Page 2 of 5
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:28 pm
by Felix
the way I figure it, if the seaslugs lose Hasslebeck that would pretty much guarantee them a Number 1 or 2 ranking on B's list........
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:34 pm
by BSmack
Felix wrote:the way I figure it, if the seaslugs lose Hasslebeck that would pretty much guarantee them a Number 1 or 2 ranking on B's list........
What is it about a team having a quality backup that you don't fucking understand?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:45 pm
by Felix
BSmack wrote:Felix wrote:the way I figure it, if the seaslugs lose Hasslebeck that would pretty much guarantee them a Number 1 or 2 ranking on B's list........
What is it about a team having a quality backup that you don't fucking understand?
quit fucking whining........
you can rank whoever you want anywhere you want.......who gives a shit....
it's just the conspicuous absence of Cincy in your poll is pretty glaring....
especially having just knocked off the world champions......
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:44 pm
by BSmack
Felix wrote:BSmack wrote:Felix wrote:the way I figure it, if the seaslugs lose Hasslebeck that would pretty much guarantee them a Number 1 or 2 ranking on B's list........
What is it about a team having a quality backup that you don't fucking understand?
quit fucking whining........
you can rank whoever you want anywhere you want.......who gives a shit....
Apparently you do.
it's just the conspicuous absence of Cincy in your poll is pretty glaring....
especially having just knocked off the world champions......
I would have been more impressed had the Steelers not gift wrapped those last two TDs for them. Hey, it's not like I'm saying the Steelers belong in that list AHEAD of the Bengals.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:02 pm
by ChargerMike
...DBLMAO
P.S. driving by
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:52 am
by Felix
BSmack wrote: I would have been more impressed had the Steelers not gift wrapped those last two TDs for them. Hey, it's not like I'm saying the Steelers belong in that list AHEAD of the Bengals.
doh.......it's the old "if my team hadn't done this, that wouldn't have happened" syndrome......
been there, done that.......
you know, if frogs had wings they wouldn't slam their ass everytime they jumped......
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:21 am
by BSmack
Felix wrote:BSmack wrote: I would have been more impressed had the Steelers not gift wrapped those last two TDs for them. Hey, it's not like I'm saying the Steelers belong in that list AHEAD of the Bengals.
doh.......it's the old "if my team hadn't done this, that wouldn't have happened" syndrome......
No, it's more like I saw them play and wasn't overly impressed by either team. At least not impressed enough to call either team a top 5 team. Follow that up with the loss of their #1 tackler and the certain loss of Chris Henry and I'm even less impressed.
But hey, I'm sure you saw the game.
Right?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:50 am
by jiminphilly
BSmack wrote:Felix wrote:BSmack wrote: I would have been more impressed had the Steelers not gift wrapped those last two TDs for them. Hey, it's not like I'm saying the Steelers belong in that list AHEAD of the Bengals.
doh.......it's the old "if my team hadn't done this, that wouldn't have happened" syndrome......
No, it's more like I saw them play and wasn't overly impressed by either team. At least not impressed enough to call either team a top 5 team. Follow that up with the loss of their #1 tackler and the certain loss of Chris Henry and I'm even less impressed.
But hey, I'm sure you saw the game.
Right?
Good teams don't turn the ball over 5 times. The defending Super Bowl champs did just that and Cincy capitalized with 2- 4th quarter tds. You do that against a defense like the Steelers, IN THE 4th QUARTER, I'd say that makes you a pretty good team.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:00 am
by BSmack
jiminphilly wrote:Good teams don't turn the ball over 5 times. The defending Super Bowl champs did just that and Cincy capitalized with 2- 4th quarter tds. You do that against a defense like the Steelers, IN THE 4th QUARTER, I'd say that makes you a pretty good team.
