Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:44 am
by Truman
BSmack wrote:
So the best you can come up with in return is that somehow two wrongs make a right?
Two wrongs, BStraw?

:lol:

I’ll just go ahead and take that as your admission that you were wrong. Who sez there is no God?!

BTW, Brian, two wrongs generally make up a BSmack post. ‘Sayin’.
Oh, and because Nancy Pelosi is a woman and a Democrat, that makes her "shrill"?
:meds:

No, it’s the fact that she’s a far-left liberal nut-bag that makes her shrill. I could give a flip about her gender. If it makes you feel any better, Harry Reed is too….
Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.
Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.

Move along, Brian. This isn't going well for you at all.

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:38 pm
by BSmack
Truman wrote:No, it’s the fact that she’s a far-left liberal nut-bag that makes her shrill. I could give a flip about her gender. If it makes you feel any better, Harry Reed is too….
Pelosi is a far left wing nut? Please do explain. This ought to be quite entertaining.
Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.
Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.

Move along, Brian. This isn't going well for you at all.
How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:37 am
by Truman
BSmack wrote:
Truman wrote:No, it’s the fact that she’s a far-left liberal nut-bag that makes her shrill. I could give a flip about her gender. If it makes you feel any better, Harry Reed is too….
Pelosi is a far left wing nut? Please do explain. This ought to be quite entertaining.
No, what would be entertaining is for you to explain how you posted your reply without [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tags.
BSmack wrote:
Truman wrote:
BSmack wrote:Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.
Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.

Move along, Brian. This isn't going well for you at all.
How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?
Oh my. You mean Paul ran you too?

---------------

Your choice, Brian. You've already been made to look stupid numerous time in one arguement. Are you really bent on being made to look like an idiot in another?

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:42 pm
by BSmack
Truman wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Truman wrote:No, it’s the fact that she’s a far-left liberal nut-bag that makes her shrill. I could give a flip about her gender. If it makes you feel any better, Harry Reed is too….
Pelosi is a far left wing nut? Please do explain. This ought to be quite entertaining.
No, what would be entertaining is for you to explain how you posted your reply without [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tags.
Because I was being dead serious. If you think Nancy Pelosi is some kind of communist, you're a fucking moron.

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:34 pm
by ChargerMike
BSmack wrote:
Truman wrote:
BSmack wrote: Pelosi is a far left wing nut? Please do explain. This ought to be quite entertaining.
No, what would be entertaining is for you to explain how you posted your reply without [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tags.
Because I was being dead serious. If you think Nancy Pelosi is some kind of communist, you're a fucking moron.

...Comminist NO..Socialist..Hell yea!

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm
by Dinsdale
BSmack wrote:
Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.
Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.

How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?

No way.


Please tell me I didn't just see "IKYABWAI" from a KC dude?

Please?

Now, I find Truman to be a deece read on an occasion, but that doesn't preclude my supporting mandatory "board timeouts" for any KC area troll who drops "IKYABWAI."

It's become an epidemic.

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:25 pm
by ChargerMike
Pretty decent battle going on IMHO...

I've got an "out of retirement" Truman ahead on points, with a staggering and dazed BSmack trying to mount a comeback in the late rounds.

Truman took an early commanding lead with this right-cross to Bri's chin..."ad nauseaum references to "Chimpy"..Bri down for a 3 count

Truman added to his early round domination when he landed a vicious left hook to Bri's liver..."BTW, wanna know the difference between Obama and Osama?..One seeks an unconditional American surrender in the Middle East……And the other lives in a cave."

Bri tried to mount a rally with this beauty..."If things are so flipping great in Basra, why don't the Brits send those guys to Baghdad to help our guys?"..but was countered effectively when Truman fired back with..."If 1,500 American CBP agents can’t effectively impact a peaceful border, just what the hell makes you think that 1,500 limp-wristed Limeys can effectively close a hostile one?"
...Truman then snuck in a quick combination to Bri's dome sending the Crapchester journeyman back into the ropes with this...BTW, Brian, two wrongs generally make up a BSmack post. ‘Sayin’.


Bri showed he still had full control of his senses when he fired back with this moment of truth...Pelosi is a far left wing nut? (he was joshing you say) :D

Well never mind, Bri did score a standing 8 count when he stunned Truman with this solid shot...How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?

Bri then scored a TKO over RedMarty, whose ill-advised leap into the fracas came to an abrupt end. This solid shot ended it early for Marty....Sorry, I'm not a communist. Please elaborate?


Going into the late rounds I have Truman ahead on points, but know full well the wily veteran Bri will not go with out a fight...

