Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:11 am
There's a 63 post 'President Bush is a dummy' thread at the top of the Cul de Wack' forum.
This is a problem.
This is a problem.
Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
SHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!Mister Bushice wrote:OC Mike is right. Pick the one you like and don't go to the ones you don't like. It's not that complicated.
^^^^^^Cuda wrote:You can start HEREJay in Phoenix wrote: Less readable? Thanks to me, PSUFAN, etc.? Link that one up little tard, I dare you.
Too Jewish (only a very select few will get this)poptart wrote: Close 'er down, tweek a few thing, resolve to do a few things differently, have everyone re-register, and open shop again.
Good idea, but I have my hands full keeping THE a Tard Free Zone.Maybe appoint Cuda the board czar too.
No, not really.Cuda wrote:Too Jewish (only a very select few will get this)poptart wrote: Close 'er down, tweek a few thing, resolve to do a few things differently, have everyone re-register, and open shop again.
Interesting idea, Smackie, but I think there are certain posters that hit specialized forums that want no part of the main forum. They’d probably just bail altogether.Smackie Chan wrote:Seems we're talkin' two issues (at least) here: 1) Quality 2) Quantity
The second one is easier to fix than the first. The obvious solution would be to get rid of all the parochial forums, and open the Cul de Smack up to all topics. The only other forums should be Archives and TROTS.
With more posters visiting this forum (because there would be no others at T1B on which to post), there's a chance the quality would also improve. Of course, there's an equal chance that it will get worse. But at least there would be more traffic.
A compromise would be to set up the forum so that when someone starts a thread, that individual would have to select a menu option identifying the category of the topic (general, sports, politics, cooking, etc.). A feature could be made available that would allow viewers who are only interested in a particular category to sort on it, thereby giving them the opportunity to bypass/ignore the rest of the threads (much like visiting a specialty forum). Threads could then be displayed with most recent posts at the top within each category, or without respect to categories, depending on individual desires. Basically, it'd be a best of both worlds scenario - heavier traffic in the main forum, with the option to choose categories within it, rather than a multitude of slow forums.
Just my $0.02.
Sadly, this seems to be occupying most of Biggie's attention, too.PSUFAN wrote:Well, most of his attention is focused on keeping Biggie's grapesack nit-free.
There's all that. And then there's telling the whiney fuckstains like Cuda to fuck off. That route is going swimmingly.Smackie Chan wrote:Seems we're talkin' two issues (at least) here: 1) Quality 2) Quantity
The second one is easier to fix than the first. The obvious solution would be to get rid of all the parochial forums, and open the Cul de Smack up to all topics. The only other forums should be Archives and TROTS.
With more posters visiting this forum (because there would be no others at T1B on which to post), there's a chance the quality would also improve. Of course, there's an equal chance that it will get worse. But at least there would be more traffic.
A compromise would be to set up the forum so that when someone starts a thread, that individual would have to select a menu option identifying the category of the topic (general, sports, politics, cooking, etc.). A feature could be made available that would allow viewers who are only interested in a particular category to sort on it, thereby giving them the opportunity to bypass/ignore the rest of the threads (much like visiting a specialty forum). Threads could then be displayed with most recent posts at the top within each category, or without respect to categories, depending on individual desires. Basically, it'd be a best of both worlds scenario - heavier traffic in the main forum, with the option to choose categories within it, rather than a multitude of slow forums.
Just my $0.02.
True, but that's only good for a day or two at a time. Then it's back to the same ol' ho-hum 'til Coods pries himself away from Hosedboard long enough to come back in here for another steaming pile of abuse. With heavier traffic, we might be able to, like, set some sort of Guinness record for creating the most heavily adorned plunger peacock. 'Course, given recent history, Cood's would have his work cut out for him trying to top BSmack.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:There's all that. And then there's telling the whiney fuckstains like Cuda to fuck off. That route is going swimmingly.Smackie Chan wrote:Seems we're talkin' two issues (at least) here: 1) Quality 2) Quantity
The second one is easier to fix than the first. The obvious solution would be to get rid of all the parochial forums, and open the Cul de Smack up to all topics. The only other forums should be Archives and TROTS.
With more posters visiting this forum (because there would be no others at T1B on which to post), there's a chance the quality would also improve. Of course, there's an equal chance that it will get worse. But at least there would be more traffic.
A compromise would be to set up the forum so that when someone starts a thread, that individual would have to select a menu option identifying the category of the topic (general, sports, politics, cooking, etc.). A feature could be made available that would allow viewers who are only interested in a particular category to sort on it, thereby giving them the opportunity to bypass/ignore the rest of the threads (much like visiting a specialty forum). Threads could then be displayed with most recent posts at the top within each category, or without respect to categories, depending on individual desires. Basically, it'd be a best of both worlds scenario - heavier traffic in the main forum, with the option to choose categories within it, rather than a multitude of slow forums.
Just my $0.02.
You not posting there again would accomplish that.Cuda wrote:Good idea, but I have my hands full keeping THE a Tard Free Zone.Maybe appoint Cuda the board czar too.
You picked up the single part of the double æntendre. Think harder!Invictus wrote:No, not really.Cuda wrote:Too Jewish (only a very select few will get this)poptart wrote: Close 'er down, tweek a few thing, resolve to do a few things differently, have everyone re-register, and open shop again.
sincerely,
Everyone on here who knows you quote continually from the same Mel Brooks movie.
You seem to have a double obsession. Feel free to not fill us in if you don't mind.PUSFAN wrote:Biggie's grapesack
this is niot going well for yor coods., lets rethink this . perhaps a surge or or somehting of drudge . lets. do . this. ill shit, ill be up for another forty 6t minutes befiore i get divorced. take yor time, im going to take a nap.Cuda wrote:You seem to have a double obsession. Feel free to not fill us in if you don't mind.PUSFAN wrote:Biggie's grapesack
snort... Goobs, you fucker, you owe me a Bud Light. No, not a nancy boy midwestern micro brew pale ale, just an honest mans beer. Fucker...Goober McTuber wrote: I don’t see where the main forum is all that bad. It’s a little slow at times, big deal. Go read a fucking book.
Goddamn ADHD twats like Cooter think they have to be continually entertained. Go buy a fucking dildo.
ft..War Wagon wrote:snort... Goobs, you fucker, you owe me a Bud Light. No, not a quality micro brew pale ale, just a broke-dick mans beer.Goober McTuber wrote: I don’t see where the main forum is all that bad. It’s a little slow at times, big deal. Go read a fucking book.
Goddamn ADHD twats like Cooter think they have to be continually entertained. Go buy a fucking dildo.
Yep. And when I try to do anything about it I get crucified. 'Swhy I decided to start caring again somewhere around the year 2439 A.D.poptart wrote:There's a 63 post 'President Bush is a dummy' thread at the top of the Cul de Wack' forum.
This is a problem.
Don't blame me- blame your dial-up connection.Cuda wrote:Nice red x there, Paula.
You're a prime example of what I'm talking about.
Thanks for not disappointing