T1B

mvscal wrote: How about his plan to implement a windfall profits tax on oil companies? Have you given any serious to thought to how that is actually going to play out in the real world, Mr. Hoping for Fresh Change?

Hey, it worked back in the 1970's didn't it?

Dinsdale wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:No military experience

Is that actually worse than a military record of tragic failure?

No, it isn't, but Bushs failed military career had nothing to do with his family agenda. Civilians with no military experience whatsoever making decisions about the military is not exactly the best scenario.

and prior to his 10 years in politics he was a teacher and a lawyer.

As opposed to marrying for money and taking bribes to look the other way while the American People get hosed for hundreds of billions?


We're fucked.

Pretty much, any which way.

Mister Bushice wrote:
No, it isn't, but Bushs failed military career had nothing to do with his family agenda.

I wasn't refering to Bush.

I was refering to the not-quite-adequate fighter pilot guy who got shot down by primitives with slingshots.

Cuda wrote:

mvscal wrote:How about his plan to implement a windfall profits tax on oil companies? Have you given any serious to thought to how that is actually going to play out in the real world, Mr. Hoping for Fresh Change?

Hey, it worked back in the 1970's didn't it?

As I recall, gas prices stabilized for the better part of the following decade in which the tax was operative.

Dinsdale wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:
No, it isn't, but Bushs failed military career had nothing to do with his family agenda.

I wasn't refering to Bush.

I was refering to the not-quite-adequate fighter pilot guy who got shot down by primitives with slingshots.

You're an idiot.

It was his 23rd mission, and he was hit by a missile over Hanoi.

BTW, Mccain had civilian commanders during that war, trying to run shit in Vietnam from Washington. his comment on that?

"In all candor, we thought our civilian commanders were complete idiots who didn’t have the least notion of what it took to win the war."

Welcome to Obama Land.

Yeah, and McCain was attempting to blow up a light bulb factory, staffed by women.

This unprovoked act of aggression upon a soverign nation was a WAR CRIME. Why not? Because Henry Kissenger decided that our not invading and destroying Viet Nam was somehow a loss of face to the U.S.S.R.? Upon the perverse and demented logic of such utter phonies the full might of the United States is visited upon millions of innocent people?

Why is any different than the Nazis? Didn't they declare that the Soviets were threatening everything and such preemptive assaults were necessary?

As for babs pathetic list of objections to Obama, what a silly little bitch he really is.

Look, the point is that Obama is at least NOT a flat-out criminal. Okay? He's NOT in the pocket of AIPAC criminals, JINSA extremists, Ziocon lunatics, and Israeli dual-citizen administration members and officials. Get it?

Nope, those are just smear attempts by the desperate (and poleaxed) Rovians and Hillarites.

Obama has been cultivating a recognizable and respectable list of administration prospects. Obviously his tenure will not be marked by some tremendous reversal in American policy or practice. However, at least the utterly depraved assault upon our constitution will be btought to heel, the disasterous plans still in the pipeline will be somewhat thwarted, and indeed some measure of respectability will return to our nation's highest office.

As for McCain, this fucking war criminal, corporate whore, let's take a closer look at his "character":
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ehind.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Morte = LT Loser II won't stop will s/he?

Ponderous.

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Look, the point is that Obama is at least NOT a flat-out criminal. Okay? He's NOT in the pocket of AIPAC criminals, JINSA extremeists, Ziocon lunatics, and Israeli dual-citizen administration members and officials. Get it?

So who is he in the tank for? Black separatists? Marxists? Muslim shitstains? Tony Rezko?

Why must you assume he's in the tank for any of them? Is it not possible that he is what he says he is? That is, an agent for positive change?

Such a wealth of hysterical bullshit comes from the keyboard of L. TRNS it would take an eternity to pick apart that embarrassment of riches. Better still, in general, is the sight of white guys who support Barack O-h.rapbrown.
They must wallow in the most abject guilt inspired self-hatred imaginable. Which makes picking on them that much more fun.

The pussification of white men in Europe is understandable. Way too fucking many of the strongest and bravest died on battlefields of WWI & II. Obviously most of them didn't survive to procreate. But the U.S. and South Africa don't have that bled-dry excuse. Why the fuck are we letting muds just have their way in all kinds of ways? It's stupid. They don't do anything for us.