Did you see the game? Those "drives" both started inside the Steelers 20 yard line. Again, I'm not saying the Steelers are better than the Bengals. I'm saying the Vikings are better than the Bengals.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:20 am
by peter dragon
BSmack wrote:Felix wrote:BSmack wrote: the loss of their #1 tackler
http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/CIN
Brian Simmons isnt lost.. Big ben looked lost..
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:26 am
by Felix
BSmack wrote:I'm saying the Vikings are better than the Bengals.
fair enough.......
you'll never convince me of that.....
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:11 am
by Terry in Crapchester
Back to the topic at hand . . .
1. Seahawks
2. Bears
3. Colts
4. Bengals
5. Jaguars
28. Browns
29. Lions
30. Texans
31. Raiders
32. Titans
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:26 am
by Shine
I'll put BSmack's bitter delusions on the backburner as well.
1- Cincinnati
2- Indianapolis
3- Chicago
4- Seattle
5- Jacksonville
28- Cleveland
29- Detroit
30- Tennessee
31- Houston
32- Oakland
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:05 pm
by KUTTER
1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
28. Dolphins
29. Browns
30. Cards
31. Titans
32. Raiders
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:10 pm
by Felix
KUTTER wrote:1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
not after the Broncos get through with them Monday Night.........
all you Raven lovin fags are gonna be crying a different tune......
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:05 am
by Shoalzie
Top 5 (same as KUTTER)
1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Patriots
Bottom 5
28. Packers
29. Buccaneers
30. Lions
31. Raiders
32. Titans
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:49 am
by KC Scott
1. Chicago
2. Indy
3. Baltimore - though I'm picking them to lose at Denver Monday Night
4. Atlanta - Too much Karma in New Orleans - But still class of the NFC South
5. Patriots - Won't be here for long but impressive in Cincy
28. Miami - Props for Getting Houston off the list. Saban is my # 1 choice for first massive coronary
29. Detroit - How long till Millen disappears like Jimmy Hoffa
30. Tampa - congrats on that meteroic decent. Sorry but with a rook QB I see Many L's in the immediate future
31. Tennessee - Really bad and getting worse.
32. Oakland - Damn.... Not even the Browns at home? OK I know pity the Raider fans on T1B
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:03 pm
by moon
1. Chicago
2. Indy
3. Eagles
4. San Diego
5. Seattle
28. Houston
29. Miami
30. Lions
31. Tennessee
32. Oakland
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:02 am
by KUTTER
1. Bears (for motherfucking real)
and the rest...
2. Colts
3. Ravens (regardless of MNF result)
4. Eagles
5. Chargers
28. Dolphins
29. Packers
30. Lionss
31. Titans
32. Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:03 pm
by poptart
1. Chicago
2. Indianapolis
3. Denver
4. New England
5. Cincinnati
32. Oakland
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:05 pm
by BSmack
1. Bears
2-5 In no particular order... Indy, New Orleans, Philly and Denver
28. Titans
29. Packers
30. Lions
31. Bucs
32. Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:10 pm
by poptart
New Orleans ... ?
Their schedule has been relatively soft, Bri.
How do you figure them ahead of Cincy or NE ... ?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:14 pm
by BSmack
poptart wrote:New Orleans ... ?
Their schedule has been relatively soft, Bri.
How do you figure them ahead of Cincy or NE ... ?
Because I've seen all 3 teams play and the Saints look better than either Cincy or NE at this time. This ain't the BCS, I'm just ranking who I think the best teams are at this moment.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:06 pm
by Cicero
1 Bears
2 Indy
3 Philly
4 Denver
5 San Diego
28 Texans
29 Titans
30 Bucs
31 Lions
32 Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:02 pm
by upstart
1) Denver
2) Bears
3)Indy
4) Pats
5) Cincy
28 K.C.
29 Titans
30 Bucs
31 Lions
32 Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:17 pm
by Nixhex
upstart wrote:1) Denver
2) Bears
3)Indy
4) Pats
5) Cincy
28 K.C.
29 Titans
30 Bucs
31 Lions
32 Raiders
Tard
If this is anything other than a weak attempt a trolling you should retire.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:31 pm
by Felix
KUTTER wrote:1. Bears (for motherfucking real)
and the rest...
