T1B

Goober McTuber wrote:

Disingenuous Seater wrote:And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions.

Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.

I am not saying all liberals but many do. Let me ask you this question Goins, if it is ok to abort a fetus days after conception but not days before birth, where do you draw the line? We have heard for decades that a woman should have the ability to control decisions about her body. What changes a few days before birth in that argument?

Left Behinder, educate yourself:

https://drjengunter.wordpress.com/2019/ ... snt-exist/

She's an OB/GYN doctor, so she actually knows what she's talking about (as opposed to those advocating a theocracy...like Fox Spews).

Great she gave definitions to try to make abortions seem less severe closer to the due date. And she is an abortion provider so no agenda there.

But go ahead and let us know the difference between a first trimester abortion and a third trimester abortion when it is the mother’s choice.

Queerland wrote: The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has.

So are you and Screwed in the Ass pushing each other out of the way to see who gets to lick AOC's snatch first ? ( Probably not since you both are dick sucking queers) Your stupidity keeps manifesting itself with your ideas that her stupid GND shit could actually work.

Left Seater wrote:

Kierland wrote: The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has.

This is nothing but a lie. She had the option to use the subway system which had a station less than 200 feet from her office. Amtrak sends trains around the country and has "high speed" service between NYC and DC. Get off this, she is working with what she has bullshit.

Kierland wrote:Fuck off and go use the socialist air traffic control system while you bitch about socialism.

Try to keep up little angry racist. I have long complained about the air traffic control system in this country. The hardware is crap, and we lag behind much of the world when it comes to keeping planes separated. We waste time and money due to the government monopoly over the system. Keep kicking your own ass.

So you think the ATC sucks and you want to do something about that piece of socialism, and you hate socialism, but you use it anyways. Why don’t you walk your clients to their destination you stupid blind fuck?

Rooster wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Disingenuous Seater wrote:And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions.

Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.

C’mon. It’s never about the life of the mother. Maybe the lifestyle burden of being a mother, but an actual life or death decision where the mother’s life hangs in the balance is statistically insignificant. At the very least let’s be honest about that.

Late. Term. Abortions. Idiot.

Left Seater wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Disingenuous Seater wrote:And yes Liberals do want last minute abortions.

Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.

I am not saying all liberals but many do. Let me ask you this question Goins, if it is ok to abort a fetus days after conception but not days before birth, where do you draw the line?

Viability.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Rooster wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: Bull. Shit. We've been through this repeatedly. The arguments I've seen for late term abortions have to do with viability and life of the mother.

C’mon. It’s never about the life of the mother. Maybe the lifestyle burden of being a mother, but an actual life or death decision where the mother’s life hangs in the balance is statistically insignificant. At the very least let’s be honest about that.

Late. Term. Abortions. Idiot.

What about them? Late term abortions and those who advocate for them are trying to obsfucate the issue by making it sound that this is something that needs to be made into law to protect those thousands and thousands of women whose life hangs in the balance in their ninth month of pregnancy— and that’s utter crap because there is no statistically significant number of women for whom that applies. The desire of the abortion crowd is simply the ability to kill a baby at will, even after birth, as evidenced by recent legislation and comments by pro-abortionists.

Sometimes the mask slips and we get to really see the murderous intent of those who advocate “safe, legal, and rare.” Oh, they want safe and legal, alright, but rare? Not hardly. Given the opportunity abortionists cheerfully would and have surpassed the body count of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and the Khmer Rouge. Only Communist China has a peer in the United States for killing her young.

But keep telling yourself that Goobs, if only to assuage your guilty conscience.

88 wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Viability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability



You got some 'splainin' to do.

What is it you want explained? The legal aspects? :grin:

Rooster wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Rooster wrote: C’mon. It’s never about the life of the mother. Maybe the lifestyle burden of being a mother, but an actual life or death decision where the mother’s life hangs in the balance is statistically insignificant. At the very least let’s be honest about that.

Late. Term. Abortions. Idiot.

