For me it almost always comes down to picking the lesser of two evils.mvscal wrote:Who the fuck do you do think you're kidding? You're a straightline party hack.
Party affiliations don't mean shit to me.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Yea, like you would ever vote the other way?mvscal wrote:More mindless gibberish
The lesser of two evils is still evil.Mister Bushice wrote: For me it almost always comes down to picking the lesser of two evils.
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
I got a whopping $600 tax cut on my federal income taxes, as a result of which, my state property taxes doubled. Yeah, that was one helluva deal for me, all right.ChargerMike wrote:...I've not knowingly ever accused yooz guys as "having something to gain should the Dems ever regain the White House". Certainly you would realize a sizeable gain in your TAX liability,BSmack wrote:What makes no sense at all is when people like you or whomever the dittotard of the day is accuse myself or Bushice or Terry or whomever of having something to gain as a result of a Democratic victory
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Who is her opponent again?Terry in Crapchester wrote: She also happens to be up for re-election in the Senate. Just so's ya know.
I will take that leap of faith and challenge the fallibility of T1B exit polling, thanks.Terry in Crapchester wrote:And also, given that two of her constituents are on record in this forum alone, saying that they'd never vote for her in a Democratic Presidential Primary, doesn't say much for her chances, now does it?
Or she can take that money and throw it behind a candidate that has a chance of winning and gurantee herself a cabinet seat. Or maybe the chair of whatever committee she damn well feels like in the Senate? Maybe plum job for Chelsea as well?Degenerate wrote:Who is her opponent again?![]()
![]()
![]()
She could beat that lunatic from Yonkers with just two fundraisers in Watertown, so why is she still getting anyone and everyone to max out their contributions to her? Because she will turn around and tap that donor list for her '08 run. And they will give.
Dean will not be running.And before you play the liberal blog galvanizing behind someone else card, I'll go ahead and direct you to Dr. Dean's long list of primary/caucus victories in 2004. Unless Al Gore finds Jesus in his stump speeches, there is no race.
Terry in Crapchester wrote:I got a whopping $600 tax cut on my federal income taxes, as a result of which, my state property taxes doubled. Yeah, that was one helluva deal for me, all right.ChargerMike wrote:...I've not knowingly ever accused yooz guys as "having something to gain should the Dems ever regain the White House". Certainly you would realize a sizeable gain in your TAX liability,BSmack wrote:What makes no sense at all is when people like you or whomever the dittotard of the day is accuse myself or Bushice or Terry or whomever of having something to gain as a result of a Democratic victory
My property value went up 20%? Good thing the county didn't find out about that before they sent out my property tax bill.ChargerMike wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:I got a whopping $600 tax cut on my federal income taxes, as a result of which, my state property taxes doubled. Yeah, that was one helluva deal for me, all right.ChargerMike wrote: ...I've not knowingly ever accused yooz guys as "having something to gain should the Dems ever regain the White House". Certainly you would realize a sizeable gain in your TAX liability,
...you're property value went up 20% for the year largely based on low interest rates and improving economy, and based on you're initial down payment, you probably made 500% on your outlay. Tell us some more about those taxes doubling
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
And before you play the Hillary will win cuz the media says so card, I'll go ahead and direct you to the media's predictions as to the 2004 Democratic nominee, at least before the primaries actually started.Degenerate wrote:And before you play the liberal blog galvanizing behind someone else card, I'll go ahead and direct you to Dr. Dean's long list of primary/caucus victories in 2004.
I don't want Gore, either. I do think that Kerry has a real chance at beating the odds and getting the nomination a second time.Unless Al Gore finds Jesus in his stump speeches, there is no race.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.