Re: AOC lets her inner freak flag fly
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 5:51 pm
Rack AOC
I wish you had finger cancer so you'd never post here again.Papa Willie wrote: That’s like saying “I sure hope my mother gets breast cancer.”
I thought you were for gun control? Or you're just not for compromising to get anything accomplished on the hill?Screw_Michigan wrote:Rack AOC
Screwy is for only one thing, that which the most liberal fascists in Congress support. He doesn’t think for himself. Of course he is for gun control but not if it includes illegals. He was all for adding a seat to the House for DC, but when that bill included relaxing gun control measures in DC he slurped up Pelosi’s discharge and agreed with her pulling the bill.Joe in PB wrote:I thought you were for gun control?Screw_Michigan wrote:Rack AOC
lmaoLeft Seater wrote:.... he slurped up Pelosi’s discharge....
...including the double standard for government elite.....Ocasio-Cortez announced that no one on her congressional staff in Washington, D.C., will make less than $52,000 annually.
In order to pay for it, she’s not taking a pay cut or using any of the money from her $174,000 a year salary.
Here’s the problem. You have got to find a way to get money to pay the entry-level people so she plans to take that from the chief of staff. Senior staffers who would normally make $154,000 for chief of staff are probably only going to make about $80,000,
Every Capitol Hill office has a limited amount of money to pay their staff. ........ Entry level intern is making 52 grand. Your chief of staff who has a very important role in a congressional office now is capped at 80 as opposed to the actual markets rate on Capitol Hill which is closer to 150,000. Everyone is between 52 and 80. Actually socialism and communism on display....
LolJoe in PB wrote: url=https://ilovemyfreedom.org/wow-fec-comp ... -payments/
Who gives a fat fucking shutyomouth ass? Don't like it, don't work for her. How's that for socialism?Joe in PB wrote:AOC Imposes Communism On Staffers
...including the double standard for government elite.....Ocasio-Cortez announced that no one on her congressional staff in Washington, D.C., will make less than $52,000 annually.
In order to pay for it, she’s not taking a pay cut or using any of the money from her $174,000 a year salary.
Here’s the problem. You have got to find a way to get money to pay the entry-level people so she plans to take that from the chief of staff. Senior staffers who would normally make $154,000 for chief of staff are probably only going to make about $80,000,
Every Capitol Hill office has a limited amount of money to pay their staff. ........ Entry level intern is making 52 grand. Your chief of staff who has a very important role in a congressional office now is capped at 80 as opposed to the actual markets rate on Capitol Hill which is closer to 150,000. Everyone is between 52 and 80. Actually socialism and communism on display....
Jesus Pole Vaulting Christ....Joe in PB wrote:Ocasio-Cortez’s team allegedly attempted to hire and pay her boyfriend under the radar, but got caught.
AOC's just another corrupt Capitol Hill gold digger.
I'd say she got her money's worth, judging from the Cohen hearing....Joe in PB wrote:AOC Imposes Communism On Staffers
...including the double standard for government elite.....Ocasio-Cortez announced that no one on her congressional staff in Washington, D.C., will make less than $52,000 annually.
In order to pay for it, she’s not taking a pay cut or using any of the money from her $174,000 a year salary.
Here’s the problem. You have got to find a way to get money to pay the entry-level people so she plans to take that from the chief of staff. Senior staffers who would normally make $154,000 for chief of staff are probably only going to make about $80,000,
Every Capitol Hill office has a limited amount of money to pay their staff. ........ Entry level intern is making 52 grand. Your chief of staff who has a very important role in a congressional office now is capped at 80 as opposed to the actual markets rate on Capitol Hill which is closer to 150,000. Everyone is between 52 and 80. Actually socialism and communism on display....
I'm sure that will happen, my point was the disparity between the average Chief of Staff salary compared to a congress representative $24k, and the difference between AOC & her chief staff, $94k. If she had taken a pay cut too, then she's setting an example of what Socialism could be. As is, she's not any different than any other self serving regime.Screw_Michigan wrote:Who gives a fat fucking shutyomouth ass? Don't like it, don't work for her. How's that for socialism?.....including the double standard for government elite.
Shut the fuck up, you beta boomer numb-skull.Joe in PB wrote:If she had taken a pay cut too...
