Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:31 am
by War Wagon
Felix wrote:War Wagon wrote:
We're both 0-2 'tart. Should make for an interesting wager, yes?
won't even be close....the rayduds will mop the floor with the Chefs
I beg to differ.
In fact, I've got tickets to an upcoming game if you can convince me otherwise.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:36 am
by Felix
Arch Angel wrote:
Will anyone score?
I anticipate a 2-0 drubbing of KC
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:55 am
by KC Scott
War Wagon wrote:Felix wrote:War Wagon wrote:
We're both 0-2 'tart. Should make for an interesting wager, yes?
won't even be close....the rayduds will mop the floor with the Chefs
I beg to differ.
In fact, I've got tickets to an upcoming game if you can convince me otherwise.
Doesn't he need to write an essay first?
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:14 am
by Felix
KC Scott wrote:
Doesn't he need to write an essay first?
STFU ya fuggin Canuck.....
haven't you got some Canadiens gear to pick up...
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:12 am
by poptart
orcinus wrote:Good faith?
This is gripping after a loss, man.
Let it go.
Sucks that Seabass couldn't convert two in a row, but the Rat got over with the TO. Call it bush, if you will, but calling it a couple seconds earlier wouldn't bring a peep from your end.
Sucks to be Oakland fan after that game, for certain, but it was a strategic move that worked beautifully.
Rat got over, no doubt.
Janikowski didn't get his job done, also no doubt.
The Raiders didn't quite do enough to win the game.
If you can forget that this was Oakland, and if you can forget that I'm in mid-season NFL Office bashing form, then perhaps you can visualize the same scenario happening to the Chiefs.
Then you can also visualize that the 'rule' is as lame as can be.
Such was noted by a few people in the other thread.
p.s. -- J. Lynch should have been flagged for 15 yds for his blatant trip attempt when he whiffed on Lamont Jordan on the overtime run. Not called, wow, big surprise.
p.s.s. -- If anyone thinks Janikowski would have been granted a 2nd kick attempt if he had missed the first one then their naivity knows no limit.
p.s.s.s. -- Eat my undies.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:29 pm
by War Wagon
poptart wrote:
p.s. -- J. Lynch should have been flagged for 15 yds for his blatant trip attempt when he whiffed on Lamont Jordan on the overtime run. Not called, wow, big surprise.
I believe that a trip actually has to occur to warrant a flag, not just a blatant attempt.
If anyone thinks Janikowski would have been granted a 2nd kick attempt if he had missed the first one then their naivity knows no limit.
cue the black helicopters...
'tart, the play was blown dead before the snap. Dead, I tell ya'. The first kick didn't happen. It was an apparition, a mirage. It was all in your fevered imagination.
Of course he would've been allowed another kick.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:55 pm
by poptart
Watch the replay of the Jordan run, Wagon.
I defy you watch it say that Lynch didn't deliberately swing his leg and trip Jordan.
He slowed his progress, no doubt.
The man doesn't have to go to the ground for a trip to be called.
All that needs to happen is for a player to deliberately swing a leg to trip an opponent.
That clearly happened.
Fact is Jordan may have scored without that trip by Lynch.
As it was, a 10 yd penalty should have been tacked on to the end of the play.
Jano - 42 yd FG attempt.
Hmmmmmm .........
No 2nd kick if Jano misses the first.
No way.
Long bitch and moan session by the Mule braintrust.
Lengthy official meeeting.
Determination that time out was not called in time.
Game over, better luck next time, Pollock.