T1B

Not inclined to take sides in the Pac-10/SEC debate, and I certainly have no stake in it either way, but just wanted to send a drive-by rack out for this line:

Spinach Genie wrote:The only thing you likely ever "kicked" out of bed in college was the used condom your boyfriend left lying on your forehead from the night before.

I'm not usually one to elevate homo smack to the echelon that many in here do, but that line was just damn funny.

Buc, you can say a lot of things about the Pac 10 but "boring to watch" is definitely not one of them, especially coming from a fan of the conference known for stone aged three yards and a cloud of incest football.

Van wrote:Buc, you can say a lot of things about the Pac 10 but "boring to watch" is definitely not one of them, especially coming from a fan of the conference known for stone aged three yards and a cloud of incest football.

Yeah, because there's nothing more fun to watch than 3 play scoring drives. And that's with some defense too...

Van wrote:Buc, you can say a lot of things about the Pac 10 but "boring to watch" is definitely not one of them, especially coming from a fan of the conference known for stone aged three yards and a cloud of incest football.

That depends what you like to watch football for, Van. If you want basketball style fast break drives where calling defense an afterthought is a nice way of putting it, the PAC is the way to go. The SEC, Big 10 and increasingly ACC put priority on defense, hard hitting, control offense...sometimes it's old school, but football should be a physical game.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Van wrote:Buc, you can say a lot of things about the Pac 10 but "boring to watch" is definitely not one of them, especially coming from a fan of the conference known for stone aged three yards and a cloud of incest football.

Yeah, because there's nothing more fun to watch than 3 play scoring drives. And that's with some defense too...

To score on only three plays means you probably had to have a big play or two involved. Big plays tend to be more interesting than inept, conservative offenses grinding out 16-13 wins...

But hey, if you'd rather watch a duel of punters and field goal kickers more power to ya'...

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Not inclined to take sides in the Pac-10/SEC debate, and I certainly have no stake in it either way, but just wanted to send a drive-by rack out for this line:

Spinach Genie wrote:The only thing you likely ever "kicked" out of bed in college was the used condom your boyfriend left lying on your forehead from the night before.

I'm not usually one to elevate homo smack to the echelon that many in here do, but that line was just damn funny.

Ya' know Terry, I've wondered why someone whom I've barely interacted with would want to use some tongue-in-cheek words that I posted in their sig. Not any more.

The premise that you don't "usually elevate homosmack", but think that that particular instance was "damn funny" and somehow remarkable, explains much.

It looks like Rutgers is making the pac-10 look pretty good.......oops.....maybe ASwho better start playing some defense.

Sorry for getting way OT here, but I feel I have to respond to War Wagon:

War Wagon wrote:Ya' know Terry, I've wondered why someone whom I've barely interacted with

Lately, you're right. But it would seem you have a short memory.

Remember addressing me as "Crap in Terrychester"? How about creating a troll with that nic, until you retired it when I outed it?

. . . would want to use some tongue-in-cheek words that I posted in their sig. Not any more.

Tongue-in-cheek? Maybe that was your intention. But dude, you posted your daughter's full name, not to mention the full name of the other girls picked for the all-star team. And on the main board, no less. And going back to the original thread, I recall B_Smack remarking that the line was sig material.

Basically, most go by the understanding that anything posted on these boards is fair game. And others (myself included) have had to deal with far more tasteless matters as a result of what we've posted on these boards (e.g., Abu following me around four different boards for over four years about my father's death, even creating a troll named after the disease that killed him). In fairness, if you had a problem with me, or anyone else, using that line as a sig, you should have thought about that before posting it. But since I'm basically a nice guy, most of the time anyway, I'll tell you what I'll do. If it bothers you to have me use that as a sig, PM me and I'll change my sig, no questions asked. Ball's in your court.

The premise that you don't "usually elevate homosmack", but think that that particular instance was "damn funny" and somehow remarkable, explains much.

