T1B

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: I also like the fact that one of the smartest folks in biology, Ken Miller (who also co-wrote the text I use) is a devout Christian and also doesn't believe that evolution and religion are incompatible.

Does he know enough about evolutionary science to know, unlike you, that D is not S and S is not D?

The only actual tribe that has really profitted from gaming are the Seminoles. The other tribes are just getting used by big companies already involved in gaming and only maing pennies on the dollar for these companies using them for their ability to open casinos.

Moving Sale wrote:

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: I also like the fact that one of the smartest folks in biology, Ken Miller (who also co-wrote the text I use) is a devout Christian and also doesn't believe that evolution and religion are incompatible.

Does he know enough about evolutionary science to know, unlike you, that D is not S and S is not D?

Ooooooh, look everybody...my little ankle-biter decided to hop forums!

And what's more, he's hoping that if he lies yet again about something I never said, that maybe, just maybe, people won't remember the royal ass-kicking received.

Look, Tinypants - I never, at any time, stated that Darwin was Spencer and/or vice versa. But you feel free to keep beating that dead horse. It only adds more tarnish to the pathetic little rep you've acquired.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I never, at any time, stated that Darwin was Spencer and/or vice versa.

Not only did you say it. You then said they said it too. It is the crux of your whole argument in that thread.

Not only that, but you did it in a post where you were talking about Kodak which is S not D anyway.

Not only that but you teach SotF and don't mention S. You should be fired for being an iodiot.

Nice going you stupid, lazy eye sporting tard.

Moving Sale wrote:

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I never, at any time, stated that Darwin was Spencer and/or vice versa.

Not only did you say it. You then said they said it too. It is the crux of your whole argument in that thread.

Give me the quote in wich I stated that they were the same person. Go ahead.

Moving Sale wrote:Not only that, but you did it in a post where you were talking about Kodak which is S not D anyway.

You mean THIS post?:

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:And, as Darwin pointed out when he helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," it is not necessarily the biggest, the swiftest, the strongest, that wins the day. Luck plays a HUGE role. Dinosaurs were the fittest for millions of years. An ecological catastrophe later, and the age of mammals hit. Kodak was the Colossus of photography, banking on film. It became a bloated beast that adapted poorly to the rapid advent of digital photography.

Your example doesn't work because it is in no way, shape, or form, an accurate representation of real-world economics. Your example would still have Kodak controlling photography and being a financial powerhouse...instead, it is a shadow of itself.

Please, tell all of us...where precisely in the post do I say that Spencer and Darwin are the same person? All I stated was that Darwin helped coin the concept of survival of the fittest, a fact to which Darwin and Spencer both testify in their own writings (and from which I quoted).

Don't you hate when your lies get exposed?

Moving Sale wrote:Not only that but you teach SotF and don't mention S. You should be fired for being an iodiot.

I'm sure that the New York State Board of Regents would love to hear curricular and staffing suggestions from a bitter little scientifically ignorant troll like you. Hey, toss in some of your "impressive" engineering, aeronautical, and physics analyses from your 9/11 Pentagon conspiracy theories..I'm sure that'll make 'em sit up and take your suggestions seriously. Yep.

Moving Sale wrote:Nice going you stupid, lazy eye sporting tard.

Lazy eye? Where did that come from? The only person on the boards who has ever seen me is BSmack, and not only does he know that I don't have a lazy eye, he's never stated that I did, even as a joke. You, on the other hand, have been seen by other posters (in fact, there are pics of you that have been posted), and your lack of stature -physically and otherwise- is a standard running gag here.

Are you honestly so bitter about the whipping you received in an old thread that you decided to pathetically dredge it up and place it into a completely different thread, in a different forum,...just to get your ass kicked again?

You really need to lighten up. Maybe you should read some books on biology so that you won't continue to look like a complete "iodiot" in future discussions.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Please, tell all of us...where precisely in the post do I say that Spencer and Darwin are the same person? All I stated was that Darwin helped coin the concept of survival of the fittest, a fact to which Darwin and Spencer both testify in their own writings (and from which I quoted).

D is known for NS and S is known for SotF and you said there are the same thing...IN A POST ABOUT KODAK. How fucking dumb are you?

Hey, toss in some of your "impressive" engineering, aeronautical, and physics analyses from your 9/11 Pentagon conspiracy theories...

A) "conspiracy theories?" Where did I ever say there was a conspiracy?
B) You will not argue 9/11 science on the merits so shut your ignant piehole.

Lazy eye? Where did that come from?

From the fact that you have a lazy eye. What a dumbass you are.

your lack of stature -physically and otherwise- is a standard running gag here.

As is your lazy eye, the hump on your back and your doublewide. Deal with it.

Are you honestly so bitter about the whipping you received in an old thread that you decided to pathetically dredge it up and place it into a completely different thread, in a different forum,...just to get your ass kicked again?

Yelling BODE AGAIN!?! What a fucking tard you are.

Now go back to teaching SotF to 5th graders w/o speaking of Spencer you fucking hack.

Moving Sale wrote:

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Please, tell all of us...where precisely in the post do I say that Spencer and Darwin are the same person? All I stated was that Darwin helped coin the concept of survival of the fittest, a fact to which Darwin and Spencer both testify in their own writings (and from which I quoted).

D is known for NS and S is known for SotF and you said there are the same thing...IN A POST ABOUT KODAK. How fucking dumb are you?

Smarter than you, obviously.

You lied when you claimed that I stated that Darwin was Spencer. I never said that. I stated that darwin helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," which is a fact that both Darwin and Spencer agreed. Darwin agreed that Spencer coined the phrase, and Spencer admitted that he came up with the phrase after reading Darwin and even said that his phrase was just a way of renaming Darwin's presentation of natural selection. The fact that you can't get past the fact that all I said was that Darwin helped to coin the concept and even provided proof from the writings of the pertinent individuals is truly sad for you.

Moving Sale wrote:From the fact that you have a lazy eye. What a dumbass you are.

Tell you what, shyster - find me a single quote from another poster who has seen me or a link to a pic of me that shows me having a lazy eye. Otherwise, I'll have to keep referring to you as a habitual liar who has been forced to making up physical ad hominems in a sad attempt to distract me and others from your losing effort.

MtLR wrote:your lack of stature -physically and otherwise- is a standard running gag here.

Moving Sale wrote:As is your lazy eye, the hump on your back and your doublewide. Deal with it.

Maybe you're unfamilar with the concept with a "running gag." It kind of requires that someone other than the originator uses the gag...and that it is actually funny and based in reality. For example, several other posters have referred to you as short. Oh, and in this thread also, - and hey, you referred to the "Bush cabal" (sounds conspiracy-like to me...). Hell, I even remember doing a whole photo montage bit using Herve Villechaize to make fun of you last year, based upon how other posters call you short (by the way, Tinypants, I'm 6' 4", so I'm going to assume you're short compared to me). Absolutely no one, including people who have met you, contradicted my assessment of you as sub-normal in height.

Your decision to describe me as having the lazy eye, etc. OTOH, is something you made up all on your own and you've been the only one using it. It hasn't caught on because we all know it's not true.

I understand why you're bitter. Having to buy your wardrobe at "Build A Bear Workshop" must be embarrassing. So is having the occasional mistype because your colleagues have turned off the accessibility options on your keyboard that allow you to type with those niblets at the end of your hooflike hands. But, please...taking out your anger in this senseless way isn't helping your case. It just makes for another sad episode of "Little Shyster, Big Board."

