T1B

Sky wrote:
9/29
10/06
10/27

Oh yeah, that you might say the words previously thought unmentionable: "I want Chris Leak back."

How about 1/8/07??

Or better yet?

41-14!!!!!

I'm not bandwaggoning anyone....its the fucking truth and your bitch ass knows it. What does UF have to do with stating the obvious????? Nothing. Hey, we have three losees and I'm still here. Hell, I'm not even honking the SEC....I think Oregon has as much right to the title game as LSU.

See, you aren't making any type of argument....your just making deflections by trying to rip on UF instead of the topic.....osu doesn't deserve to play for a title based on their schedule. Period. Come back when you actually want to argue instead of looking like a total bitch.

T REX wrote:How about 1/8/07??

Or better yet?

41-14!!!!!

I'm not bandwaggoning anyone....its the fucking truth and your bitch ass knows it. What does UF have to do with stating the obvious????? Nothing. Hey, we have three losees and I'm still here. Hell, I'm not even honking the SEC....I think Oregon has as much right to the title game as LSU.

See, you aren't making any type of argument....your just making deflections by trying to rip on UF instead of the topic.....osu doesn't deserve to play for a title based on their schedule. Period. Come back when you actually want to argue instead of looking like a total bitch.

No, see Trixie, that is the point. Why doesn't tOSU deserve to play in the game? Because they play a weak schedule? Because the Big10 is down (according to our resident SEC/ACC experts)? Show me why a 1-loss team besides Oregon deserves to be there without citing how massively difficult the SEC schedule is?

Mind you, I don't think you can contribute to a single conversation without stating that the SEC is really the All-American League, but lets see if you can try really really hard.

And don't preach to me about how "I'm still here even though Florida has 3 losses" when it took a fucking NC to bring your sorry ass back to the board. How long will that last? I bet if you don't win one by '08 you will be gone again.

Bitch....I have been here since SCIII....that's smack chat III on the rome site.....probably close to ten years....can you say that jack ass?

Why didn't Boise or Utah and you've answered your question.....going undefeated doesn't guarantee you a spot. See your shit stained schedule.

Next....

88,
thanks

\/\/\/\/\/\/

Michigan, down ten with 7 mins. to play was worthy of an official "upset alert". State was running it down our throats in the second half. Props to Sparty, they gave themselves a great chance to win the game. Props to Hart, Henne, Manningham, and the rest on pulling one out.

WolverineSteve wrote:
FWIW though, I got your 'noles over BC.

^^Recognize bitch!!!

88 wrote:The 2007 Board Bitch trophy was awarded too early, imho.

Oh mercy.....referring to me?

If so, that's the problem in here.....board bitch is thrown every time someone disagrees.......you can't handle that OSU is overrated even though you can't defend their schedule, can you? Kent St? D-IAA? Ohio?

Going undefeated doesn't guarantee you shit and shouldn't....hopefully the pollsters will see that. And drop you.

You have no body of work. The reason they both haved one loss is they actually play real teams.....with rankings....more than once or twice in a whole season.

OSU got butcher raped by UF and it will happen again by Oregon or LSU.....

^^^^^^^^^^^^

last year you mentioned how no one gave UF any credit, etc...tables are turned this year...keep giving tOSU no credit...if they get to the title game...if they beat LSU or Oregon then bode tOSU then...if they lose...so be it...

good fucking lord...tOSU has no control over the conference sked...their non-con sked was horrific as were a lot of teams...fuck...

can we get a playoff already so we can settle this on the field and not on the court of public opinion...

King Crimson wrote:that's a fine point, and this is not about Oklahoma....would you argue that OSU is one of the two best teams in the country?

I'd argue Ohio St is a top three team, when you look at and combine offense, defense, and coaching. They have fewer marquee names, but the efficiency hasn't dropped off, and the defense might even be better. They're also playing with a gigantic chip on their shoulders, and perform well under pressure and constant criticism. They're a football factory used to being in this position. We're not talking about USF or ASU here.

But of course I'm not completely without bias here. And none of you are either. I put OSU #1 because I've seen them play a lot of football, much more than those other guys -- and every time I see them play, they look scarier, get better. In the Wisconsin game, they were finally up against some adversity -- as opposed to blowing people out -- and they handled it very well by exploding on offense late in the game and burying Wisconsin.

Sure, I'd say the Big Ten is in a down year, but I'm not just going to take everybody's word for it that the entire conference "sucks." Especially coming from folks whose eyes are glued to Big 12 football, SEC football, etc.

We've got guys like Sudden Sam claiming he doesn't watch Big Ten football (along with Big East) because it's "boring." And that's fine.

But hey, you know what? I don't read the bible. As a result, I don't quote scriptures.

