Cicero wrote:So, you're telling me Hollywood actors are smarter than the President?
Sorry little man.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Irrelevant. Even if being articulate is not a measure of intelligence, it is one of the minimal qualities one needs to have in order to perform the duties of the President of the United States in this day and age.mvscal wrote:The ability to clearly articulate has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Actors and newsreaders are all articulate and are also among some of the stupidest people on planet Earth.Eaglebauer wrote:Any reasonable and at least semi-intelligent person (you don't qualify I guess) knows that the ability to articulate thoughts, albeit not the end-all be-all of intelligence, is *a* indicator of intelligence.
This isn't even subject to debate. You might as well try to argue that water isn't wet...or that you aren't a total dumbfuck.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Fwiw, Cicero, I don't agree with m2 on this.Cicero wrote:m2 wrote:It would be hard to find someone other than you that isn't.Cicero wrote:So, you're telling me Hollywood actors are smarter than the President?
m2
And you wonder why your party fails time and time again.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Actually, you must have missed the pictures... they're a lot of fun with good times had by all.Cicero wrote:m2 wrote:It would be hard to find someone other than you that isn't.Cicero wrote:So, you're telling me Hollywood actors are smarter than the President?
m2
And you wonder why your party fails time and time again.
no way-----Terry in Crapchester wrote:Fwiw, Cicero, I don't agree with m2 on this.Cicero wrote:m2 wrote: It would be hard to find someone other than you that isn't.
m2
And you wonder why your party fails time and time again.
Imho, W is smarter than most of the people who voted for him.
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Fwiw, Cicero, I don't agree with m2 on this.Cicero wrote:m2 wrote: It would be hard to find someone other than you that isn't.
m2
And you wonder why your party fails time and time again.
Imho, W is smarter than most of the people who voted for him.
Holy crap!!!TiC wrote:Your boy, Smirky McFlightsuit, is unqualified to be President.
I said most, not all.Cicero wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:Fwiw, Cicero, I don't agree with m2 on this.Cicero wrote:
And you wonder why your party fails time and time again.
Imho, W is smarter than most of the people who voted for him.
TiC I respect you, but statements and thinking like this is why the Dems are so out of touch. Everyone on your side automatically thinks that everyone who voted for Bush were trailer park, no teeth havin, radical right wing, far Christian Right and that almost everyone that voted for the Dems are Rhodes Scholars.
There are a lot of intelligent, well-to-do, very imformed people out there that can look past the media and tabloid bias and make their own decisions.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Selective vision?mvscal wrote:Evidently not. Two terms should have told you that.Terry in Crapchester wrote:Even if being articulate is not a measure of intelligence, it is one of the minimal qualities one needs to have in order to perform the duties of the President of the United States in this day and age.
Then again, you're a dumbfuck, so the effort would have been wasted in any event.
Another point to consider is that W had every advantage growing up, yet showed no inclination whatsoever to make the most of it. By his own admission, he was more or less a bum up until the time he was 40.Bizzarofelice wrote:I've wondered the same thing.PSUFAN wrote:I've often wondered if W lost a lot of wattage in his wild years. He's a pretty dim bulb...but perhaps he wasn't always that way.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
... and then he suddenly acquired "character".Terry in Crapchester wrote:Another point to consider is that W had every advantage growing up, yet showed no inclination whatsoever to make the most of it. By his own admission, he was more or less a bum up until the time he was 40.
Does the fact that every time he goes off script, he comes across as a total fucking moron because he can't answer simple questions, or when he's on script, he says shit like this:Tribal sovereignty means that. It's sovereign. You're a ... you're a ... you've been given sovereignty and you're viewed as a sovereign entity."
"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
He has advisors who tell him what to think and say. He has people who write the speeches that he butchers. He has publicly stated he doesn't read the news. He shows no signs of making intelligent, well thought out decisions on his own, and blames everyone else for every fuck up that happens."Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"
Martyred wrote: Hang in there, Whitey. Smart people are on their way with dictionaries.
War Wagon wrote:being as how I've got "stupid" draped all over, I'm not really sure.
you left out cypherin' , terry.Terry in Crapchester wrote:[mvscal]George W. Bush is a man of action. He doesn't have time for all them sissy things like readin' and learnin' and wordsmithin' and speakin' all grammatical.Eaglebauer wrote:Not sure which is more pathetic.mvscal wrote:Yeah, it is.
Tom Cruise is articulate, but I don't think you'll be finding him on Mensa's membership list any time soon.
You being so intellectually dishonest as to defend your figurehead's inability to speak as bearing no indication on his lack of intelligence, or you correctly pointing out that even a boob like Tom Cruise is in fact smarter than him.
Any reasonable and at least semi-intelligent person (you don't qualify I guess) knows that the ability to articulate thoughts, albeit not the end-all be-all of intelligence, is *a* indicator of intelligence.
But if you want to represent that George is too deep and complex to be articulate, feel free to make an even bigger ass of yourself.