Moving Sale wrote:Yelling BODE AGAIN!?! What a fucking tard you are.

No one with a functioning synapse can deny that you've been skewered yet again.

Moving Sale wrote:Now go back to teaching SotF to 5th graders w/o speaking of Spencer you fucking hack.

I've never taught 5th grade. I've made it quite clear I teach high school. Wait - I think I understand your confusion. For most folks, 5th grade isn't high school, but then again, given your obvious lack of knowledge, maybe we can now assume that for you, 5th grade was "high school."

Moving Sale wrote:lazy eye
lazy eye

Hey, Shorty, the lazy eye belongs to a different Mike. Think Atomic. Update your spreadsheet, tardling.

"Little Shyster, Big Board."

Beautiful. In case it wasn't crystal clear, welcome to the MtLR clinic.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:You lied when you claimed that I stated that Darwin was Spencer.

You said there was no reason for your 5th graders to know about S when you talk about SotF. That means you are a hack of a teacher and a huge tardling. You use "SotF" not 'SotF' when you mention D in a post about Kodak and everybody who has been outside of a Lab in the last 100+ years knows that Kodak's "SotF" is S's baby not D's. You mention the D and S quotes but fail to talk about how S used the quote in his other works, the works that formed 'Social Darwinism.' SPENCER'S Social Dawinism. SotF is a misapplication of a Biological Theory and yet you say it is D's baby. I tried to be nice about it and you were a Dick. Not my fault.

I stated that darwin helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," which is a fact that both Darwin and Spencer agreed.

And then you buried your head in the sand for over 100 years of Science and Sociology because you are a simpleton that is why you teach 5th grade and not say Con Law at a Post Grad Level… like say Me.

Darwin agreed that Spencer coined the phrase, and Spencer admitted that he came up with the phrase after reading Darwin and even said that his phrase was just a way of renaming Darwin's presentation of natural selection.

And then life went on for over 100 years. Catch up tard boy.

…who has been forced to making up physical ad hominems in a sad attempt to distract me and others from your losing effort.

As opposed to you who bandwagons off of others on this board who do? You repeat what other say about me and then when I try to point out what a tard you are for lying about me because it has nothing to do with D or S and is just a distraction BY YOU, you get all pissy? You look funny from what I heard. Deal with it.

Now go fuck yourself you humpbacked maroon.

For example, several other posters have referred to you as short. Oh, and in this thread also, - and hey, you referred to the "Bush cabal" (sounds conspiracy-like to me...).

A thread from over a year ago where I never said ANYTHING about a cabal you type using quotes? It’s ‘Bush cabal’ if I never said it in the thread which I didn’t. That is what got you in hot water here in the first place. YOU ARE A 5TH GRADE TEACH… CAN YOU USE QUOTES PROPERLY PLEASE?

I'm 6' 4", so I'm going to assume you're short compared to me).

And so you call most everyone on this Board small because you are a lurch? No you don’t, you fall in line behind the other tads that lie about me… like a fucking sheep. I bet you teach at a public school huh tard?

Absolutely no one, including people who have met you, contradicted my assessment of you as sub-normal in height.

Bully for them, I’m actually taller than the normal American Male my age. Who fucking cares? What does it have to do with the topic of who is the father of SotF? Nothing, but since you are a tard you went to the “making up physical ad hominems” (see how I used quotes cause you said it fucking gibbon?) first and often.

I understand why you're bitter.

Far from it. It lets me see how utterly unimaginative and desperate you are. I know how tall I am. I am taller than over half the board. So what? Just because mvscal is 5 5 does not mean he is stupid. That is why I don’t go to that card. What does it have to do with his brain which is what he uses here?

occasional mistype

This from the guy who can’t find the “ and ‘ buttons when he needs them? How desperate are you for material if you will lie about such trivial crap in a feeble attempt to distract from your shit premise that D is the father of SotF?

No one with a functioning synapse can deny that you've been skewered yet again.

There you go again? You are not the jury you fucking tard. Yelling BODE is childish and you are a child who teaches science to children and calls people who mention your misquote of SotF “Tinypants.” What a fucking dolt.

I've made it quite clear I teach high school.

I’ve made it quite clear I’m not 4 10. So what? Shut your piehole and get back to ‘teaching’ science to 10 year olds.

For most folks, 5th grade isn't high school, but then again, given your obvious lack of knowledge, maybe we can now assume that for you, 5th grade was "high school."

How drool.

Hey, Tinypants, check out what Goobs wrote:

Goober wrote:Hey, Shorty, the lazy eye belongs to a different Mike. Think Atomic. Update your spreadsheet, tardling.

Let me get this straight...Mr. "Let's Get Identities Straight" has my physical appearance confused with that of a different poster named "Mike"?!?

Oh, that's rich.

I suppose that it's all confusing, keeping all the "Mikes" straight, especially with me having changed my nic...well...NEVER since having posted way back in the days of the Benton/Rabick board.

So, the microshyster decides to go for physical appearances smack...and uses the stats from the wrong poster. That's about par for Midget Sale.

I guess the "Bitty Barrister" should fire his fact-checker.

Moving Sale wrote:You said there was no reason for your 5th graders to know about S when you talk about SotF.

Once again...out come the lies. I never said anything about "my 5th graders." I teach high school. 5th grade is elementary level.

Moving Sale wrote:That means you are a hack of a teacher and a huge tardling.

As opposed to an alleged attorney who spends a hell of a lot of time arguing about biology (and losing, btw). I'm only online this much lately because I'm on vacation and taking numerous breaks from my summer to-do list. Aren't you supposed to be defending pedophiles or buying orthopedic lifts or something?

Moving Sale wrote:You use "SotF" not 'SotF' when you mention D in a post about Kodak and everybody who has been outside of a Lab in the last 100+ years knows that Kodak's "SotF" is S's baby not D's. You mention the D and S quotes but fail to talk about how S used the quote in his other works, the works that formed 'Social Darwinism.'

I'm a biologist. I use Chuckie Darwin's "natural selection/survival of the fittest" context. I know you've got the hots for Spencer, but let me be the guy to break this to you...he doesn't really look like Robert Urich.

Moving Sale wrote:SotF is a misapplication of a Biological Theory and yet you say it is D's baby.

SOCIAL Darwinism is a misapplication/misuse of Darwin's principles. Not only is your contention that "survival of the fittest" is a "misapplication of a Biological Theory [sic]" completely wrong, you can find Darwin using it as a synonym for "natural selection" in the 5th edition (and later) of "Origin of Species." Nice capitalization screwup, btw.

Moving Sale wrote:I tried to be nice about it and you were a Dick. Not my fault.

For someone obsessed over whether of not I hold the shift key when hitting the quote key, you sure are pretty lax with regards to capitalization. I just chalk that up to your usual hypocrisy. Could also be those little cork-like digits on your dwarven hands, but I'll stick with the hypocrisy angle...

Moving Sale wrote:And then you buried your head in the sand for over 100 years of Science and Sociology because you are a simpleton that is why you teach 5th grade and not say Con Law at a Post Grad Level… like say Me.

I don't teach 5th grade. Never did. Never said I did.

And I don't for a second believe you teach Con Law to grad students, especially after your imaginary biology buddies you dreamed up to anecdotally back your bio arguments conveniently morphed into relatives.

You're a liar, plain and simple.

Moving Sale wrote:You look funny from what I heard. Deal with it.

Heard from who? There is exactly ONE person from these boards who has seen me. And I'll bet he's never described me to you. I have never, ever, posted a pic of myself on any boards.

