Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:33 am
by Dr_Phibes
War Wagon wrote:
Good to see him get clowned around a bit. I bet that didn't turn out quite the way he hoped it would. Props to the Columbia U. president for inviting him into the lions den, and then devouring that idiots carcass alive.
Seriously, what other kind of reception did this tool think he'd get? He'll probably meltdown in a big way in front of the General Assembly once he realizes how badly he got thumped.
I don't know, most of the press is saying that the audience was respectful, quiet and applauded - aside from gay cracks.
I see it differently, Bollinger second guessed himself on the decision to invite him and to cover himself, took the route of a two year old. Ahmadinejad took the high road and nailed him:
Distinguished Dean, dear professors and students, ladies and gentlemen, at the outset I would like to extend my greetings to all of you. I am grateful to the almighty God for providing me with the opportunity to be in an academic environment, those seeking truth and striving for the promotion of science and knowledge.
At the outset I want to complain a bit from the person who read this political statement against me. In Iran tradition requires that when we demand a person to invite to be a speaker we actually respect our students and the professors by allowing them to make their own judgment and we don't think it's necessary before this speech is even given to come in with a series of claims...
(APPLAUSE)
... and to attempt in a so-called manner to provide vaccination of some sort to our students and our faculty.
I think the text read by the dear gentleman here, more than addressing me, was an insult to information and the knowledge of the audience here, present here. In a university environment we must allow people to speak their mind, to allow everyone to talk so that the truth is eventually revealed by all.
Certainly he took more than all the time I was allocated to speak, and that's fine with me. We'll just leave that to add up with the claims of respect for freedom and the freedom of speech that's given to us in this country.
Many parts of his speech, there were many insults and claims that were incorrect, regretfully.
Washington Post
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:24 am
by LTS TRN 2
Wrong, Busher, and once again we see the auto-smear hysteria mounted against this guy and the nation of Iran, he NEVER denies that the horrific crime of genocide was committed by the Germans against the Jews of Europe. Notice how in all the standard "outrage" at his presence, no one offers an answer to his basic question: why should the Palestinians suffer for the crimes of the Germans. THIS is what his "shocking" questioning is about. The dean of Colombia, by attacking the man for his statements before he spoke, revealed himself as a puppet of the JINSA crowd, etc.
Sunny, your standard revisionist "Golda Meir" script of the "land without a people" is repugnant and thoroughly false. Moreover, you really miss the essential fact that prior to the establishment of the drastic race-state experiment in 1948, Jews lived peacefully and productively throughout the Arab world for many centuries. For example, you child-like idiot, did you realize--or consider the lasting potential significance--that prior to 1950 or so, Baghdad's population was approximately one third Jewish?
What part of this monstrous police state do you feel has been working these sixty blood-soaked years? Perhaps the environmental disaster initiated by the jump-started Modern Society imposed upon the region's delicate ecosystem?
The world center of organized crime?
Wake...the...fuck...UP!
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:44 am
by Y2K
"If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
George Orwell
Animal Farm
"A classic argument for protecting freedom of speech as a fundamental right is that it is essential for the discovery of truth"
Great quote from the Wikipeeeeeedia
Rack the ever living shit out of the people at Columbia University for reminding Americans the power they have in ole Amendment 1. We should welcome these crazy fucks to our Country and invite them to "Meet the People." more often.
Watching that Sack of Shit "Kick His Own Ass" when exposed to intellegent Americans making use of The Bill of Rights did not suck. I don't think he'll be back anytime soon.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:51 am
by Mister Bushice
Dr_Phibes wrote:
I don't know, most of the press is saying that the audience was respectful, quiet and applauded - aside from gay cracks.
I see it differently, Bollinger second guessed himself on the decision to invite him and to cover himself, took the route of a two year old. Ahmadinejad took the high road and nailed him:
Hogwash. You filtered out a small part of his polite intro, left out his sales pitch of Islam and his politely veiled comments about the holocaust, which were in essence, why are the people who claim the holocaust does not exist still in prison?
