T1B

Great. Fox Sports Midwest is mute.

Guess I'll have to listen to this game on the radio. Mike Kelly is ok, but I just can't stand John Kadlec or whatever the fuck that geezers name is.

Oh, and welcome aboard Scott.

They do have other RB's besides Temple, btw.

Edit: I've got all the candles in my KLEIZA shrine burning brightly.

TD Macklin!

ZOO!

Nice block by Daniel opened that up. Beautiful 17 yard pass on 4th and 1.

You got sound on your TV, Scott?

Working fine on DirecTV.

Has Michael Keck - the Harrisonville kid played any this year?

Watching Bradford on that 3rd and 8 made me think of a pass rush from the outside

No Fucking Way! That guy was down.

What a horseshit call.

No way we win if chase throws those,
Lucky to hold 'em to a FG.

**Shudder**

Shades of last year

Some really bad officiating so far.

Glad to have replay

Nice drive to close out the half.

Not a great half by either team -

I'll have to say that thus far OU has dominated the game, yet is only up by 7. Looks like Mizzou finally found their legs towards the end of the half. When it looked like the game was getting totally away from them, they stepped up and stopped the bleeding.

Keys to the 2nd half.

1. Get some pressure on Bradford. That guy has been amazingly accurate for a freshman.

2. Mizzou secondary not letting receivers get behind them. See #1 for one way to help stop that.

3. Protecting Daniel. OU getting waaay too much pressure.

4. Get the ball in Maclin's hands every way possible.

Oh, and I finally got sound from the game about the 5 minute mark of the 2nd qtr.

Hey, I know. Let's take our QB out and put a WR back there and see what happens.

:roll:

War Wagon wrote:
They do have other RB's besides Temple, btw.

I'd forgot about Derek Washington from Ray-Pec - only seen him get one touch.
They really need someone that can take it inside.

The more I see Maclin - the more I think he needs 15+ touches minimum every game.

Gamebreaking potential ever time he touches the ball

Maclin! Maclin! Maclin!

Still a ball game.

C'mon boys...punch that sumbitch in and GET THE LEAD.

With the size advantage of the OU line, I'm amazed Stoops isn't pounding it more.

Leading by 1 going into Q4 - I'll take it

War Wagon wrote:
2. Mizzou secondary not letting receivers get behind them. See #1 for one way to help stop that.

Our corners are playing 7 yds. off - They need to jam those guys off the line.

Way too soft with a QB like Bradford

Shit - stoops heard me

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

Busted play - Maclin didn't even try to take the handoff.

It's not over yet.

And taht's about it.

*Sigh*

Looks like the PAID athletes are gonna win again....

War meaningless touchdowns to beat the spread

Props to OU for hanging around long enough and waiting for Mizzou to shit down their leg.

But I'm not hanging my head in shame. They played toe to toe with 'em all nite long.

Mizzou won't lose another game this year.

Again, props to the Sooners.

War fourth quarter serenades.

Wags is a good cat to put up with that kind of abuse, especially from 19 or so folks he doesn't even know.

RevLimiter wrote:Looks like the PAID athletes are gonna win again....

Who the fuck are you?

Step the fuck off and let the Tiger fans that have been in here all week have their say.

MO nominates Bitchdom.

OUMO wrote:

RevLimiter wrote:Looks like the PAID athletes are gonna win again....

Who the fuck are you?

Step the fuck off and let the Tiger fans that have been in here all week have their say.

MO nominates Bitchdom.

revlimiter is KCPAUL

ctrl-copy ctrl-paste a take

orcinus wrote:War fourth quarter serenades.

Wags is a good cat to put up with that kind of abuse, especially from 19 or so folks he doesn't even know.

Right. Like I had a choice.

We had you right where we wanted, it was all right there laid out nice and pretty... but instead, phhht... a golden opportunity lost in a proverbial Oklahoma whirlwind.

On the bright side... well there isn't really any bright side... but I'm going to see Ozzy at the new Sprint Center. I'm thinking "No More Tears" is quite appropriate at this point.

Adelpiero wrote:

OUMO wrote:

RevLimiter wrote:Looks like the PAID athletes are gonna win again....

Who the fuck are you?

Step the fuck off and let the Tiger fans that have been in here all week have their say.