Not that I have to explain myself to you, but that particular line, unlike most of the homosmack around here, actually made me laugh. It was creative, and by my parlance, anyway, somewhat unexpected. Likewise, your line in my sig made me laugh, as did the line from Nishlord (who never complained about me using it, btw) in the sig I used before that.

Most of what's posted on these boards doesn't make me laugh. When there's an exception to that rule, I usually recognize it one way or another.

And btw, if you think I'm piling on Jimmy, think again. Jimmy gives as good as he gets around here when it comes to smack. He's a big boy and he can handle it, which is why I felt free to laugh at that line in public.

Back on topic...


Pac 10 is now 2-0... and the train keeps a rollin!

A 5th place, 6-5 Arizona State team takes it to a 3rd place 7-4 Big East School in Rutgers.

Once again... the best football is played out West!

The South showed once again why they have the most overrated/hyped teams in the country... Clemson is #23 in the country???? Yet needs a last minute TD to pull away from... Colorado???


m2

Pac 10 is now 2-0... and the train keeps a rollin!

A 5th place, 6-5 Arizona State team takes it to a 3rd place 7-4 Big East School in Rutgers.

Once again... the best football is played out West!

Yeah, Rutgers is such a power :roll:, that big loss to powerhouse illinois. ASU and Rutgers suck.

Spinach Genie wrote:
With a bowl lineup of such heavies as:
BYU (6-5, unranked)
Rutgers (7-4, unranked)
Oklahoma (7-4, unranked)
Northwestern (7-4, unranked)
...and the lone ranked opponent among them, Texas...

Probably wouldn't occur to one whose family tree has no forks, but you do not choose your opponent in bowl games; however, you do select the Div 2 teams you schedule during the season....

Van wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Van wrote:Buc, you can say a lot of things about the Pac 10 but "boring to watch" is definitely not one of them, especially coming from a fan of the conference known for stone aged three yards and a cloud of incest football.

Yeah, because there's nothing more fun to watch than 3 play scoring drives. And that's with some defense too...

To score on only three plays means you probably had to have a big play or two involved. Big plays tend to be more interesting than inept, conservative offenses grinding out 16-13 wins...

But hey, if you'd rather watch a duel of punters and field goal kickers more power to ya'...

I'm not taking up for the SEC here. I'm a Big Ten fan. I think the Big Ten has the best balance of offense and defense.

I might have to agree with you there, overall.

tool...if ASU is so good then why were they behind and had to rally for a victory against a team they should have dominated?

Freaking Rutgers???????

Then again...

Laxplayer wrote:tool...if the mighty SEC team LSU is so good then why were they behind and had to rally for a victory against an ASU team they should have dominated?

Go ahead Van, compare LSU and rutgers.....you're reaching.

The Seer wrote:

Spinach Genie wrote:
With a bowl lineup of such heavies as:
BYU (6-5, unranked)
Rutgers (7-4, unranked)
Oklahoma (7-4, unranked)
Northwestern (7-4, unranked)
...and the lone ranked opponent among them, Texas...

Probably wouldn't occur to one whose family tree has no forks, but you do not choose your opponent in bowl games; however, you do select the Div 2 teams you schedule during the season....

You see me bragging on D2s, genius? (It's 1AA btw)

Laxplayer wrote:Go ahead Van, compare LSU and rutgers.....you're reaching.

Of course I'm reaching. Point being, if you're going to rip ASU for merely squeaking by Rutgers then it's perfectly valid to rip LSU for barely squeaking by ASU.

In fairness to ASU, this was not your father's Rutgers team, for rather obvious reasons.

Yeah, the loss to Illinois was embarassing, but there's no question that they were a much better team by season's end.

Van wrote:

Laxplayer wrote:Go ahead Van, compare LSU and rutgers.....you're reaching.

Of course I'm reaching. Point being, if you're going to rip ASU for merely squeaking by Rutgers then it's perfectly valid to rip LSU for barely squeaking by ASU.

It could have had a lot to do with Hurricane Katrina slamming ashore two weeks before and the fact that football was the last thing on many of their minds. Some of the players had families that lost everything. Many of the players had family living in their dorm rooms. I'm not trying to make any excuses but I think coming out of there with a W under those circumstances is very admirable. They didn't really shake it off till October rolled around.

