Raiders QB situation

talking about who was arrested today

Moderators: Shoalzie, Biggie

User avatar
The Assassin
Raider Fan
Posts: 3171
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:27 am
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada 89130

Post by The Assassin »

poptart wrote:Those eager to toss dirt on Oakland before they're even out of pre-season may need to re-think things.
From the sounds of it they (and the 1st teamers in particular) delivered an overall BEATDOWN to SF today.
Yeah, yeah, only the '9ers .... only pre-season.
I DO hear ya.
Still a good effort by the Silver & Black.

Brooks and Walter both did well.
The defense continues to play well.
I hear Huff left with a 'sprained ankle' though.
Fingers crossed on that.

If anyone saw the game I'd like to hear about how the O-line looked.


3-0, bitches. ;)


I'll see it tomorrow on tape.

From what Greg Papa described the Raiders offensive line looked good tonight. Picking up blitzes and solid protection.

Huff has a mild sprain according to reports so nothng serious.
Al Davis=Fidel Castro
User avatar
drummer
Give the drummer some
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:26 am
Location: San Francisco , Homeless mecca of the USA

Post by drummer »

poptart wrote:Those eager to toss dirt on Oakland before they're even out of pre-season may need to re-think things.
From the sounds of it they (and the 1st teamers in particular) delivered an overall BEATDOWN to SF today.
Yeah, yeah, only the '9ers .... only pre-season.
I DO hear ya.
Still a good effort by the Silver & Black.

Brooks and Walter both did well.
The defense continues to play well.
I hear Huff left with a 'sprained ankle' though.
Fingers crossed on that.

If anyone saw the game I'd like to hear about how the O-line looked.


3-0, bitches. ;)
I saw it . The Raider O-line looked good against a very ,very weak Niner defense .

I wouldn't put much stock in this game , since Brooks still made some bonehead mistakes against that defense .
User avatar
WhatsMyName
Elwood
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Denver

Post by WhatsMyName »

AaWrong Brooks ain't the answer, unless the question is "Who shouldn't start in Oakland?" No wonder the Raiders like Walter so much, I'd like him too if my starter was Aaron Brooks.

Beating the 49ers is no feat. They are the most dysfunctional team in the NFL and the Raiders still looked shitty even in victory.

I pity Raider fan.
Image

Jake is out. Jay is in. Finally.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Post by poptart »

WhatsMyName wrote:........the Raiders still looked shitty even in victory.
1. Did you watch the game .... ?

1st downs : 24-9, Oakland
TOP: 41:41-18:19, Oakland
Net yds: 394-209, Oakland
Rushing yds: 156-57

Oakland had 3 penalties for 40 yds in the game, 1 fumble (not lost), and 1 INT.


Looks like a complete ass-kicking, dude.


2. How exactly did they 'look bad' .... ?


Two questions there.

Give 'em an answer.
User avatar
drummer
Give the drummer some
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:26 am
Location: San Francisco , Homeless mecca of the USA

Post by drummer »

The Raiders were up only 10-0 at the half , against a starting defense with a lot of new players on the team .

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

I had to watch the RaiderNation TV feed down here to see it . Los Angeles prep powerhouse Mater Dei has a better broadcast than that shit that comes outta Oaktown . Somebody kill Artie Gigantino NOW . He flat out sucks ass .
User avatar
Sirfindafold
Shit Thread Alert
Posts: 2939
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by Sirfindafold »

WhatsMyName wrote:Beating the 49ers is no feat.

What?


sin,

The Chicago Bears, 28-14 losers to the 9ers 8/11/06
Raider Loco
Elwood
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Brentwood, CA
Contact:

Post by Raider Loco »

drummer wrote:The Raiders were up only 10-0 at the half , against a starting defense with a lot of new players on the team .
Should of been 17-0 but a dropped pass in the end zone from a reciever is not the QB's fault dumb ass! It went off Buchanon's hands and up in the air to the Niner defenders.

Kerry Collins and the first team were awsome last year in preseason.......PRESEASON
User avatar
Sirfindafold
Shit Thread Alert
Posts: 2939
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by Sirfindafold »

mvscal wrote:If you think Brooks represents and improvement over Collins, you're liable to be sadly mistaken.
Is that why the league is knocking down Collins' door to sign his stiff ass?


go fuck yourself.
User avatar
WhatsMyName
Elwood
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Denver

Post by WhatsMyName »

The Bears played a vanilla defense against the Niners when they lost. Also, the 49ers were out of sync vs. Oakland. The first fucking play could've told you that. The Raiders did nothing and the 49ers fucked themselves for a backward lateral that lost major yardage.

I guarantee the Raiders finish last, barring major injuries from either DEN, KC or SD. Beating a team devoid of talent on their worst day doesn't impress anyone but Raider fan.
Image

Jake is out. Jay is in. Finally.
User avatar
WhatsMyName
Elwood
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Denver

Post by WhatsMyName »

2. How exactly did they 'look bad' .... ?
Aaron Brooks throwing a dart in the endzone with zero touch whatsoever and turning the ball over was reckless and ruined a good drive. Only going up 10 points against what was an obviously atrocious team. A good team like Denver would have rolled 35 on them by the 3rd quarter, just ask the Titans, who could probably trade with Oakland for 4 quarters.

Bottom line, they did what any team could've done, and did it unspectacularly. The only thing that impressed me was the OL. Huff sitting in a zone picking off a horrible QB who can't read defenses wasn't impressive either.

Don't believe me? See me by about Week 8.
Image

Jake is out. Jay is in. Finally.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Post by poptart »

It's certainly possible that Oakland will finish last this year.
Hey, they've had their shit packed for 3 straight seasons, so until they claw their way UP in the regular season .... yes, they are still the suck.
Going so far as to GUARANTEE a cellar finish for them is D U M B.
Not surprising it came from you, SucksYourName.
I will NOT forget your guarantee.

Oakland has concerns.
1. O-line
2. Middle of the D-Line
3. Depth and speed at RB
4. QB

I'm not 'fan' of Brooks, and he's got to win me over. So far I don't see it. He's an upgrade over Collins mainly because he has above average mobility. But I don't like his leadership, his body language, his ball management, his smarts, or his game management. Frankly I don't like much about him other than his deep ball.
I read an Oakland writer's article (J. McDonald) in which he made the point that Brooks and Moss appear to have no chemistry at all, and that in his time watching the team he has not one time seen the duo stay after a practice to work on things.
Not good.

I see Brooks starting the season, but if the offense is not getting in gear by say week 4 or 5 I can definitely see them tossing young Walter out there.
I am reading a lot of good things about him, and I have hopes that the kid can legitimately be the Oakland QB of the future.
KC Scott

Post by KC Scott »

mvscal wrote:
You'll be pining for the good old "Kerry Collins Days" before the season is out.

Possibly the smartest thing I've ever seen you contribute to a football discussion.

Brooks is terrible and makes Collins look like Marino
Post Reply