Once again - you're a liar.

Moving Sale wrote:Now go fuck yourself you humpbacked maroon.

Nope, no sign of pathetic desperation in Midget Sale...nope, not in the least...

Moving Sale wrote:A thread from over a year ago where I never said ANYTHING about a cabal you type using quotes? It’s ‘Bush cabal’ if I never said it in the thread which I didn’t. That is what got you in hot water here in the first place. YOU ARE A 5TH GRADE TEACH… CAN YOU USE QUOTES PROPERLY PLEASE?

You're insane. And a liar. The UK Plot thread is less than a year old, not over a year old. You used the words "Bush cabal" on page 5 of the thread (posted August 11), and since it was your nutty phrase, I quoted you. Correctly.

By the way, in case you haven't gotten it straight yet...I don't teach 5th grade.

Moving Sale wrote:And so you call most everyone on this Board small because you are a lurch?

Come now, Mr. Anal-About-English, why didn't you capitalize the proper name "Lurch?"

What would your imaginary grad students say?

Besides, 6'4" isn't freakishly tall. I'm below average height to be an NBA player. You're below average height to be a jockey. We all have our limitations.

Moving Sale wrote:I’m actually taller than the normal American Male my age.

Sure. From the 17th century.

By the way, "male" is not normally capitalized in the context in which you are using it.

And you teach Con Law?

Oh, wait, that's right, you don't really.

Moving Sale wrote:I know how tall I am. I am taller than over half the board.

There goes that keyboard problem again. You meant to type "I am half as tall as all the board."

Your welcome.

Besides, numbnut, just how would you prove that ridiculous statement? Do you honestly have the physiological data from the posters here at T1B? Did we all give our heights out in a thread I missed?

You're a sad little man.

Moving Sale wrote:Just because mvscal is 5 5 does not mean he is stupid. That is why I don’t go to that card. What does it have to do with his brain which is what he uses here?

You happen to be short and stupid. The former is a fact mention frequently by people who have met you...and the latter is obvious to all who have met you or read your posts.

Besides, what does mvscals age have to do with anything? I didn't know he was 55. Didn't care.

Moving Sale wrote:This from the guy who can’t find the “ and ‘ buttons when he needs them? How desperate are you for material if you will lie about such trivial crap in a feeble attempt to distract from your shit premise that D is the father of SotF?

You're the one who started the whole anal retentive stuff about me not hitting the shift key. By the way, Lollipop Guild, the ' and " "buttons" are in fact one key.

I'd avoid the shift-key smack if I were you, given your random use of capitalization in this thread.

Not to mention your delightful omission of those very "buttons" when you discuss height.

Moving Sale wrote:There you go again? You are not the jury you fucking tard.

On the contrary, Tinypants. I am judge jury, and in your case, executioner.

Moving Sale wrote:Yelling BODE is childish and you are a child who teaches science to children and calls people who mention your misquote of SotF “Tinypants.” What a fucking dolt.

I love being called childish by someone who is having a public meltdown, resorting to lies about my job and physical appearance, tossing inane profanities, and basically pitching a screeching fit about my declaring that he's an idiot.

Moving Sale wrote:I’ve made it quite clear I’m not 4 10. So what? Shut your piehole and get back to ‘teaching’ science to 10 year olds.

I never said you were 410. I said you were short, not Biblically old.

mvscal wrote:

July 26, 2007, 4:36PM
Man crosses U.S. to violently settle Internet feud


By ANGELA K. BROWN
Associated Press


ELM MOTT, Texas — A Navy man who got mad when someone mocked him as a "nerd" over the Internet climbed into his car and drove 1,300 miles from Virginia to Texas to teach the other guy a lesson.

As he made his way toward Texas, Fire Controlman 2nd Class Petty Officer Russell Tavares posted photos online showing the welcome signs at several states' borders, as if to prove to his Internet friends that he meant business.

When he finally arrived, Tavares burned the guy's trailer down.

"I didn't think anybody was stupid enough to try to kill anybody over an Internet fight," said John G. Anderson, 59, who suffered smoke inhalation while trying to put out the 2005 blaze that caused $50,000 in damage to his trailer and computer equipment.

The feud started when Anderson, who runs a haunted house near Waco, joined a picture-sharing Web site and posted his artwork and political views. After he blocked some people from his page because of insults and foul language, they retaliated by making obscene digitally altered pictures of him, he said.

Anderson, who went by the screen name "Johnny Darkness," traded barbs with Tavares, aka "PyroDice."

Investigators say Tavares boiled over when Anderson called him a nerd and posted a digitally altered photo making Tavares look like a skinny boy in high-water pants, holding a gun and a laptop under a "Revenge of the Nerds" sign.

Tavares obtained Anderson's real name and hometown from Anderson's Web page about his Museum of Horrors Haunted House.

I hope it's not to late to take it all back...

Mike the PyroDice,

You are right. D coined SotF. Sorry I doubted you.

Sin,
TVO

I know, I know, YOU'RE the one that lives in the trailer....

Why didn’t you just wave a white flag? Tard.

He obviously has anger issues:

Goober McTuber wrote:Why didn’t you just wave a white flag? Tard.

Mike the PyroDice did that just fine when he split from the original thread to come here.

Thanks for asking though troll.

Moving Sale wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Why didn’t you just wave a white flag? Tard.

Mike the PyroDice did that just fine when he split from the original thread to come here.

Once again, Midget Sale swings and misses...

Since when is deciding to post in another thread or another forum "splitting?" Tell us, Itty-Bitty Barrister, how my deciding to participate in a thread involving how science shouldn't be invoked by Christians to prove their faith constitutes waving the metaphorical white flag in a different thread. Use that sharp-as-a-Nerf legal mind to argue how my hopping into THIS thread somehow gives you the ability to claim victory.

Make sure to toss in some patented Moving Sale maneuvers, like lying about my own appearance...and yours (yeah, that howler about being taller than half the board worked out REALLY well for you, didn't it?).

Don't forget to call me a 5th grade teacher, because, as we all know, calling someone an elementary teacher is quite the harsh insult (never mind the fact that elementary teachers bust their asses and are among the hardest working teachers in any district).

Give us some more interesting science "facts" that you've misinterpreted or deliberately distorted after cursory visits to Google and Wikipedia. Every time you attempt to delve into science it just ends badly for you. Stick to chasing Fisher-Price ambulances and defending pedophiles.

Toss in some references to my misuse of the shift-key in hitting the quote key (or as you like to call it, the "buttons") as grounds for my dismissal as a teacher while yourself capitalizing words with absolutely no grounding in accepted English.

Oh, and make sure to steal a day(s) old gag used by other posters (like the one about the vengeful nerd) and drop it into not one, but TWO threads. Nothing quite like hopping into the joke a day late and then doing someone else's shtick badly...twice. It was like listening to a six-year-old in the middle of a "LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT ME" fit.

The fact that you decided to nip at me with your idiocy in two completely unrelated threads just shows what a pathetic little ankle-biting troll you are. Then again, with your physical shortcomings, the ankle is about the limit for what you can really hit...

Nice frigging job, Pygmy Paralegal.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: Since when is deciding to post in another thread or another forum "splitting?"

You had time for this thread and no time for the other. How is that not splitting?

Oh, and make sure to steal a day(s) old gag used by other posters

Itty-Bitty
Pygmy

You really ARE a stupid fuck aren't you?

like lying about my ... appearance

Itty-Bitty
Pygmy

Dig that hole deep enough yet tard?

