Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:47 pm
So you’re saying that if Rhode Island had just as many murders as New York, New York would have the lower per capita rate? Yeah, you’re a stinking genius.
Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
Sexist.trev wrote:I hope it's a very long time before this country sees a female as president. I haven't seen any female politician capable of that job yet.
Federal gun laws are not Constitutional unless they are regulating Interstate Commerce. State gun laws are Federally Constitutional unless they somehow violate the 14th Amendment or the Dormant Commerce Clause.Terry in Crapchester wrote: In that regard, I'm not looking so much at the 2nd Amendment as the 4th and 14th.
Moving Sale wrote:It’s better have it and not need to kill a jackboot than not have it and need to kill a jackboot.
Dinsdale wrote:On 6/21/1942, the Japs attempted a stealth attack in an effort to soften up the defenses, and be able to get an inland passgae via the Columbia. Ft Stevens was fairly well armed with artillary, and the weak attack was quickly thwarted. It was the only attack on a mainland US base in WW2.
And yet New York is always one of the leaders in the national crime stats- regardless whether or not you use per-capita, or overall numbers.Terry in Crapchester wrote:
What I was trying to get at was, that as a populous state, New York would be less hurt in a statistical analysis of violent crime by a number of violent crimes than would most other states.