T1B

Terry in Crapchester wrote: The entire concept of race is based on long-since-discredited 16th century pseudoscience. It would be nice if racial classifications were to go the way of the dinosaur. Unfortunately in this country, race still has an important social connotation, and much of U.S. history is tied in with the history of race relations, so that's not likely to happen.

Nice take.

RACK

The only exception being, the U.S. isn't the only place whose history is racially tinted. Look around the globe. It's all over the place. The U.S. CAN BE, a place that leads by example and shows that with a good economic system that affords all it's citizens opportunity, with BALANCED social programs to assist those in need, etc.. etc...

Races can get get along.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I don't shit my $75 Polanimals everytime I see someone drop the N bomb, though.

Who does? The people you say labeled me a racist because I used the word once?

Tie your 'argument' up in knots much?

Moving Sale wrote:Tie your 'argument' up in knots much?

Wouldn't make him the only one around here --

Terry in Crapchester wrote:It would be nice if racial classifications were to go the way of the dinosaur.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:As the father of two biracial children

Terry in Crapchester wrote:They're biracial. By definition that would make them a minority.

That, my friends, is an example of sheer, utter, unadulterated self-inflicted asskicking.

The man abhors people being labelled by race, then goes on to describe his own freaking children as "biracial" and, in an act that should be considered offensive in anyone's book...refers to them as "minorities."

Way to preach the water and drink the wine.

Anyone else notice how the alleged lawyers here are either culturally or genetically predisposed to shoving their foot up their own asses, and being absolutely horrible at debate? THAT is pretty fucking funny.

Dinsdale wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Tie your 'argument' up in knots much?

Wouldn't make him the only one around here --

Terry in Crapchester wrote:It would be nice if racial classifications were to go the way of the dinosaur.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:As the father of two biracial children

Terry in Crapchester wrote:They're biracial. By definition that would make them a minority.

That, my friends, is an example of sheer, utter, unadulterated self-inflicted asskicking.

Uhhh, no.

What it is is an example of a differentiation between an ideal, on the one hand, and a reality, on the other.

In an ideal world, people would not make distinctions on the basis of race. In the real world, however, they do.

Sort of like Martin Luther King saying, "I have a dream that one day, my children will be judged not on the color of their skin, but on the content of their character."

He said it far more eloquently than I ever could. But he also recognized that there is a difference between his dream and reality.

Dinsdale wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Tie your 'argument' up in knots much?

Wouldn't make him the only one around here --

Terry in Crapchester wrote:It would be nice if racial classifications were to go the way of the dinosaur.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:As the father of two biracial children

Terry in Crapchester wrote:They're biracial. By definition that would make them a minority.

That, my friends, is an example of sheer, utter, unadulterated self-inflicted asskicking.

The man abhors people being labelled by race, then goes on to describe his own freaking children as "biracial" and, in an act that should be considered offensive in anyone's book...refers to them as "minorities."

Way to preach the water and drink the wine.

Anyone else notice how the alleged lawyers here are either culturally or genetically predisposed to shoving their foot up their own asses, and being absolutely horrible at debate? THAT is pretty fucking funny.

Dins,

You missed this one:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: Do you have anything intelligent to contribute to the discussion, you subhuman, assbreathing mongoloid?

Moving Sale wrote:Who does? The people you say labeled me a racist because I used the word once?

Once? That's laughable. You used the term repeatedly in an epic ass-kicking that spanned several days. Do you really think I'd remember it otherwise? You were strung up and beaten like some Nog caught stealing a bag of pork rinds in 1950s rural Alabama.

You're a document racist. You attacking mvscal for submitting racist posts makes about as much sense as entering the upcoming NBA Slam Dunk competition... unless, of course, you're being used as a prop.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:You used the term repeatedly...

Only in reference to the first time I used it.

You're a document racist.

What is a document racist?

But props to you for standing up for mvsKKKal and his Racist posts.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:What it is is an example of a differentiation between an ideal, on the one hand, and a reality, on the other.

Too much LSD must have fused them together in his feeble little mind.

Moving Sale wrote:What is a document racist?

Someone who insists that official documents be prepared using white paper?

Smackie Chan wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:What is a document racist?

Someone who insists that official documents be prepared using white paper?

Rack

mvscal wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:
Wouldn't make him the only one around here --


That, my friends, is an example of sheer, utter, unadulterated self-inflicted asskicking.

Uhhh, no.

Uhhh, yes. You define your niglets as "biracial" according to what you consider to be:

Hypocritical Pussy in Crapchester wrote:...long-since-discredited 16th century pseudoscience.

No, the Census Bureau considers them to be biracial. I was merely recognizing that fact.

I consider them to be my children. Nothing more, nothing less.

Goober McTuber wrote:You missed this one:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: Do you have anything intelligent to contribute to the discussion, you subhuman, assbreathing mongoloid?

Yup, entirely missed that one.

Hey Terry, YOU RACIST FUCKSTAIN...many anthroplogist classify humans as being from one of 5 subspecies of homo sapiens sapiens, although there has been so much interbreeding, the lines are blurred.

Of those, the vast majority are primarily made up of combination of three subspecies -- Caucasoid, Negroid, and...


Mongoloid. (If memory serves me correctly, the other two are Congoid and Australoid, or something like that, but they represent a very small portion of the gene pool, whereas Mongoloids are a larger contributor than Caucasoids.)


So, are you implying that people of Asiatic descent are less intelligent by genetic predispositon than other human subspecies?

Any Native Americans here? They're predominantly Mongoloid, so I would assume they'd be offended by your racist comments.


Nice job on your own keister, you racist fuckstain. You called out someone for dropping racist takes by...dropping racist takes.


Referring to a person with mental deficiencies as "mongoloids" has deep racist roots, and is considered quite offensive to anyone who actually knows what they're talking about, since it's a term to descibe defects in Caucasians. It originated from people with mental defects being likened to the Mongoloid peoples, where a defect in the brain put them closer to Mongoloids on the evolutionary scale that they were to Caucasians.


Fucking brilliant.

Nice catch, Goobs.

Moving Sale wrote:What is a document racist?

I'd love to further your education. You know I am here to educate your dumb ass, right? Which word are you struggling with, Stubbs? Documented... or racist?

Smackie Chan wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:What is a document racist?

Someone who insists that official documents be prepared using white paper?

Very nice.

mvsspic has bode in this thread. His epithet laced tirades and Terry's responses to them make me laugh.

Dinsdale wrote:So, are you implying that people of Asiatic descent are less intelligent by genetic predispositon than other human subspecies?

No, it was a common reference to Downs Syndrome until recently. In fact, mvsged dropped the same line in a quote on my sig, but you give him a pass.

Politically incorrect on my part? Sure. Racist intent? Sorry, but no.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

document racist

Which word are you struggling with, Stubbs? Documented... or racist?

Yes, please educate me on how document and documented are the same word.