Toss in some references to my misuse of the shift-key in hitting the quote key

Big difference from using quotes incorrectly to using a Capital to emphasize something.

Nothing quite like hopping into the joke a day late

Or in your case a couple of years. Do you think before you type?

ankle-biting

Hey tardling it's called a message board. One person types something and then someone else responds. "ankle-biting?" What a thin-skinned pansy you turned out to be.

Paralegal.

Some of the hardest working people I know....

Aw fuck it you are too stupid to even get what a fucking tard you are posting such and such about me and then bitching because I do it back to you.

Care to explain how D coined the SotF that regulates the relative health of KODAK? No you wouldn't because you are a stupid simple tard who goes to the appearance smack in the 4th post you made to me. WTF is that? Laziness or stupidity is what it is. Same reason you are an elementary school teacher... you are either too stupid or too lazy to do any better.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: And, as Darwin pointed out when he helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," it is not necessarily the biggest, the swiftest, the strongest, that wins the day. Luck plays a HUGE role. Dinosaurs were the fittest for millions of years. An ecological catastrophe later, and the age of mammals hit. Kodak was the Colossus of photography, banking on film. It became a bloated beast that adapted poorly to the rapid advent of digital photography.

Well you fucking tard? Care to tell us how Darwin was talking about KODAK when he used Spencer’s term “SotF” in the fifth edition of ‘Origin?’ Huh? I didn’t think so.

No go back to making 22K a year so you can buy your kid 4 comics a year.

Moving Sale wrote:

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: Since when is deciding to post in another thread or another forum "splitting?"

You had time for this thread and no time for the other. How is that not splitting?

"Had time?"

Awww, what's the matter, Tinypants...did you feel neglected? Did you have a desperate need to continue to be kicked all over the board again and again? Is that why you felt it necessary to nip and yip at my heels in other threads like some needy grey-headed stepchild?

Moving Sale wrote:Dig that hole deep enough yet tard?

For you, I would assume a puddle-sized depression would be deep enough, Tattoo.

By all accounts, your claim to a height above the norms for an American male (and above that of half the board) were, to quote Twain, "greatly exaggerated."

You've been pegged at five and a half feet tall. If you honestly think that you're taller than average, then obviously your buds are HGH-deficient freaks who can use an ottoman for a dining room table.

Dude, you look like a barn owl.

Moving Sale wrote:

Toss in some references to my misuse of the shift-key in hitting the quote key

Big difference from using quotes incorrectly to using a Capital to emphasize something.

The only thing that got emphasized was your inability to use capitalization correctly, which made your attempt at punctuation smack even more pathetic.

Hypocrisy, thy name is Tinypants.

And by the way, as far as me allegedly getting to a joke late, I've been calling you short, tiny, etc. for as long as I can recall. And stuff like this from another poster this week:





Will always be fresh and funny.

Paralegal.

Moving Sale wrote:Some of the hardest working people I know....

"People I know"

Ooooh, are these folks also people in your family, like the convenient biology experts?

You know, I'll bet your colleagues, opposing attorneys, clients, and judges love when you whip out the "anecdotal beliefs from people I know" strategy. How does that work exactly?

Other lawyers: "Counselor, how do you plan to rebut the incriminating bullet hole evidence?"

Midget Sale: "Well, I know some people who are ballistics experts, and they say..."

Other lawyers: "Waitaminnut - you 'know some people?'"

Midget Sale: "Well....err....umm...actually, they're IN MY FAMILY! Yeah...that's the ticket!"

I'm sure that jaws and pencils must hit the floor with that devastating "evidence."

Moving Sale wrote:Care to explain how D coined the SotF that regulates the relative health of KODAK? No you wouldn't because you are a stupid simple tard who goes to the appearance smack in the 4th post you made to me.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: And, as Darwin pointed out when he helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," it is not necessarily the biggest, the swiftest, the strongest, that wins the day. Luck plays a HUGE role. Dinosaurs were the fittest for millions of years. An ecological catastrophe later, and the age of mammals hit. Kodak was the Colossus of photography, banking on film. It became a bloated beast that adapted poorly to the rapid advent of digital photography.

Midget sale wrote:Well you fucking tard? Care to tell us how Darwin was talking about KODAK when he used Spencer’s term “SotF” in the fifth edition of ‘Origin?’ Huh? I didn’t think so.

I merely made what is known as an "analogy," depicting Kodak as an organism.

Kodak, as a large organism that was once dominant due to being well-adapted, ceased to be as well-adapted when the (now, pay attention, Tinypants...) "business environment" changed. And hey, that's kind of what happened to the dinosaurs. Failure to adapt to environmental changes can lead to death of the organism. It's not a perfect analogy, since businesses aren't actually living organisms, but only an anal-retentive midget hell-bent on trying to save face on an internet board would be psychotic enough to nip at me in three threads to continue beating this dead horse.

Midget sale wrote:Same reason you are an elementary school teacher... you are either too stupid or too lazy to do any better.

Do I get extra points for predicting you'd go to the "elementary teacher" bit again?

One would think that something very bad happened to you in 5th grade for you to continue harping on the idea that 5th grade teachers are bad. Did someone hurt you? Hurt you real bad? C'mon, little guy, you can talk about it...

And since you seem to be laboring under the misconception that somehow school teacher grades are assigned like rank (hence your referring to me as a 5th grade teacher instead of a 9th, 10th, and 12th grade teacher...), Let me disbuse you of that notion.

Elementary teachers in New York are certified to teach multiple areas - reading, writing, math, science, and history and multiple grades. Someone who is a 5th grade teacher must also be able to teach these areas in kindergarten, 1st grade, 2nd grade, 3rd grade, 4th grade AND 5th grade. Which grade you wind up teaching from year to year depends on where your administrator decides to stick you, so you have to be prepared for EVERY grade elementary level.

So, Tinypants, go ahead and reach for the "5th grade teacher" bit again and trumpet your stupidity again like the braying ass you are.

Moving Sale wrote:No go back to making 22K a year so you can buy your kid 4 comics a year.

OHMIGAHD, YOU TYPED "No go back..."!!!! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?!?! CAN'T YOU EVEN FIND THE LETTER "W"?!? AND YOU CALL YOURSELF A LAWYER?!? YOU SHOULD BE DISBARRED, YOU TARD!!

[looking to the other board members..]

Uh, guys, did I do that right? Is that how TBO (The Barn Owl) sounds?

Maybe I should go ask some people I know...oh, wait, that's right, I have some experts in my family.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Is that why you felt it necessary to nip and yip at my heels in other threads like some needy grey-headed stepchild?

Nope, just thought it funny that you ran from a thread you say you were winning.

Moving Sale wrote: You've been pegged at five and a half feet tall.

Dude you are creeping me out. You mention my appearance in almost every post. Sometimes 5 and 6 times a post. You tell me your height. Now you are incorrectly speculating at mine? Sounds like you have seriously low self-of-steam. Why can’t you stick to the topic? Do you really think Kobe is better than you because he is taller? Do you really put that much weight in someone’s height? Do you mock your elementary kids who are average height? You frat boys are one big bundle of insecurities aren’t you? (And if you think you FBs don’t rape at a higher rate than the general Male population at colleges and universities around the county then you are nuts. I’m not saying you do as I have only see you say that farts {not a typo} were not ‘rape factories’, but if you do you are nuts.)

Dude, you look like a barn owl.

What is that number 5 for the post? Real original.

The only thing that got emphasized was your inability to use capitalization correctly, which made your attempt at punctuation smack even more pathetic.

