T1B

Husker4ever wrote:See my above post. There's no arguement that Nebraska beat the better team....by a much wider margin. That and those odds are about all we have to go on now isn't it? You fucks are in a 1 and 2 matchup this year and we're in here beating this dead horse?

walk and chew gum, my friend. there's seperate threads for those of us who can.

M Club wrote:

Husker4ever wrote:See my above post. There's no arguement that Nebraska beat the better team....by a much wider margin. That and those odds are about all we have to go on now isn't it? You fucks are in a 1 and 2 matchup this year and we're in here beating this dead horse?

walk and chew gum, my friend. there's seperate threads for those of us who can.

Cut me a break...Husker fan ain't got much to talk about these days other than the "days of yore" and a win over Michigan in the lowly Alamo Bowl.

Just fucking around in here, M Club...

You fucks are in a 1 and 2 matchup this year and we're in here beating this dead horse?

I laughed.

Husker4ever wrote:Cut me a break...Husker fan ain't got much to talk about these days other than the "days of yore" and a win over Michigan in the lowly Alamo Bowl.

i'd whittle that down to just the "days of yore." last year's umich team?

L45B wrote:Just fucking around in here, M Club...

i figured you took my point wrong, which was to say you prolly care little for either umich or nebraska and wanted to point out osu's win at mizzou just for the sake of pointing it out.

M Club wrote:

Husker4ever wrote:Cut me a break...Husker fan ain't got much to talk about these days other than the "days of yore" and a win over Michigan in the lowly Alamo Bowl.

last year's umich team?

And there you have the state of affairs in Huskerland.

M Club wrote:i figured you took my point wrong, which was to say you prolly care little for either umich or nebraska and wanted to point out osu's win at mizzou just for the sake of pointing it out.

Actually, I remember a lot from that season and think both teams had decent arguments for being the true mythical national champion. But yes, I was just throwing in a haymaker comment. It connected, and I just had to keep it going to humor Husker fan.

GOD this is so laughable, meeechigan pussies trying to make cases for why michigan was better in 97?

ARE YOU FREAKIN' kiddin me??????????????

lets get the FACTS STRAIGHT , shall we?

tennesseee was better than wash st. MUCH BETTER. in fact. they were the no. 3 team.
wash st. was ranked 11th, and, they played in the faggott pac ten, to boot.
nebraska sodomized and humiliated tennessee, while, michigan was lucky to just hang on and squeak out a win,
second,
michigan fags love to bring up the come from behind win at missouri in overtime.
HOWEVER, the michigan fairies FAIL to note, that missouri was a bowl team,
MEANWHILE, michigan barely survives a 4-7 crap notre dame team in michigan, by 6 pts!
now, which is the better result?
obviously, nebraska played a much better bowl team in missouri, while michigan barely survives a shitty 4-7 irish team at home,
no comparison, advantage nebraska.
HOW DO THOSE FACTS TASTE? swish those FACTS around in your mouth with that warm big ten cum, you cocksucking big ten fairies,
you guys are losers.
by the way, if nebraska wins the big 12, we go to a BCS bowl stupid.

God help me, but I actually enjoy brad's goofball rants. It's getting to where I almost look forward to seeing how he'll come up with new ways to conjugate and then drop "faggot", "fairy" and other poofy derivatives on the various conferences and his Valvenis-esque homoerotic obsessions are kinda spooky to boot...

Winning the Big 12 North is like having the highest IQ in the Special Ed class.

Van wrote:God help me, but I actually enjoy brad's goofball rants. It's getting to where I almost look forward to seeing how he'll come up with new ways to conjugate and then drop "faggot", "fairy" and other poofy derivatives on the various conferences and his Valvenis-esque homoerotic obsessions are kinda spooky to boot...

you are an easy corn-fed stud 1995 fuck, Van. he already turned you out and made you like it--twice.

no one has been dryfucked in quite a while,

Van wrote:God help me, but I actually enjoy brad's goofball rants. It's getting to where I almost look forward to seeing how he'll come up with new ways to conjugate and then drop "faggot", "fairy" and other poofy derivatives on the various conferences and his Valvenis-esque homoerotic obsessions are kinda spooky to boot...

whats funny van, is that all you see is goofball rants, cause you are a GOOFBALL yourself.
you cant see the FACTS that I listed, which is what I am known for, the facts.
see, the michigan fairies dont like FACTS, because it kills any stupid point they may have.
like the FACT where I listed tennessee as the No. 3 team in the nation, and they clearly were a more powerful team than wash st. who plays in the fag pac ten.
then, michigan faggott counters with the missouri overtime game against nebraska, MEANWHILE, michigan fairy seems to forget the fact that missouri actually was a bowl team,
WHILE notre dame, was a crap 4-7 loser team, who came into the fag big house, and pushed michigan around like homos,
EVERY way you look at the 1997 season, nebraska comes out on top, when you deal with FACTS.
and every time michigan faggott opens his mouth, I make him look like a retard.
and I do it with hard FACT.

Van wrote:God help me, but I actually enjoy brad's goofball rants.

Moth to a flame, so do I.

Rack brad.

Pinkel gets a 3 year extension.

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS


sin,

Big 12 North