Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:09 pm
by Van
Nah, I didn't ask and you didn't offer. It just sorta happened.
:-)
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:53 pm
by Laxplayer
Van, I'm not a doctor....but I did stay at a Holiday Express last night...anyway, I know there are many things out there that are lifestyle diseases, along with physical conditions that people don't have control over. Thyroid conditions etc.....There are many people that have tried dieting, exercise, etc....and seen no results and the GBS has worked for them. My mother is one of them along with a very good friend of mine, so to group these people into the same category as fat, blubbering, lacking self control gluttons is just foolish. It would be like me saying all $C football players are rapists, thugs, drug dealers, etc.....
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:20 pm
by Dinsdale
Laxplayer wrote:It would be like me saying all $C football players are rapists, thugs, drug dealers, etc.....
This anaolgy is supposed to
support your point?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:21 pm
by Van
It wasn't my fault! Really!
-Miss C
Seriously though Lax, a thyroid condition? Failed diets?
The odds of it being an out of control thyroid condition are pretty slim. HUGELY slim, especially for a guy of his monetary means. "Failed diets" means he's falling off the wagon. It means he's dieting, rather than simply making it a habit of eating right and exercising.
Bottom line, his obesity is almost certainly a result of poor lifestyle choices/impulse control. If it's not, has Weis (or anybody in his camp) ever stated that his condition is due to an out of control thyroid condition?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:24 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Van wrote:Bottom line, his obesity is almost certainly a result of poor lifestyle choices/impulse control. If it's not, has Weis (or anybody in his camp) ever stated that his condition is due to an out of control thyroid condition?
To my knowledge, no. But why would he do that? One's health is an intensely private and personal matter. I don't think the world needs to know anything more about Charlie Weis' medical history than he chooses to share.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:34 pm
by Van
One's health is an intensely private and personal matter.
Bullshit.
-Dins' liver, and my kidneys
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:11 pm
by SoCalTrjn
Dudes medical condition is that he is a lazy, cheese eating cock sucker and instead of eating smaller portions of the correct foods and exercising he went the easy way out and had a GBS, probably after the Fen Phen and Liptrovin failed.
So here this fat clump of bile sits in his golf cart, 2 fisting Nathans covered in onions, cheese and peppers and washing it down with a 12er of Cherry Coke while riding behind the players who are running and who he is trying to preach self control to.
On top of that he throws huge tempertantrums on the sideline and questions his kids desire and toughness. The Irish players may have had their teeth kicked in by the Wolverines players but at least theyre tough enough to stand up to a Steak Sandwich and 1/2 lb bag of French Fries.
Next time you question desire or will power Charlie, start questiong that blob looking back at you in the mirror.
He's right, parts of Notre Dame are soft, the softest isnt that spare tire he's carrying around his waist, its the lump of shit living between his ears in the portion of the brain that controls will power.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:27 pm
by GreginPG
What in the hell is going on here?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:40 pm
by Jimmy Medalions
Who the fuck cares if Weis is a lardass? You can love or hate the guy depending on your loyalty to a team, but the guy's obesity shouldn't count for shit.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:03 pm
by The Seer
Laxplayer wrote: It would be like me saying all $C football players are rapists, thugs, drug dealers, etc.....
And?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:07 pm
by Jimmy Medalions
The Seer wrote:Laxplayer wrote: It would be like me saying all $C football players are rapists, thugs, drug dealers, etc.....
And?
He left out acquitted murderers :wink:
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:10 am
by Laxplayer
Van and So Cal Troj...have you been asshole motherfuckers your whole lives or just since you've been visiting this board.
I can only hope that the things you insult people with happen to you and yours. Good luck and may only bad things happen to the two of you. It's nice that you find it humurous to insult someone that you know absolutely nothing about. Good job, you're parents must be proud.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:55 am
by SoCalTrjn
I know as much about Cheesecake Charlie as you know about USC players and fans that you enjoy taking shots at.
Don't get butt hurt, Im sure that on top of all that blubber Weis has a thick skin, it may be full of stretch marks and smell like Gouda but its probably pretty thick.
You think that if he broke his leg, gravy would pour out of it?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:25 am
by Van
Lax, read my posts again on this subject.
You're WAY overreacting, at least where my comments are concerned.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:50 am
by socal
Van wrote:Nah, I didn't ask and you didn't offer. It just sorta happened.
:-)
Nothing happened. It's just your autoerotic fantasies run amok triggered in part by catching a glimpse of Stranded Texan in the urinal.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:37 pm
by Van
That was just a bit too specific for an "off the top of your head" vignette there, dude. Especially considering all the urinals and all the kids standing at them where you work, hmmm, I dunno...
Speaking of which, aren't you a little old to still always be volunteering for Hall Monitor duty, and shouldn't you just let the janitors "clean the restrooms"??
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:51 pm
by socal
There's a reason Stranded Texan and the manager of the parts department have dubbed you Vanrie, gazer.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:40 am
by Laxplayer
I know as much about Cheesecake Charlie as you know about USC players and fans that you enjoy taking shots at.