You used quotes wrong. You then misquoted SotF by typing ‘SotF” it was ironic that you ALMOST fucked up enough get it right. You then used quotes wrong AGAIN when you typed “Bush cabal.” I wasn’t going “punctuation smack” on you. We all make mistakes. They are only funny when it is ironic like you did or “self-of-steam” or “iodiot.”

And by the way, as far as me allegedly getting to a joke late, I've been calling you short, tiny, etc. for as long as I can recall.

And still for less time than others. So you hop in late and you work it for years. So you are slow and unimaginative. Props to you on that I guess.

You know, I'll bet your colleagues, opposing attorneys, clients, and judges love when you whip out the "anecdotal beliefs from people I know" strategy.

You know you REALLY are a tard. You said you know elementary school teachers who were hard working when I pointed out that you teach 10 year olds. I then MOCKED you when you went Paralegal smack on me and you have the nerve to whip this shit out? Dude you are a mess. I was mocking YOU. Fuck you are dense.

Now we finally get off of Mike the PyroDice’s wild ride of obfuscation and get down to brass tacks. Thanks Mike you fucking tard.

I merely made what is known as an "analogy," depicting Kodak as an organism.

Nice backpedal you fucking hack. You don’t need an analogy for that you fucking tard you have SPENCER. That was my whole fucking point you dense son of a bitch.

Kodak, as a large organism that was once dominant due to being well-adapted, ceased to be as well-adapted when the (now, pay attention, Tinypants...) "business environment" changed. And hey, that's kind of what happened to the dinosaurs. Failure to adapt to environmental changes can lead to death of the organism. It's not a perfect analogy, since businesses aren't actually living organisms, but only an anal-retentive midget hell-bent on trying to save face on an internet board would be psychotic enough to nip at me in three threads to continue beating this dead horse.

You fucking shyster. That is not what Darwin said. That is Spencer. That is Social Darwinism. “It's not a perfect analogy…” umm no, no it’s not. In fact it sucks. If you studied Spencer (or more precisely his progeny) you would have a much better one at your fingertips.

Now what was that again about your almighty BODE?

Do I get extra points for predicting you'd go to the "elementary teacher" bit again?

Hey Sir Dense-a-Lot!
I am MOCKING you for going to the appearance smack early and often. I don’t care if you are a HS teacher or not. I think it is great if you are. I am MOCKING your inability to stay on topic. Gawd you are a dolt.

One would think that something very bad happened to you in 5th grade for you to continue harping on the idea that 5th grade teachers are bad. Did someone hurt you? Hurt you real bad? C'mon, little guy, you can talk about it...

How droll. You sure do talk about my height a lot. Did someone…..

Aw fuck it you are too stupid to get it when it is laid out right in front of you.

Let me disbuse you of that notion.

We all make mistakes.

Elementary teachers in New York… elementary level.

Hey dumbass. I don’t care. I was MOCKING you.

Tinypants

Tard.

OHMIGAHD, YOU TYPED … YOU TARD!!

You REALLY are a simple stupid fuck aren’t you?

[looking to the other board members..]

Of course you are. You are sheelpe. You are a Frat boy looking for recognition. You are a fucking joke.

Is that how TBO (The Barn Owl) sounds?

Ok now that is funny. Blind squirrel met nut.

So after all this BS. After me trying to be nice to you and point out that KODAK went with Spencer and that extinction of most of the dinosaurs went with Darwin. After countless instances of you being a DICK when I was trying to be nice. After you breaking out appearance smack and being blind in the face of my returns to show you how stupid and silly you sound when you try that crap. Finally after you bouncing and dodging with all of your non sequiturs we finally get down to it. You used a bad analogy. Well DUH! You are a fucking tard of the highest order.

And now, a musical interlude, to the tune of "Lucky Man."




He ate kids' portions
And kids clothing he wore
Drove in a Tonka
Entered by the cat door

Ooooh, what a tiny man he was
Ooooh, what a tiny man he was

Posted some dumb crap
'Bout shift keys and Darwin,
Spencer and teaching
LabRat kicked his head in

Ooooh, what a tiny man he was
Ooooh, what a tiny man he was

Made up some height lies
Made up some bio buddies
Made up a Con Law grad class
Made up legal studies

Ooooh, what a tiny man he was
Ooooh, what a tiny man he was

The posters had found him
Exposed his "tall tale" lies
No spinning could save him
His stories no one buys

Ooooh, what a tiny man he was
Ooooh, what a tiny man he was

Moving Sale wrote:

Moving Sale wrote: You've been pegged at five and a half feet tall.

Dude you are creeping me out. You mention my appearance in almost every post. Sometimes 5 and 6 times a post. You tell me your height.

I did several posts ago. And again in the other thread in which posters have been listing them.

Nice attention span.

Moving Sale wrote:Now you are incorrectly speculating at mine?

"Incorrectly speculating?"

Gee, Tinypants, since there's not a single person, including those that have seen you, that will testify to you being anything other than shorter than normal (hence the numerous pic wytch posts in your tiny honor), what else do I have to go on? YOUR incredibly suspect word? Sorry, Shorty, but the scuttlebutt is that you sleep in a shoebox and decorate your dwelling with the best that Fisher-Price has to offer.

Moving Sale wrote:Do you really put that much weight in someone’s height?

Society sure as hell does, since it's been shown that tall people make more money and tall men are more attractive to women.

Apparently, you short folks do tend to live longer than us tall folk, so comfort yourself with that nugget, Simon Bar Sinister.

The Barn Owl wrote:(And if you think you FBs don’t rape at a higher rate than the general Male population at colleges and universities around the county then you are nuts. I’m not saying you do as I have only see you say that farts {not a typo} were not ‘rape factories’, but if you do you are nuts.)

Where the hell did THAT come from? Did a couple of neurons in your cranium hiccup? And you've got the nerve to accuse ME of not staying on topic?

Poor attempt at the simultaneous red herring AND strawman "twofer."

Moving Sale wrote: I wasn’t going “punctuation smack” on you.

And the lies just keep coming. How in the hell does your fixation with the shift key not qulify as "punctuation smack?" Please, elucidate for myself and the other posters how you harping on my occasionally sloppy use of '/" is separate and distinct from, say, doing so with regard to the sloppy use of ellipses, commas, etc.

And while you're at it, please explain why my occasionally sloppy use of '/" warrants an aneurysm on your part, while your inability to use those same characters correctly in discussing heights is just dandy. Toss in an explanation of your delightfully inconsistant use of capitalization also and try to rationalize that in light of your obsession with the shift key.

If you're going to make the issue such a big dal, you might want to check your own posts before you hit "submit," just so you'd stop looking like such a moron.

MtLR wrote: You know, I'll bet your colleagues, opposing attorneys, clients, and judges love when you whip out the "anecdotal beliefs from people I know" strategy.

Tiny Dancer wrote:You know you REALLY are a tard. You said you know elementary school teachers who were hard working when I pointed out that you teach 10 year olds. I then MOCKED you when you went Paralegal smack on me and you have the nerve to whip this shit out? Dude you are a mess. I was mocking YOU. Fuck you are dense.

Actually, Tattoo, you seem to be the dense one. I was referring to your laughable fibbing during the whole "well, the biologists that I know think that..." attempt at a rebuttal. When I doubted that you actually hobnobbed with biologists who discussed the topic of Darwin & Spencer, these phantom biology buddies magically and conveniently morphed into close family members. Not that it changed the purely anecdotal nature of your attempted rebuttal one bit.

