Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:29 pm
by Bizzarofelice
Cuda wrote:obviously, you've never fucked her, have you?
Seen ample pics of her less than ample frame.
I never found anything sexy about the Ethopian famine. Same logic applies to Coulter.
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:36 pm
by Cuda
felice, you are used to pictures of blondiebabe down on all sixes. anyone is "less than ample" compared to that
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:37 pm
by Bizzarofelice
I like my chicks to have an appetite for something more than her two fingers.
That bitch is disgusting. All bags of bones that skinny are disgusting.
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:44 pm
by Raydah James
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Dog wrote:With responses like yours, mvscal, I find it amazing that you are not the board bitch 'round here. I've read better posts from Jeff in San Diego and M2
OUCH....that'll leave a mark!
Out of all the great blasts in this thread, you fucking pick
that??.
Congrats on your posting douchery hitting new levels.
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:27 pm
by Dog
Bizzarofelice wrote:I like my chicks to have an appetite for something more than her two fingers.
That bitch is disgusting. All bags of bones that skinny are disgusting.
Maybe I'm not picky, but give me a shot of anything and I'd shag her.
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:44 pm
by OCmike
Dog wrote:Bizzarofelice wrote:I like my chicks to have an appetite for something more than her two fingers.
That bitch is disgusting. All bags of bones that skinny are disgusting.
Maybe I'm not picky, but give me a shot of anything and I'd shag her.
Penicillin would probably be your best bet.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:19 am
by Mike Backer
BSmack wrote:Just because your self of steam is slipping...
Can't believe someone didn't catch this gem.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:24 am
by Dinsdale
I think most of us caught it...about 5 years ago.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:20 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Mike Backer wrote:BSmack wrote:Just because your self of steam is slipping...
Can't believe someone didn't catch this gem.
The spreadsheet users are laughing at you.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:46 am
by War Wagon
Dog wrote:
Well, NEWS FLASH: Yes, I masturbate.
Just don't do it in here, CPA perv.
I see Bri trying to further the agenda with this thread (dis-crediting Ann Coulter). Once a spinmeister, always a spin meister, eh Bri?
Why you so concerned about little old Ann? Is she a threat?
Mega racks to mv for keeping cocksuckers honest.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:39 pm
by Dog
88 wrote:Dog-
I couldn't give two shits what Ann Coulter or anyone else thinks about politics, but...
I don't get your plagarism argument in this instance. Unlike works of fiction, where the author's individual creativity determines the sentence structure and content, in non-fictional news reporting and commentary, the content is determined by the event and can only be stated in a few ways. For example, one would expect that a passage in any work that comments on Souter's views on abortion during his time as attorney general would necessarily include his memorable quotes on the subject. Most of the "plagarism" examples you cite appear to be nothing more than vanilla descriptions of news events.
I think if you are intellectually honest, you know that if you tried to describe any news event in one sentence or two, some lame ass with a lot of time and an axe to grind could find a nearly identical description of the same event somewhere. Does that make you sloppy or plagaristic?
Even copyright law, which protects the expression of ideas and such, recognizes that you cannot have copying (another name for plagarism) without access. If someone can prove that Coulter had access to the sources and relied on them during the writing of her books and columns, then you might have something. But finding similarities in news stories and commentary regarding them is kind of a weak ass argument, in my opinion. Hell, read the different articles on Novak's discussion of the Plame anti-scandal and you'll see what I mean.
I will give you credit. At least you were able to articulate a thought that is worth considering. Your points are valid, and I understand exactly what you are saying. However, I do believe that with this beyotch, it goes a little further. Do I think she's the only person to every plagiarized? No. Do I think she's the worst plagiarizer? No. Do I think she plagiarized? Yes. She can state facts and use the same sentence structure as others before her, but I find it odd that when you look at her complete works, even before Godless (which is fiction, mind you) that this woman has a tendancy to be a lazy writer who will copy other people's words rather than take the time to restructure her sentences so there is no dispute.