He calls that a limitation on seeking knowledge, despite the videos, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses, etc. etc.
Then he goes on to try and link the so called holocaust to the long suffering of palestine, neatly avoiding the fact they are hip deep in the same hatred and do not seek peace but revenge.
He limits himself to a convenient 60 year timeline, ignoring the centuries of change the region has endured.
And perhaps halfway down, he pulls the "Why Us" card regarding sanction.
Recall this was one of the assholes who led the taking of the US embassy back in the 70's. Just in case he needs a reason to wonder why We don't give them shit, there you go.
Not to mention that an American wouldn't survive 20 minutes in his "Peaceful " country with out being torn apart, burned and dragged through the streets.
And then there is this little dance he did, for his puppet master and followers back home:
The question is: Do you or your government seek the destruction of the state of Israel as a Jewish state? And I think you could answer that question with a single word, either yes or no.
(APPLAUSE)
AHMADINEJAD (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): You asked the question, and then you want the answer the way you want to hear it. Well, this isn't really a free flow of information.
Spinsdalesque, don't ya think?
This guy has a fucking agenda and masks it in a "we are a poor, but peaceful people much wronged" cloak.
Check this shit:
QUESTION: Mr. President, the question isn't about criminal and drug smugglers. The question was about sexual preference and women.
(APPLAUSE)
AHMADINEJAD (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): In Iran, we don't have homosexuals, like in your country.
(LAUGHTER)
We don't have that in our country.
(AUDIENCE BOOING)
AHMADINEJAD (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon. I don't know who's told you that we have it.
(LAUGHTER)
SO - Iran is the ONLY country in the world with no gay people? Really? How did they manage that?
And a nice wrap up:
MODERATOR: I'm sorry that President Ahmadinejad's schedule makes it necessary for him to leave before he's been able to answer many of the questions that we have, or even answer some of the ones that we posed to him.
(LAUGHTER)
(APPLAUSE)
Fuck him and his rhetoric filled bullshit. The President of CU was spot on about him.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:09 am
by Atomic Punk
"After reviewing call.... the play stands. LTard gets a bullet to the head."
The canatards whimpering behind their United States defense force are in line behind him.
So much envy from the worthless pieces of shit that populate this board. Hate on... you fucking worms.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:21 am
by LTS TRN 2
Here, puppets, read the interview--and remember who the real liars were in ramping up the war hysteria for attacking Iraq. Remember who the
real war mongers are...you know, the folks who have actually
initiated mass carnage in the region.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/ ... 6690.shtml
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:12 am
by Mister Bushice
You're fucking joking, right? did you read page two?
Fucking hypocrite. Claims he wants peace in iraq, but Weapons manufactured in his country are found in Iraq and he says its for the iraqi peoples "self defense"?
PELLEY: Mr. President, American men and women are being killed by your weapons in Iraq. You know this.
AHMADINEJAD: No, no, no.
PELLEY: Why are those weapons there?
AHMADINEJAD: Who's saying that?
PELLEY: The American Army has captured Iranian missiles in Iraq. The critical elements of the explosively formed penetrator bombs that are killing so many people are coming from Iran. There's no doubt about that anymore. The denials are no longer credible, sir.
AHMADINEJAD: Very good. If I may.
AHMADINEJAD: Are you an American politician? Am I to look at you as an American politician or a reporter? This is what the American officials are claiming. Well, we don't need to arrest many people to prove that Americans are occupying Iraq or produce fabricated documents. If you go to the streets of Baghdad, you will see American helicopters and tanks and Humvees, so on and so forth. So the Iraqi people are just defending themselves.
And then there's this total bullshit, where he speaks "You made your bed, go lie in it" out of one side of his mouth, followed by "We want peace for all, cooperation and no soldiers killed" out of the other:
(CBS) PELLEY: As a goodwill gesture, will you say right now in this interview that you will do everything in your power to prevent Iranian arms from entering Iraq?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, Iranian forces are not inside Iraq. Can you show me one?