The difference between my discussing 5th grade teachers and your sad little fiction is that it is established that I do know elementary teachers, what with me also being a teacher in same the K-12 building. My knowledge of the workload of that group is actually believable, what with me being a teacher and all. Your imaginary bio experts, OTOH...not so much.

MtLR wrote:I merely made what is known as an "analogy," depicting Kodak as an organism.

Nice backpedal you fucking hack. You don’t need an analogy for that you fucking tard you have SPENCER. That was my whole fucking point you dense son of a bitch.

I'm a biologist. I have Darwin, whose main work I have read and with whom I am familiar. I used an analogy appropriate to my background, training, and experience. Citing Spencer, with whom I have no experience and whose writings I have never read, would have been goofy.

My Kodak analogy, referring to that corporation as a living organism makes sense in the context of my background, your little three-week hissyfit notwithstanding.

MtLR wrote:Elementary teachers in New York… elementary level.

Spinderella wrote:Hey dumbass. I don’t care. I was MOCKING you.

Sorry, but that dog won't hunt. You were somehow trying to insult me by insinuating that I actually teach [gasp] 5th grade. You did it in another thread (the comic book one). Popping that "insult" into the other thread was in no way, shape, or form an attempt on your part to refer to an alleged inability on my part to stay on topic. Nope. It was an incredibly stupid attempt to insult me by claiming that I teach a lower grade level than I actually do. Epic smack, by the way. Just epic.

Moving Sale wrote:You are sheelpe. You are a Frat boy looking for recognition. You are a fucking joke.

I'm a "sheelpe?" Great. I'm guessing that "Self-Appointed Keyboard Accuracy Monitor 2007" may lose his sash and staff if this sloppiness keeps up.

Go ahead and refer to my being in a fraternity all you want. While you're at it, toss in my successful career, happy marriage and great kids. That'll certainly put me in my place.

You tried to take a swipe at me by claiming that I'm seeking board recognition, but tell me hobbit, which of us is the one who has been dragging this tired thing out for over three weeks, nipping and yipping the other poster, carrying it over to two other threads, and has been reduced to hypocritical shift-key smack in an attempt to score ANY points?

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:You tried to take a swipe at me by claiming that I'm seeking board recognition,

I just thought you have 'last word' and 'i am always right' issues, personally.

but tell me hobbit, which of us is the one who has been dragging this tired thing out for over three weeks, nipping and yipping the other poster, carrying it over to two other threads, and has been reduced to hypocritical shift-key smack in an attempt to score ANY points?

If you become obsessive compulsive about responding to each smack as if it were a slander against your mother, country and faith deserving of a nuclear strike instead of a return snark, if anything -- then that would be you.

Look, bitch...your seemingly obsessive desire to kibbitz in every stinking thread with your useless and unsupported mental meanderings make you the least likely person to go to the "must have the last say" accusation.

Midget Sale is the one who has stalked me for over three weeks, through three threads, two of which have nothing to do with the original thread. And you have the gall to say that I'm the one with issues? And you and Tinypants keep trying to have it both ways - if I let a thread go, I get accused of "running away" or "ignoring" the poster, but if I do respond, I'm now obsessed?

You're an idiot.

And a tedious slunt.

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I did several posts ago.

Mmmmm yea I know I just said that. You can read right? I said you brought up my height then you mentioned it often then you told me yours then you speculated at mine. I said it was creepy. You can read right? Maybe you should retake 5th grade reading comprehension you fucking hack.

Tinypants

Tard.

since there's not a single person, including those that have seen you, that will testify to you being anything other than shorter than normal (hence the numerous pic wytch posts in your tiny honor), what else do I have to go on?

Oh I see you heard it on the internets so it must be true? Maybe you could look at one of the numerous photos that shows me with other people.

YOUR incredibly suspect word?

But your word is good as gold? How dumb are you?

Fisher-Price

Let me get this straight YOU can’t read a simple declarative sentence in context and then you drop FP smack? Dude you are not even smarter than a 5th Grader so you might want to tone down the elementary school rhetoric.

Society sure as hell does, since it's been shown that tall people make more money

A) Stats say you are 5 10 just like me.
B) I’m an Attorney. I make more before April Fool’s day than you make all year ya fool.

and tall men are more attractive to women.

So now, after never having laid eyes on my GF, you are going to the ‘My chick is hotter than your chick card?’ You are a pathetic fuck

Apparently, you short folks do tend to live longer than us tall folk, so comfort yourself with that…

So I have more $, a hot GF and I am going to live longer than you and you are STILL dodging the Darwin/Spencer thing for this obfuscation? You are an iodiot.

Where the hell did THAT come from?

A post you made a day or two ago?

Q: Where did appearance smack from you come from?
A: Years ago.

Q: Where did the 9-11 shit you dropped earlier come from?
A: Months ago.

Q: Where did your “Bush cabal” {note I never said that so you should not use quotes} shot come from?
A: Months ago.

And you've got the nerve to accuse ME of not staying on topic?

Yes I do?

strawman

So you admit you farts rape at a higher rate than the general male population in C&U. Interesting.

How in the hell does your fixation with the shift key not qulify as "punctuation smack?" Please, elucidate for myself and the other posters how you harping on my occasionally sloppy use of '/" is separate and distinct from, say, doing so with regard to the sloppy use of ellipses, commas, etc.

Gawd you are a panty-twisted tard. You use “s wrong all the time after dropping Master’s in Education smack. I leave ‘em out once in a while when they mean little or nothing. If you don’t get that 5 5 in a sentence about height means 5’ 5” you are a pissy little tard. And then you dropped ‘SotF” which you almost fucked up enough to get right. It was funny.

Toss in an explanation of your delightfully inconsistent (SIC) use of capitalization also and try to rationalize that in light of your obsession with the shift key.

I wanted a word emphasized so I capped it. Big deal. I will use italics next time ok you pissy fucking tard.

If you're going to make the issue such a big dal, you might want to check your own posts before you hit "submit," just so you'd stop looking like such a moron.

It is not a big “dal” to me. I only brought it up cause it was ironic, like “self-of-steam”….
Wait I JUST told you this. Can you read?

I was referring to your laughable fibbing during the whole "well, the biologists that I know think that..." attempt at a rebuttal. When I doubted that you actually hobnobbed with biologists who discussed the topic of Darwin & Spencer, these phantom biology buddies magically and conveniently morphed into close family members. Not that it changed the purely anecdotal nature of your attempted rebuttal one bit.

Fibbing? So you think I am the highest achieving one in my family? You don’t believe that there are PhDs and Masters holders? And I care why?

The difference between my discussing 5th grade teachers and your sad little fiction is that it is established that I do know elementary teachers, what with me also being a teacher in same the K-12 building. My knowledge of the workload of that group is actually believable, what with me being a teacher and all. Your imaginary bio experts, OTOH...not so much.

Established how? ‘Cause you said so? You have a Master’s… and we know that how? You are a fucking tard.

AGAIN! After much obfuscation we get Mike the PyroDice back on track…

I'm a biologist. I have Darwin, whose main work I have read and with whom I am familiar. I used an analogy appropriate to my background, training, and experience. Citing Spencer, with whom I have no experience and whose writings I have never read, would have been goofy.

Yea dumb fuck. You did cite Spencer. You said “SotF” (using quotes) in a post about KODAK. Then when I told you that you were full of shit (I’ve read D AND S) in a nice way you were a dick. So all of this shit about ‘BODE’ for you was all a bunch a crap and you NOW admit you know NOTHING about Spencer and yet you are trying to tell me I am full of shit when you KNOW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AND YOU ADMIT IT?