But again, props for doing something that mvscal couldn't.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:20 pm
by See You Next Wednesday
I remember when I was in grade school and I was asked to doa report on something or other,like George Washington. SO I would go to the library and pull out the World Book Encyclopedia and take a passage that read something like
Washington first gained prominence leading troops from Virginia during the French and Indian War (1754–1763). Thanks to this experience, his military bearing, his dramatic charisma, and his political base in Virginia (the largest colony), Congress chose him as commander in chief of the American forces during the Revolutionary War.
(borrowed this time from Wiki)
and re-write it as
Washington became known for leading troops from Virginia during the French and Indian War. Several factors, including his military success, his military bearing, his charisma and the support he had in Virgina, led to Congress choosing him as commander in chief of the American forces during the Revolutionary War.
It usually worked pretty well.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:47 pm
by Dog
Good thing you were just stating the facts, cause life according to mvscal would say that you did not plagiarize.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:09 pm
by Atomic Punk
Dog wrote:Good thing you were just stating the facts, cause life according to mvscal would say that you did not plagiarize.
Wow, another Quebcian shit troll.
Perk, I like you as a person which would shock many, but these are either yours or you are letting this happen. Same style, same bullshit, and a hatred for America and Israel.
You are the admin in charge, and you've denied owning these shit trolls, but come on man. This is getting out of hand dog.
WTF is going on in the province?
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:16 pm
by YD
Atomic Punk wrote:Dog wrote:Good thing you were just stating the facts, cause life according to mvscal would say that you did not plagiarize.
Wow, another Quebcian shit troll.
Perk, I like you as a person which would shock many, but these are either yours or you are letting this happen. Same style, same bullshit, and a hatred for America and Israel.
You are the admin in charge, and you've denied owning these shit trolls, but come on man. This is getting out of hand dog.
WTF is going on in the province?
the funny thing AP ..is that this is not a canadien shit troll
AND he's trooled you at least once before, over a year ago after you called the jungle.
now....
Dog is the poster formerly known as Dog in Heat. from (harhar) LWM originally.
HE is THE guy that Jackie in Wichitaw called called his boss on for running her on messageboards. Almost getting him fired, etc.
He's deece and sometimes funny
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:17 pm
by Goober McTuber
mvscal wrote:Also according to everyone other than weak, partisan morons like you.
It's OK. Everyone knows you're complete pussies who can't argue facts so you have to make up lies about people.
Bullshit. BTW, I know for a fact that you fuck baby goats.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:19 pm
by Atomic Punk
Well, I better man up and apologize to Mark in advance. Still, he has a shit troll problem from his province. I have one fucking troll here and play by the rules that Brian from TNW wanted for his board.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:25 pm
by YD
rack that
zero trollies for me here
can't say the same for places I can authorize my own ST's without needing legit addys or proxies
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:39 pm
by Dinsdale
Atomic Punk wrote:Wow, another Quebcian shit troll.
Atomic Punk wrote:Still, he has a shit troll problem from his province.
You need to update your spreadsheet, infowhore.
You got his first name right, but I think the city he lives in is fairly common knowledge.
And it ain't in Quebec, you flaming fucking idiot. Why don't you give the "everybody is down with me" ruse that you've perpetrated by infowhoring a rest, doucheface?
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:05 pm
by Dog
No trollie here. I posted on here before with a different name over a year ago, "squirrel" but that was during the whole troll v. LWM feud or whathaveyou. Forgot that password so I re-registered a few weeks back.
Yes, I tend to lean left in my political views. But please don't call me Canadian. Those phuckers have their own problems.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:06 pm
by Dog
Actually, I think I re-registered when Jeffy baby in San Diego called me out during a thread when you were all piling on him. I was notified of it and had to register. Strange why he called me out when he was getting run. Maybe he has an "obsession"
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:08 pm
by Y2K
Dog wrote:No trollie here. I posted on here before with a different name over a year ago, "squirrel" but that was during the whole troll v. LWM feud or whathaveyou. Forgot that password so I re-registered a few weeks back.
Yes, I tend to lean left in my political views. But please don't call me Canadian. Those phuckers have their own problems.
Canada...
Idaho......
Close enough eh?