Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:57 pm
by OCmike
Terry in Crapchester wrote:19. What pitcher holds the lifetime record for average number of strikeouts per game?
Strictly a guess . . . Nolan Ryan?
Nope.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:57 pm
by OCmike
Smackie Chan wrote:19. What pitcher holds the lifetime record for average number of strikeouts per game?
Randy Johnson
Yep.
Re: OCmike's Humpday Challenge
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:58 pm
by Risa
Dinsdale wrote:You've dissed everyone who has ever put their knowledge to the test by playing Mike's game, you lowlife.
It's one thing to use references to verify or eloborate an answer that you question the validity of, it's a whole nother ball of wax to use references to actually come up with the answer.
Oh, the piranha is definitely feeling threatened now. ;) So this is what Dinsdale looks like with no clothes on.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:59 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
OCmike wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:19. What pitcher holds the lifetime record for average number of strikeouts per game?
Strictly a guess . . . Nolan Ryan?
Nope.
In that case, I defer to Smackie. After seeing his answer, it's probably correct.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:00 pm
by Shoalzie
We're not playing for money here...chill out. The one time I mentioned that I blatantly looked up an answer and you rake me over the coals. If everyone here can honestly say they've never done that, I'll apologize for breaking the rules. I just loving messing things up just to see you get your panties in a bunch.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:05 pm
by Risa
6. Who did Colorado need five downs to beat in the 1990 season?
EDIT: I watched that game. And I remember the idiocy. I couldn't tell
you who played against Colorado, though. so I had to look it up. In
the spirit of the thread, now that I'm rereading. I'm taking the answer down.
Dinsdale is still a dork, and his self-satisfying parsing is ludicrous. But
the spirit of the thread is the spirit of the thread.
I apologize for entering it, OC.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:05 pm
by Dinsdale
Shoalzie wrote:I just loving messing things up just to see you get your panties in a bunch.
Ah, the always-fresh "I was just
trolling you" defense.
Did you happen to notice that there's been responses of "wrong" in this thread?
Do you think that was a function of
people giving their best educated guess, or a Wiki page was wrong?
Absolutely fucking retarded.
Almost as retarded as "mentioning a blatant act," but not quite.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:19 pm
by Shoalzie
OK Deputy Dins, let's hand it off to the judge...if OCM wants me to buzz off and not play anymore, I'll honor his wishes.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:39 pm
by socal
15. Who was the leader of the Church at the time of the initiation of the Crusades? He is also credited with being the initiator.
Pope Urban II
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:49 pm
by smackaholic
shoalz,
I am certain there have been other shitstains here that have googled an answer.
I am fairly certain though, that you are the first to be dumb enough to admit it.
So, you sir are not dishonorable in this case, just dumb as a stump..
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:02 pm
by OCmike
smackaholic wrote:shoalz,
I am certain there have been other shitstains here that have googled an answer.
I am fairly certain though, that you are the first to be dumb enough to admit it.
So, you sir are not dishonorable in this case, just dumb as a stump..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We...have..a...winnah!
Shoalz, you're more than welcome to continue playing.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:04 pm
by Smackie Chan
OCmike wrote:smackaholic wrote:shoalz,
I am certain there have been other shitstains here that have googled an answer.
I am fairly certain though, that you are the first to be dumb enough to admit it.
So, you sir are not dishonorable in this case, just dumb as a stump..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We...have..a...winnah!
'Zactly. I believe this can be filed under, "If you're not cheating, you're not trying."
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:04 pm
by Shoalzie
smackaholic wrote:So, you sir are not dishonorable in this case, just dumb as a stump..
Hey, it's not like I haven't kicked my own ass with being open and honest in the past...right Dins?
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:06 pm
by Shoalzie
OCmike wrote:Shoalz, you're more than welcome to continue playing.
Cool...thanks, man.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:49 pm
by MuchoBulls
OCmike wrote:MuchoBulls wrote:9 - Vanderbilt
Nope.
He took over midway through the 2000 season and this was a road game.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:05 pm
by OCmike
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/scores10 ... RBILT0.htm
According to the box score for the above Vandy-Tenn game (from 2002), Tennessee has not lost to Vandy since 1982.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:32 pm
by A.C. Crut
9. Casey Clausen lost 1 SEC road game his whole career at Tennessee to who?
Gators
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:49 pm
by OCmike
As usual, Crut is wrong. All is right with the universe.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:04 pm
by Brew in FBurg
14. What exactly was a 'motte'?
A big 'ol mound of dirt that a fort or castle can be built on...
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:06 pm
by Mr T
9. Georgia?
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:08 pm
by MuchoBulls
My bad. I see I misread the boxscore of that game.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:09 pm
by OCmike
Mr T wrote:9. Georgia?
Nope.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:09 pm
by A.C. Crut
9. Casey Clausen lost 1 SEC road game his whole career at Tennessee to who?
Arkansas
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:20 pm
by OCmike
Still wrong and still smuggling purple dongs in your cheeks like a chipmunk preparing for winter.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:26 pm
by Mr T
9. LSU
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:31 pm
by OCmike
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:49 pm
by Mr T
9. Auburn
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:05 pm
by Dinsdale
We've only got what... 3 SEC teams to go now?
Did OCMike screw up the question? If it was a road game, he must have meant 1-AA team.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:08 pm
by Mr T
Well I know tenn lost to georgia, lsu, and auburn during clausens tenure. I just dont know if he was starting in any of those.
Are we counting bowl games as away games?
Clausen shared duties with ainge from 2000 to 03 I think...
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/di ... ?year=2000
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:45 pm
by OCmike
Mr T wrote:9. Auburn
Yep.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:46 pm
by OCmike
Dinsdale wrote:We've only got what... 3 SEC teams to go now?
Did OCMike screw up the question? If it was a road game, he must have meant 1-AA team.
No, it just took awhile to get to the right one.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:55 pm
by Shoalzie
You know if you looked up the answer...
Oh, nevermind. :wink:
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:01 pm
by RevLimiter
Goober McTuber wrote:BSmack wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:13. In medieval times, what was a ‘quintain’?
An object used to help train a knight. It consisted of a shield and dummy suspended from a swinging pole, kind of a practice target. Like the jousting equivalent of BSmack.
You honor me with your continued ankle biting. Tell me, what exactly did I do to earn your never ending attention?
Ankle-biting, huh. You buying your material from KFC Paul now?
He's just calling a spade a SPADE, Goobs....surely you're used to it by now.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:03 pm
by Goober McTuber
You should be collecting royalties from BSmack by now, Tubby, though based on Wolfman’s experience, the check is NOT in the mail.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:50 pm
by OCmike
5. With one of the weirdest names in anatomy, where is the Zonule of Zinn found?
The eye
...now back to your regularly scheduled bickering.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:56 pm
by Hobbes
OCmike wrote:5. With one of the weirdest names in anatomy, where is the Zonule of Zinn found?
The eye
Roach wrote:5. With one of the weirdest names in anatomy, where is the Zonule of Zinn found?
In yer eye. It holds the lens in place or something like that.
Roach answered this one already.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:11 pm
by OCmike
Damn, I'm slipping. That was on page one too. :hangs head in shame:
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:19 pm
by A.C. Crut
^^^
and still can't see peeled baby carrot sized caahck