My Kodak analogy, referring to that corporation as a living organism makes sense in the context of my background, your little three-week hissyfit notwithstanding.

Hey fucksatin, it wasn’t a “hissyfit.” I was nice to you about for a few posts at least. YOU made it personal with your dickish demeanor.

It was an incredibly stupid attempt to insult me by claiming that I teach a lower grade level than I actually do.

Look you dumb fuck. It was an attempt to show you how stupid it was for you to “attempt to insult me by claiming that I” am shorter than I am, but in your world that is cool but me retorting using the same method is dumb and outlandish. You are a fucking tool.

I'm a "sheelpe?" Great. I'm guessing that "Self-Appointed Keyboard Accuracy Monitor 2007" may lose his sash and staff if this sloppiness keeps up.

Non sequitur says what? How is you being a follower and me running Keyboard smack even CLOSE to being the same thing. Is this another one of your ‘bad analogies?’

Go ahead and refer to my being in a fraternity all you want.

Ok you are sheeple as evidenced by your need for acceptance, which is evidenced by your joining of a frat. What horrid things did you let them do to you so they would be your friends. Wait don’t answer that? You can answer my query about you belief in the % of frats who rape. That would be fun and interesting.

While you're at it, toss in my successful career, happy marriage and great kids. That'll certainly put me in my place.

How do we know you are happy and have great kids? Because you say so? Ha!
If you use your idea of successful (That is: happy with a job in NY as a 5th grade teacher) then your wife is a fat, has been, drunken, sorority hag and the kids both have HDD, lazy eyes and a hump. Nice going tard.

You tried to take a swipe at me by claiming that I'm seeking board recognition…

Board recognition? Who said that? Can you read? Can you remember what happened yesterday? You are a mess.

which of us is the one who has been dragging this tired thing out for over three weeks…

You had a chance to just admit you know nothing about Spencer. Now that you have admitted you are full of shit when it comes to your knowledge of the CONCEPT of “SotF” I might let it go.

has been reduced to hypocritical shift-key smack in an attempt to score ANY points?