Don't get butt hurt, Im sure that on top of all that blubber Weis has a thick skin, it may be full of stretch marks and smell like Gouda but its probably pretty thick.
Let's see...Charlie hasn't been accused of rape, Charlie didn't have 130+ exstacy pills in his room, charlie doesn't help drunk girls into bed. charlie doesn't go into bars as an underage individual, Charlie never said "We own the police, if Charlie had a kid ineligible for 2+ years....oh wait, he's got too much class for that. Your coach sees nothing wrong with it. Just keep em around until I can use them for the football program. Yep, apples and apples there dick head. You keep rooting for your band of thugs, gangsters, rapists, and drug dealers and I'll keep rooting for a guy who has a legitimate physical/medical problem. You keep rooting for your coach who sweeps things under the rug like they never happened. You keep owning the police. I'll keep rooting for a team that produces class individuals and plays by the rules. I'll stick to the fact that there are only TWO SC fans in here worth a shit. Greg and Jimmy. You two idiots aren't worth walking across the street to piss on if you were on fire.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:23 am
by Van
Lax, what "legitimate physical/medical problem" does Weis have?
I keep asking you this but you just keep lumping me in with SoCalTrjn. If you know something about his "condition" then spill it, otherwise quit being so cunty about this.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:28 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Van wrote:Lax, what "legitimate physical/medical problem" does Weis have?
He can't stop his legs from making a third trip to the buffet?
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:40 am
by Laxplayer
I don't know and neither do you. Once you do please stop judging the man. If he is a glutton for food then so be it, I feel for the man, however since neither you nor I have been in contact with his doctors then shouldn't we stop making ridiculous claims about his dietary habits?
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:09 am
by SoCalTrjn
wouldnt an accusation that a fat guy has poor dietery habbits be as accurate if not more accurate than rape accusations the even the police didnt take seriously enough to ever charge a guy with?
I suppose Weis is one of those fat fucks whos a fat fuck even though he never eats and runs 3 or 4 miles a day, thats an epidemic
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:10 am
by Dinsdale
Van blows goats.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:11 am
by Van
Lax, I already allowed for the SLIGHT possibility that his obesity might be due to a medical condition rather than being any fault of his.
Have you acknowledged that? No. You just keep getting more and more vindictive towards me.
I also stated that the odds are pretty damn slim that a guy with his wealth is dealing with a condition which is beyond his control. That's a fact. The odds that it's a non treatable thyroid condition which forces him to be enormously fat are MIGHTY slim. The odds that it's the result of an allergy are even slimmer, since that's easy enough to fix, isn't it?
No, Weis almost certainly looks the way he does due to his lifestyle choices. There's almost NO chance that he ever would've ballooned up like that and then stayed that way if all along he'd been eating correctly and exercising properly.
That's in NO way a ridiculous claim. It's a near certainty. I'm allowing though for the slight possibility that he's that ultra rare exception, so what's your problem?
Here's one other thing...
For the sake of argument let's assume he has some rare medical codition that made him balloon up and then remain fat forever. Now, being a highly visible celebrity like he is, man, it'd be almost impossible in our society these days for dude to not be a spokesperson for that condition.
The people trying to fight that condition would be all over the guy to get him to do PSAs and whatnot in support of research to find a cure.
Yeah, I think the odds are next to zero that he originally got morbidly obsese and then stayed that way through zero fault of his own. (Same with Mangini.) That'd be rarer than rare for a guy with his wealth and educational background and you know it as well as I do. So, considering we post nothing alike I'd appreciate it if you'd quit lumping me in with SoCalTrjn...
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:16 am
by Van
human decency edit
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:40 am
by socal
Factor in his round-the-clock NFL coaching lifestyle, and the fact he has a family to include a special needs child, it isn't hard to believe that he doesn't make time for proper diet and exercise. So he's fat. No bigee.
For whatever reason, Van, you've hit a sore spot with Lax. He's too blinded with rage to reevaluate your jabs versus SoCalTrjn.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:43 am
by Van
Lax and I have always been cool with each other so yeah, it rankles a bit to see him going so overboard and reckless with this new vindictiveness...
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
by Laxplayer
Sorry Van....I'll lighten up. I'm just trying to give the guy the benefit of the doubt.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:55 pm
by SoCalTrjn
wouldnt it take more time to eat more food?
I can understand a fat coach if he actually played and subjected himself to eating massive amounts in order to bulk up to play on the lines, but Weis never played. Hes just a fat fuck, theres no doubt you need to give him the benfit of
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:01 pm
by Killian
^^^^^^
You're a fucking idiot.