PELLEY: No sir, Iranian arms, sir.
AHMADINEJAD: Please, allow me to continue. Please, allow me to finish my thought. The American government has admitted that with more than 160,000 troops, state-of-the-art military equipment, they have failed to control and put a stop to the activities of these few people. That's very unfortunate. You shouldn't accuse others because you have certain problems yourself.
Very clearly, we are friends to all. We very much are saddened with war. We are very much saddened that American troops are being killed, losing their lives over there.
and the artful dodge. Never answering a straight forward yes or no:
PELLEY: Mr. President, we appreciate your thoughts. Some people watching this interview, frankly, will think that you're dodging the questions because many of the questions that I ask you are fairly straightforward "yes" or "no" questions. And let me try this one again, if I may. Will you pledge tonight to do everything in your power to prevent Iranian arms from entering Iraq? Can you make that pledge?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, I think you have been charged with a mission to repeat a sentence over and over again. My comments are very clear. I think that you should go back and take American officials to task. Use the same force you're using right now so that they take the troops out.
PELLEY: Was that a "yes" or a "no," sir?
AHMADINEJAD: If you are to take sides, well, I don't know. Well, you shouldn't tell me what kind of answer I should give to you. You're free to ask me questions. I didn't put any limitations on your questions.
PELLEY: For the sake of clarity, because there is so much concern in the world about this next question, please give me the most direct answer you can. Is it your goal to build a nuclear bomb?
AHMADINEJAD: What are you driving at?
So much crap:
PELLEY: You mentioned telling the truth as a Muslim, and as you know so much better than I do, Verse 42 of the second sura: "The truth shall not be obscured by falsehood, and those who know the truth must tell it." But when I ask you a question as direct as "Will you pledge not to test a nuclear weapon?" you you dance all around the question. You never say "yes." You never say "no."
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, thank you for that. You are like a CIA investigator. And you are . . .
PELLEY: I am just a reporter. I am a simple, average American reporter.
AHMADEINEJAD: This is not a Baghdad prison. Please, this is not a secret prison in Europe. This is not Abu Ghraib. This is Iran. I'm the president of this country. Well, I think that I've gone beyond what you've asked me, above and beyond. And I think that if you speak to your job as a reporter, what I have said so far, again, goes above and beyond what you ask me.
And the revealer:
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, you shouldn't speak on behalf of the American people. I can speak on behalf of the Iranian people, but you cannot speak on behalf of the American people. Why do you insist on doing that? Why do you not allow the American people to speak for themselves? Why? Let them speak for themselves.
So he speaks for all Iranians, but won't accept the same concept from our side?
and finally:
AHMADINEJAD: Well, our foreign policy is a policy which says that we should have relations with all countries and nations.
AHMADINEJAD: Israel is not a nation.
Doesn't that neatly solve his little semantic dilemma?
Just a big pile of total bullshit spewing propaganda is what he is.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:31 am
by LTS TRN 2
Look, Busher, despite our mutual disdain for Islamic Fundamentalists (and this includes ALL monotheists on my part), the facts are all on his side. There is NO evidence of Iranian weapons in Iraq, regardless of the now standard howling allegations by the PNAC-owned media hacks (Novak, Friedman, WSJ, etc).
Why don't you accept that these
same "officials" and "sources" who lied and smeared and fear-mongered us into the present catastrophe in Iraq are the
same hysterical assholes screaming about some threat from Iran?
Who is defending our presence in Iraq?
This piece of shit yes-man walking next to Don Rumsfeld in this picture?
Frankly, I find it embarrassing as an American that a Fundamentalist Shiite should have to politely remind the American public that our "government" (i.e.,
totally unelected) should be properly administered a Nuremberg Noose. Even though he's far too polite to say it explicitly, it's the truth. And you know it too.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:01 pm
by smackaholic
Remind me again, let's turd, why you are still here? You really do need to go hang out in Iran. I mean free open elections, no queers. Who could ask for anything more?