What about them? Late term abortions and those who advocate for them are trying to obsfucate the issue by making it sound that this is something that needs to be made into law to protect those thousands and thousands of women whose life hangs in the balance in their ninth month of pregnancy— and that’s utter crap because there is no statistically significant number of women for whom that applies.

I think you're starting to catch on. Maybe not.

Well, that didn’t take long. AOC got dirty quick when she ran a train on her campaign contributions. Gotta give it to her though, she’s a natural Democrat politician, corrupt right out the gate.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio ... nt-alleges

Rooster wrote:Well, that didn’t take long. AOC got dirty quick when she ran a train on her campaign contributions. Gotta give it to her though, she’s a natural Democrat politician, corrupt right out the gate.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio ... nt-alleges

Hopefully she'll be forced out of office.

Rooster wrote:Well, that didn’t take long. AOC got dirty quick when she ran a train on her campaign contributions. Gotta give it to her though, she’s a natural Democrat politician, corrupt right out the gate.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio ... nt-alleges

"You're Fake News."

88 wrote:If you truly "draw the line" at "viability", and "viability" is around 28 weeks (+/- a week or three), then isn't any abortion performed (for whatever reason) after "viability" across the line you've drawn? If not, explain how you can draw a line and then ignore when it is crossed?

Beyond viability (which would include a late discovery that the fetus has no chance of survival outside of the womb), only in the case where the life of the mother is an issue. Anything else? BTW, for legal purposes, I would draw the viability line at 21 weeks, the last point at which the survival rate is 0%.

I intentionally ignored your southern border analogy.

Kierland wrote:

Left Seater wrote:

Kierland wrote: The GND is about society changing not one person. She is working with what she has.

This is nothing but a lie. She had the option to use the subway system which had a station less than 200 feet from her office. Amtrak sends trains around the country and has "high speed" service between NYC and DC. Get off this, she is working with what she has bullshit.

Kierland wrote:Fuck off and go use the socialist air traffic control system while you bitch about socialism.

Try to keep up little angry racist. I have long complained about the air traffic control system in this country. The hardware is crap, and we lag behind much of the world when it comes to keeping planes separated. We waste time and money due to the government monopoly over the system. Keep kicking your own ass.

So you think the ATC sucks and you want to do something about that piece of socialism, and you hate socialism, but you use it anyways. Why don’t you walk your clients to their destination you stupid blind fuck?

Hey angry racist midget, there isn’t another choice. The government has it on lock down. As for Occasional Cotex she did have other options available to her. Options she wants to force on everyone. Yet she chose not to use them. Just more hypocrisy from the liberal establishment.

So why don’t you walk your clients to their destination if you hate socialism so much?
And where did she say she wanted to get rid of cars you fat greedy bastard?

How’s this for kind hearted socialism.

I am 100% in favor of tax payer supported tubal ligation for anyone that wants it. I would even make it a requirement for a second abortion if said abortion was taxpayer supported.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

88 wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Viability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability



You got some 'splainin' to do.

That's a chart that only deals with viability in general. It has nothing to do with viability in specific medical cases.

Yep, the right sure is pro-life...

schmick wrote:The health of the mother is the cause of 0.065% of abortions.

Care to provide a link showing the CDC saying this?

schmick wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Yep, the right sure is pro-life...

She deserves to be shot if she's going to try to pass such stupid laws

Proving once again that you conservatives are anything but "pro-life."

As well as being imbeciles.

Kierland wrote:So why don’t you walk your clients to their destination if you hate socialism so much?
And where did she say she wanted to get rid of cars you fat greedy bastard?

Keep up abgry racist. She is claiming she wants public transportation accessible for all and high speed rail. That is right out of sect H ii and iii. She passed on both many times. Yet the subway station less than 200 feet from her office can’t be any more accessible.

Troll on troll.

She never said she wanted to get rid of cars. You don’t know if the destinations were near PT. She did use PT. You arguement is stupid from jump street as I explained before you fat greedy fuck.

schmick wrote:

Rooster wrote:Well, that didn’t take long. AOC got dirty quick when she ran a train on her campaign contributions. Gotta give it to her though, she’s a natural Democrat politician, corrupt right out the gate.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio ... nt-alleges

Either she or Chakrabati is going to be going to jail. Dinesh went to jail for less. They either paid themselves close to a million dollars or they illegally used the million dollars on campaign they weren't supposed to.