MO nominates Bitchdom.

revlimiter is KCPAUL

ctrl-copy ctrl-paste a take

Damn right.

Believe the Heupel wrote:Looks like the crybaby bitch is going to cry about how unfair life is again.

The next time I do that will be the 1st time.

Believe the Heupel wrote:Waaaah! Those guys beat Missouri! They must be cheaters!!

You know who says shit like that?

Fans of second-tier programs. So, you know, congratulations on the promotion Missouri.

kinda like the comment that MU was playing "with house money". nothing to lose. pressure is all on OU. that's wrong-headed.

if you want to take a step as a program, you wanna win games like this. not play close and slither back to the north division with a moral victory feather in your cap.

if OU makes PAT's Mu is down 19 points, a 3 score game either way, with a minute left and on MU boards and Jason Whitlock's game column....saying they feel the best team didn't win?

they stood "tie-to-toe" with OU in Norman. for 3 quarters. but, 4th Q counts too. c'mon, that's lame stuff.

though i will say the Border War is looking like a lot of hate on hate fun that actually means something in the conference. hey hey!

C'mon guys. CCPaul was just funnin' ya.

These games really don't "mean" anything. After all, Mizzou just got beat AGAIN. CudaPaul didn't really care about it, he only chimed in with bold a few times.

This game didn't mean anything, no sirree.

King Crimson wrote:

Believe the Heupel wrote:Waaaah! Those guys beat Missouri! They must be cheaters!!

You know who says shit like that?

Fans of second-tier programs. So, you know, congratulations on the promotion Missouri.

kinda like the comment that MU was playing "with house money". nothing to lose. pressure is all on OU. that's wrong-headed.

if you want to take a step as a program, you wanna win games like this. not play close and slither back to the north division with a moral victory feather in your cap.

if OU makes PAT's Mu is down 19 points, a 3 score game either way, with a minute left and on MU boards and Jason Whitlock's game column....saying they feel the best team didn't win?

they stood "tie-to-toe" with OU in Norman. for 3 quarters. but, 4th Q counts too. c'mon, that's lame stuff.

though i will say the Border War is looking like a lot of hate on hate fun that actually means something in the conference. hey hey!

Woah, talk about sore winners.

Hopefully, we'll see you again on December 2nd in San Antonio.

2nd tier program, indeed. If a "second-tier" program had OU on the ropes at home thru 3-qtrs, what's that say about YOUR team?

Hey, you guys can run scoreboard smack all you want, and that's cool. You were the better team last night. But don't try to make out like you outclassed and overpowered Mizzou, because you didn't.

MU outgained OU in total yards, had more 1st downs, and more time of possesion. That game turned on ONE busted play, and you damn sure know it. Now, I'm not saying that the outcome would've been different, but it might've.

War Wagon wrote:

King Crimson wrote:

Believe the Heupel wrote:Waaaah! Those guys beat Missouri! They must be cheaters!!

You know who says shit like that?

Fans of second-tier programs. So, you know, congratulations on the promotion Missouri.

kinda like the comment that MU was playing "with house money". nothing to lose. pressure is all on OU. that's wrong-headed.

if you want to take a step as a program, you wanna win games like this. not play close and slither back to the north division with a moral victory feather in your cap.

if OU makes PAT's Mu is down 19 points, a 3 score game either way, with a minute left and on MU boards and Jason Whitlock's game column....saying they feel the best team didn't win?

they stood "tie-to-toe" with OU in Norman. for 3 quarters. but, 4th Q counts too. c'mon, that's lame stuff.

though i will say the Border War is looking like a lot of hate on hate fun that actually means something in the conference. hey hey!

Woah, talk about sore winners.

Hopefully, we'll see you again on December 2nd in San Antonio.

2nd tier program, indeed. If a "second-tier" program had OU on the ropes at home thru 3-qtrs, what's that say about YOUR team?

Hey, you guys can run scoreboard smack all you want, and that's cool. You were the better team last night. But don't try to make out like you outclassed and overpowered Mizzou, because you didn't.

MU outgained OU in total yards, had more 1st downs, and more time of possesion. That game turned on ONE busted play, and you damn sure know it. Now, I'm not saying that the outcome would've been different, but it might've.

OU was never "on the ropes".
it was about an even game through three quarters.

