T1B

ChargerMike wrote:....A once proud party...what the hell happened?

Weak and Wrong

Wrong my ass. Iraq has been an absolute unmitigated clusterfuck from the moment Saddam's statue hit the ground. 2500 Americans have died unecessarily and thousands more have been needlessly maimed for absolutely no good fucking reason.

I guess "weak and wrong" means stepping up when the nation is truly threatened, but calling an idiot an idiot when his failed attempt at neocon hegemony plunges the nation into an endless quagmire, pissing away 1000s of lives and 100s of billions of $$ in the process.

BSmack wrote:

ChargerMike wrote:....A once proud party...what the hell happened?

Weak and Wrong

Wrong my ass. Iraq has been an absolute unmitigated clusterfuck from the moment Saddam's statue hit the ground. 2500 Americans have died unecessarily and thousands more have been needlessly maimed for absolutely no good fucking reason.

...so then you disagree with Rosevelt, Truman, and JFK..thought so

Roosevelt, Truman and JFK invaded Iraq?

Guess I'm not keeping up enough lately.

ChargerMike wrote:

BSmack wrote:

ChargerMike wrote:....A once proud party...what the hell happened?

Weak and Wrong

Wrong my ass. Iraq has been an absolute unmitigated clusterfuck from the moment Saddam's statue hit the ground. 2500 Americans have died unecessarily and thousands more have been needlessly maimed for absolutely no good fucking reason.

...so then you disagree with Rosevelt, Truman, and JFK..thought so

Strawman sez what?

A Your so called anti-war "movement" is nothing but a very small, very noisy minority

What? The MAJORITY of Americans??

mvscal wrote:You mean the majority of Americans who re-elected George Bush in the middle of the war?

That majority of Americans?

I think that's what BSmack meant by this:

And the seeds of Dean's candidacy are just now bearing fruit.

OCmike wrote:

mvscal wrote:You mean the majority of Americans who re-elected George Bush in the middle of the war?

That majority of Americans?

I think that's what BSmack meant by this:

And the seeds of Dean's candidacy are just now bearing fruit.

Goldwater didn't win his run for President either. But he lit the fuse on a movement. That's what Dean's candidacy did for the Democratic Party. All in due time Mike.

mvscal wrote:You mean the majority of Americans who re-elected George Bush in the middle of the war?

That majority of Americans?

He stole it outright--in Ohio primarily, buy in many other states and districts as well. The SECOND stolen election by these neocon criminals was really worse than the first.

And Clinton's Secy of Defense was home boy Powell--WTF is your point anyway, silly dittohead?

Powell was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs under Clinton. The three Secs of Defense under Bill C. were Aspin, Cohen and Perry. Thanks for playing, dipshit.

I love idiots who think election fraud is only committed by one party in this country (regardless which side of the aisle they're on). Sadly, it goes on in both parties, but not to the degree to which you could say that an election was "stolen". That's just stupid.

BSmack wrote: Goldwater didn't win his run for President either. But he lit the fuse on a movement. That's what Dean's candidacy did for the Democratic Party. All in due time Mike.

Dean didn't light the fuse on the anti-war movement, the media did that with its nightly bodybag counts.

OCmike wrote:Powell was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs under Clinton. The three Secs of Defense under Bill C. were Aspin, Cohen and Perry. Thanks for playing, dipshit.

To be even more fair, it was Bush who appointed Powell.

mvscal wrote:Your so called anti-war "movement" is nothing but a very small, very noisy minority with zero clout at the polls.

You were saying?

My God and GOD, I think you live in a parallel universe or something. Nobody could be this dense.

It's the 60% lunatic fringe.

mvscal wrote:You think that translates into support for the Democratic party?

That's not what he said, dumbfuck.