T1B

If you did, I doubt even ogrish.com could do you justice...

mvscal wrote:

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:

Liberal "Hottie"

Guess she broke the airbrush.

She's 80 fucking years old you moron.

If my scrotum grew a nose it would look like Helen Thomas.

Age is no excuse.

In that case . . .

Conservative "Hottie"



Your rules.

Terry,

How could you let this babe slide?

Sudden Sam wrote:
Keith Olberman was hilarious in destroying her on Countdown last night. What was it he finished with? Two things she'd never have to worry about...getting divorced and appearing in Playboy (references to her idiotic comments about 9/11 widows).

After she had gone off the air and couldn't retort.........


Brave man, that olberman....

BSmack wrote:

Diogenes wrote:She mocks stupid people and hurts their feelings, and all you have to come back with is the fact that she isn't the hottest GOP female out there.

Of course the ugliest GOP skank is Michalle Malkin. She looks like she face fucked a grenade.

Sincerely,

The Seer wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:
Keith Olberman was hilarious in destroying her on Countdown last night. What was it he finished with? Two things she'd never have to worry about...getting divorced and appearing in Playboy (references to her idiotic comments about 9/11 widows).

After she had gone off the air and couldn't retort.........


Brave man, that olberman....

Sheesh, she didn't get her fair ups, right. She only writes a column and was on the Today show stammering away trying to make some idiotic point. She is constantly putting her opinions out ther. She has plenty of opportunity to retort.

If my scrotum grew a nose it would look like Helen Thomas.

Rack!

Coulter is a total puppet--like Rusp Limpdick--who can be counted on to trot out whatever malicious fearmongering slime she's given--from Rove, et al.

This latest shameless tripe is typical. Notice that what she's really opposed to is the idea of a 9/11 commission--as insisted upon by the widows.

Gee, does Coulter/Rove have some problem with Americans coming to face the fact that on 9/11 the most sophisticated and continuously tested air security system in the history of the world--NORAD--did a complete STANDOWN on the one time that was not a test?

Gee, do you think that makes Cheney and pals a wee bit nervous?
(think Nuremberg-like trial)

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Hot enough that they saw fit to put her face on the $1 bill.

mvscal wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:Coulter is a truly ugly person. She says things to try and get people's attention. She fell out of the spotlight for some time, so she dishes out this thing about 9/11 widows and her ugly visage is back in front of cameras.

Say what you will about her, but she's trolling on a level that none of us here can ever hope to aspire to.

Is that admirable? She had no honor or legitimacy. All she has is a big mouth. I don't think I would aspire to such a shitty life.

mvscal wrote:Oh now you're all about "honor and legitimacy", huh?



Good stuff.

Its your life. If you look up to bulemic attention whore, then that's your sad existence.

mvscal wrote: All puffed up

If you think it takes an ounce of ire for me to discuss Coulter, then you are projecting.

So why is it that these women are beyond reproach/criticism? Because their husbands were killed on 9/11 people can't have an opinion about them? By sticking their faces in front of the camera, and also appearing in campaign ads for a presidential candidate they have essentially put themselves out there to be commented on. Do I agree with what she said? Not really. Do I think she has a right to say it? Sure do. Do I feel bad for the wives losing their husbands? Yes. Do I feel bad that somebody wrote some not so nice things about them? Nope. If you put yourself out in the media spotlight.....especially on one particular side of the aisle.....then you have to be ready for the consequences.

What if Hillary Clinton said what she did?

mouse wrote:What if Hillary Clinton said what she did?

Would I agree with it then? Not really. Does she have a right to say it if she wants? Sure.

My main point is that if these women want to stick their nose out in the political arena then they have to be prepared to receive some criticism.

The reason I ask? I get tired of the double standards.

Fuzzy or Shaq say something about Blacks or Japs?
The Earth stops moving. Eddie Murphy or Dave Chapelle say it? it's funny and cool.

This lady is out to sell books and to start shit to stay in the news. And she is doing a good job at it. Her day will come when some young punk with a gun wants his 15 minutes of fame and she is dead or in a wheel chair. That is the price of pissing folks off. just ask Larry Flint and John lennon.

I do stand up on the side as a hobby and I will never use Cancer ,wheel chairs . or 9/11 as any means to make a joke or get attention. But then again I am not some white trash attention seeking dike.

Diogenes wrote:And again, she's nowhere near the type of human garbage that say Michael Moore is with his accepting of Hezbollah support (just to deal with the moral dimensions of media figures).

Given that Michael Moore isn't on "news" shows regularly to spout his "humorous" takes, I'd say they're about equal, under the "relevance" category.

Implied "understanding" of Hezbollah vs. Let's convert all those Arabs to Christians = Moron. From both sides.

Ann Coulter is the stake to the GOP's Dracula.

RACK her devisive, unmedicated ramblings.

Sudden Sam wrote: I'm sure Keith O would relish the opportunity to belittle her face to face. What a mismatch that would be! Coulter and Sean Hannity vs. Olbermann would be cool. Two complete imbeciles vs. a guy who actually thinks.

Who's the imbecile, again?

That'd have to be YOU, mister Sudden Samwise Gamgee...

