Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 5:46 pm
Papa Willie wrote:
Poor Killiard. You and your GOP asswipes don't like it when your tactics are thrown back in your faces.Killian wrote:Ford won't testify, Feinstein "I can't say that everything is truthful."
Fuck this. Complete political hit job. This is what our politics has become.
The ends justify the means eh Screwy? Sadly all this lady is doing is hurting and diluting legitimate claims of sexual harassment.Screw_Michigan wrote:Poor Killiard. You and your GOP asswipes don't like it when your tactics are thrown back in your faces.Killian wrote:Ford won't testify, Feinstein "I can't say that everything is truthful."
Fuck this. Complete political hit job. This is what our politics has become.
Fuck off, loser.
Give me a fucking break. You only held a seat open on the court for a year because you wouldn't consider Merrick Garland for the seat he was nominated for.Killian wrote:Tell me exactly what "tactic" was thrown in Republicans face. I want to clarify what point of yours I will be tearing apart.
I didn't do shit you fucking window licking mouth breather. I think the Senate should have considered him and had a vote. But if you want to talk about a tactic being thrown in another parties face, you can thank your boy Joe Biden for that one. Still, that tactic and the one being employed by the democrats right now is an apples and cow shit comparison. One is holding open a seat based on a suggestion made by a sitting senator in 1992, the other is fabricating a sexual assault claim 35 years after it happened to besmirch someone who already had his confirmation hearing, similar to the attempt on Clarence Thomas in 1991.Screw_Michigan wrote:Give me a fucking break. You only held a seat open on the court for a year because you wouldn't consider Merrick Garland for the seat he was nominated for.Killian wrote:Tell me exactly what "tactic" was thrown in Republicans face. I want to clarify what point of yours I will be tearing apart.
Love how you're in a rush to get Kavanaugh approved and seated. It's only a lifetime appointment. But packing courts and crushing libuhrals can't wait a moment longer!
Again.......fukk you.
FWIW: The reasoning behind lifetime appointments.In the highly politicized atmosphere which has long attended the nominally apolitical arena of Court Justices, Presidents often attempt to buttress their agendas by selecting Court Justice nominees favorable toward their views. At times, however, the judicial leanings of Court Justices prove different in practice than they had previously appeared. The policy of lifetime
appointment, therefore, secures a Court Justice against “retribution” for decisions going against the wishes of his or her Presidential sponsor. In this regard, proponents have cited Alexander Hamilton’s declaration in the Federalist Papers that “nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office”.
Oh geez, I guess he'll have to go back to slumming it as a DC court of appeals judge or wherever else he's emptying trash cans for a living. Clutch your pearls a little harder.Killian wrote:Ruin the guys life
Nice ad hominem. What happened to him was disgraceful and his accuser should have spent years in prison.I'm sure Brian Banks agrees.
Nonsense on both accounts. Why are you so quick to defend accused rapists?Killian wrote: the other is fabricating a sexual assault claim 35 years after it happened to besmirch someone who already had his confirmation hearing, similar to the attempt on Clarence Thomas in 1991.
She didn't accuse anyone of rape, dummy. Get your fucking facts straight. There are also now 3 eye witnesses who says shes full of shit. Why are you so quick to defend her?Screw_Michigan wrote:Nonsense on both accounts. Why are you so quick to defend accused rapists?Killian wrote: the other is fabricating a sexual assault claim 35 years after it happened to besmirch someone who already had his confirmation hearing, similar to the attempt on Clarence Thomas in 1991.
So in your world, it's okay to completely make something up about someone as long as it suits you and they land on their feet. You are an evil, evil person. The Brian Banks comparison was apt, even if you don't like it and it makes you feel uncomfortable.Screw_Michigan wrote:Oh geez, I guess he'll have to go back to slumming it as a DC court of appeals judge or wherever else he's emptying trash cans for a living. Clutch your pearls a little harder.Killian wrote:Ruin the guys life
Nice ad hominem. What happened to him was disgraceful and his accuser should have spent years in prison.I'm sure Brian Banks agrees.
Because he's innocent until proven guilty, you human cumstain.Screw_Michigan wrote:Why are you so quick to defend accused rapists?
He's not a defendant in a criminal trial.Carson wrote: Because he's innocent until proven guilty, you human cumstain.
You have absolutely no evidence she's making it up. Provide it and then shut the fuck up.Killian wrote: So in your world, it's okay to completely make something up
Yeah, I betCarson wrote:I left to get away from clueless swishes like you.
Three people say she's making it up. Three people she said were eyewitnesses to said event. You have absolutely no evidence to say she is telling the truth.Screw_Michigan wrote:You have absolutely no evidence she's making it up. Provide it and then shut the fuck up.Killian wrote: So in your world, it's okay to completely make something up
To me the idea of term limits would address decisions going against the wishes of the people.ML@Coyote wrote:FWIW: The reasoning behind lifetime appointments.In the highly politicized atmosphere which has long attended the nominally apolitical arena of Court Justices, Presidents often attempt to buttress their agendas by selecting Court Justice nominees favorable toward their views. At times, however, the judicial leanings of Court Justices prove different in practice than they had previously appeared. The policy of lifetime
appointment, therefore, secures a Court Justice against “retribution” for decisions going against the wishes of his or her Presidential sponsor. In this regard, proponents have cited Alexander Hamilton’s declaration in the Federalist Papers that “nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office”.
What an idiotic statement to make.Goober McTuber wrote:And a Kavanaugh supporter is now floating the idea that it might just have been "rough horseplay".
https://thedailybanter.com/2018/09/18/k ... horseplay/
Ford has claimed that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer while they were in high school in the 1980s and "groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it."
Give me a break.Ford has said she wants the FBI to investigate the charges she's made before going "on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident," according to The New York Times.
I assume that's what will happen.Killian wrote:What an idiotic statement to make.Goober McTuber wrote:And a Kavanaugh supporter is now floating the idea that it might just have been "rough horseplay".
https://thedailybanter.com/2018/09/18/k ... horseplay/
At this point, call her to testify. If she does not, hold the vote as planned.
I can see advantages and disadvantages both ways. But I guess I'm not so sure it wouldn't be a bad thing for the justices to be more tuned into the current wishes of the populace. They do after all work for us, and not for themselves.Goober McTuber wrote:To me the idea of term limits would address decisions going against the wishes of the peopleML@Coyote wrote:FWIW: The reasoning behind lifetime appointments.In the highly politicized atmosphere which has long attended the nominally apolitical arena of Court Justices, Presidents often attempt to buttress their agendas by selecting Court Justice nominees favorable toward their views. At times, however, the judicial leanings of Court Justices prove different in practice than they had previously appeared. The policy of lifetime
appointment, therefore, secures a Court Justice against “retribution” for decisions going against the wishes of his or her Presidential sponsor. In this regard, proponents have cited Alexander Hamilton’s declaration in the Federalist Papers that “nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office”.
For what?Screw_Michigan wrote:Why won't Kavanaugh sit down and interview with the FBI?
If she's such an innocent man, as he proclaimed, why not?Dinsdale wrote:For what?Screw_Michigan wrote:Why won't Kavanaugh sit down and interview with the FBI?
Who is the real "victim shaming misogynist?" I say Kavanaugh is the victim of an obvious smear campaign, and that Ford is the misogynist who is trying to shame him. She is a misogynist because deliberately and publicly portrays women as being dishonest and manipulative. Why does she hate her own gender?Killian wrote:victim shaming misogynist.
Wolfman wrote:
Why should he? Is he being accused of committing a federal crime deserving of investigation?Screw_Michigan wrote:Why won't Kavanaugh sit down and interview with the FBI?