Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:36 am
Makes you really question the use of the word "famous" in there for sure.Goober McTuber wrote:Gee, Sam, thanks for telling us a month late.
Makes you really question the use of the word "famous" in there for sure.Goober McTuber wrote:Gee, Sam, thanks for telling us a month late.
I just would have liked to have been in on the celebration.Mister Bushice wrote:Makes you really question the use of the word "famous" in there for sure.Goober McTuber wrote:Gee, Sam, thanks for telling us a month late.
All I am saying is no matter how well the owner mightve treated the slave. There is no way you can keep someone as a slave and be considered kind or benelovent. If you were either one of those two, you would let them go free.mvscal wrote:It stands to reason. Most whites were kind owners. I'm sure the race pimps like you to believe the ante-bellum South was Mandingo 24/7 365 days a year, but it wasn't.Mr T wrote: Yet somehow Woodson believes that most blacks were kind owners.
You are right but isnt that what this topic was about anyway.mvscal wrote:You are flat out wrong. You are making a modern value judgement on a situation where those values have no applicability.Mr T wrote: There is no way you can keep someone as a slave and be considered kind or benelovent. If you were either one of those two, you would let them go free.