As for the worn out tired old zionist thing, let me be honest. I wish to hell that we had given the jews a homelands smack in the middle of germany, but, given the politics of the time, that might not have been feasible. An even better alternative would have been to invite every last one of them to the US, but, that probably wouldn't have worked so good either.
So, we went with the 3th option, give them a chance at having their own place where they have historical ties and which is pretty much a barren shithole anyway.
The muzzies could have went along and everything would have been fine. They didn't. When that happens, you have this thing called a war.
The jews won including multiple rematches. The reason this thing still festers is that unlike in past wars where the loser gives shit up, they don't anymore.
Start taking away big chunks of stuff from the losers and the losers will decide to cut their loses. Till then, they will keep coming back.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:23 pm
by SunCoastSooner
Notice that LTS avoided my question as to whether or not he has ever been to Israel or the middle East himself.
Take note. LTS is just using this as his rhetoric to bash America as he always has. I know there is at least one other (I think it's Luth) that has visitied Israel in the last decade. Wish he would toss his thoughts out there. I know what I saw. I saw a people who are litterally living in fear for their children's safety.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:37 pm
by Goober McTuber
SunCoastSooner wrote:I know what I saw. I saw a people who are litterally living in fear for their children's safety.
You mean like Tardowen’s neighbors?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:55 pm
by SunCoastSooner
Goober McTuber wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:I know what I saw. I saw a people who are litterally living in fear for their children's safety.
You mean like Tardowen’s neighbors?
I am being serious Goobs. Those people live in fear. A fear that an American can not fully comprehend because we do not experience it as they have for 3 generations now.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:01 pm
by Atomic Punk
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Look, Busher, despite our mutual disdain for Islamic Fundamentalists (and this includes ALL monotheists on my part), the facts are all on his side. There is NO evidence of Iranian weapons in Iraq
Fucking die now you goddamned liar. Unbelievable that a piece of shit like you isn't killed by your disgusted neighbors.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:10 pm
by Goober McTuber
SunCoastSooner wrote:I am being serious Goobs.
Your problem. Not mine.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:49 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Imadinnerjacket wrote:In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country.
Uhhh, yeah, whatever, dude.
Rack Columbia, btw.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:16 pm
by Neely8
Didn't i read/see a show that explained how Muslim men have homosexual relations all the time? Even if they are married they have men on the side that they sleep with? I could have sworn I saw it on 60 minutes or something. Anybody else remember seeing it?
Maybe thats why he said they don't have fags like we do. Because they are all fags deep down......
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:47 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
You love the Jewish people soooooo much that you just cant wait to see them convert to Christianity
before Jesus comes back, right?
That, or die, correct?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:03 pm
by DallasFanatic
Neely8 wrote:Didn't i read/see a show that explained how Muslim men have homosexual relations all the time? Even if they are married they have men on the side that they sleep with? I could have sworn I saw it on 60 minutes or something. Anybody else remember seeing it?
Maybe thats why he said they don't have fags like we do. Because they are all fags deep down......
I saw something on this too Neely. I think it was 60 Minutes, and focused on the Muslim culture. They were all playing with their hair, holding hands, and just being gay. Thats the first thing I thought of when I heard that fool say they don't have homosexuality. Classic. I hope 60 Minutes re-airs that episode.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:04 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
Seeing that dude speak makes me wonder if we're all getting punked by one big Persian Borat skit.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:11 pm
by Neely8
DallasFanatic wrote:Neely8 wrote:Didn't i read/see a show that explained how Muslim men have homosexual relations all the time? Even if they are married they have men on the side that they sleep with? I could have sworn I saw it on 60 minutes or something. Anybody else remember seeing it?
Maybe thats why he said they don't have fags like we do. Because they are all fags deep down......
