Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:36 am
by Mister Bushice
Goober McTuber wrote:Gee, Sam, thanks for telling us a month late.
Makes you really question the use of the word "famous" in there for sure.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:04 pm
by Goober McTuber
Mister Bushice wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Gee, Sam, thanks for telling us a month late.
Makes you really question the use of the word "famous" in there for sure.
I just would have liked to have been in on the celebration.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:12 pm
by Mr T
mvscal wrote:
Mr T wrote: Yet somehow Woodson believes that most blacks were kind owners.
It stands to reason. Most whites were kind owners. I'm sure the race pimps like you to believe the ante-bellum South was Mandingo 24/7 365 days a year, but it wasn't.
All I am saying is no matter how well the owner mightve treated the slave. There is no way you can keep someone as a slave and be considered kind or benelovent. If you were either one of those two, you would let them go free.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:15 pm
by PSUFAN
Since we're apologizing in this thread, I'd like to say SORRY to trev's worn out balloon knot for posting Raydah James' pic.

I'm also SORRY for banning all the jews around here.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:34 am
by Mr T
mvscal wrote:
Mr T wrote: There is no way you can keep someone as a slave and be considered kind or benelovent. If you were either one of those two, you would let them go free.
You are flat out wrong. You are making a modern value judgement on a situation where those values have no applicability.
You are right but isnt that what this topic was about anyway.