The lights didn't hang for "hours", more like minutes. Those "witnesses" are building a mountain out of a small lump of clay. This is what happens when you turn a camera on Joe and Jane Nobody. The so-called perfect formation was addressed by the mountain commentary earlier.

Face it Nick, you're exposed and ridiculed. I was there, you were not. Simple fact. I've had 25 plus years of television work, I know a thing or 12 about videos and witnesses. Suck it up Felchie, you've got nothing left but more listless denial. So go ahead and do what you do, parrot yourself over and over, "Coward, liar, watch this YouTube bullshit, blah-blah-conspiracy-blah-puke..."

And where's some evidence for Bin Laden?

Have you checked your ass lately? Those sand niqqers love to bugger each other, so if you feel a firm nudge back there, you found him.

Bullshit. You're the one who just keeps parroting the same simplistic nonsense. The link of the How To Make A Crop Circle is simply bullshit. The insructions are absolutely worthless. The notion of "having a plan" and "a team" that can somehow render one of these huge designs with precision in the dark is a fucking joke. And notice how the (fake) instructions are curiously shallow and incomplete. Notice how the so-called "stomper" is never described or in any way demonstrated.

And as for the Phoenix Lights, who are you to deny the actual witnesses who clearly saw those lights maintain a moving precise formation for hours. the "mountain" theory is nothing--and you've offered nothing to back it up.

And of course all you've got is childish potty jokes concerning the supposed guilt of Bin Laden.

You're the pathetic fraud. Who are you trying to kid? And that's a real question.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:You're the one who just keeps parroting the same simplistic nonsense.

Crop circles...oh...boy...

:|

Actually B-Juice, the subject here is Bin Laden's supposed guilt--which we realize was never substantiated, or even charged. It was his birthday and while the lunatic Zionists , both Christian and Jewish, are celebrating his murder and the subsequent Permanent War, it's also a good time to reflect on how we've been deceived.

The digression onto the subject of crop circles was in no way my subject of discussion, but rather desperately tossed out by Jay--a squirming little toad as ever slimed its way through this palsied forum. It's a fairly interesting topic, and his annoyingly simplistic take is worth refuting, though it's like bouncing a bll--nothing really happens.

So save your (fake) attempts at sarcasm and so forth for he and his similar brain dead right-wing circle-jerkers.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
So save your (fake) attempts at sarcasm...

Here's something that's not so sarcastic.

Sometimes I'm astounded at this message board's enthusiasm for responding to your under-medicated, socially-retarded observations.
No joke here, but...you've been diagnosed bi-polar by a psychiatrist, correct?

Here's a link for you:

http://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-evide ... 11-attacks

It states that Bin Laden was never charged for 9/11 due to a lack of evidence. He was indicted and charged for the 1998 embassy bombings.

P.S. Hey Nicky, I will lift a glass or three tonight to toast the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. Cheers.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
So save your (fake) attempts at sarcasm...

Here's something that's not so sarcastic.

Sometimes I'm astounded at this message board's enthusiasm for responding to your under-medicated, socially-retarded observations.
No joke here, but...you've been diagnosed bi-polar by a psychiatrist, correct?

Well bring it, bitch. I back up what I say--on all the topics in this thread and others. Who the fuck are you? Can you actually refute anything I've said? Got any good jokes? No...nothing from bris-juice?

Goober McTuber wrote:Here's a link for you:

http://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-evide ... 11-attacks

It states that Bin Laden was never charged for 9/11 due to a lack of evidence. He was indicted and charged for the 1998 embassy bombings.

P.S. Hey Nicky, I will lift a glass or three tonight to toast the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. Cheers.

Why wait, you may as well start drinking now. But even if Bin Laden was involved in the embassy attacks, why should the obvious falsity of the official 9/11 story not outrage you? Are you so comfortably boiled so as not to care?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Bullshit. You're the one who just keeps parroting the same simplistic nonsense. The link of the How To Make A Crop Circle is simply bullshit. The insructions are absolutely worthless. The notion of "having a plan" and "a team" that can somehow render one of these huge designs with precision in the dark is a fucking joke. And notice how the (fake) instructions are curiously shallow and incomplete. Notice how the so-called "stomper" is never described or in any way demonstrated.

CTRL-KC much Nick? Pot and kettle time again? Moron.