I saw something on this too Neely. I think it was 60 Minutes, and focused on the Muslim culture. They were all playing with their hair, holding hands, and just being gay. Thats the first thing I thought of when I heard that fool say they don't have homosexuality. Classic. I hope 60 Minutes re-airs that episode.
I thought thats where I saw it. They dance with each other and shit. No women allowed. Some weird mofo's.....
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:17 pm
by LTS TRN 2
SunCoastSooner wrote: I has visitied a people who are litterally living in (someone else's land)..
Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer. And if there is a more disgusting and disgraceful default from basic decency as the conversion to the Christer cult, it has yet to demand tax-free status. You and malignant crooks like Pat Robertson are in your bizarre obeisance to the fanatical racists of the Likud, etc., reaching a new low in human degradation. You've "been" to Palestine? You've stood in line for four hours at a checkpoint? You've watched your house being bulldozed? You've seen tanks and storm troopers coming rolling into your village at dawn? You've been herded up like animals into the world's largest concentration camp? You've stood there "seriously" worrying about the threat to Euro-Jewish settlers in the midst of the longest occupation in modern history? Sure you have.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:28 pm
by Atomic Punk
^^^Annie got banned for being this tedious, boring, and fucking stupid. Why aren't you banned? I'm not even mad at you. I'm just wondering why you are a fucking retard to this level. It makes no sense why you still breathe air.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:43 pm
by LTS TRN 2
A-punk, did you vote for the Chimp n' Cheney? C'mon, admit it.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:45 pm
by Mister Bushice
LTS TRN 2 wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote: I has visitied a people who are litterally living in (someone else's land)..
You've "been" to Palestine? You've stood in line for four hours at a checkpoint? You've watched your house being bulldozed? You've seen tanks and storm troopers coming rolling into your village at dawn?
Yes, and the reason all that shit happens is because the palestinians harbor individuals who are willing to drive truck bombs into markets in israel filled with innocent women and children, or blow themselves up on israeli buses - also filled with innocent hard working people.
So fuck off. They get exactly what they give. They want misery, they earn it.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:51 pm
by Atomic Punk
Better choice of the 2 evils. John Kerry would take a tongue in his bung from the Iranian dicktator.
Cheney and the Chimp have nothing to do with the history of Israel you so distort... you fucking piece of shit.
You are the most fucked up poster EVER on these boards and that's saying something. Worse than Annie... far worse. Nothing comes close to a being a stupid fuckingtard like yourself.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:54 pm
by RadioFan
LTS TRN 2 wrote:A-punk, did you vote for the Chimp n' Cheney? C'mon, admit it.
I didn't. Doesn't change the fact that you're a monumental fucking dipshit.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:11 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Well, let's connect the dots...Cheney 'n Chimp are by FAR the most pro-Israel administration to date. Their original inner circle contained at least four dual citizens. It was--and remains--their number one objective to attack and undermine both Iraq and Iran, as well as Syria. ALL of the hysterical demonization of Iran is coming through the JINSA/AIPAC/PNAC consortium.
Gee, kids, given that this group of neocon lunatics has engendered the biggest catastrophe since Viet Nam, don't you think we should be a little skeptical of their present agenda? And by skeptical I mean a Nuremberg-like trial for gross international war crimes.
Why are you in such denial? Don't you believe that drastic situations call for drastic actions?
And Busher, you cling to the fact of Palestinian attacks without ever acknowledging that the very implementation of the apartheid state experiment in1948 was in itself completely illegal, immoral, impractical, horribly cruel and vile, and moreover, guaranteed to engender resentment, hatred and violence which will only increase as the Zionists are driven further and further in their desperate machinations. Deal with the fact that Jews had lived throughout the Arab world for centuries in complete peace (not ONE pogrom by Arabs) before the forced colony of Euros rolling in.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:17 pm
by Goober McTuber
Time to shunt this piece of shit thread off to where it belongs: T.R.O.T.S. The Spin Zone.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:24 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Well I'm sure most of the right-wing radio hacks would want the president of Iran "TROT"ed off as well.