You know NOTHING about Spencer and yet you drone on and on about how smart you are then finally admit (after having also shown that you can’t even read) you are full of shit and the ONLY points I scored were on my shift-key smack? You are a fucking tard.

~~~~~~

And you and Tinypants keep trying to have it both ways - if I let a thread go, I get accused of "running away" or "ignoring" the poster, but if I do respond, I'm now obsessed?

I never said you were obsessed with anything but my height so this sentence (as directed at me) is a fallacy. Nice going tard.

MtLR wrote:since there's not a single person, including those that have seen you, that will testify to you being anything other than shorter than normal (hence the numerous pic wytch posts in your tiny honor), what else do I have to go on?

Moving Sale wrote:Oh I see you heard it on the internets so it must be true? Maybe you could look at one of the numerous photos that shows me with other people.

I "heard it on the internets" from people that have met you. many of these same folk, by the way, feed the whole "Moving Sale can fit in a Happy Meal box" schtick.

I've yet to read a post (other than from YOU, of course) that asserts that you are anything but sub-average.

The only photos of you that ever get posted here are ones that emphasize your...shortcomings.

Moving Sale wrote:A) Stats say you are 5 10 just like me.

You are not 510 years old. You may be as short as Yoda, but not as old as him. Oh, I'm sorry, did you have some difficulty reaching the quote "buttons" (as you so delightfully called them) without your stepstool? Did you mean to type 5' 10"?

In that case, I'd LOVE to read your explanation of how "stats say" that we are both 5' 10".

I'm 6'4". You are 5'6". That averages out to a little over 5'10" (I'm the one who bumped our average up...).

Moving Sale wrote:B) I’m an Attorney. I make more before April Fool’s day than you make all year ya fool.

And I'll bet you're a darned fine attorney, what with all the time and energy you spend on a workday right here at T1B, discussing issues pertinent to whatever legal papershuffling you're supposed to be doing...

Moving Sale wrote:

and tall men are more attractive to women.

So now, after never having laid eyes on my GF, you are going to the ‘My chick is hotter than your chick card?’ You are a pathetic fuck

Gee, Tinypants, I think it's more pathetic that someone who is supposed to be able read well enough to grasp contracts and stuff can't understand that my statement was that women find tall men more attractive, not that tall men GET women that are more attractive.

What was that little dig you tried earlier about reading comprehension? Hypocrite.

By the way, I believe that you're "girlfriend" is not so much "Miss Right" as "Miss Right Hand."

Moving Sale wrote:You use “s wrong all the time after dropping Master’s in Education smack. I leave ‘em out once in a while when they mean little or nothing. If you don’t get that 5 5 in a sentence about height means 5’ 5” you are a pissy little tard. And then you dropped ‘SotF” which you almost fucked up enough to get right. It was funny.

Umm...sure it was.

Now, let's get this straight...when I occasionally mistype '/", it's a cause for screeching and flailing on your part, which includes casting idiotic aspersions on my professional abilities...but when YOU do the same thing, repeatedly, it "mean little or nothing."

Ah. Gotcha.

You're a hypocrite.

Now I get it.

MtLR wrote:Toss in an explanation of your delightfully inconsistent (SIC) use of capitalization also and try to rationalize that in light of your obsession with the shift key.

Moving Sale wrote:I wanted a word emphasized so I capped it. Big deal. I will use italics next time ok you pissy fucking tard.

Your choice of words to emphasize bore no connection to logic. Or style. Or IQ over 58.

Moving Sale wrote:So you think I am the highest achieving one in my family? You don’t believe that there are PhDs and Masters holders? And I care why?

You care enough to respond.

And do I think that you're the highest achieving one in your family? For their sake, I hope not. I genuinely hope that the other chimps in your clan have gotten past boasting of their professional prowess as a lawyer while frittering away God knows how much time "at work" in pointless arguments on a chatboard.

Way to go, champ!

MtLR wrote:Go ahead and refer to my being in a fraternity all you want.

Tinypants wrote:Ok you are sheeple as evidenced by your need for acceptance, which is evidenced by your joining of a frat. What horrid things did you let them do to you so they would be your friends.

Went to a lot of parties, did community service stuff, studied the history of the fraternity, took an Exoteric Exam, paid $135 dollars. It was horrific.

Tinypants wrote:You can answer my query about you belief in the % of frats who rape. That would be fun and interesting.

Would it?

The majority of men in fraternities do not rape. Fraternity houses are not "rape house central."

Ta-daa.

MtLR wrote:And you and Tinypants keep trying to have it both ways - if I let a thread go, I get accused of "running away" or "ignoring" the poster, but if I do respond, I'm now obsessed?

Teenypants wrote:I never said you were obsessed with anything but my height so this sentence (as directed at me) is a fallacy. Nice going tard.

Uh...Tinypants, my reply was to Risa, who DID accuse me of being obsessed.

Once again, way to go.

By the way, the BOTTOM LINE is that I stated that Darwin helped to coin the concept of "survival of the fittest."

- in other words, he was ONE of those who helped to devise or invent the concept; I never said that he alone was its originator. Your sad little attempt to deliberately misrepresent what I said has failed from Day 1.
- my statement does not equate to Darwin and Spencer being the same person, despite your repeated attempts to deliberately distort my argument to the contrary

- You have never, at any point been able to refute the following quotes I used from Darwin and Spencer to support my statement:

Spencer:"This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life."

Darwin:""I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term natural selection, in order to mark its relation to man's power of selection. But the expression often used by Mr. Herbert Spencer, of the Survival of the Fittest, is more accurate, and is sometimes equally convenient."

Both Darwin and Spencer agree that Darwin helped to devise the concept that Spencer renames 'survival of the fittest."

No amount of hissyfits on your side, no amount of completely anecdotal and vague support from conveniently-contrived bio "experts" in your family, no amount of keycap smack, no amount of "5th grade teacher" smack, no amount of support from Risa, will change the fact that both Darwin and Spencer support my statement.

And here's another nail in your argument's coffin, from a book that came out THIS YEAR on the subject of evolution and the confusion surrounding it:

"What Did Darwin Mean By 'Survival Of The Fittest?"

We know how popular culture portrays survival of the fittest, but what did Darwin himself have to say about it? In 1872 he wrote: '[The] preservation of favourable individual differences and variations, and the destruction of those which are injurious, I have called Natural Selection, or Survival of the Fittest'

[note: the full text including the above quote can be found here.]

So, according to Darwin himself, 'survival of the fittest" and 'natural selection' are basically the same thing - both phrases tell us that in any population, those individuals with characteristics well suited to an environment tend to be preserved, while those less suited tend to die off. What's most important is that Darwin doesn't specify anything here about the characteristics we often casually associate with the idea that only the strong survive, such as brute force. In fact, Darwin doesn't mention any specific characteristics (like bulging muscles, sharp teeth, or a keen sense for smelling blood) equating to fitness."

from page 15 of "The Top 10 Myths About Evolution", by Cameron M. Smith and Charles Sullivan, Prometheus Books, published 2007.

The italicized portion is in the original, the bolded section I did myself for emphasis.

You've tried over and over, for almost a month, in vain, to prove your point, with increasing desperation and venom. To no avail.

Geez, little man, what the hell are you gonna do when I'm gone for a week and a half on vacation?

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I "heard it on the internets" from people that have met you.

And so you believe it? Tard.

The only photos of you that ever get posted here are ones that emphasize your...shortcomings.

And that is all the ‘evidence’ YOU need.

Tard.

In that case, I'd LOVE to read your explanation of how "stats say" that we are both 5' 10".

Gawd you are dumb. You tried to go all ‘stats say short people’ on me and you don’t get how stats say you are 5’10”?

I'm 6'4".

You don’t get it do you? I don’t care. YOU are the one with the obsession.

You are 5'6

Because you heard it on the internets?

Tard.

And I'll bet you're a darned fine attorney, what with all the time and energy you spend on a workday right here at T1B, discussing issues pertinent to whatever legal papershuffling you're supposed to be doing...

How do you know I was supposed to be at work? You make it up or did you hear it on the internets?

Gee, Tinypants, I think it's more pathetic that someone who is supposed to be able read well enough to grasp contracts and stuff can't understand that my statement was that women find tall men more attractive, not that tall men GET women that are more attractive.

Hey tard, I can read. The IMPLICATION was that if women find you attractive they fuck you. I am sorry you are too stupid to understand that I am not so dumb as to miss the implication of your stat.

What was that little dig you tried earlier about reading comprehension?

I read it right. I then took it to its logical conclusion. Sorry if you are too stupid to get that and needed help with something a 5th grader could understand.

I believe that you're "girlfriend" is not so much "Miss Right" as "Miss Right Hand."

Did you hear that on the internets too or are you just making it up as you flail along?

Now, let's get this straight...when I occasionally mistype '/", it's a cause for screeching and flailing on your part, which includes casting idiotic aspersions on my professional abilities...but when YOU do the same thing, repeatedly, it "mean little or nothing."

You had to do EXTRA work to type a “ and not a ‘. I was doing less work because you are barely worth the effort to respond to. Sorry I will not assume you can follow along in the future and will type Darwin and not D when I mean Darwin. Happy you fucking shitstain?

Your choice of words to emphasize bore no connection to logic.

Says you. I ment to emphasize it. Get over it tard.

… the other chimps in your clan

Your kids are ugly.

have gotten past boasting of their professional prowess

YOU went to the education card first you stupid silly fuck. I just have more education than you and so you are pissed off. BFD.

as a lawyer while frittering away God knows how much time "at work" in pointless arguments on a chatboard.

Hey dumbfuck you say ‘at work’ not “at work” when you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about and you don’t. Who said I was “at work?”

Way to go, champ!

Went to a lot of parties, did community service stuff, studied the history of the fraternity, took an Exoteric Exam, paid $135 dollars. It was horrific.

You are either lying or were a member of the easiest frat ever to rush.

The majority of men in fraternities do not rape.

Hey dumbfuck! Learn to read. I didn’t ask how many don’t rape I asked how many rape as a % compared to the male University and College population generally.

my reply was to Risa, who DID accuse me of being obsessed.

But your post included me. Learn to read YOUR OWN damn posts.

Mike the PyroDice wrote:] And you and Tinypants keep trying to have it both ways..

You were saying?

By the way, the BOTTOM LINE is that I stated that Darwin helped to coin the concept of "survival of the fittest."

As it relates to KODAK which is wrong and you admitted it was wrong.

-

in other words, he was ONE of those who helped to devise or invent the concept; I never said that he alone was its originator.

Only as it relates to biology and you were not talking about Biology.

Tard.

You have never, at any point been able to refute the following quotes I used from Darwin and Spencer to support my statement:

I don’t have to. Those quotes relate to biology. You were not talking about biology so you should have used Spencer’s later works on Survival of the Fittest, but since you have never read Spencer you wouldn’t know that… So I told you that you were wrong, nicely, and you were a dick for 6 pages and here we are.

Both Darwin and Spencer agree that Darwin helped to devise the concept that Spencer renames 'survival of the fittest."

As it relates to biology. Spencer when went on to talk more about it in later books and those works lay the foundation for the survival of the fittest the we know today and that survival of the fittest relates to companies like KODAK. You were wrong and now you are being a DICK about it.

No amount of hissyfits on your side, no amount of completely anecdotal and vague support from conveniently-contrived bio "experts" in your family, no amount of keycap smack, no amount of "5th grade teacher" smack, no amount of support from Risa, will change the fact that both Darwin and Spencer support my statement.

And no amount of appearance smack will change the fact that those quotes were talking about biology and you were talking about KODAK.

The italicized portion is in the original, the bolded section I did myself for emphasis.

Which shows you have no idea about survival of the fittest as it relates to KODAK.

You've tried over and over, for almost a month, in vain, to prove your point, with increasing desperation and venom. To no avail.

Yelling BODE again. How quaint.

Geez, little man, what the hell are you gonna do when I'm gone for a week and a half on vacation?

Oh I see. YOU can take vacation but I can’t. Let see... you make 22k a year I make 22k before spring. Who can afford a nice long vacation?

Mike the Lab Rat wrote: And, as Darwin pointed out when he helped coin the concept of "survival of the fittest," it is not necessarily the biggest, the swiftest, the strongest, that wins the day.

Cameron M. Smith and Charles Sullivan wrote:In fact, Darwin doesn't mention any specific characteristics (like bulging muscles, sharp teeth, or a keen sense for smelling blood) equating to fitness."

Well which is it? He talks about not needing to be "the biggest, the swiftest, the strongest" or he "doesn't mention any specific characteristics ... equating to fitness."

Tard.

Who do I pray to to Please Make it Stop?

Try Terminus, the Greek God of Abortion.