Van wrote:

Laxplayer wrote:Go ahead Van, compare LSU and rutgers.....you're reaching.

Of course I'm reaching. Point being, if you're going to rip ASU for merely squeaking by Rutgers then it's perfectly valid to rip LSU for barely squeaking by ASU.

1. LSU had to go on the road to play a home game(nice job ncaa fuckos, arizona is not a home game when your playing asu)
2.had to put the hurricane and that shit behind them to play @ASU
3.New Coach, first game of season
4,Family and friends possibly killed by hurricane, possibly missing, or looking for a place to stay, while their son plays football.
5. winning on the road, is 1000 times tougher than beating a bad Rutgers team @ home.


ps i don't like LSU one bit, but to compare the 2 games is laughable(ASU was actually a ranked team when they played LSU(and played @ HOme)

Adelpiero wrote:5. winning on the road, is 1000 times tougher than beating a bad Rutgers team @ home.

My point earlier is that Rutgers isn't a bad team. They're a far, far cry from a great team, of course, but a bad team? No way. You're relying too much on past reputation, but it's not applicable here.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote:5. winning on the road, is 1000 times tougher than beating a bad Rutgers team @ home.

My point earlier is that Rutgers isn't a bad team. They're a far, far cry from a great team, of course, but a bad team? No way. You're relying too much on past reputation, but it's not applicable here.

they are bad


Just because they actually found 4 turds to beat in Bigeast(nothing says power football like bigeast) doesn't equate to good. They have improved greatly, but they are still a bad team. Just like many teams this year, they aren't avg, they are bad.

TenTallBen wrote: It could have had a lot to do with Hurricane Katrina slamming ashore two weeks before and the fact that football was the last thing on many of their minds. Some of the players had families that lost everything.

So, this is supposed to be a testament to the focus, dedication, and mental toughness of the elite of the SEC, right?

Wahhhhh, there was a hurricane, I can't play football now....WAHHHHH!

Dear god, wipe your eyes and get over it, nancies.

Last time I checked, California has about more natural disasters than the rest of the country put together. And the next time I hear that used as an excuse by a PAC 10 team will be the first.

SEC Homer comes in trying to defend his sorry ass conference, but ends up actually JOINING the pile-on...classic.

Adelpiero wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote:5. winning on the road, is 1000 times tougher than beating a bad Rutgers team @ home.

My point earlier is that Rutgers isn't a bad team. They're a far, far cry from a great team, of course, but a bad team? No way. You're relying too much on past reputation, but it's not applicable here.

they are bad


Just because they actually found 4 turds to beat in Bigeast(nothing says power football like bigeast) doesn't equate to good. They have improved greatly, but they are still a bad team. Just like many teams this year, they aren't avg, they are bad.

This coming from Missouri fan?

[So, this is supposed to be a testament to the focus, dedication, and mental toughness of the elite of the SEC, right?

Wahhhhh, there was a hurricane, I can't play football now....WAHHHHH!

Dear god, wipe your eyes and get over it, nancies.

Last time I checked, California has about more natural disasters than the rest of the country put together. And the next time I hear that used as an excuse by a PAC 10 team will be the first.

SEC Homer comes in trying to defend his sorry ass conference, but ends up actually JOINING the pile-on...classic.

No, I don't think anyone's claiming that it's the focus of the SEC. Oh sure, blow off the fact that one of the worst natural disasters ripped through the south. No big deal, just go play football guys. Don't worry about your family floating down main street USA. You can't do anything about it, but dammit there's football to be played. How stupid are you dins? Get over it???? Have you ever suffered like these people?

What natural disaster does California have that's worse than a hurricaine? We had our last really big earthquake in Jan of 1994. California has had nothing that compares to that or Katrina in 10+ years.