Dumbfuck.[/mvscal]
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
~translation~smackaholic wrote:you left out cypherin' , terry.Terry in Crapchester wrote:[mvscal]George W. Bush is a man of action. He doesn't have time for all them sissy things like readin' and learnin' and wordsmithin' and speakin' all grammatical.Eaglebauer wrote: Not sure which is more pathetic.
You being so intellectually dishonest as to defend your figurehead's inability to speak as bearing no indication on his lack of intelligence, or you correctly pointing out that even a boob like Tom Cruise is in fact smarter than him.
Any reasonable and at least semi-intelligent person (you don't qualify I guess) knows that the ability to articulate thoughts, albeit not the end-all be-all of intelligence, is *a* indicator of intelligence.
But if you want to represent that George is too deep and complex to be articulate, feel free to make an even bigger ass of yourself.
Dumbfuck.[/mvscal]
as for bush's intelligence compared to kerry/gore, let's see.
Kerry is a pompous ass who is skilled in the art of marrying well. this doesn't say much one way or the other to his intellect. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he may be smarter than Dubya. But Gore?
Phuleeeeze. He got through harvard, probably due to picking the right daddy. bush did the same at yale. then he made an appearance in nam as an enlisted paperboy. real impressive. then he dropped/flunked out of vandy divinity school. went home, inherited daddy's senate seat, got picked up by whilly who was smart enough to know he needed another southerner to shore up the southern vote. Then ran one of the worst campaigns ever picking a jew to ensure he got no southern states. Since then, he has basically become a raving lunatic.
Bush, on the other hand made it through a harvard mba. Served in the guard as a fighter jock. I don't give a fukk who you are, if you don't have it, the military will not let you play with their rather expensive aircraft. they would be more likely to let you go play paperboy or peel potatos or something.
As for speaking ability, I will take someone like bush who, when he really needs to can nail it, over the pompous ass kerry or al bore.
Maybe if we didn't have--Wolfman wrote:has anyone noticed --
the stock market
unemployment
???
yup---
horrible POTUS !!
I think we already covered why even the Federalist Society doesn't agree with your take.The Seer wrote:Worst. President. Ever.
Not even close.
Billy Carter's stupid brother....
~translation~m2 wrote:~translation~smackaholic wrote:you left out cypherin' , terry.Terry in Crapchester wrote: [mvscal]George W. Bush is a man of action. He doesn't have time for all them sissy things like readin' and learnin' and wordsmithin' and speakin' all grammatical.
Dumbfuck.[/mvscal]
as for bush's intelligence compared to kerry/gore, let's see.
Kerry is a pompous ass who is skilled in the art of marrying well. this doesn't say much one way or the other to his intellect. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he may be smarter than Dubya. But Gore?
Phuleeeeze. He got through harvard, probably due to picking the right daddy. bush did the same at yale. then he made an appearance in nam as an enlisted paperboy. real impressive. then he dropped/flunked out of vandy divinity school. went home, inherited daddy's senate seat, got picked up by whilly who was smart enough to know he needed another southerner to shore up the southern vote. Then ran one of the worst campaigns ever picking a jew to ensure he got no southern states. Since then, he has basically become a raving lunatic.
Bush, on the other hand made it through a harvard mba. Served in the guard as a fighter jock. I don't give a fukk who you are, if you don't have it, the military will not let you play with their rather expensive aircraft. they would be more likely to let you go play paperboy or peel potatos or something.
As for speaking ability, I will take someone like bush who, when he really needs to can nail it, over the pompous ass kerry or al bore.
I dont care how much jizz I get in my eyes... as long as I know it's W's balls I was sucking on when it happens...
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Raoul Duke wrote:I think I'll wait until Maxim weighs in on the situation before I make a decision. Rolling Stone magazine is about as relevant as a Fatburger in New Delhi.
You might have a point if the article had been written by Hunter Thompson.Raoul Duke wrote:I think I'll wait until Maxim weighs in on the situation before I make a decision. Rolling Stone magazine is about as relevant as a Fatburger in New Delhi.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Non-elected? He won the electoral college. Twice.LTS TRN 2 wrote: The astonishing incompetence of this (non-elected) disaster is boggling.
The DJIA is at or near an all time high. Unemployment is very low.Economically
The Uniteds States remains the worlds lone Superpower and everybody knows this.Militarily
Bush is as "moral" as they get. Gay marriage out front should have told you, and if that doesn't convince you, look at what side he's taking on the immigration issue.Morally
What? We shoudn't drill in ANWAR?Environmentally
He's a lame duck President and doesn't give a fuck what YOU or CNN think or what polls say. He's trying to do the right thing. Rack him!Politically
After 6 years, the Dow is back up to where it was when Clinton left office. Way to go Chimpy.War Wagon wrote:The DJIA is at or near an all time high. Unemployment is very low.
Bush doesn't support gay marraige. Therefore he is as immoral as you can get. Gay people should have the right to be as miserable err as HAPPY as straight people. Plus he supports the rights of employers to abuse cheap labor. That ain't moral.Bush is as "moral" as they get. Gay marriage out front should have told you, and if that doesn't convince you, look at what side he's taking on the immigration issue.