Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:22 pm
by Dog
Dinsdale wrote:
Dog wrote:So we have WAshington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State in the next 4 years. Doesn't give much room to add in a USC or Miami or FSU, now does it?

Yeah, that's it.

The only thing stopping BSU from multiple H&Hs with USC is a lack of room.

Damn that schedule... poor BSU had to say "sorry, we're all full up" when Miami came looking for the H&H.
Umm, if I remember correctly, it was Miami that pulled out of the negotiations. But neither here nor there, I don't make the schedule.....

But, it is a contract....Sure, they could drop Weber State from their schedule and play somebody else and you won't get any tears from Bronco fans, but there's probably not a school in the entire NCAA that doesn't already have contracts signed for the next 3-4 years. That's just the way it is.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:24 pm
by Atomic Punk
Dog wrote:What the fuck is your point?
Who else in the WAC plays those power houses (or is it powerhouses?) on Boise's upcoming schedules? Who in the WAC plays USC, UCLA, Arizona, Auburn, Tennessee, LSU, Ohio State, West Virginia, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Colorado, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and a few other teams besides the U&L teams?

Until you smurf turds can say you made it happen, then STFU.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:25 pm
by Dinsdale
Dog wrote:
Umm, if I remember correctly, it was Miami that pulled out of the negotiations.

Yeah -- the minute they learned that it wasn't a typo, as they originally assumed, and in fact the paperwork wasn't missing a zero at the end.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:28 pm
by Dog
Dinsdale wrote:
Dog wrote:
Umm, if I remember correctly, it was Miami that pulled out of the negotiations.

Yeah -- the minute they learned that it wasn't a typo, as they originally assumed, and in fact the paperwork wasn't missing a zero at the end.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:32 pm
by Dog
Atomic Punk wrote:
Dog wrote:What the fuck is your point?
Who else in the WAC plays those power houses (or is it powerhouses?) on Boise's upcoming schedules? Who in the WAC plays USC, UCLA, Arizona, Auburn, Tennessee, LSU, Ohio State, West Virginia, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Colorado, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and a few other teams besides the U&L teams?

Until you smurf turds can say you made it happen, then STFU.
Yeah, Kansas State and Colorado would have been a much better contract than Oregon and Washington.....

So your point is you don't like the Broncos. Hey, I can dig that.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:38 pm
by Felix
Dog wrote:
So your point is you don't like the Broncos.
updating spread sheet....AP doesn't like BSU

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:50 pm
by Atomic Punk
Again, you BSU homers haven't even looked up what I've stated.

A few years ago Kansas State was ranked what #12 when a certain team went there and beat the shit out of them AT Kansas State?

Colorado with Kordell Stewart was a very good team. Trent Dilfer's team came up a bit short.

Oregon State was ranked #7 by most polls at the time they travelled and got smashed by David Carr and Bernard Berrian 63-7.

Just making a point. I'm talking about teams over (Read: "'the past decade or so") and not current rosters.

Obviously, you're too lazy to look shit up.

BTW, I like Boise State. I would like to see them actually do what I said in my initial post wha they need to do.

Does frostbite set in this early up there?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:54 pm
by King Crimson
Felix wrote:see, this is the kind of thing that makes me laugh out loud.....
Believe the Heupel wrote:
See, OU fans (prior to idiots one and two) were thinking national title last year. Several publications were thinking the same thing.
followed by......
King Crimson wrote: last year's OU team was BY FAR the weakest Big XII champion since 01 Colorado.
BtH claiming that OU fans and "several publications" were of the opinion OU was a national championship contender, while KC claims they were an over achieving team of sophs with some seniors.....

maybe the OU tards should get together and come to some sort of consensus on exactly what the Sooners were last year......

thanks for the laughs though....:lol:


reading comprehension, G. you are pretty dumb to be calling others "tards".

"several publications" and expectations=preseason:

Bomar and OL JD Quinn being dismissed ("the two idiots")--a converted WR plays QB=season.


end of season, and Adrian Peterson missing most of the conference season and a converted DB carrying the load and beating bowl teams OSU, ATM, Mizzou (all on the road) and NU (in KC): "overachieving"--wins Big XII.

the statements are not contradictory. Tard.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:50 pm
by Felix
hmmmmm, after the Oregon game I distinctly remember OU fan crying about being ripped off of their chance at the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP because of a bad call.....but after Texas kicked their asses, that's when the Bomar/JD Quinn excuses started popping up.......

funny shit brah.....

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:59 pm
by King Crimson
Felix wrote:hmmmmm, after the Oregon game I distinctly remember OU fan crying about being ripped off of their chance at the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP because of a bad call.....but after Texas kicked their asses, that's when the Bomar/Peterson/JD Quinn excuses started popping up...

funny shit brah.....
you'd have to prove that. i don't think any OU fans (here, or anywhere) thought OU was a MNC contender with Paul Thompson at QB. just because you "assert it" does not make it so.

i don't see anyone making Bomar excuses. that's something YOU and OTHERS impose on the situation. go to a Sooner board, no one wants Bomar back. nor did they want him back last year. your argument is bullshit. you wish it were that way.

"funny shit brah".

if your team loses a chance to go undefeated by a bad call, and "whine about it", then i guess you are right. your chance to win the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP might be impaired.

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:57 pm
by RadioFan
Felix wrote:yeah, one of these days.....:lol:
You were saying?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fucking tard.

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:51 pm
by Cross Traffic
BSU is now 0-13 on the road at BCS schools, horrible performance yesterday.

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:54 pm
by Adelpiero
tharp was horrible at QB


he conitued to cost them with bad throws and ints

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:03 am
by RadioFan
Dog wrote:45 Days or so until the Broncos run the table AGAIN
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:47 pm
by Felix
RadioFan wrote: You were saying?

Fucking tard.
yeah, I was saying you're a fucking douchebag.......

but you won't find anything wherein I said BSU would go undefeated this year......

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:43 pm
by orcinus
Looks like somebody's Dale Carnegie courses are paying off.

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:51 pm
by Felix
orcinus wrote:Looks like somebody's Dale Carnegie courses are paying off.
and you said it was a colossal waste of money......

HA......

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:20 pm
by orcinus
I was talking about your haircut.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:03 am
by RadioFan
Felix wrote:
RadioFan wrote: You were saying?

Fucking tard.
yeah, I was saying you're a fucking douchebag.......
How's this season goin' for ya?

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:43 pm
by Felix
RadioFan wrote:

How's this season goin' for ya?
it's going great.....BSU is 10-2....

they lost to a very good Hawaii team that will end up with a BCS at large berth.....

(assuming of course they beat Washington next week)