Somebody who claims to never watch Big Ten football is going to educate me on Big Ten teams? Get the fuck outta here.

I just made a case for OSU as #1. But if any of you make cases for Oregon or LSU or even Oklahoma, I wouldn't put up a fight. There's still football to be played, and anybody who believes they've got the clear cut #1 and #2 teams pinned down - then you're an ignorant douche.

88 wrote: That being said, I think LSU will wipe the floor with the three SEC doormats left on their schedule and then beat whatever barely +.500 team the other division of the SEC sends to be stomped by them in the SEC Championship game.

not only that, Lester Miles has some weird mongoloid juju thing going on that will let him and his purple minions play a BCS home game in the Superdome (again).

88 wrote:KOTREX-

You aren't the perennial board bitch because people disagree with you. You are the perennial board bitch because you bring absolutely nothing to the board except a bleeding vag.

I thought Ohio State was overranked at the beginning of the season at #12. I thought the team lost too many players off of last year's squad (including three juniors: Antonio Pittman, Anthony Gonzalez and Ted Ginn, Jr.) and with a new quarterback would be lucky to get through the BigTen with less than 3 losses this year. Apparently, I was wrong. They have played only one opponent close, and that was Michigan State. And the only reason that was close was because Ohio State gave them a gift of 14 points on turnovers after stomping a 24-0 mudhole in them. If Ohio State can beat Illinois and Michigan, they will deserve a spot in the MNC.

I also figured that LSU and USC had a date in New Orleans to play for the MNC. I figured that USC had a ton of skill and experience coming back and that LSU was the class of the entire CFB world. Again, I was wrong. USC's defense blows monkey cack and their offense has sputtered. They obviously have no shot this year. And LSU has not played well many times this season. Florida had them beat. Auburn had them beat. Alabama was in position to beat them. And Kentucky did beat them. That being said, I think LSU will wipe the floor with the three SEC doormats left on their schedule and then beat whatever barely +.500 team the other division of the SEC sends to be stomped by them in the SEC Championship game.

WAAAHHHHH....you are the bleeding vag because you can't handle the truth.....you haven't played anybody....you know it, I know it, your team knows it......guess what....I will be vindicated yet again as I always am....

Look at OSUfan.....defensive....cause they know what's coming.....the hammer will be dropped at some point. I may have to wait till January but it will happen.

OSU does not deserve a title shot. They don't and you know it......how are you harping on LSU? They actually play RANKED teams......say it with me.....RANKED.....you know top 25...top 10 teams.....not Kent or I-AA teams....or Akron......LSU should go over OSU period whether there are two or three teams in the final conundrum.

Your logic sucks....."we beat everybody we've played"(even though every OSU fan will admit its no one) so that guarantees you a spot even though a team has played a much more difficult schedule with one loss?

Oregon or LSU by 14 over OSU in the title game.....you'll be waiting another 50 days for an opponent. Too long of a layoff again. You'll be bitchslapped. ANd I'll smile.

T REX wrote:WAAAHHHHH....you are the bleeding vag because you can't handle the truth.....you haven't played anybody....you know it, I know it, your team knows it......guess what....I will be vindicated yet again as I always am....

Look at OSUfan.....defensive....cause they know what's coming.....the hammer will be dropped at some point. I may have to wait till January but it will happen.

OSU does not deserve a title shot. They don't and you know it......how are you harping on LSU? They actually play RANKED teams......say it with me.....RANKED.....you know top 25...top 10 teams.....not Kent or I-AA teams....or Akron......LSU should go over OSU period whether there are two or three teams in the final conundrum.

Your logic sucks....."we beat everybody we've played"(even though every OSU fan will admit its no one) so that guarantees you a spot even though a team has played a much more difficult schedule with one loss?

Oregon or LSU by 14 over OSU in the title game.....you'll be waiting another 50 days for an opponent. Too long of a layoff again. You'll be bitchslapped. ANd I'll smile.

Just to clarify. You think tOSU is overrated? They don't deserve their rating? Because they haven't beaten any ranked teams? Is that right. Now I want to make sure I understand this.

And you think a team like LSU deserves to be ranked higher because they beat ranked teams? Week in and week out they beat ranked teams again and again, is that right?

OK, so the same people who said LSU opponents were ranked (top 25) are the same people have tOSU ranked #1. So, disregarding our argument, you simultaneously support and disagree with the rationale these voters use? Is that right?

And frankly, the only reason tOSU is #1 (as opposed to KU, Hawaii, etc) and the only reason LSU beat "ranked" teams was because of where they started in the preseason polls. Had KU or Hawaii had Boise St's preseason ranking, they would probably be #1.