Lock Her Up

Fake news

It’s just a matter of time before one of them squeezes her clacker and goes Allah ackbhar KABOOM. Yay for diversity, right?

Rooster wrote:It’s just a matter of time before one of them squeezes her clacker and goes Allah ackbhar KABOOM. Yay for diversity, right?

Thank you for confirming criticism of Rep Omar isn't based on any perceived anti-Semitism but hatred of Muslims.

Left Seater wrote: Keep up abgry racist. She is claiming she wants public transportation accessible for all and high speed rail. That is right out of sect H ii and iii. She passed on both many times. Yet the subway station less than 200 feet from her office can’t be any more accessible.

Melt on

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote: Keep up abgry racist. She is claiming she wants public transportation accessible for all and high speed rail. That is right out of sect H ii and iii. She passed on both many times. Yet the subway station less than 200 feet from her office can’t be any more accessible.

Melt on

Look at Screwy trying to bring the funny. Complete swing and a miss, but hey he tried.


Sorry, but your poster girl is Team D’s version of Donald Trump. They do much of the same shit, but since hers come with a team D label you ignore what makes her Trumpian and call him out while ignoring her same issues.

But you do you, hypocrite.

The far right is always screaming about total bullshit. It’s their thing.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Rooster wrote:It’s just a matter of time before one of them squeezes her clacker and goes Allah ackbhar KABOOM. Yay for diversity, right?

Thank you for confirming criticism of Rep Omar isn't based on any perceived anti-Semitism but hatred of Muslims.

Only because they have a proven track record of self detonation, my friend. But the anti-Semitism is real, no question. If it weren’t she and Talib or whatever her name is wouldn’t be saying these things.

Sudden Sam wrote:Before everyone goes off the deep end about AOC's comments on Afghanistan (the far right is screaming that she said we shouldn't have responded to the 9/11 attacks), that's not what she said.

Challenged on not intervening, she said that didn't mean doing nothing.

“It means not invading an entire nation without end,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “Doesn’t mean ‘do nothing,’ it means perhaps we could have leaned more on the larger role of other agencies (intelligence, state dept, diplomatic teams, etc) before Congress decided to invade a nation without a concrete end plan.”

While the gist of what she is saying can be debated for the practicality of the desired outcomes of various options available to us back in 2001, I have to seriously question her ability to wrap her mind around the complexity that is and was the situation in Afghanistan. After all, she has a tremendous amount of difficulty understanding economics, her chosen field of study, much less a geo-political reality for which a PR from the Bronx has had no experience dealing with. But sloganeering is always a winner with those who blindly accept unrealistic outcomes such as diplomatic solutions to the Taliban providing aid, comfort, security, and training space for Obama Osama bin Laden.

Sudden Sam wrote:Before everyone goes off the deep end about AOC's comments on Afghanistan (the far right is screaming that she said we shouldn't have responded to the 9/11 attacks), that's not what she said.

Challenged on not intervening, she said that didn't mean doing nothing.

“It means not invading an entire nation without end,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “Doesn’t mean ‘do nothing,’ it means perhaps we could have leaned more on the larger role of other agencies (intelligence, state dept, diplomatic teams, etc) before Congress decided to invade a nation without a concrete end plan.”

The end of her sentence spells out why she, like many others, have no clue about what they are speaking about. There is not, nor can there be a “concrete end plan” for any armed conflict, even moreso for a protracted war like Iraq and Afghanistan. To believe that we can predict or war game when the shooting will stop, much less how to direct it to an ending that we can manage is sheer foolishness.

