Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:13 pm
by Mikey
atomicdad wrote:Mikey, I think mvscal is just pissed because he can't get his favorite little Mexican candy anymore since they were banned a few months back.
Guess he's not getting his daily dosage of lead.
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:02 pm
by Eaglebauer
Cuda wrote:Eaglebauer wrote: the douche-bags in the 60s and 70s claiming asbestos wasn't harmful
Link?
Yeah, what he said.... link?
Sincerely,
Every corporation (not room for 1,000 names here) producing asbestos-containing products up to and until the day the government banned it (in certain products) in 1977.
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:03 pm
by Eaglebauer
mvscal wrote:Eaglebauer wrote:mvscal wrote:
Honestly, these clowns are weak.
So, after "much laboratory research" they found...nothing. Amazing. Sorry guy, "likely to be carcinogenic" means nothing and if that's the best they could come up with after "much research" then there is nothing there.
Link?
It's an excerpt from the original article, dumbfuck.
No it wasn't. It was your spin that "likely to be carcinogenic" means "nothing".