But the day is what we've made it. And even though you're hunkered down in your well-polished hole, fending off different perspectives and realities like so many annoying gusts of wind, the fact remains that a hurricane is coming, and you're really not ready.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:58 pm
by War Wagon
LTS TRN 2 wrote:
And by skeptical I mean a Nuremberg-like trial for gross international war crimes.
And who's going to conduct this trial? The U.N. with Ahmenejihadist as the chief inquisitor?
Don't you believe that drastic situations call for drastic actions?
Sure.
I believe that you should be hunted down, put under extensive interrogation using the most vile techniques imaginable, then deported to live out the rest of your miserable days among your Palestinian friends on the Gaza strip.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:16 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
LTS TRN 2 wrote:A-punk, did you vote for the Chimp n' Cheney? C'mon, admit it.
Nick,
If the only options I had were to choose between voting for Bush & Cheney or sticking a hot poker into my eyes and having my fingernails and toenails pulled out with tweezers, I would choose the latter option.
Having said that, I should note that even I think you're a few fries short of a Happy Meal. Is that "WAKEY WAKE" enough for you?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:05 am
by Goober McTuber
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well I'm sure most of the right-wing radio hacks would want the president of Iran "TROT"ed off as well.
But the day is what we've made it. And even though you're hunkered down in your well-polished hole, fending off different perspectives and realities like so many annoying gusts of wind, the fact remains that a hurricane is coming, and you're really not ready.
Your continuous hot wind does not it any way resemble a hurricane, you penis-harfing fuckwit.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:12 am
by RadioFan
Watch it goobs, he'll be breaking out the
"what do you have in your package?" smack, next.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:45 am
by LTS TRN 2
Terry in Crapchester wrote:LTS TRN 2 wrote:A-punk, did you vote for the Chimp n' Cheney? C'mon, admit it.
Nick,
If the only options I had were to choose between voting for Bush & Cheney or sticking a hot poker into my eyes and having my fingernails and toenails pulled out with tweezers, I would choose the latter option.
Having said that, I should note that even I think you're a few fries short of a Happy Meal. Is that "WAKEY WAKE" enough for you?
T-in Crap, look closely...what criticisms of the Cheney etc., cabal that I level do you dispute?
Which ones? That they've run headlong into a Quagmire of unprecedented proportions? That they've lied, swindled, smeared and fear-mongered every inch of the way? That EVERY bedrock "conservative" that had initially bought into their agenda has turned in disgust?
What exactly are you disagreeing with? You forgot to mention.
Who are you defending? And why?
WW
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:40 pm
by SunCoastSooner
LTS TRN 2 wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote: I has visitied a people who are litterally living in (someone else's land)..
Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer. And if there is a more disgusting and disgraceful default from basic decency as the conversion to the Christer cult, it has yet to demand tax-free status. You and malignant crooks like Pat Robertson are in your bizarre obeisance to the fanatical racists of the Likud, etc., reaching a new low in human degradation. You've "been" to Palestine? You've stood in line for four hours at a checkpoint? You've watched your house being bulldozed? You've seen tanks and storm troopers coming rolling into your village at dawn? You've been herded up like animals into the world's largest concentration camp? You've stood there "seriously" worrying about the threat to Euro-Jewish settlers in the midst of the longest occupation in modern history? Sure you have.
How about you take a little stroll to the fucking theology forum (that I help moderate for a specific reason) and tell me again how much of a christer I am.
Morons never cease to amaze me with their ignorance!!!
I think I just found another maroon to add to my sig line guys!!!!
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:08 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
LTS TRN 2 wrote:T-in Crap, look closely...what criticisms of the Cheney etc., cabal that I level do you dispute?
