What the military will and won't let soldiers hear

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4226
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Post by Dr_Phibes »

"This ain't Iwo Jima, sunshine.
This is walking on patrol on a busy urban street, people minding their own business, life going
on as people shop at the market and kids play, then...BAM! .."

Rack the internet

...

By the way, what happened to online head CHOPS. It was big in 2004, but seems to have disappeared.
User avatar
Diogenes
The Last American Liberal
Posts: 6985
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Ghost In The Machine

Post by Diogenes »

Zogby is a joke.

He was being interviewed on the Hugh Hewitt show, when Hugh started asking about his methodology and who he had conducting his polls, he hung up five minutes into the interview.

He did mention that the poll was comissioned by an anonymous wealthy anti-war activist though.

Fuck Soros, Zogby and his bullshit poll.
Message brought to you by Diogenes.
The Last American Liberal.

ImageImage
User avatar
Ang
Jumpin' Little Juke Joint Gal
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:31 am
Location: the Moat

Post by Ang »

Looks to me like everyone is spinning in their own personal opinion about this, and what we saw on the first post was someone saying what the folks in service would or would not see based on what? A survey? Someones opinion? I have no idea, and nothing was backed up to say how the opinion was made. We all know you can take 20 people or less and come up with more opinions than you have people. The list of news things accessible to soldiers is from...where?

All we know is what was said, we don't know if that is true or not. I would like to see some proof that those links are what the soldiers see or do not see.

In the world where I work, we have to back it up. That's all I'm asking. Not rumor, not supposed something someone said...I would like to read some proof that our soldiers are having the censorship that was proposed in the first post in this thread.

Back it up. It is a very serious situation if our troops are getting only half the story, and if you are posting it you need to say where you got your stats.

Many people out here are for free speech, no matter what our party lines and would support free access to information for our troops. Please feel free to clarify and let's all work on getting more access for our guys who are fighting for us, whether or not you agree with the reason for being there.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

SunCoastSooner wrote:Taking political notes from someone who flunked out of college and became a bike messanger is the status quo for Democrats now? :lol:
As opposed to the Republicans taking political notes from someone who flunked out of college, got out of Vietnam due to "anal cysts" and later took a job as ballboy for the KC Royals? :lol:

WAR GLASS HOUSES.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Dr_Phibes wrote: By the way, what happened to online head CHOPS. It was big in 2004, but seems to have disappeared.
Baghdad's MOSSAD station chief called a moratorium on head chopping.
It's under further review. Most likely be overhauled, and a fresh wave rolled out
just in time for the serious talk of troop withdrawal.

BTW, I believe the internet crackdown is to curtail the soldier's penchant in making
and distributing gay porn.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Post Reply