Now Trixie, Mizzfan, SECfan, someone please take the time to honestly explain this to me?

OSU is there on its name alone.....that's it.

OSU is there on its name alone.....that's it.

That's not just "it" but yeah, OSU's tradition and recent-era winning % does play a factor.

If any of the traditional powerhouse programs from any conference go undefeated (OU, USC, UF, FSU, etc), regardless of schedule, you can pretty much guarantee they'll be there in the end.

Fair or not, that's just how it is.

T REX wrote:They actually play RANKED teams......say it with me.....RANKED.....you know top 25...top 10 teams.....not Kent or I-AA teams....or Akron......

When they're not too busy playing Middle Tennessee, Tulane, or Louisiana Tech, right?

Say it with me... "Middle Tennessee and Louisiana Tech."

Dinsdale wrote:

T REX wrote:They actually play RANKED teams......say it with me.....RANKED.....you know top 25...top 10 teams.....not Kent or I-AA teams....or Akron......

When they're not too busy playing Middle Tennessee, Tulane, or Louisiana Tech, right?

Say it with me... "Middle Tennessee and Louisiana Tech."

You conveniently left off Va Tech....why?

T REX wrote:You conveniently left off Va Tech....why?

Hey dick fuck, get with the program here and explain to me how you love the rankings of some teams but not others. How you put so much weight in the fact that they ranked teams LSU beat but not in the fact that they rank tOSU? Can you answer that or did that just skim right over your head?

Dick fuck...that's what I am questioning....that's what I am saying dick fuck.....

The ONLY reason OSU is number one is by default....their name....their tradition.

They would be underdogs to at least Oregon and LSU. Period.

osu=overrated

dick fuck

Huh, funny how you got there. Cause before I swear we were talking about how they don't deserve to be #1, how they hadn't beaten any ranked teams, and how LSU had beaten so many ranked teams.

Now, none of that matters.

Now the same people who rankings matter so much before don't mean anything now. Is this a love-hate kind of thing? You love the voters when they help your cause and hate them when they help a team you hate?

Jsc810 wrote:Per SI.com, OSU is 2-0 against the top 25. LSU is 5-1.

which two?

T REX wrote: WAAAHHHHH....you are the bleeding vag because you can't handle the truth.....you haven't played anybody....you know it, I know it, your team knows it......guess what....I will be vindicated yet again as I always am....

Why do you keep fighting, Mr. Anderson?

Why, why, why?

T REX wrote:

Jsc810 wrote:Per SI.com, OSU is 2-0 against the top 25. LSU is 5-1.

which two?

Here we are again....tell me Trixie, how come you put so much weight in some of the rankings but not others? In fact, any of you SEC pukes tell me how this works.

Hopefully, IF they beat UM, we'll get a chance to see OSU matched up against a solid team. I think OSU/Oregon would be a good game.

PSUFAN wrote:Hopefully, IF they beat UM, we'll get a chance to see OSU matched up against a solid team. I think OSU/Oregon would be a good game.

I'd welcome a shot against Oregon or LSU.

^^^^^^^^

Bullshit...we all know even a 4 loss SEC team should be the national champion...

Sin,

SEC Ball Sucking Homer (who has now taken the KAL with 3 losses is better title from M2oooL)

T REX,

I assume you said the same thing in 2002. Were you vindicated then? When OSU was supposed to get slaughtered and beat Miami?

UF kicked the shit out of OSU last year. Congrats. Outside of that one game, OSU has proven time and time again that they can play with the big dogs under Sweatervest.

Killian wrote:T REX,

I assume you said the same thing in 2002. Were you vindicated then? When OSU was supposed to get slaughtered and beat Miami?

UF kicked the shit out of OSU last year. Congrats. Outside of that one game, OSU has proven time and time again that they can play with the big dogs under Sweatervest.

I think thats a great point. And as I recall, didn't Oklahoma look really really bad in a NC game a few years back? Does that mean Oklahoma doesn't deserve a shot in any future NC games? Does that mean the Pac10 owns the Big12? No, it doesn't.

You know Trixie, you had your run. I hope you enjoyed it, because now your AD has to validate those huge contracts w/ more wins in the future. Maybe they will come, maybe they won't but just because tOSU had a really bad game last year doens't mean they don't deserve it this year.

Killian wrote:T REX,

I assume you said the same thing in 2002. Were you vindicated then? When OSU was supposed to get slaughtered and beat Miami?

UF kicked the shit out of OSU last year. Congrats. Outside of that one game, OSU has proven time and time again that they can play with the big dogs under Sweatervest.

As much as it kills some of you....I actually know what I am talking about(most of the time)....

Bad PI call.....

T REX wrote:As much as it kills some of you....I actually know what I am talking about(most of the time)....

Bad PI call.....

First, it wasn't a PI call. It was a defensive hold.

Second, we actually have a real life college ref on this board who didn't have a dog in either fight, and confirmed that it was the correct call.

But lets throw all of that out the window for a moment. Assume that call wasn't made and OSU lost.

That was a loss in overtime, to a team that had more talent than UF had last year.

Again, outside of one game, how has OSU proven to you that they can't hang with other major programs? And as Sky pointed out, should OU not be allowed to play for the MNC because of their loss to USC?

I won’t argue that the Big 10 isn’t down somewhat this year, but I don’t think it’s as bad as some are making it out to be. 6 of Ohio State's last 7 games are against teams that are/were ranked in the top 25.

I won’t argue that the SEC isn’t the better conference, but the media is definitely in love with the SEC as evidenced by the fact the when a Big 10 team loses in conference, they drop a lot further than an SEC team does when they lose in conference.

And I happen to think that this year’s Buckeye team is better than last year’s, and I’d love to see them in the championship game against LSU or Oregon. But if tOSU, LSU and Oregon all win out, there’s no way in hell that the Buckeyes don’t belong in the championship game.

Trixie seems very upset about the Board Bitch results.

Sky wrote:
You know Trixie, you had your run. I hope you enjoyed it, because now your AD has to validate those huge contracts w/ more wins in the future. Maybe they will come, maybe they won't but just because tOSU had a really bad game last year doens't mean they don't deserve it this year.

Uhhhh....the three titles validates it moron......

Also, I am not basing last year's OSU loss on anything this year....I am basing on their shit stain of a schedule. Not one of you has argued otherwise to that point. None of you can.....maybe that's why.

I could give a flying fuck about some high school award you guys pass out every year. You finger someone and then pile on.....its this board's MO....has been for a long time. Ever wonder why membership is diminishing....why we don't ever have an inlfux of new people......

T REX wrote:Ever wonder why membership is diminishing....why we don't ever have an inlfux of new people......

Maybe "I have BODE, I'm in your dome, SEC-blah-blah-blah" doesn't sell particularly well these days?

really.....do you know how long the OOC SEC scheduling thing went on...still going on.....

The SEC/Pac 10 I feel are head and shoulders above the rest of the country.

T REX wrote:Ever wonder why membership is diminishing....why we don't ever have an inlfux of new people......

I thought that was my fault, Trixie. At least that's what you said in your PM's to me last year.

It's called thinning the heard.

Do you care to answer my questions, or just leave them alone because you know you can't without stepping on your dick?

T REX wrote:As much as it kills some of you....I actually know what I am talking about(most of the time)....

Bad PI call.....

You are a bleeding, vinegar-oozing vageenis.

If you read any of my posts.....why is OSU number one?

their schedule does NOT dictate it.....Auburn was punished for playing a I-AA team a few years back....what's different this year? OSU hasn't played dick.....what's funny is they all agree.

"We're undefeated!" That's the argument? Oh, just because they are in a major conference even though it absolutely sucks this year?

Have you looked at their schedule? EVerybody crucified SEc schools.....OSU played I-AA YSU, KENT, and Akron...talk to me here....

ol' t rex needs to find a new sport to root for. we all know how the system works, and your boise state/utah arguments are, at best, retarded. a team that works its way through a bcs conference without a single loss is going to play in the bcs title game. unless you're kansas, of course.

M Club wrote:ol' t rex needs to find a new sport to root for. we all know how the system works, and your boise state/utah arguments are, at best, retarded. a team that works its way through a bcs conference without a single loss is going to play in the bcs title game. unless you're kansas, of course.

Or Auburn.....

Terrible argument.....

I think the SEC had the best bowl record that year as well.....

T REX wrote:Have you looked at their schedule? EVerybody crucified SEc schools.....OSU played I-AA YSU, KENT, and Akron...talk to me here....

Their conference schedule is usually so tough that they don't play any tough OOC games, just like the SEC teams.

It works well for you that this is the one year in recent memory that OSU hasn't had a name school on their OOC schedule. You know, like that little series with Texas the past two years or the up comming home and home with USC? Teams that are actually in different time zones.

You calling out OSU for their schedule is one of the funniest unintentional pieces of comedy I have ever seen on this board.

I guess UF shouldn't have played for the NC last year, seeing as how they had a 1-AA team on their schedule, and they lost a game, and they scab dicked their way to a few more close wins. They were there on name only and shouldn't have been in the top 2 before bowl season.

Auburn had a 1-AA team on their schedule that year, so they shouldn't have played. According to you.

Oh, and it just so happened that two other major BCS conference teams were undefeated. Oklahoma and USC. Not like it was Oregon State and Baylor.