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:04 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
ChargerMike wrote: Bri then scored a TKO over RedMarty...
Normally, I go into the later rounds, but I was distracted by the round card girl...
Image

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:19 pm
by ChargerMike
Martyred wrote:
ChargerMike wrote: Bri then scored a TKO over RedMarty...
Normally, I go into the later rounds, but I was distracted by the round card girl...
Image

...YIKES!...I'd say she's holding the right card...

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:59 am
by Truman
ChargerMike wrote:
Well never mind, Bri did score a standing 8 count when he stunned Truman with this solid shot...How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?
:meds:

Might wanna go to the video on this one, Mike.

I can see where nuance and subtlety might just be lost on tards trying to follow a bare-knuckle brawl, but super slo-mo will prove that B actually took as well as he gave in that last sequence.

No apologies. Truman is gonna actually make you read his rhetoric to understand it. Can’t keep up? Well, then, sucks to be you. Go post at StuckNut.

That said, however, I’ll try to keep this post in simple terms so that even the good folks in the “Up and Left” can keep up.

“Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.” – BSmack

“Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.” - Truman

Now, on the outside, this may appear to be neener-neener smack to the illiterate and uneducated.

For those who struggle with reading comprehension, however, what BSmack essentially said was, “keep posting shit that makes you look stupid.” My reply was, “no, B, it is a helluva lot more fun posting shit that makes you look stupid.”

If this somehow falls to the standard of IKYABWAI, then half the Board is run. They oughtta shut this sordid clambake down.

I realize that KC bashing is Board-sexy these days, but that’s like suggesting that Bushice, mvscal, and even ChargerMike fall to the level of mtool just because they’re all Californians.

[rickeyricardo]…an’ if I gotta ‘splain it to joo, then it ain’ no fun[/rickeyricardo]

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:09 am
by Truman
BSmack wrote:
Because I was being dead serious. If you think Nancy Pelosi is some kind of communist, you're a fucking moron.
[kcpaul]No, B, you're a fucking moron.[/kcpaul]

:lol:

Communist? Hell no. She’s way too far Left. And I feel fairly safe in assuming that Marx and Lenin wouldn’t be down with gay marriage, global warming, or animal rights. Oh, and actively working to retreat from an enemy that is avowed to kill you. Doesn't fit Communist doctrine at all.

Now, secular-progressive threat to all good things uniquely American? You bet.

The anti-Christ? Well, now if the shoe fits….

Two bullets, BSmack, and you get the America you so futilely desire. Hopefully, the good constables in your town are minding the local bell towers should the "Chimp" come a-visitin'….

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:06 am
by RadioFan
Image

L-R, Truman, BSmack

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:14 pm
by BSmack
RadioFan wrote:Image

L-R, Truman, BSmack
He better be in a good sturdy boat. And I wouldn't recommend bringing the Webber along.

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:40 pm
by BSmack
Truman wrote:For those who struggle with reading comprehension, however, what BSmack essentially said was, “keep posting shit that makes you look stupid.” My reply was, “no, B, it is a helluva lot more fun posting shit that makes you look stupid.”

If this somehow falls to the standard of IKYABWAI, then half the Board is run. They oughtta shut this sordid clambake down.
So your defense is "I meant to do that"???

Paul Rubens truly is your God. You must fall to your knees in reverence everytime Pee Wee's Playhouse comes on. Which, given current Kansas City posting patterns, must be every fucking hour on the hour in your fair city.

Now, on to Pelosi.
Truman wrote:Communist? Hell no. She’s way too far Left.
Now you're just being stupid for the sake of being stupid.
And I feel fairly safe in assuming that Marx and Lenin wouldn’t be down with gay marriage, global warming, or animal rights.


True, those would be values associated with true conservatives and fans of liberty, not the faux conservative poseurs currently in the White House.
Oh, and actively working to retreat from an enemy that is avowed to kill you. Doesn't fit Communist doctrine at all.
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk out front says you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Figures you wouldn't even recognize the one aspect of Pelosi's policy that DOES support your argument, at least in the respect that there is a Leninist precedent for the concept of recognizing a failed policy when she sees one.
Now, secular-progressive threat to all good things uniquely American? You bet.
You are a faithful follower of Brother John Birch. But tell me, are you a member of the Antioch Baptist Church? Or are you one of them undercover agents sent down to infiltrate the Klu Klux Klan?

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:11 pm
by Tom In VA
DRIVE BY RACKS to TRUMAN


10 for Sportsmanship
10 for Content
10 for Delivery
10 for Style



Big fan of that guy.