DiT wrote: OU was never "on the ropes".
it was about an even game through three quarters.

Put it another way, then. The momentum had definitely swung in MU's favor. Admit it, Sooner fan was starting to get worried.

one play does not equal 3 scores. that's what i'm saying.

MU got whipped in the 4th quarter, deal with it.

no one has said MU is not a good team before or after the game. i don't see second-tier posted as a phrase anywhere--that's the same Wag "we don't get no repect" paranoia we've seen all week. what i said is your own words: you talked a lot of junk and then said all the pressure was on OU. i said if you want to take a step as a program, these are the games you win to take that step. not talk about "house money".

Believe the Heupel wrote: What it says about OU is that OU managed to win a game against Missouri's supposed best team in decades, and a Missouri fan's first thought was that OU is a bunch of cheaters. You know, instead of "Hey, great game."

You didn't see me saying OU cheats. And it was a great game that should've had a more exciting finish, sans the boneheaded busted play.

Like I said before, I'm not hanging my head in shame over that loss. I just regret the missed opportunity that was right there for the taking.

But Missouri scored late and coverd the spread by half a point, VICTORY!

I heard the same shit about a rematch from K-State fans in Manhatten in 2000, they got their wish and got beat again.

The difference is, K-ST was a lot better then than you guys are now.

I would like to get a second shot at CU, or take KU out, but in a way, I hope you fuckers win out and get slapped down again.

Two wins against a team in CFB during one seasin is a "shut the fuck up" moment.

Believe the Heupel wrote:

War Wagon wrote:

King Crimson wrote: kinda like the comment that MU was playing "with house money". nothing to lose. pressure is all on OU. that's wrong-headed.

if you want to take a step as a program, you wanna win games like this. not play close and slither back to the north division with a moral victory feather in your cap.

if OU makes PAT's Mu is down 19 points, a 3 score game either way, with a minute left and on MU boards and Jason Whitlock's game column....saying they feel the best team didn't win?

they stood "tie-to-toe" with OU in Norman. for 3 quarters. but, 4th Q counts too. c'mon, that's lame stuff.

though i will say the Border War is looking like a lot of hate on hate fun that actually means something in the conference. hey hey!

Woah, talk about sore winners.

Hopefully, we'll see you again on December 2nd in San Antonio.

2nd tier program, indeed. If a "second-tier" program had OU on the ropes at home thru 3-qtrs, what's that say about YOUR team?

Hey, you guys can run scoreboard smack all you want, and that's cool. You were the better team last night. But don't try to make out like you outclassed and overpowered Mizzou, because you didn't.

MU outgained OU in total yards, had more 1st downs, and more time of possesion. That game turned on ONE busted play, and you damn sure know it. Now, I'm not saying that the outcome would've been different, but it might've.

Wow, it's almost like ONLY Missouri's turnovers had any kind of effect on the game. Never mind that OU turned the ball over on their side of the field twice, without which Missouri would have never even been close. And it's not like Missouri didn't gain a ton of yards when they were down 17 with less than 2 minutes to go in the game. All these things count, though.

What it says about OU is that OU managed to win a game against Missouri's supposed best team in decades, and a Missouri fan's first thought was that OU is a bunch of cheaters. You know, instead of "Hey, great game."

IF IF thats all im seeing from your bitter twat ass. what about the 2 dropped easy interceptions Pig Browns had??? If he catches them OU doesnt have 14 points on the board, thus MU is winning. see how that works dumbfuck.

you were actually arguing with"ctrl-copy ctrl-paste a take" Paul. way to go assfuck



they gained 80 yards while down 17. they went down and scored, funny, when you score a late cheapie, you tend to put up some yards. They had 300+ yards before the late turnovers.



I havent said one word about the game, hey fuckhead i expected them to lose, OU is a very good team, but to pull this 2nd tier shit is something that pussies do. Ive seen your bullshit in threads before, being a bitter cunt, then claiming you were drinking :m200l: And if it wasnt you and another OU fan(KU schedule thread) i could give a fuck, then your another bitter puss oozen cunt.

I didnt realize cramps were that bad, need some pamprin, cunt?


Good to see OUmo,Radio, king, and dit in here talking about the game and not being baited by KCPauls post, only a fucking idiot would be baited by his post, congrats on you being the only dillhole to fall on the sword.