2. Colts
3. Ravens (regardless of MNF result)
4. Eagles
5. Chargers
rack your undying homerism.........
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:41 pm
by upstart
Nixhex wrote:upstart wrote:1) Denver
2) Bears
3)Indy
4) Pats
5) Cincy
28 K.C.
29 Titans
30 Bucs
31 Lions
32 Raiders
Tard
If this is anything other than a weak attempt a trolling you should retire.
Are you telling me the Bears are better then Denver ?
Who have the Bears played ?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:51 pm
by Nixhex
upstart wrote:Nixhex wrote:upstart wrote:1) Denver
2) Bears
3)Indy
4) Pats
5) Cincy
28 K.C.
29 Titans
30 Bucs
31 Lions
32 Raiders
Tard
If this is anything other than a weak attempt a trolling you should retire.
Are you telling me the Bears are better then Denver ?
Who have the Bears played ?
They have played Seattle and they demolished them. Denver has a great defense. So do the Bears. The Broncos offense has been less than impressive. The only game they showed some sort of offense was against the depleted Patriots secondary. The Bears offense has been outstanding. The Bears didn't make their schedule. They've just played who's been put in front of them. They've destroyed them all too. Denver got beat by the Rams and barely escaped KC (a team you list in your bottom 5 with a back up QB in his first start) at home. I think you could maybe make an argument for Denver at #2.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:36 pm
by jiminphilly
upstart wrote:I know nuthing!
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:54 pm
by Cuda
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:KUTTER wrote:1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
*ESPECIALLY after the Ravens get through with them Mules on Monday Night.........
all you Donkey lovin fags are gonna be crying a different tune......:twisted:
How'd that turn out anyway?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:56 pm
by Felix
Cuda wrote:KC Paul 3.0 wrote:KUTTER wrote:1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
*ESPECIALLY after the Ravens get through with them Mules on Monday Night.........
all you Donkey lovin fags are gonna be crying a different tune......:twisted:
How'd that turn out anyway?
not quite like he'd envisioned.....
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:41 pm
by Goober McTuber
Paul needs to be a little more selective in the posts he borrows.
BTW, can anybody do something about upstart’s over-sized avatar?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:41 pm
by ChargerMike
Week 5
Bears
Colts
Bolts
Eggles
Patsies
Browneyes
Lioness's
Dolphins
Titans
Alcula's Raiderett's
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:08 am
by KC Scott
1. Bears
2. Colts....... Barely
3. Chargers ...... Arrggghhh
4. Pats
5. Bengals .....by default
28. Dolphins
29. Bucs
30. Lions
31. Titans
32. Raiders
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:32 pm
by Cicero
1 Bears
2 Colts
3 Denver
4 San Diego
5 Seattle
28 Titans
29 Browns
30 Dolphins
31 Texans
32 Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:22 am
by KC Scott
1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Seattle
4. Chargers
5. Denver / New Orleans
28. Packers
29. Cardinals
30. Texans
31. Dolphins
32. Raiders
Lots of mediocre / bad teams but only a few good ones
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:20 pm
by KUTTER
1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Chargers
4. Broncos
5. Saints
28. Lions
29. Cardinals
30. Packers
31. Texans
32. Raiders
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:29 pm
by BSmack
1. Bears
2. Chargers
3. Saints
4. Broncos
5. Seahawks
28. Packers
29. Texans
30. Dolphins
31. Browns
32. Raiders
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:50 pm
by Cicero
Regardless of tonight's outcome, mine wont change.
1 Colts
2 Bears
3 Broncos
4 Patriots
5 Rams
28 Cardinals
29 Titans
30 Browns
31 Raiders
32 Lions