Diego in Seattle wrote:Jesus Pole Vaulting Christ....Joe in PB wrote:Ocasio-Cortez’s team allegedly attempted to hire and pay her boyfriend under the radar, but got caught.
AOC's just another corrupt Capitol Hill gold digger.
Would it have been okay if she had her daughter & son-in-law hired?
Oh wait....
Please try to keep up.It’s not illegal for [Ocasio-Cortez] to pay her boyfriend, but it appears that they created some sort of scheme to avoid claiming the money [as a campaign expense].
That man is a GOD...Joe in PB wrote:..Jerry Lewis...
Yeah, I read that too and blanched.Joe in PB wrote:lmaoLeft Seater wrote:.... he slurped up Pelosi’s discharge....
I wonder how Omar can breathe with that Semtex girdle on so tight?Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
1,3,2,5,6,4Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
ftfyPapa Willie wrote:You sure as fuck would - only because she has a dick bigger than you.Kierland wrote:But you would still fuck her. :doh:
Nice “I know you are but what is he?”Carson wrote:ftfyPapa Willie wrote:You sure as fuck would - only because she has a dick bigger than you.Kierland wrote:But you would still fuck her. :doh:
Papa Willie wrote:
Trump & Pence talked about how the Democrats want late-term abortions & infanticide (lie). How many unwanted babies have they adopted?Papa Willie wrote:And in other AOC news:
https://nyp.st/2EwfcPC
She’s going to implode. Not a question of if, but when. She can’t hide her stupid...
Stupid argument. Suppose the answer is '0' -- still shouldn't be a sufficient enough excuse to allow killing humans.Diego in Seattle wrote:How many unwanted babies have they adopted?
Way to move the goalposts. And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions. But questioning how many adoptions an opponent of abortion is apples and streetcars.Diego in Seattle wrote:Trump & Pence talked about how the Democrats want late-term abortions & infanticide (lie). How many unwanted babies have they adopted?Papa Willie wrote:And in other AOC news:
https://nyp.st/2EwfcPC
She’s going to implode. Not a question of if, but when. She can’t hide her stupid...
Screwy already addressed that. The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has. You just want to hamstring her. Fuck off and go use the socialist air traffic control system while you bitch about socialism. Stupid hypocrite.Left Seater wrote:If his argument is that she is a walking contradiction then he is spot on.
The article just points out her hypocrisy. If she truely believes in the Green New Deal, as I think she does, why isn’t she and her staff using public transportation exclusively? Why isn’t she and her staff using Amtrak at all times over planes? Why is she paying herself more than her staffers?
This is nothing but a lie. She had the option to use the subway system which had a station less than 200 feet from her office. Amtrak sends trains around the country and has "high speed" service between NYC and DC. Get off this, she is working with what she has bullshit.Kierland wrote: The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has.
Try to keep up little angry racist. I have long complained about the air traffic control system in this country. The hardware is crap, and we lag behind much of the world when it comes to keeping planes separated. We waste time and money due to the government monopoly over the system. Keep kicking your own ass.Kierland wrote:Fuck off and go use the socialist air traffic control system while you bitch about socialism.
Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.Disingenuous Seater wrote:And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions.
It still has to start with somebody, so why not the woman who is making it her mission to save the planet? After all, if she wants others to buy into what she’s selling, she should lead the way regardless how minuscule the effect would be. As it is she talks a good game, but relishes those first world perks that come with living in a consumerist society. But then again, we’ve always known Socialism is all about some pigs being more equal that others, right comrades?Kierland wrote:Screwy already addressed that. The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has.Left Seater wrote:If his argument is that she is a walking contradiction then he is spot on.
The article just points out her hypocrisy. If she truely believes in the Green New Deal, as I think she does, why isn’t she and her staff using public transportation exclusively? Why isn’t she and her staff using Amtrak at all times over planes? Why is she paying herself more than her staffers?
C’mon. It’s never about the life of the mother. Maybe the lifestyle burden of being a mother, but an actual life or death decision where the mother’s life hangs in the balance is statistically insignificant. At the very least let’s be honest about that.Goober McTuber wrote:Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.Disingenuous Seater wrote:And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions.