Page 6 of 8

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:31 pm
by mvscal
Blitzkrieg wrote: "Sagging pants"?? WTF, yeah shoot that fucking person! Great take Einstein. I suppose the Sandy Hook kids had it coming, too.
I understand that you labor under some sort of profound congenital or perhaps chemically induced mental deficiency which prevents from you comprehending the little squiggly things dancing in front of your glazed eyes, so I'll try to help you out here.

Shoot that fucking person? Well, personhood is arguable, but, yes, it needed to be put down like any other rabid animal.

Image

The sagging pants only added to the comic relief of that ridiculous piece of shit bleeding out...in the middle of the fucking street.

Stop stealing, stop assaulting people, stop walking in the middle of the fucking street and/or shut your fucking bluegummed dicksucker when a cop tells you to get out of the middle of the fucking street.

Does that clear things up for you, you pissdripping dumbfuck?

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:16 pm
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote:
Shoot that fucking person? Well, personhood is arguable, but, yes, it needed to be put down like any other rabid animal.
I guess you would like black people if they like owned a few individuals eh missa Candie? That would show how human they are. Or maybe they could lynch a few people just because their skin was a different color eh missa Candie? Would that show how human they are? Put a few people in a hot box? Pass some poll taxes, maybe some sunset laws or maybe if they just beat a few people under color of authority, would that help? Or maybe they could act like you and advocate killing white jaywalkers and back talkers.

Go fuck a black cock you shit fill racist cock sofa.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:25 pm
by mvscal
Moving Sale wrote:I guess you would like black people if they like owned a few individuals eh missa Candie?
I like them just fine so long as they behave themselves like civilized human beings. I have black neighbors I get along with quite well. Granny is a wizard on the grill. They're real Africans and are regularly appalled by the violent and absurd behavior of American niqqers as any other thinking individual should be.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:30 pm
by Moving Sale
You mean like owning people? Or beating them for the color of their skin? Lynching them or advocating death for jaywalking and whatnot? Those are the kind of things they are into that make them good like you and not bad like mvscals?

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:44 pm
by mvscal
Nice strawman, you pathetic cunt.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:18 pm
by Moving Sale
You think black people are genetically more violent than white people (and swarthy people such as your self i would assume) and you used recent events to bolster your argument.
White people have been at least as violent as blacks in the recent past also.
Therefore my argument does not misstate your argument
Therefore it is not a SM.

Now go fuck a black cock you jaywalker-murdering bag of racist piss.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:36 pm
by mvscal
Moving Sale wrote:
Therefore my argument does not misstate your argument
Therefore it is not a SM.
You are a colossal moron or perhaps just habituated to lying.

Let's break it down.
You mean like owning people? Or beating them for the color of their skin? Lynching them or advocating death for jaywalking and whatnot?
Owning people? Who ever said anything about that? Certainly not me in this conversation or any other for that matter.

Beating them for the color of their skin? Or lynching them? Who said anything about that or that it was OK? Not me. Not anybody else either.

Advocating death for jaywalking? A blatant lie. I did not advocate death for jaywalking. I advocated getting the fuck out of the middle of the fucking street when told to get the fuck out of the middle of the fucking street.

Your argument is a textbook strawman fallacy. That isn't even an arguable point. You're simply full of shit.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:03 pm
by Killian
88 wrote:Image

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:43 pm
by Derron
poptart wrote:
He nailed an unarmed man six times -- dead.

I guess he has to deal with that.
Six times ? That is pretty damn good, and shows he was well trained. Probably a Glock .40 which is 13 rounds on the Gen 40 series. Putting at least 50% effective on target is good under that situation. Props to him.

Deal with it ? A lot of cops these days are combat veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. Probably pulled the trigger more than a couple times over there. Street thug needs to be dealt with the same way.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:46 pm
by Derron
Moving Sale wrote: Now go fuck a black cock you jaywalker-murdering bag of racist piss.
Go fuck a black cock you shit fill racist cock sofa.
Why not a white cock ?

Do you have something against white cocks ??

Are you racist ??

Why does it have to be a black cock ??

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:13 pm
by Left Seater
Derron wrote:
He nailed an unarmed man six times -- dead.

I guess he has to deal with that.

For sure he has to deal with it. Prolly will cost the city a decent amount of money for his treatment of dealing with it. Some will say the broken eye socket makes it easier, but I doubt it.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:26 pm
by mvscal
Image

vapid...black...dust...cock...fuck...ass...puddle...cum

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:44 pm
by Goober McTuber
Derron wrote:
Moving Sale wrote: Now go fuck a black cock you jaywalker-murdering bag of racist piss.
Go fuck a black cock you shit fill racist cock sofa.
Why not a white cock ?

Do you have something against white cocks ??

Are you racist ??

Why does it have to be a black cock ??
Just be thankful he's leaving all the white cock for you, Dohron.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:01 pm
by Dinsdale
Goober McTuber wrote: Just be thankful he's leaving all the white cock for you, Dohron.

Not sure about this one -- I think we need a ruling from the KC posters.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:20 pm
by Goober McTuber
You're reaching. I'll let Wags explain.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:24 pm
by PL
Many people consider my to be very rational and level headed.

having said that, I find MVSCAL to be 100% dead correct.

you can not be rational with uneducated, sub human ni66ers.
having them know that white cops will pull the trigger
is what they need to know.

what has led to them being disrespectful to cops
is the liberal peeps that feel you
can reason with these yard apes.
every once in awhile, cops need to let them know they will shoot.

law and order should follow after that.

these liberal activists are only making thing more unsafe
as next time, the cop will have to just let criminals do their thing,
because God forbid a white cop tries to tell a Ni66er he's breaking the law.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:27 pm
by Goober McTuber
PL wrote:Many people consider my to be very rational and level headed.
Let me give that some thought.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:09 pm
by War Wagon
mvscal wrote:I like them just fine so long as they behave themselves like civilized human beings. I have black neighbors I get along with quite well. Granny is a wizard on the grill. They're real Africans and are regularly appalled by the violent and absurd behavior of American niqqers as any other thinking individual should be.
Exactly.

This is some of the funniest shit ever.



Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:25 pm
by Derron
Goober McTuber wrote:
Derron wrote:
Moving Sale wrote: Now go fuck a black cock you jaywalker-murdering bag of racist piss.
Go fuck a black cock you shit fill racist cock sofa.
Why not a white cock ?

Do you have something against white cocks ??

Are you racist ??

Why does it have to be a black cock ??
Just be thankful he's leaving all the white cock for you, Dohron.
You been laying out until somebody runs a white cock reference and then you are all over that shit. Epic.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:32 am
by poptart
Theft, assault, and assault of a police officer are not death penalty crimes.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:57 am
by poptart
None of us know the facts of the case, yet.
We've just heard things.

I've heard Scmick's take many times, though.
The guy was a bad apple and he likely started serious shit in this case, so... pfft, fuck him.

:twisted: DEATH :twisted:


Schmick wouldn't like it much if that sort of disproportionate punishment was leveled against him.

Speeding in a school zone??
Well...
15 years for Scmick -- because he's a shit head with no value for young, precious life.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:46 pm
by Mikey
schmick wrote:You steal, you assault someone and then you assault a police officer and then you get shot. I dont see a problem here. Had Brown not stole, not assaulted the store clerk and not assaulted the police officer, he is still alive. Brown made the choice and justice was done
And yet stealing from the American people and fomenting an armed uprising against the legitimately elected government deserves no consequences at all.

Ponderous.


Image

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 5:32 am
by Atomic Punk
Great, another black/white thread with the midget paralegal flailing at all costs.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:35 am
by poptart
You've told a fun little story there, but it will be weeks before we know how much of it is accurate.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:54 pm
by Goober McTuber
Derron wrote:You been laying out until somebody runs a white cock reference and then you are all over that shit. Epic.
Are you serious? There's been a White Cock troll here for years. Right, 88?

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:15 pm
by mvscal
poptart wrote:Theft, assault, and assault of a police officer are not death penalty crimes.
Who said they were? Getting killed is an occupational hazard of violent criminals. Contrary to your brain dead assertion, we do know several pertinent facts.

Brown was:

A. Stupid

B. Violent

The equation is very simple. Stupidity + Violence = Dead Niqqer.

Class dismissed.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:55 pm
by White Cock
Goober McTuber wrote:
Derron wrote:You been laying out until somebody runs a white cock reference and then you are all over that shit. Epic.
Are you serious? There's been a White Cock troll here for years. Right, 88?
Be careful with that, or we'll post a pic of you Without the loin cloth.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:57 pm
by poptart
Schmick wrote:its all on Brown, you have to be a fucking idiot or a race baiter trying to incite a riot to argue that it isnt.
It's not very common for an unarmed man to be blown away with six shots, including two to the head.

So I prefer to wait for as many of the facts as possible to come out before making a strong judgment about the event.

Do I suspect that Brown was a lowlife shit-for-brain?
Yep, I do.

Do I suspect that the officer did something wrong in this encounter?
Yep, I do.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:14 pm
by smackaholic
a coherent normal person wrote:
So I prefer to wait for as many of the facts as possible to come out before making a strong judgment about the event.
moments later.....
an incoherent mouth breathing slep wrote: Do I suspect that the officer did something wrong in this encounter?
Yep, I do.
One fukking moment you say you will reserve judgement till the facts are out. seconds later you jump on the idiot racist band wagon

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:37 am
by Arch Angel
War Wagon wrote:
poptart wrote:Could it be that W. Wagon just doesn't care much for bad actors of any race.


He is spot on.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:19 am
by poptart
smackaholic wrote:One fukking moment you say you will reserve judgement till the facts are out. seconds later you jump on the idiot racist band wagon
Link me up to where I said the cop is racist, smarty pants.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:06 pm
by poptart
Right you are, Sam.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:09 pm
by Left Seater
While this would absolutely appear to be a hate crime, how do you make the leap to blame this not being called a hate crime on Holder?

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:16 am
by smackaholic
poptart wrote:
smackaholic wrote:One fukking moment you say you will reserve judgement till the facts are out. seconds later you jump on the idiot racist band wagon
Link me up to where I said the cop is racist, smarty pants.
Just making comments backing the moron racist nog narrative that this cop did anything wrong puts it in the racist category as far as I am concerned.

As you originally said, all the facts are not out yet, but, there are a few which point to the cop simply exercising a little self preservation against a worthless POS gorilla bully.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:32 pm
by poptart
smackaholic wrote:Just making comments backing the moron racist nog narrative that this cop did anything wrong puts it in the racist category as far as I am concerned.

Police are human and they make mistakes.

Six shots into an unarmed man is unusual, yes?

An officer takes unusual action, so why do you automatically eliminate the idea that he could have made a mistake in this encounter?

Can you understand that by not even entertaining that possibility, one might wonder if it is YOU who are racist?

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:43 pm
by mvscal
poptart wrote:Six shots into an unarmed man is unusual, yes?
No. You fire as many shots many shots as it takes to drop your assailant. If it takes one that's fine. If it takes 85, that's fine too. You can drop the "unarmed man" bullshit, too. It also has zero relevance in a physical assault.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:59 pm
by poptart
If an officer (with multiple tools of defense and deterrent at his disposal) finds himself at the point where he is physically assaulted, it's possible that he made a mistake to get to that point.


My own read on you is that you don't particularly care if the officer was in error during this encounter.

Your default setting for young black males is that they are -----> shit, and this cat was already coming off a robbery.
So the fact that he is dead is just fine with you, regardless whether the officer acted properly or not.

You don't care about the truth.

Your truth is, "This ape was shit, he's dead, so I'm lighting a cigar." :)

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:17 pm
by The Seer
Sudden Sam wrote:Might I suggest that basically everyone has jumped to conclusions...on both "sides". There shouldn't even be sides. We should wait 'til the evidence is piled squarely in front of us. 'We' being the protestors, the cop's supporters, us iodots in here, the media, the governor of Missouri, Eric Holder, Al Sharpton, etc.

This whole clusterf**k is ridiculous.
When riots begin, when the media congregates to one side of the argument, when pieces of shit like Sharpton et. al. start barking about evil law enforcement, when both sides are largely not being reported...it is not "jumping to conclusions" when you respond to the hysterical bullshit.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:22 pm
by mvscal
poptart wrote: this cat was already coming off a robbery.
Yes. A fact which clearly demonstrates his stupidity and violent behavior. It also supports the officer's contention that he was assaulted by that brainless meat sack and forced to defend himself.

The cop's "multiple tools of defense and deterrent" don't come into play when he gets jumped before he can exit the vehicle. He is the one at the tactical disadvantage at that juncture.

The point that you are attempting to make is so stupid I'm going to have to assume you're trolling.

Re: St. Louis nogs rioting

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:41 pm
by poptart
mvscal wrote:The point that you are attempting to make is so stupid I'm going to have to assume you're trolling.
Yeah, the point that facts need to known before accurate judgment can be made is really foolish, isn't it? lol


You don't know what happened.

A few points you've latched on to are probably accurate, but the rest is your own conjecture.