Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:13 pm
sure thing, fag.Dinsdale wrote:Then could you edit that to read "backpedalling?"Bizzarofelice wrote:no.Dinsdale wrote:
Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:20 pm
There was no fuck up, it just went over your head (as usual).Bizzarofelice wrote:No, you got caught in a fuck up...Diogenes wrote:What I was saying is...
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:36 pm
explain your way of this statement, Susie.Diogenes wrote:The military loathes the idea, which is one reason you only hear the left talking about it
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:44 pm
The entire military decidedly does not loathe the idea of a new draft. The people delivering anti-draft sentiment may just be field-grade officers who fear unpleasant monkey business with their careers if the draft is reinstated.
Personally, I believe it's a great idea, and we'll see it happen within four months.
Personally, I believe it's a great idea, and we'll see it happen within four months.
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:08 pm
What part of the statement did you not get? Name someone on the right who supports the draft? Exactly when did you serve anyway, bitch?
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:22 pm
I serve bitches like you. Last time I did that... check the time.
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:45 pm
Only if we can call a moratorium on anal retentive posting behavoir.Dinsdale wrote:Then could you edit that to read "backpedalling?"Bizzarofelice wrote:no.Dinsdale wrote:
Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?
oh, looky. there I went and missplelled a word or some.
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:06 pm
Being slightly to the right of Castro (if that) doesn't put you on the right. In WW II we didn't have the same anti-military press corps or a minority party dedicated to subverting the military effort in order to bring down the CinC. And our culture as a whole is slightly differant. And by serve, I didn't mean suck off, I meant enlist in the armed forces. Flat out, those who are serving right now don't want or need chicckenshit losers like you sullying the uniform.mvscal wrote:I do. No deferrals. Your number comes up...you pack your shit and go. Bad back? No problem. You can push a pencil as well as that able bodied PAC clerk.Diogenes wrote: Name someone on the right who supports the draft?
Conscripts won the Civil War and WW2. They'll do just fine today.
Stick to proofreading, bitch.
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:45 pm
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:50 pm
If the only thing those field grade officers were concerned about was their careers, they would be all for the draft.silvurna wrote:The entire military decidedly does not loathe the idea of a new draft. The people delivering anti-draft sentiment may just be field-grade officers who fear unpleasant monkey business with their careers if the draft is reinstated.
Personally, I believe it's a great idea, and we'll see it happen within four months.
A draft means rapid expansion of the Army, which means accelerated promotions for the guys that are already in.
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:05 pm
I voted No
Obviously the majority of young, serving age Americans are too obese to get through one day on a parade ground. How the fuck are they going to serve in some war except as tank camouflage?
Obviously the majority of young, serving age Americans are too obese to get through one day on a parade ground. How the fuck are they going to serve in some war except as tank camouflage?
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:17 pm
This thread is proving my point in spades...except that after reading this thread I'm not sure if I'd even want some of you prior-service guys getting drafted if you hadn't already signed up.Rich Fader wrote:Considering that a good number of you clowns are probably still of draft age, I voted "stfu timmah". The idea that somebody might consider some of you even basically qualified to take up the defense of our country gives me hives. (I'm obviously excluding those of you who actually went in and served honorably and well--props, by the way--but you know who I mean.)
Oh, well...props for your service, anyway.
:D
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:20 am
I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:28 am
Does "B" stand for Bic?BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and burn their draft card.
Rip City
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:35 am
Yes. I was wondering who the 2 who voted yes were. I figured you were one of them.BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:05 pm
Nobody wants to hear about your fantasies with young liberals, BFoley.BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:10 pm
I have a feeling that re-instating the draft would be somewhat unpopular, politically, particularly with
a. People in the eligible age group
and
b. Their parents
Approval of this "war" would go down to about 2% if anybody actually had to consider making any personal sacrifices for it.
a. People in the eligible age group
and
b. Their parents
Approval of this "war" would go down to about 2% if anybody actually had to consider making any personal sacrifices for it.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 pm
So people would be less interested in freedom if it meant their freedoms would be stepped on?Mikey wrote:Approval of this "war" would go down to about 2% if anybody actually had to consider making any personal sacrifices for it.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:17 pm
Non sequiter much?OCmike wrote:Nobody wants to hear about your fantasies with young liberals, BFoley.BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.
Must suck to jump on the GOP bandwaggon just in time to see the wheels come off out from under you. Tell me, how's Arnie doing stopping those Messicans from littering your parking lots?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:27 pm
He does fine every day, 'cept for Cinco de Mayo, like always.
Arnie, while way too far left for my tastes, is still a far cry better than that union whore Gray Davis that he replaced.
Arnie, while way too far left for my tastes, is still a far cry better than that union whore Gray Davis that he replaced.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:51 pm
While the Governator has done a lot better job than I expected, he still hasn't done much if anything to rein it the most powerful and corrput union in the state.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:35 pm
Exactly. Which is why only leftist scum are actually floating the idea as 1) an opportunity to scare the voters and 2) Becuse they actually think that our military is a collection of pathetc losers from the hood who are one step away from incarceratiion (Dims? Bace? Did Ispelt that one right?) Actually those in uniform (and the vast majority of those who have served) don't require or wish for any help from losers who don't care about their country in the first place (something the Dems will never get).BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young left-wing morons to get out and vote.
Fuck you and have a nice day.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:51 pm
That's okay, I missed when you posted yours. Or I didn't give a shit. The point is that if you have served, you are fit to comenent on these matters. Even if <Bace Alert>your<End Bace Alert> a clueless racist shitstain like you.. Still a step abve a draft(snicker)dodging loser like Bace or Dins.mvscal wrote:I'm sorry, I must have missed it when you posted your branch and unit.Diogenes wrote: those who are serving right now don't want or need chicckenshit losers like you sullying the uniform.
BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.
And BTW, Fuck Off~edit~ Do you actually disagree with what I've been saying in this thread or is this just a drive-by blowjob?
Just curious.
Oh wait.
I don't care.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:16 pm
Mexican Navy maybe?
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:43 pm
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:06 pm
Actually. Iskra had a pretty nice ass. Her face on the other hand...
No Comment.
No Comment.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:17 pm
Oh, so you're a battle hardened veteran.BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.
That was the Love boat war, right?In 1981, HECTOR began her 25th deployment, visiting Yokosuka Japan; Diego Garcia; Tonga, Western Samoa; Auckland, New Zealand and Melbourne, Australia.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:47 pm
I liked that episode where Isaac whips up a Mai Tai for Sonny Bono, and then he goes and spills it on Gopher.Mister Bushice wrote:Oh, so you're a battle hardened veteran.BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.
That was the Love boat war, right?
Oh the laughs!
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:44 pm
Got to rack the shit out of that one, Goobs.
and it does pain me to do so.