So don't even try and compare what those people went through.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: My point earlier is that Rutgers isn't a bad team. They're a far, far cry from a great team, of course, but a bad team? No way. You're relying too much on past reputation, but it's not applicable here.

they are bad


Just because they actually found 4 turds to beat in Bigeast(nothing says power football like bigeast) doesn't equate to good. They have improved greatly, but they are still a bad team. Just like many teams this year, they aren't avg, they are bad.

This coming from Missouri fan?

Jackass , i believe the subject was Rutgers, If you want to talk about MU and the Pathetic Gary Pinkel, we can, but let's try to stay on topic for a bit, ok?

Laxplayer wrote:

[So, this is supposed to be a testament to the focus, dedication, and mental toughness of the elite of the SEC, right?

Wahhhhh, there was a hurricane, I can't play football now....WAHHHHH!

Dear god, wipe your eyes and get over it, nancies.

Last time I checked, California has about more natural disasters than the rest of the country put together. And the next time I hear that used as an excuse by a PAC 10 team will be the first.

SEC Homer comes in trying to defend his sorry ass conference, but ends up actually JOINING the pile-on...classic.

No, I don't think anyone's claiming that it's the focus of the SEC. Oh sure, blow off the fact that one of the worst natural disasters ripped through the south. No big deal, just go play football guys. Don't worry about your family floating down main street USA. You can't do anything about it, but dammit there's football to be played. How stupid are you dins? Get over it???? Have you ever suffered like these people?

Will the idiocy ever end???

What Lax, and the other SEC ball-lickers want you to believe, is that every member of the LSU team is from NO and each one lost many family members and had to play on!

FACT: Most players on LSU are Not from NO!!!

FACT: LSU is in Baton Rogue!!! Which is over 100 miles to the west... and was barely hit by the hurricane!!!

Have any of the SEC homers thought about how the hurricane may have effected the ASU players???

They had to play, while they were worried about the LSU players and their families.


m2

M2, Compassionate Conservative!

mtard

FACT: Most players on LSU are Not from NO!!!

FACT: LSU is in Baton Rogue!!! Which is over 100 miles to the west... and was barely hit by the hurricane!!!

jackass, because you live in Shreveport, your not allowed to have family in New Orleans??

Shut the fuck up, when we want info on how many hitpoints a Dagger +3 causes, we'll ask you, ok?

Adelpiero wrote:mtard

FACT: Most players on LSU are Not from NO!!!

FACT: LSU is in Baton Rogue!!! Which is over 100 miles to the west... and was barely hit by the hurricane!!!

jackass, because you live in Shreveport, your not allowed to have family in New Orleans??

What the fuck is SEC ball-licker babbling about now???

Yes, if you live in Shreveport... you're not allowed to have family in NO.

Just like the people that live in Tempe aren't allowed to have family in NO.


m2

Laxplayer wrote:

[So, this is supposed to be a testament to the focus, dedication, and mental toughness of the elite of the SEC, right?

Wahhhhh, there was a hurricane, I can't play football now....WAHHHHH!

Dear god, wipe your eyes and get over it, nancies.

Last time I checked, California has about more natural disasters than the rest of the country put together. And the next time I hear that used as an excuse by a PAC 10 team will be the first.

SEC Homer comes in trying to defend his sorry ass conference, but ends up actually JOINING the pile-on...classic.

No, I don't think anyone's claiming that it's the focus of the SEC. Oh sure, blow off the fact that one of the worst natural disasters ripped through the south. No big deal, just go play football guys. Don't worry about your family floating down main street USA. You can't do anything about it, but dammit there's football to be played. How stupid are you dins? Get over it???? Have you ever suffered like these people?

What natural disaster does California have that's worse than a hurricaine? We had our last really big earthquake in Jan of 1994. California has had nothing that compares to that or Katrina in 10+ years.

So don't even try and compare what those people went through.

So Thailand shouldn't even suit up a team for the Olympics????

What Lax, and the other SEC ball-lickers want you to believe, is that every member of the LSU team is from NO and each one lost many family members and had to play on!

Since when did I become an SEC ball licker? Are you really this stupid?

Hell yes they should seer because anyone who survived will probably do well in the water events.