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:21 pm
by Laxplayer
I'm giving Van the benefit of the doubt So Cal....you are still one of the biggest tools this board has ever seen. I'm guessing you've been a fan of $C for 3 years, still have the tags on your brand new hat that your mommy bought you for your 20th birthday, never went to the school but still say "we" when referring to the football team. Just keep posting your drivel and people will continue to solidify their opinion that you are one of the biggest idiots this board has ever seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:09 pm
by Van
never went to the school but still say "we" when referring to the football team
<---------Guilty
Then again, I have
been to the school, many times! Just never attended classes there as the minor scholarship offer they gave me was pretty much useless.
Also, I call all my teams "we", including the pro teams for which I also never played.
Pretty sure a lot of people do this, actually...
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:56 pm
by SoCalTrjn
went to school there but still have never refered to any team that I was not playing on at the time as "we." Even if you go to the school currently, if you're not practicing, traveling and bleeding with the team it is "they" and not "we"
Have had my own season seats since 1995, my family has had them since the late 60's.
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:42 pm
by Laxplayer
went to school there but still have never refered to any team that I was not playing on at the time as "we." Even if you go to the school currently, if you're not practicing, traveling and bleeding with the team it is "they" and not "we"
Have had my own season seats since 1995, my family has had them since the late 60's.
Fine, but you're still an asshole.
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:05 pm
by SoCalTrjn
Ill accept that
?
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:46 pm
by bradhusker
heres the really funny part about van, and, its awesome!
van constantly talks about usc's accomplishments, their heisman winners, their championships, all their glory thru the years, BUT, you know what makes him mad?
the simple fact that for all those great usc teams thru the years, NOT ONE of them, NOT A SINGLE ONE, can approach the ALL TIME JAUGGERNAUT, that was 1995 nebraska.
let me make it crystal clear, every single publication, every knowledgeable football guru, even casual fans, know this to be true,
in the annals of college football, only one team is talked about in hushed whispers, only one team is considered frightenning and powerful, only one team didnt have ANY close calls,
only one team stands above all others, and is positioned atop the football world,
1995 nebraska,
and, when you get down to brass tacks, this makes van squirm in his faggoty fag girly shorts,
it makes him angry that none of his beloved usc squads can even come close to the all time behemouth, that was 1995 nebraska,
and, remember, this isnt my opinion, but the solidified fact of every single expert on the subject, its basically, when you get right down to it, WRITTEN IN STONE.
so, let me be the first to say, I LOVE IT! I love rubbing it in his pussy trojan face, because, no matter how much of an asshole he is to you guys, to me, a CORN FED STUD, A MASSIVE GORILLA, he is just a little tiny pink pussy, a vagina,
and, while usc is currently enjoying success, they still havent reached the heights that 1995 nebraska did,
and, they NEVER WILL.
for instance, the 03, 04, 05, usc teams, though great in their own right? were not as DOMINANT as the 93, 94, 95 nebraska powerhouse teams,
especially, when you look at their respective bowl opponents, nebraska had to face ALL three florida teams, the trifecta, if you will, and, 2 of them, in their HOME STATE, no less,
also, the 1995 squad, had to face 4 final top ten teams in a single season, usc has NEVER DONE THIS, I repeat, NEVER.
plus, usc won back to back, BUT, they had a loss in one of the years, in contrast, 94-95 nebraska went PERFECT, no blemish,
also, usc did play for a third straight title, BUT, the outcome was not in their hands, texas marched down their pussy throats, and they were helpless to stop it,
in strong contrast, with 1 second left, nebraska controlled its own destiny, if they make a 41 yd feild goal, against FSU, it would have been a threepeat,
basically, there is nothing in this post that van can refute, I have stated facts, and stated them with much dignity and class, and I know that deep down, van cannot stand the fact that usc has never had a team that can approach 95 nebraska, in fact, to a man, 95 nebraska was just bigger and stronger and faster than any usc team, our safties and linebackers would totally reak havoc with your pussy pac ten team, the blackshirts of 95 would not only shut you down, but, there would be some "season ending" injuries to boot,
any questions?
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:56 pm
by Van
non sequitur
One entry found for non sequitur.
Main Entry: non se·qui·tur
Pronunciation: 'nän-'se-kw&-t&r also -"tur
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, it does not follow
1 : an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically : a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative proposition or from the transposition of a condition and its consequent
2 : a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said
('sup, Dins! :-) )
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:57 pm
by SoCalTrjn
Yeah I have a question Brad, does your mother know you still wear her underwear?
?
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:06 am
by bradhusker
sure its a non-sequitur, but, it hits you deep down with its honesty and brutal frankness,
and, for all your raving about the usc program thru the years, 1995 nebraska, is the ONLY thing that you just dont have an answer for,
you've got all the other homers in here beat, but, when the topic of "best ever" comes up,
your trojans just dont measure up to the all time jauggernaut, now do they.
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:15 pm
by Van
Here's one list of all time best teams...
http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/colfoot ... /best.html
Here's another...
http://www.cfrc.com/Archives/Top_200_2005.htm
Those were the first two I found and '95 Nebraska heads neither list. ('71 Nebraska does...)
Lotta different lists out there...lotta different ways to go about ranking 'em...lotta different arguments.