T1B

Nishlord wrote:Why don't you cut and paste some Milli Vanilli lyrics as well? They're about as relivant.

Plagiarized by Adam wrote:And how does Coulter know that dissent in America gives comfort to the enemy?

RadioFan wrote:

War Wagon wrote:I'll do more ....

You mean like having an actual take, on the topic at hand?

Here, let me help you out.

War Wagon wrote:

RadioFan wrote: It's pretty unpatriotic of me to even talk about this right, tards?

For somebody who glosses himself "RadioFan" to be tossing out the term "tard" indiscriminately...

Obviously, you took offense at this point.

So which is it? Do you disagree with me? If so, state why, and drop this fucking lame username smack, Wags.

Or have you taken offense because I really was addressing you in my generic reference to all those who happen to agree with a cunt trying to sell books who's had no military experience?

Moving Sale wrote:I do.

rozy wrote: Why do you hate common sense?

adam-$300 wrote:For in her latest "column" (if by "column," you mean "the blood blots of self-mutilated flesh from a loathsome, foamingly rabid she-wolf on shredded toilet paper"), Coulter packs in so much bullshit about Iraq that you can see the turds slipping through the cracks. It's useless to take on her "argument" that much good has been done through the war because one can't see where the spin and lies stop and the delusion begins.

She even drags out the corpse of the dead connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda and Niger uranium: "As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger." You may do a double take and think, "Um, forged documents? No real contact?" But you'd be caught then in the web of inference and bugfuck nuttery that is the cuntistry of Ann Coulter. However, shit, since Coulter is the same kind of whoredog for the Bush administration as Bob Woodward and Judith Miller (it's a question of presentation, not degree), here's Donald Rumsfeld to Wolf Blitzer's question about the alleged nexus of swarthy eeevil: "Zarqawi was physically in Baghdad." It's like saying that because you have a toothbrush at your girlfriend's place, you wanna move in. In other words, really, and, c'mon, is that the best you got?

But Coulter's bizarre rah-rahing, like the cheerleader of the damned, continues. She shakes her little pom-poms for all the elections and, in general, behaves as if Iraq is just a car bomb or two away from gettin' all that nasty resistance out of its lil' ol' system.

Then she gets to the real blood and meat of her "argument," that those who advocate for withdrawal, immediate or otherwise, are traitors: "It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it's time to bring the troops home." So, like, these'd be the same insurgents that Iraqi leaders just declared a legitmate resistance and that U.S. soldiers are legitimate targets? Fuck, encouragement is havin' something to shoot at and blow up. And how does Coulter know that dissent in America gives comfort to the enemy? Why, 'cause former North Vietnamese soldiers, who, you know, would have no reason to sow conflict in the U.S., said that war protesters during the Vietnam War gave them the warm fuzzies.

But once Ann Coulter gets somethin' in her craw, she ain't done with it until she's masticated that fucker with all ten sets of her viperous teeth: "The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle." And, most bizarre, she holds Democrats in contempt for voting down the un-debated House Republican stunt bill on immediate withdrawal from Iraq: "They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors." Well, fuck it. Take it to its logical conclusion. Round us up and waterboard us, bitch, 'cause we're part of this country, too.

You can dismiss Coulter's mad brain as a belfry filled with those flying rats, but she is the seething evil id of the right, daring others to cross her line. It's sad, too, really, how hard she works to show she's got the biggest balls in the room. For the only thing that pleases the monsters in Ann Coulter's brain, the ones that press her to go further, be more wicked, press more buttons, is more dead, more blood, more bodies, and it doesn't matter whose they are as long as they provide sweet sustenance.

smackaholic wrote:

adam-$300 wrote:A steaming tubful of moronic crap.

I assume this is a c&p from somewhere? The author should thank you for not crediting him.

What an incredibly badly written pile of shit. This POS can't argue Coulter's points, so he just goes on a rabid rambling personal attack.

Moving Sale wrote:

rozy wrote: Why do you hate common sense?

Suck Bush Cock Much?

smackaholic wrote: This POS can't argue Coulter's points, so he just goes on a rabid rambling personal attack.

Moving Sale wrote:And just so everyone knows what's going on with AC. AC and Savage and the like are in business for one thing. To make the most extreme part of the opposition look loony. AC is about a 10 on the right wing wacko scale. Franken is about a 7 on the LWWS. There is no Nationally known left wing pundit who is a 10 on the LWWS. People that want to push the agenda to the right dismiss both AC and AF, thereby dismissing a legitimate left wing stance and an illegitimate right wing stance, thus moving the 'center' to the right. It's an old trick and works very well on stupid simple fucks like smackaholic and Diogenes.

smackaholic wrote:

RadioFan wrote:Let's get one thing clear here and now ... just because we "talk" about Iraq, whether in a bar among two drunks, or on a national level, it's not going to enbolden the terrorists any more nor any less. They are ALREADY emboldened. The U.S. having a discussion about how we're conducting this war or when we're going to leave hasn't and will not have any impact whatsoever on what they are going to do.

bull...fukking...shit.

Sure, there are some hardcore martyr types, set on cashing their 72 virgin coupon, but, there are a shitload of Iraqis, the ones that will eventually make Iraq a stable place, that are currently sitting on the fence. Why are they?

Do you think for one second, that these people are not affected by the bickering they see amongst american politicians?

War Wagon wrote:Try reading her book "TREASON" one day before you totally dismiss her as some sort of B-Smackian lune. You might change your tune.

RadioFan wrote:Perhaps I'll give her a shot ... at the library. I have no immediate plans to give that cunt any more money than she already has.

No worries, though, Wags. I have no plans to give Franken or Moore any of my money either.

ElvisMonster wrote:

Cuda wrote:As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire...enriched uranium from Niger.

As far as I got before I started laughing.

Blitzkrieg wrote:

ElvisMonster wrote:

Cuda wrote:As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire...enriched uranium from Niger.

As far as I got before I started laughing.

I started laughing when I saw the thread title.