Kiss all the mud ass you want, lefty useless idiots. They won't appreciate it, they'll just take advantage. You think those fuckers think highly of Ted Kennedy? He's helped the Asshole agenda for decades but none of the beneficiaries will even remember his name. The moral moral of the story? There is none. YOU are not more morally in the right fucking your own over to benefit some shitty group of fucks who, now get this, wouldn't need a hand up if they were so fucking awesome in the first place.

Yeah, even the filthiest low down mud is better than the whole lot of idiot whites who see salvation in Obullshit.


This should be the slogan and symbol of a better policy with regard to muds foreign and domestic:

Yo, screwdriver, what...are you trying to put on?

Fuck your charactature of a White Pride Militia Aryan Closet Homo, it's played out. Despite your efforts, your tedious imitation is a joke. No one, I promise you, is in any way taking the bait on your sorry ass troll attempt. Okay? Bye bye.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Look, the point is that Obama is at least NOT a flat-out criminal. Okay? He's NOT in the pocket of AIPAC criminals, JINSA extremeists, Ziocon lunatics, and Israeli dual-citizen administration members and officials. Get it?

So who is he in the tank for? Black separatists? Marxists? Muslim shitstains? Tony Rezko?

Why must you assume he's in the tank for any of them? Is it not possible that he is what he says he is? That is, an agent for positive change?

Not possible.

He is talking about the necessity of another rebate ... err giving back what was stolen ... check before the Innauguration.


What a wonderful, populist.


Any truth to the notion he told his constituents flat out he wasn't going to run for president, that he was too inexperienced and all that ? That he thre his name in the ring as a lark to just get his name out there ?

BSmack wrote:

Cuda wrote:

mvscal wrote:How about his plan to implement a windfall profits tax on oil companies? Have you given any serious to thought to how that is actually going to play out in the real world, Mr. Hoping for Fresh Change?

Hey, it worked back in the 1970's didn't it?

As I recall, gas prices stabilized for the better part of the following decade in which the tax was operative.

You goddam laughable idiot, gasoline prices stabilized in the 1980's because Reagan got some de-regulation of the oil industry passed and (son of a bitch, what a coincidence) the oil companies were allowed to increase production to meet demand.

Cuda wrote:You goddam laughable idiot, gasoline prices stabilized in the 1980's because Reagan got some de-regulation of the oil industry passed and (son of a bitch, what a coincidence) the oil companies were allowed to increase production to meet demand.

Still slurping on Reagan's cock eh?

Still in denial eh, Monica?

BSmack wrote:Still slurping on Reagan's cock eh?

Why not? Best president since Ike.

RumpleForeskin wrote:

BSmack wrote:Still slurping on Reagan's cock eh?

Why not? Best president since Ike.

People who still do keg stands at the age of 26 should STFU when it comes to grown up subjects.

BSmack wrote:People who still do keg stands at the age of 26 should STFU when it comes to grown up subjects.

Pussy.

In Rumple's defense, they were probably quaffing Piss Minus. A keg stand or twenty would be the only sure fire way to feel a buzz.

RumpleForeskin wrote:

BSmack wrote: Reagan

Best president since Ike.

Your stupidity knows no limits.

I suppose you think Slick Willie is that guy.

RumpleForeskin wrote:

BSmack wrote:Still slurping on Reagan's cock eh?

Why not? Best president since Ike.

Blanket statements suck, especially discussing two-term Presidents.

Reagan had plenty of successes politically and militarily. But, though people love to fellate him for Reaganomics, a lot of economists feel that those policies led to the recession suffered during the administration of Bush 41.

And, as long as we’re talking about Reagan failures, how about his Star Wars defense system that cost $1 billion+ and never got past the research stage. Conceptually it may have been a feasible plan, but trying to deploy such a system in 1980-whatever was just stupid. Keep in mind, this was during the time when the Commodore 64 was the dominant computer on the market. Probably not the best time to design defense systems reliant on ultra-quick situational assessments and near instant reactions.

Then there was Iran Contra. In retrospect, selling arms to Iran…not such a good idea.

I’m actually a fan of Reagan the leader and feel he’s one of the best speakers and leaders we’ve had in some time, but let’s not look back on the past with glasses that are THAT rose colored. Ronnie had plenty of blunders to go along with his successes.

I could go on and on about Reagan's shortcomings, but pretty soon it would reach the length that I'd be remiss without dropping a U&L reference in there somewhere.

RumpleForeskin wrote:I suppose you think Slick Willie is that guy.

No I don't.

Pathetic. Try defending yourself instead of coming after me. You people make this too easy.

Aren't there economists that attibute the post cold war recession to the end of the Cold War.