RACK 'IM

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:30 pm
by ChargerMike
Truman wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:
Well never mind, Bri did score a standing 8 count when he stunned Truman with this solid shot...How very "Kansas City" of you. You must be taking over for Paul?
:meds:

Might wanna go to the video on this one, Mike.

I can see where nuance and subtlety might just be lost on tards trying to follow a bare-knuckle brawl, but super slo-mo will prove that B actually took as well as he gave in that last sequence.

No apologies. Truman is gonna actually make you read his rhetoric to understand it. Can’t keep up? Well, then, sucks to be you. Go post at StuckNut.

That said, however, I’ll try to keep this post in simple terms so that even the good folks in the “Up and Left” can keep up.

“Keep stringing yourself up there petard boy.” – BSmack

“Naw, it's far more entertaining hoisting you up by yours.” - Truman

Now, on the outside, this may appear to be neener-neener smack to the illiterate and uneducated.

For those who struggle with reading comprehension, however, what BSmack essentially said was, “keep posting shit that makes you look stupid.” My reply was, “no, B, it is a helluva lot more fun posting shit that makes you look stupid.”

If this somehow falls to the standard of IKYABWAI, then half the Board is run. They oughtta shut this sordid clambake down.

I realize that KC bashing is Board-sexy these days, but that’s like suggesting that Bushice, mvscal, and even ChargerMike fall to the level of mtool just because they’re all Californians.

[rickeyricardo]…an’ if I gotta ‘splain it to joo, then it ain’ no fun[/rickeyricardo]

...I think I was following the action as you explained it, however I felt for the sheer "smack" aspect, Bri. earned some points with the "Paulie" shot. :D ....lets face it....you're out to an almost insurmountable lead..just keep the jab working.


BTW..1 pt. deduction for the California shot. :wink:

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:51 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Bri, you're getting thumped by a guy who brings little more than threadbare late 90's AM talk radio talking points wrapped in Valvenis, SCIII era ad hominem barbs.

That you even have to counter the assertion that Pelosi is a "far-left Communist" is beyond ridicule.

Failed.

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:04 pm
by BSmack
Martyred wrote:Bri, you're getting thumped by a guy who brings little more than threadbare late 90's AM talk radio talking points wrapped in Valvenis, SCIII era ad hominem barbs.

That you even have to counter the assertion that Pelosi is a "far-left Communist" is beyond ridicule.

Failed.
I'll be sure to offer a rebuttal as soon as Truman offers an example of Pelosi's alleged extremism. So far all he's offered have been, as you pointed out, "late 90's AM talk radio talking points". Shall I make his argument for him just to knock it down again?

Sheesh. :meds:

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:56 am
by Dr_Phibes
Isn't she the fascist who told Chavez to 'shut the hell up' when he cracked on Bush in New York?

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:33 am
by BSmack
Dr_Phibes wrote:Isn't she the fascist who told Chavez to 'shut the hell up' when he cracked on Bush in New York?
An example of triangulation surpassed only by Clinton's 1992 attack on Sister Souljah. Don't take it personaly, it was only business. She's really on your side. Just ask Truman. :lol:

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:16 am
by Dr_Phibes
BSmack wrote: She's really on your side. Just ask Truman. :lol:
Gee, thanks.

It's depressing, it's all down to association - Socialism, Social Democrats,
Democrats, Communists - real definitions with very distinct and seperate ideas, all with their own nuanced positives and negatives, have lost all their meaning - and the level of arguement nosedives.

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:47 am
by BSmack
Dr_Phibes wrote:
BSmack wrote: She's really on your side. Just ask Truman. :lol:
Gee, thanks.

It's depressing, it's all down to association - Socialism, Social Democrats,
Democrats, Communists - real definitions with very distinct and seperate ideas, all with their own nuanced positives and negatives, have lost all their meaning - and the level of arguement nosedives.
You make it sound like the majority of the electorate actually ever understood those nuances. To which I would beg to differ.

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:37 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Dr_Phibes wrote:Isn't she the fascist who told Chavez to 'shut the hell up' when he cracked on Bush in New York?
I think you're confusing her with the person who pledged an oath of fealty to the Likudniks in AIPAC.

Oh wait...it's the same person.


Gee, I hope she doesn't spill her borscht while planning the dissolution of private capital...

:meds:

What a fucking idiot.

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:11 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Sorry, I'm not a communist. Please elaborate?
Vince Foster's current state of room temperature should tell you everything you need to know.
Yeah, and there are black helicopters circling your house. And Elvis really is still alive.

:meds: x infinity.

If you want to criticize Hillary, there are more than ample grounds upon which to do so. That, however, is not one of them.