Those "instructions" are every bit as valid and more than all of the crap you've linked to over the years. Just because you don't like the truth, it doesn't mean you have to keep ostriching your pin-head into the sand to avoid it. Chin up buttercup, the real world doesn't completely hate you, as much as it wants you to just go away.

And as for the Phoenix Lights, who are you to deny the actual witnesses who clearly saw those lights maintain a moving precise formation for hours. the "mountain" theory is nothing--and you've offered nothing to back it up.

I'm an actual witness. Moron.

The military has proven what the lights were, as have scientists. Your clutching at some desperate straws here, holding onto "testimony" from biased sources. Witnesses have been trying to one-up each other for years now, you happen to be biting into that hook like a stupid, starving fish. Plus, the human eye is a terrible judge of altitude of point sources of light(s) in the sky.

The images of the Phoenix Lights presented on the web further confuse the fact that two different incidents happened. The first incident, the original “vee,” passed overhead with almost no one photographing or filming it. Only one video seems to exist, and since it was shot of an overhead object it does not show a cityscape. This film was never promoted by UFO enthusiasts, perhaps because it doesn’t show the famous optical illusion of the “dark triangle.”

Most of the photos and video of the lights were taken of the second incident — the flares — as people came out in response to the first. These images show the flares in an arc over the Phoenix cityscape, which is sometimes confused with the earlier, overhead “vee.”

The famous "vee" was a formation of airplanes, and this was confirmed by eyewitness Mitch Stanley, who was using his Dobsonian telescope at the time. He clearly saw each light was a "double", with one light under each wing.

As for the people who swore they saw a black triangular shape joining the five lights of the vee, that’s a classic contrast effect of the human eye. In a very telling case, a man who swore he saw a black shape joining the lights of the vee saw it pass directly in front of the moon. At that point, he saw not a black shape but wavy lines pass over the undimmed moon. But rather than conclude that he’d seen the contrails of planes, the man, whose perception had already been heavily influenced by the UFO explanation concluded instead that the pilot of the alien craft had turned his spaceship transparent right at that moment so the man could see the moon through it.

How convenient.

All of this is documented by Dateline NBC and the Arizona Republic.

And of course all you've got is childish potty jokes concerning the supposed guilt of Bin Laden.

You're the pathetic fraud. Who are you trying to kid? And that's a real question.

Sorry you don't like the ass buggery of your fallen idol, sucks to be you I guess. But unlike you, I'm just passing along facts, not kidding anybody. As you insist on hammering your dome into the rocks of ignorance, I'll leave you with a little quote.

“Sometimes I need what only you can provide: your absence.”- Ashley Brilliant

Or, as Mark Twain once wrote, in talking about someone like you...“Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of the 9/11 conspiracy club. But I repeat myself.”

Moron.

No, Mark Twain would call bullshit on the official 9/11 story, and so should every responsible person. After all, there's not a single part of it that you can defend.

As to Phoenix, while you claim to have been a witness, there's no way to prove this, and you've already shown yourself to be weaselly and duplicitous. However, there's no question that the governor of Arizona at the time, Fife Symington, saw it, and while he initially went along with the official explanation, he later came clean and said quite clearly,

"I'm a pilot and I know just about every machine that flies. It was bigger than anything that I've ever seen. It remains a great mystery. Other people saw it, responsible people. I don't know why people would ridicule it". Symington had earlier said, "It was enormous and inexplicable. Who knows where it came from? A lot of people saw it, and I saw it too. It was dramatic. And it couldn't have been flares because it was too symmetrical. It had a geometric outline, a constant shape."

Are you a pilot? All you've offered is a rote recitation of the official story--thus further undermining your claim to have been a witness.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Here's a link for you:

http://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-evide ... 11-attacks

It states that Bin Laden was never charged for 9/11 due to a lack of evidence. He was indicted and charged for the 1998 embassy bombings.

P.S. Hey Nicky, I will lift a glass or three tonight to toast the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. Cheers.

Why wait, you may as well start drinking now. But even if Bin Laden was involved in the embassy attacks, why should the obvious falsity of the official 9/11 story not outrage you? Are you so comfortably boiled so as not to care?

Kind of like when OJ went to prison for robbery and kidnapping instead of homicide. I'm all good with the end result.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:As to Phoenix, while you claim to have been a witness, there's no way to prove this, and you've already shown yourself to be weaselly and duplicitous. However, there's no question that the governor of Arizona at the time, Fife Symington, saw it,

Are you a pilot? All you've offered is a rote recitation of the official story--thus further undermining your claim to have been a witness.

