T1B

Invictus wrote:ala Archie Bunker which made All In The Family great and Family Guy great.

Unfortunately, Risa ain't bright enough to get the parody/corrolation.

Didn't know the "Cleveland" inside joke.

I don't think Family Guy had All in the Family in mind with his crass bigotry. I think its just pigheaded stupidity in general.

Bizzarofelice wrote:Didn't know the "Cleveland" inside joke.

I don't think Family Guy had All in the Family in mind

Good post, Risafelice.

then explain, all wise in the U&L.

Uncle Fester wrote:

No mention of Family Guy?

You guys are tards...still.

Too Irie Lagos for me. The main character has testicles on his chin.

Come on Fester, I've been reading your posts for years now. This show should be right up your alley.

Risa wrote:Whatever, ho. The dynamic is brilliant. But the rest of it is trash .. as opposed to a King of the Hill where everything works. When did they come up for a black best friend for the racist dad?

Is he his Griff?

You probably spend too much time trying to rationalize the show. It's not that kind of show. Just let the randomness of it enthrall you.

Good point, Mgoo. There is no way to rationalize a grown man fighting a giant chicken for five minutes because the chicken gave out expired coupons. Or, why when a man hits his shin, he has to sit down on the ground, hold said shin and cry about the pain for a full minute.

WAR NATE GRIFFIN

Bizzarofelice wrote:Didn't know the "Cleveland" inside joke.

I don't think Family Guy had All in the Family in mind with his crass bigotry. I think its just pigheaded stupidity in general.

Yep. McFarlane has explained this before. Peter Griffin just represents loud mouth New Englanders in general.

My Name is Earl

the Office

Risa wrote:so what was the deal with the racist father?

Dave Chapelle's show is based on white stereotypes, ensuing mockeries and a bunch of filler. Explain why that's ok to you but a "racist" cartoon is going too far?

B/c its ok for blacks to poke fun and not for whites. Sheeesh, havent you been watching the new the past 10 years???

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Risa wrote:so what was the deal with the racist father?

Dave Chapelle's show is based on white stereotypes (mostly cliched and unoriginal), ensuing mockeries and a bunch of filler. Explain why that's ok to you but a "racist" cartoon is going too far?

I guess you missed all of the black stereotypes.
everybody gets fucked up on the dave chapelle
show. and not everybody's gonna find all of it funny.

are the most memorable the white caricatures... or the black?

i was just asking what was the deal with the racist father.
there's nothing to him, he just came across as a mouthpiece
for all the shit the show's creator wanted to say but couldn't.
i haven't watched every show, and don't intend to.

it's trash, with moments of brilliance.

Invictus wrote: Risa. Peter's black best friend is actually voiced by a white man which makes the character that much more funny.

why?

Peter is bigoted, sexist, and extremely clueless, ala Archie Bunker which made All In The Family great and Family Guy great.

Archie was losing it, that's why he lashed out at Meathead, the Jeffersons and everyone else.... including his wife, who wasn't as docile as he'd probably like to believe (if i remember correctly).

and Gloria would always be his little girl, in spite of the times.

Is Peter losing it, or is he just the Yankee version of Hank Hill.. but more abrupt?

everybody gets fucked up on the dave chapelle
show. and not everybody's gonna find all of it funny.

Family Guy does the same...so what the fuck is the problem?

it's trash, with moments of brilliance.

For someone who believes more talent was brought in to make "Married With Children", your opinion is pretty much null and void. Family Guy is about surreal nonsense and obscure pop culture references and insults. You'll either get it or you won't. Sounds like you were part of the latter the majority of the time.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: For someone who believes more talent was brought in to make "Married With Children",

Married with Children is brilliance. Pick your era (except for maybe when the Wanker County relatives dropped in; or Marcy always having to always win on Al).

I dare you not to laugh, even 15, 20 years later.

Scrubs!

Come on Fester, I've been reading your posts for years now. This show should be right up your alley.

I know, but I wasn't kidding before. I've tried to watch Family Guy, but I can't get past the fooken testicles on that guy's chin.

It's like when Uncle Buck tried to talk to that lady with the giant melanoma on her face.

It's like trying to concentrate on the subject of any thread when that girl with the basketball boobs is flouncing around in the avatard.

I'm sure it's nothing that a good dose of shock therapy can't cure.

Scrubs
My Name Is Earl
The Office

Goober McTuber wrote:

twitlover wrote:this might be a stupid question

Considering the source, probably so.

so you're saying you have no fucking clue but decided to post anyway.

nice.

titlover wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

twitlover wrote:this might be a stupid question

Considering the source, probably so.

so you're saying you have no fucking clue but decided to post anyway.

nice.

No, I was confirming that it was a stupid question, not surprisingly so considering the source. Do you need it broken down further?

Goober McTuber wrote:

titlover wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: Considering the source, probably so.

so you're saying you have no fucking clue but decided to post anyway.

nice.

No, I was confirming that it was a stupid question, not surprisingly so considering the source. Do you need it broken down further?

ya.

titlover wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

titlover wrote: so you're saying you have no fucking clue but decided to post anyway.

nice.

No, I was confirming that it was a stupid question, not surprisingly so considering the source. Do you need it broken down further?

ya.

OK. You’re a tedious little fucktard with minimal posting skills. Not sure why it matters if Julia Louis Dreyfus is Jewish, but I’m pretty sure that even a dullard like Cicero could google up the answer within a matter of minutes. Yes, it was a stupid question, and I’m sure there’s plenty more where that one came from.

Goober McTuber wrote:

titlover wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: No, I was confirming that it was a stupid question, not surprisingly so considering the source. Do you need it broken down further?

ya.

OK. You’re a tedious little fucktard with minimal posting skills. Not sure why it matters if Julia Louis Dreyfus is Jewish, but I’m pretty sure that even a dullard like Cicero could google up the answer within a matter of minutes. Yes, it was a stupid question, and I’m sure there’s plenty more where that one came from.

so being ignorant of why I was asking the question actually precludes you from knowing whether it was valid or not.

thanks.

titlover wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

titlover wrote: ya.

OK. You’re a tedious little fucktard with minimal posting skills. Not sure why it matters if Julia Louis Dreyfus is Jewish, but I’m pretty sure that even a dullard like Cicero could google up the answer within a matter of minutes. Yes, it was a stupid question, and I’m sure there’s plenty more where that one came from.

so being ignorant of why I was asking the question actually precludes you from knowing whether it was valid or not.

thanks.

Knowing that a 10-year-old could have figured it out for themselves tells me all I need to know about how “valid” your question was.

You’re welcome.