Adelpiero wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote: they are bad


Just because they actually found 4 turds to beat in Bigeast(nothing says power football like bigeast) doesn't equate to good. They have improved greatly, but they are still a bad team. Just like many teams this year, they aren't avg, they are bad.

This coming from Missouri fan?

Jackass , i believe the subject was Rutgers, If you want to talk about MU and the Pathetic Gary Pinkel, we can, but let's try to stay on topic for a bit, ok?

Just pointing out that it's difficult for Missouri fan to call another bowl team bad if you don't sack up about your own. 'S'all.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: This coming from Missouri fan?

Jackass , i believe the subject was Rutgers, If you want to talk about MU and the Pathetic Gary Pinkel, we can, but let's try to stay on topic for a bit, ok?

Just pointing out that it's difficult for Missouri fan to call another bowl team bad if you don't sack up about your own. 'S'all.

dude, do you actually read any of the Big12 threads? It's been put in stone, that: MU,KST,KU,CU,NEB are bad teams! I hated to call out and prove to CU fan that their team was bad also, but facts are facts,The Big12North is full of cripple teams. But there are a lot of bad teams this year in college football. Several of them are in bowl games!

Well with 28 bowl games that gives us 56 teams. Bowl season is a joke with almost 60 teams playing. the other thing that's a joke is when we talk about sOS and someone inevitibaly says...well we played 4 bowl teams last year....so whoopdie freaking doo.......almost 60 teams make bowl games. Many of which are crappy teams.

Adelpiero wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Adelpiero wrote: Jackass , i believe the subject was Rutgers, If you want to talk about MU and the Pathetic Gary Pinkel, we can, but let's try to stay on topic for a bit, ok?

Just pointing out that it's difficult for Missouri fan to call another bowl team bad if you don't sack up about your own. 'S'all.

dude, do you actually read any of the Big12 threads? It's been put in stone, that: MU,KST,KU,CU,NEB are bad teams! I hated to call out and prove to CU fan that their team was bad also, but facts are facts,The Big12North is full of cripple teams. But there are a lot of bad teams this year in college football. Several of them are in bowl games!

Do I read the Big 12 threads? Sure. And yes, I do remember the consensus being that there wasn't a strong team in the Big 12 North.

Having said that . . .

Do I remember exactly who said what to whom in said threads, particularly where the threads in question are a month or more old? Of course not. Do you?

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Lately, you're right. But it would seem you have a short memory.

Remember addressing me as "Crap in Terrychester"? How about creating a troll with that nic, until you retired it when I outed it?

You outed a troll you thought was me and then that troll retired? Did you get said troll to own up to being me? That is simply too funny. Link? Wish I would have been there to see that. Much more hilarity would've ensued.

Dude, in the five years and the 5 or so message boards that I've frequented, I've never had a troll. Period.

I will admit to tossing a few poisonous barbs your liberal way under this nic, prolly the last being at TNW, but that was a looong time ago. Sorry to have caused you so much consternation that you've waited 3 years and two BBS's later to exact revenge.

Tongue-in-cheek? Maybe that was your intention. But dude, you posted your daughter's full name, not to mention the full name of the other girls picked for the all-star team. And on the main board, no less. And going back to the original thread, I recall B_Smack remarking that the line was sig material.

So? Are you going to start making crank phone calls?

In fairness, if you had a problem with me, or anyone else, using that line as a sig, you should have thought about that before posting it.

I didn't say I had a problem with it. I said that I "wondered".

Sure, it's all fair game. There are some petty, vicious 'tards out there looking to grind some dull axes, but I didn't think you were one of them.

Props on joining the JHawk BCD wanna' be fan club, and if you've been paying an ounce of attention, you'd know how that's working out.

But since I'm basically a nice guy, most of the time anyway, I'll tell you what I'll do. If it bothers you to have me use that as a sig, PM me and I'll change my sig, no questions asked. Ball's in your court.

[fag] Don't expect any PM's from me. You know what to do with the ball. [/fag]

Back to your regularly scheduled inane CFB trivialities.