So trust the word of an admitted liar. Just like Toolio, that's how you roll. Got it.

What I have noted as reported and verified fact, you admittedly are siding with the tin foil topped lunatic fringe. Enough said. We know you are terrified of the truth, it shows in your hysterical pouting and hissy-fitting like an angry little girl.

Grow up.

The man was the governor--and a pilot. And you're saying what...he's a loon? Why would he come forth with the truth, knowing he'd be held to ridicule by totally fake squirmers like you? What, was he a democrat?

And as for throwing a hissy fit, you're the one resorting to "tin-foil" references and typical bunkered and blinkered nonsense.

Goober McTuber wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Here's a link for you:

http://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-evide ... 11-attacks

It states that Bin Laden was never charged for 9/11 due to a lack of evidence. He was indicted and charged for the 1998 embassy bombings.

P.S. Hey Nicky, I will lift a glass or three tonight to toast the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. Cheers.

Why wait, you may as well start drinking now. But even if Bin Laden was involved in the embassy attacks, why should the obvious falsity of the official 9/11 story not outrage you? Are you so comfortably boiled so as not to care?

Kind of like when OJ went to prison for robbery and kidnapping instead of homicide. I'm all good with the end result.

Sure, OJ deserved to go because he really did murder his wife and the waiter. But Bin Laden did not have any part in 9/11. Or at least no evidence has been presented. So...if indeed he should pay for the previous embassy attacks, what about the real perps of 9/11? You're logic is totally fucked.

What a silly person. Twit.

Fyfe was governor, but so what. So was that racist POS Ev Mecham. So was Jan Brewer, all liars and bad people, but still elected to governor. That doesn't give them any extra credibility on UFO's however. What it gives is their, or more specifically, Symington's reversal of testimony the desperate air of a guy struggling for attention. This is the same guy that had this press conference.



Suddenly he's all weepy and begging the UFO nuts to understand him? Please.

Sorry you are getting all pissy about being a regular Tin Foil Ted.

Go take an extra heavy dose of Qaaludes, mix with a liter of cheap gin and kick back and wait for the Comet Captain Kohoutek. Hope you got your jumpsuit and black Nike sneakers ready.

You'll need 'em.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Why wait, you may as well start drinking now. But even if Bin Laden was involved in the embassy attacks, why should the obvious falsity of the official 9/11 story not outrage you? Are you so comfortably boiled so as not to care?

Kind of like when OJ went to prison for robbery and kidnapping instead of homicide. I'm all good with the end result.

Sure, OJ deserved to go because he really did murder his wife and the waiter. But Bin Laden did not have any part in 9/11. Or at least no evidence has been presented. So...if indeed he should pay for the previous embassy attacks, what about the real perps of 9/11? You're logic is totally fucked.

CNN 3 years ago wrote:The United States on Wednesday announced charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused of orchestrating the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and four others accused of involvement in the plot.

"If convicted, the five accused could be sentenced to death," the Defense Department said in a statement.

Along with Mohammed, the others are Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin 'Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

The charges allege that the five are "responsible for the planning and execution of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., resulting in the killing of 2,976 people," the statement said.

Maybe we could also try Mohammed Atta, et al, in absentia.

Khalid Sheikh Muhammed had been tortured for months before "confessing." Water boarded hundreds of times. And you're suggesting that his "confession" would stand up in any sort of court? The U.S. Justice Dept apparently doesn't think so, because they won't try him. Someone had to take the fall.

And that said, he wasn't murdered and dumped in the ocean without any charges or evidence. That was Bin Laden, the birthday boy. Are you reduced to desperately trying to make some association and somehow hope it counts in the shameless fake story of 9/11. Let's remember it was the palsied and utterly fatuous 9/11 Commission itself which produced the tortured "confession" by Muhammed. Are you actually familiar with just how hobbled and hapless was that investigative body? I'll bet you're not--and if you're honest you'll check it out.