Hannity and/or Coulter would fucking destroy that punk in any debate that involved substance deeper than "did Barry Bonds use steroids?".

Tell me you fucking knew this?

Or don't. Just continue to be a blithering idiot, instead.

Actually, I love the way self-appointed jurists ignorantly bash on Ann Coulter and get their panties all wadded.

That happens because she's correct in her assessments, you purile idiot.

But, you being the crowd pleasing clown that you obviously intend to be, thought it right and proper to drop in here and bag on a woman whose character I value much higher than yours.

And for all the dumbfucks glossing her as nothing more than a "book selling whore"...try actually reading one of her books before reaching that rush to judgement conclusion. Start with "Conspiracy". You might change your tune, you simple minded message board dingleberries.

I sure would like to see "brave" Ann Coulter confront some of those 9/11 widows face to face. What a POS bitch Ms. Coulter is.

Anns father was a certain Gen. John Coulter...I don't believe she'd have any problem whatsoever confronting anyone...especially the likes of YOU.

STFU, dumbass.

War Wagon wrote:Anns father was a certain Gen. John Coulter...I don't believe she'd have any problem whatsoever confronting anyone...especially the likes of YOU.

Wow, she looks just like him. Except he's not anorexic.

RadioFan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:And again, she's nowhere near the type of human garbage that say Michael Moore is with his accepting of Hezbollah support (just to deal with the moral dimensions of media figures).

Given that Michael Moore isn't on "news" shows regularly to spout his "humorous" takes, I'd say they're about equal, under the "relevance" category.

Implied "understanding" of Hezbollah vs. Let's convert all those Arabs to Christians = Moron. From both sides.

I wasn't comparing relevance, but general worthlessness as human beings. And there is nothing 'implied' in his accepting Hezbollah's support and helping the Anti-American cause thereby.

As far as women being exempt from criticism (as some dolt threw out earlier), who the fuck is saying that? Just that having you losers disparage Malkin or Colter on their looks is entirely laughable.

BSmack wrote: Wow, she looks just like him.

But she's not wearing three stars on her shoulder.

Nice pic though.

...he's not anorexic.

You say that as if it were a bad thing.

Much preferable to bulemia, wouldn't you say?

Whatever, I dig her for her mind.

There ain't a 'tard here that she couldn't reduce to slobbering ineptitude, present company included.

Tell me you know this.

RadioFan wrote:Given that Michael Moore isn't on "news" shows regularly to spout his "humorous" takes,

God forbid he would ever have to field questions from someone with an opposing point of view.

you guys are so sweet. Now who has a light for my Carlton 120?

I bet Six Pack Dan could snake a toilet with one of those arms with ease.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

I bet Six Pack Dan could snake a toilet with one of those arms with ease.

No wonder it's so easy for her to pull some shit.

Hannity and/or Coulter would fucking destroy that punk in any debate that involved substance deeper than "did Barry Bonds use steroids?".

I woke up late last night and couldn't sleep. Flipping channels I found Coulter was on Lou Dobbs' show. She was saying that all the mud-slinging came from the left. Lou asked her about all the mud that gets slung at him from the Bush right because he doesn't like deficits, and Coulter backed down saying that economics wasn't her strong-suit.

So, wisened forklift driver, what was it you were saying about Coulter's debates skills?

Sudden Sam wrote:

Diogenes wrote:I'd say she's being uncommonly polite. The proper answer would have been "Really? The GOP sits around all day figuring out how to take down...


Lou Fucking Dobbs?

Or she could have just said that keeping track of the economic positions of non-entities wasn't her strong suit.

Or she could do her usual rude talking louder, interrupting, babbling BS.

This is one of the best things about AC, the ability to be over someone's head and in their dome simultaneously.

Kind of a female version of me, come to think of it.

Sudden Sam wrote:She'd make a great wife.

IN!

sin

Scanner

Diogenes wrote:anyone who says she is hideously repulsive is a fucking idiot

In a world full of this:







Only a retard would settle for this:

Diogenes wrote: But anyone who says she is hideously repulsive is a fucking idiot

Yeah, heroin chic plus an Adam's apple is what's "in" nowadays.

At least to the Manhattan-CT, Sex and the- City-watching, couldn't-drag-me-from-either-coast-with-a-Prada-sale liberal set, anyway.

Gotta love the irony. Bode Ann on getting over on the midwestern hicks.

I wonder if she's ever actually met one.

timmay wrote:

mvscal wrote:

BWAH!!!!


RACK

She's a dumb twat who spouts off shit with proclaimations of fact.

When talking with some Canadian talk show host she made some reference to Canadian troops that went to Vietnam. Host replies that zero Canadian troops went to Nam. She argued over and over that they did. When in fact none ever went. Do your fucking research bitch or shut the hell up.

BTW---she's got long skinny monkey arms and nasty ass man hands. She's do a fine reacharound on Shrubber's fat ass I bet.

Cicatrix wrote:BTW---she's got long skinny monkey arms and nasty ass man hands. She's do a fine reacharound on Shrubber's fat ass I bet.

With or without the strap on?

Thanks for keeping this thread on track Sam!

Those freaky long paw hands she has really turn me off.

not IN