Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:13 am
Link?BSmack wrote: Maybe Whitey is still sore from the assfucking the Hunt family gave him and the rest of KC taxpayers.
And no, you can't use Paul as your source.
Link?BSmack wrote: Maybe Whitey is still sore from the assfucking the Hunt family gave him and the rest of KC taxpayers.
BTW Tax Wagon, how ARE those stadium improvements coming along, anyway?War Wagon to the Chiefs, Royals, and the Jackson County Sports Authority wrote:Thank you sir...may I have ANOTHER???
Too late.And no, you can't use Paul as your source.
In a sense, economics is guiding this phenomenon. Or at least, the law of supply and demand is. Simply put, there are more metro areas in the U.S. which are at least arguably capable of supporting a major-league sports team than there are major-league franchises in any given sport. So the owners essentially are able to hold their area hostage, and if that area doesn't pony up, they threaten to move the team elsewhere. Much like the proverbial dog licking his balls (back to the title of the thread, how do you like that?) they do it because they can.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Here's a recent article from "Reason" magazine on the issue of public monies and stadiums..
And another...
Actually, there's a whole bunch more there also.
Basically, the alleged arguments that government subsidies are "good business" for the municipalities they are in is a big fat fib. It's a case of business owners lying and the fans of sports teams lying to themselves (and their neighbors, whose pockets they are fleecing) to justify keeping a team in their area. If you want to keep your team in your area and use YOUR money to do it, fine. But I'd rather fans not insist that I subsidize their team owner's business with MY taxes. I love the Bills, but I was damned pissed that NYS monies went to Ralph Wilson for his stadium renovations. If it comes down to the Bills leaving if they don't get their extortion payoff....err....."stadium subsidies," then fuck 'em, let 'em go. My happiness doesn't revolve around whether some billionaire chooses to keep his team of millionaire athletes in my region.
The owners do it because they can. The politicians (who "should" know better), do it because they are afraid of their constituents wrath. It's nothing more than a bread and circus mentality that has nothing to do whatsoever with real economic benefits for the area.Terry in Crapchester wrote:In a sense, economics is guiding this phenomenon. Or at least, the law of supply and demand is. Simply put, there are more metro areas in the U.S. which are at least arguably capable of supporting a major-league sports team than there are major-league franchises in any given sport. So the owners essentially are able to hold their area hostage, and if that area doesn't pony up, they threaten to move the team elsewhere. Much like the proverbial dog licking his balls (back to the title of the thread, how do you like that?) they do it because they can.
Pure horseshit.BSmack wrote: The politicians (who "should" know better), do it because they are afraid of their constituents wrath.
Are you FUCKING kidding me????????War Wagon wrote:Pure horseshit.BSmack wrote: The politicians (who "should" know better), do it because they are afraid of their constituents wrath.
The Truman Sports Complex was originally funded in 1969 by a sales tax voted for by Jackson county voters.
The half billion dollar renovations and upgrades are now also being funded by a sales tax approved by, you guessed it, Jackson county voters.
This has nothing to do with owners holding an area hostage or politicians being afraid of their constituents wrath (though they damn sure should be). As difficult as this may be for you to understand comrade B, people want major sports teams and first class facilities for their city, and they're willing to pay for it. It's a quality of life issue, and people feel better about living in a city that has these amenities.
Your stupidity and ignorance is as alarming as it is amazing. Please tell me that you can't vote. Please tell me that you don't have a drivers license. Please hitchhike your ass to Omaha or Wichita.RevLimiter wrote:We could've had NEW stadiums for those teams for around the same price tag
Feel free ANYTIME to just fucking ADMIT THAT I'M RIGHT and this will all go MUCH more smoothly for you, Under-Katherine-Shields'- Desk Wagon. Tell me, are you closely related to the Captain of the Titanic?War Wagon wrote:Your stupidity and ignorance is as alarming as it is amazing. Please tell me that you can't vote. Please tell me that you don't have a drivers license. Please hitchhike your ass to Omaha or Wichita.RevLimiter wrote:We could've had NEW stadiums for those teams for around the same price tag
He probably thinks his state ID card is a driver's license.War Wagon wrote:Please tell me that you don't have a drivers license.
Dave,War Wagon wrote:Your stupidity and ignorance is as alarming as it is amazing. Please tell me that you can't vote. Please tell me that you don't have a drivers license. Please hitchhike your ass to Omaha or Wichita.RevLimiter wrote:We could've had NEW stadiums for those teams for around the same price tag
If your elected officials really cared about you, they would have told the Chiefs and Royals management to build their own damn stadiums and never put the sales tax on the ballot. Not that I can blame them for being cowards. Outside of LA, I can't think of too many places with the balls to stand up to team owners when it comes to stadiums. My own home state is pouring billions into the new Yankee Stadium and New Jersey errr Brooklyn Nets project. And for what? So that NYC will have two MLB and two NBA teams? It's a fucking waste of money.This has nothing to do with owners holding an area hostage or politicians being afraid of their constituents wrath (though they damn sure should be). As difficult as this may be for you to understand comrade B, people want major sports teams and first class facilities for their city, and they're willing to pay for it. It's a quality of life issue, and people feel better about living in a city that has these amenities.