In fact, while torturing him for months in all manner of barbaric inquisition, Muhammed confessed to lots of stuff

The February 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City
The September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the United States Capitol using four hijacked commercial airliners.
A failed "shoe bomber" operation
The October 2002 attack in Kuwait
The Paddy's Pub nightclub bombing in Bali, Indonesia
A plan for a "second wave" of attacks on major U.S. landmarks after the 9/11 attacks, including the Library Tower in Los Angeles, the Willis Tower (formerly Sears Tower) in Chicago, the Plaza Bank Building in Seattle and the Empire State Building in New York City
Plots to attack oil tankers and U.S. naval ships in the Straits of Hormuz, the Straits of Gibraltar and in Singapore
A plan to blow up the Panama Canal
Plans to assassinate Jimmy Carter
A plot to blow up suspension bridges in New York City
A plan to destroy the Sears Tower in Chicago with burning fuel trucks
Plans to "destroy" London Heathrow Airport, Canary Wharf and Big Ben in London
A planned attack on "many" nightclubs in Thailand
A plot targeting the New York Stock Exchange and other U.S. financial targets
A plan to destroy buildings in Eilat, Israel
Plans to destroy U.S. embassies in Indonesia, Australia and Japan in 2002.
Plots to destroy Israeli embassies in India, Azerbaijan, the Philippines and Australia
Surveying and financing an attack on an Israeli El-Al flight from Bangkok
Sending several "mujahideen" into Israel to survey "strategic targets" with the intention of attacking them
The November 2002 suicide bombing of a hotel in Mombasa, Kenya
The failed attempt to shoot down an Israeli passenger jet leaving Mombasa airport in Kenya
Plans to attack U.S. targets in South Korea
Providing financial support for a plan to attack U.S., British and Jewish targets in Turkey
Surveillance of U.S. nuclear power plants in order to attack them
A plot to attack NATO's headquarters in Europe
Planning and surveillance in a 1995 plan (the "Bojinka plot") to bomb 12 American passenger jets
The planned assassination attempt against then-U.S. President Bill Clinton during a mid-1990s trip to the Philippines
"Shared responsibility" for a plot to kill Pope John Paul II
Plans to assassinate Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf
An attempt to attack a U.S. oil company in Sumatra, Indonesia, "owned by the Jewish former [U.S.] Secretary of State Henry Kissinger"
The beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl


I'm surprised he didn't admit to blowing Bill Clinton

There's not a single part of the 9/11 Commission report that you or anyone else can defend. And yet you do?

Sounds like he confessed to an awful lot of shit. He's not a nice person. He should probably die, as well.

Got any good jokes?

A drunken farmer late at night marches up stairs to his wife, with a sheep under his arm. His wife wakes up, and he says"This is the pig I've been fucking." The wife says,"You idiot! That's a sheep, not a pig!" The farmer says,"Shut the fuck up bitch, I was talking to the sheep!".

Bud-dum-csshhhh!!!! I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

He said good jokes, you mush-brained fuckwit. Choke on that fucking veal.

How about this?:

How do you keep a moron in suspense?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sure, OJ deserved to go because he really did murder his wife and the waiter.

Gee, Nicky is wrong yet again -- what a shocker.

At this point, it's pretty well documented that OJ did not, in fact, ventilate the ex and the waiter. He did participate in the cover-up, though.

Hey LTS Tard, I just located a mysterious crop circle in a field near where you live.

I think you may be on to something after all. The aliens left this message for you to decipher.



It's a bit cryptic, but you'll "finger" it out.

Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:How about this?:

How do you keep a moron in suspense?

I'll tell you tomorrow.

Hey Roger, if you want to hijack this thread with incredibly dated and moronic jokes, this is how you do it:

This story takes place on a Native American reservation. One night, it was very, very cold; so cold that people had to bundle together to stay warm.

Coincidently, nine months later, at the reservation hospital, there were so many women in labor on the same day that every bed in the maternity ward was full. When another woman came in, the staff found a deer skin and stretched it out on top of some pillows to provide for her a comfortable place to deliver. She gave birth to a healthy baby boy.

Another woman came in, so the staff found a buffalo skin and stretched it out on top of some pillows to give her a comfortable place to deliver. She gave birth to healthy twin baby boys.

Finally, yet another woman came in. The staff scrambled around, and found the skin of a hippopotamus (a traveling circus had been passing through the area earlier that year and their hippo had died...). They stretched it out on top of some pillows to give her a comfortable place to deliver. She gave birth to triplets - three healthy baby boys.

The story is just another validation of a well-known truism:

"The sons of the squaw of the hippopotamus are equal to the sons of the squaws of the other two hides."

No, pun jokes are worse than sheep fucking jokes. Shrub wins this round.