Which ones? That they've run headlong into a Quagmire of unprecedented proportions? That they've lied, swindled, smeared and fear-mongered every inch of the way? That EVERY bedrock "conservative" that had initially bought into their agenda has turned in disgust?
What exactly are you disagreeing with? You forgot to mention.
Who are you defending? And why?
WW
Nicky,
Are you really that retarded? Let me isolate a portion of that last post for you.
Terry in Crapchester wrote:If the only options I had were to choose between voting for Bush & Cheney or sticking a hot poker into my eyes and having my fingernails and toenails pulled out with tweezers, I would choose the latter option.
What part of that do you
NOT understand? Are you really as stupid as you come across, or just trolling?
Let me spell it out for you, Nicky.
I have repeatedly referred to Bush as "Smirky McFlightsuit" on this board. I have been critical of his Iraq policy from jump. I have stated repeatedly that Iraq is a shithole not worth the life of a single American, let alone 3,000 + and counting. I have criticized Bush for the fact that he apparently cares more about poor Iraqis than about poor Americans, and for the fact that he apparently considers health care for all Iraqis good policy and worthy of American tax dollars, while he considers health care for all Americans socialism. I have called him out for lying about WMD's, and for misleading a substantial portion of the American public into believing that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. In fact, I have been so critical of Bush that mvscal now follows me around these boards relentlessly, always telling me to "go fuck yourself" or some variation thereof. In the last two Presidential elections, I cast my vote each time for the only candidate with a realistic shot at defeating Bush. Maybe 20-30% of this board can make that last claim, and trust me, if anything that's a generous estimate.
In short, if I wouldn't be the very last person on these boards that any sane person with an IQ greater than room temperature would accuse of defending Bush and Cheney, I would definitely be on the short list.
Light starting to come on yet?
WAKEY WAKE.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:34 pm
by War Wagon
Terry in Crapchester wrote:I have been so critical of Bush that mvscal now follows me around these boards relentlessly, always telling me to "go fuck yourself" or some variation thereof.
Rack!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:12 am
by LTS TRN 2
Terry in Crapchester wrote:LTS TRN 2 wrote:
What exactly are you disagreeing with? You forgot to mention.
WW
I have repeatedly referred to Bush as "Smirky McFlightsuit" on this board. I have been critical of his Iraq policy from jump. I have stated repeatedly that Iraq is a shithole not worth the life of a single American, let alone 3,000 + and counting. I have criticized Bush for the fact that he apparently cares more about poor Iraqis than about poor Americans, and for the fact that he apparently considers health care for all Iraqis good policy and worthy of American tax dollars, while he considers health care for all Americans socialism. I have called him out for lying about WMD's, and for misleading a substantial portion of the American public into believing that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. In fact, I have been so critical of Bush that mvscal now follows me around these boards relentlessly, always telling me to "go fuck yourself" or some variation thereof. In the last two Presidential elections, I cast my vote each time for the only candidate with a realistic shot at defeating Bush. Maybe 20-30% of this board can make that last claim, and trust me, if anything that's a generous estimate. And a
LOT more!
WAKEY WAKE.
So...what
are you disagreeing about? Oh, you're cool with Bush and Cheney (and Negroponte!) being rung up at the Hague...but...what?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:16 am
by LTS TRN 2
SunCoastSooner wrote:tell me again how much of a christer I am.
Well, you QUACK like a Christer, tediously bitch like a Christer, wax witlessly like a Christer, obliviously lie like a Christer, defend bizarre apartheid state experiments
just like a Christer, but you break like a little bitch.
You "moderate" a
theology forum?
BWWWWwwwwaaaaaaaaaaa
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:57 pm
by smackaholic
How exactly can you be so venomnous to certain religious groups (christians, jews) yet give a pass on one that is off the fukking scale when it comes to letting their religion influence their actions?
I think this is part of terry's issue with you. Even those that agree with damn near every position you hold still can't get past the fact that you are such a fukking hypocrite.