The only way to remotely approach that scenario is to wage war to an unconditional surrender— and even that in the entirety of human existence has never been accomplished to the point that it was in the can before a single shot was fired. And in all truth, using Desert Storm 1 as a template, even that unconditional surrender led to Desert Storm 2 because the utter destruction in detail of our enemy wasn’t done. I seriously doubt that we as a people and nation today have the will and spine to do to a country or alliance what was necessary to win back in World War 2. Barring some attack that knocks us out of the equivocation and relativism that has beset our national outlook, we cannot engage in such an endeavor today.

Sudden Sam wrote:

Kierland wrote:The far right is always screaming about total bullshit. It’s their thing.

Are you suggesting the far left is any less insane?

Yes. Just look at this board. The left has one loon (m2) and you have a shit ton (duhron shedick joeydumdum rooster melty...)

Rooster wrote:Aftwr all, she has a tremendous amount of difficulty understanding economics, her chosen field of study, much less a geo-political reality for which a PR from the Bronx has had no experience dealing with. But sloganeering is always a winner with those who blindly accept unrealistic outcomes such as diplomatic solutions to the Taliban providing aid, comfort, security, and training space for Obama Osama bin Laden.

She knows more about eco than you and that orange suit who’s cock you suck daily, put together times 43.7.

schmick wrote:

Rooster wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:Before everyone goes off the deep end about AOC's comments on Afghanistan (the far right is screaming that she said we shouldn't have responded to the 9/11 attacks), that's not what she said.

Challenged on not intervening, she said that didn't mean doing nothing.

“It means not invading an entire nation without end,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “Doesn’t mean ‘do nothing,’ it means perhaps we could have leaned more on the larger role of other agencies (intelligence, state dept, diplomatic teams, etc) before Congress decided to invade a nation without a concrete end plan.”

The end of her sentence spells out why she, like many others, have no clue about what they are speaking about. There is not, nor can there be a “concrete end plan” for any armed conflict, even moreso for a protracted war like Iraq and Afghanistan. To believe that we can predict or war game when the shooting will stop, much less how to direct it to an ending that we can manage is sheer foolishness.

The only way to remotely approach that scenario is to wage war to an unconditional surrender— and even that in the entirety of human existence has never been accomplished to the point that it was in the can before a single shot was fired. And in all truth, using Desert Storm 1 as a template, even that unconditional surrender led to Desert Storm 2 because the utter destruction in detail of our enemy wasn’t done. I seriously doubt that we as a people and nation today have the will and spine to do to a country or alliance what was necessary to win back in World War 2. Barring some attack that knocks us out of the equivocation and relativism that has beset our national outlook, we cannot engage in such an endeavor today.

There can be a concrete end plan to armed conflict and fascist socialists, like ocasio-cortez, had one in Germany in the1930s and 40s. They called it the Final Solution. And she has one for anyone who wants to go against her fascist socialist agenda and keep their cars, planes, cows, health plans and majority of their incomes/worth/wages.

Breathe into this....

schmick wrote: There can be a concrete end plan to armed conflict and fascist socialists, like ocasio-cortez, had one in Germany in the1930s and 40s. They called it the Final Solution. And she has one for anyone who wants to go against her fascist socialist agenda and keep their cars, planes, cows, health plans and majority of their incomes/worth/wages.

You are a fucking whack job.

schmick wrote:No wonder the dims do not want to address the anti semitism by their freshman congress members who are going around stating that they're going to be putting people on lists

You are a fucking wack job.

Kierland wrote: Yes. Just look at this board. The left has two loons (m2) and me. When someone brings up Dems not wanting to enforce illegal immigration, I respond with fake news. When someone brings up that Dems want open borders, I respond with fake news. When someone brings up that SF is a 3rd world shit and neddles slum, I respond with fake news. When someone brings up that California residents leaving in droves to other states because of high mortgage or rent and shitty politics, I respond with fake news. When someone brings up that California is still losing jobs because companies and corpoations continue to leave the state, i respond with fake news. When someone brings up the Jesse Smollett farce, I respond with fake news. When someone brings up that I'm a slime ball POS for representing a growing Northern California minority, criminals. I respond with nice white flag.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

“You Lie!”

Kierland wrote:“You Lie!”

And he's a fucking wack job.