T1B

smackaholic wrote:thanks for pointing out that theft is all around us, marcus. yes, there is theft. dins' point is that theft should not be government fukking policy.

But it is, and has been a policy of every government known to man since the dawn of time.

So, "everybody else is doing it" works in your world?


Big fucking shocker that your mother was just as dumb as you are.

mvscal wrote: From Bali to Thailand to the Middle East to the suburbs of Paris to New York City, the common denominator is subhuman muslim swine murdering people in the name of Allah.

No. Unacceptable.

The point is not that you have given 'them' a label that is over the top, it is that you have given diverse groups one label.

I don't accept that Hamas, Hezbollah, Iraq insurgents, the Sadr brigades, the London bombers, Amrozi etc. etc. etc. are all in the same group to start with, nor do any reasonable people I've come across. It's this oversimplification on your part - which then is used to suggest that someone who (for instance) supports the Sudanese government also supports the Bali bombings (because they are apparently the 'same group') that is getting you into your muddle in the first place.

Perhaps you should, in future, clearly define WHY you believe person X holds position Y and research the specific reasons for that belief.

"From Bali to Thailand to the Middle East to the suburbs of Paris to New York City" are groups with political motivations, every one unique and often-times at odds with other.

You're the first person to charge into the Theology forum and slag everyone off, then you're the first person to put your head in the clouds and look for simplistic supernatural explanations when political ones are readily available.

I've seen Poptart kick your arse on this in a big way ^ several times. He 'gets it'.

What you generally post are baseless accusations, oversimplified characterisations and bizarre strawmen. My suggestion is that if you want to make something of this matter you target SPECIFIC groups, make sure you've clarified their position and then explain why you consider that specific position wrong.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

mvscal wrote:

Dr_Phibes wrote:So really, there is no real case against her.

I'm sure Muslim nutters care.

As usual, babs, you're robustly oblivious of the irony.

Consider the sheer..intensity of an American judge as he defies a higher court's ruling to remove his several-ton granite Ten Commandments monument from his courthouse, etc.


So, those Islamic loonies are sub-human, but YOUR good-buddy ZioNutjob Christer cultists are somehow okay?....They're acceptable?

("Israel is all that matters..really!")



Wake the fuck up, you Rove Monkey. He's trash, what are you?

Upon recent review, I have noticed no "Christers" beheading journalists, flying planes into buildings, getting monstrous grants from the UN yet starving their own people, stoning victims of rape, hanging homosexuals from a Case boom, denying the holocaust, forcing religion down the populous throat with threat of imprisonment, slapping themselves bloody on the way to Mecca, guaranteeing the complete destrucion of a race that occupied their land before they ever did, denying women the right to vote, strapping bombs to young men who had promising futures like being a doctor and actually healing their own people.

You're damn right that was a run on sentence you cocksucking troll of a bitch, wakey fuckin wakey, if not for the American GI you wouldn't be singing "Oh Canada" you'd be called to a mandated prayer twice a day or be stoned to death after your wife and daughter were raped right in front of your face.

If I couldn't spout out to these freaks, trolls or not, I'd actually have to go run the cows and shred with tractor or watch Hogan know's Best, all on my day's off.

Thanks for the entertainment fuckheads, the check is in the mail.

Dinsdale wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: So do "liberal social-democrats," fwiw. Or at least, this one does.

Question -- how can anyone possibly justify socialism?


How can you possibly believe that people OWE YOU just because you live in the same country?


Socialism is theft, plain and simple. Terry, don't you often speak of attending a religious university? How do you reconcile christian principles like "Not Steal" with stealing?


I just can't even grasp how anyone could be so much of an over-the-top arrogant prick that you feel justified in taking someone else's money for your own benefit. I mean sure, I talk a mean game of arrogant prick on the internet, but I don't take it so far that I think anyone actually owes me money for it.


But really, I don't even understand what short-circuits in someone's brain that they truly believe random strangers owe them money, and that money should be taken by mandate and force.

"Liberal social-democrats" are not socialists, at least not within the context of this thread. Tell me you knew.

Btw, the fairy tale of the way America used to be that you have concocted in your own imagination notwithstanding, there's always been plenty of theft in this country. Read The Jungle sometime, then get back to me.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:"Liberal social-democrats" are not socialists, at least not within the context of this thread. Tell me you knew.

Btw, the fairy tale of the way America used to be that you have concocted in your own imagination notwithstanding, there's always been plenty of theft in this country. Read The Jungle sometime, then get back to me.

Never mind the forcible eviction of millions of native people from their lands. As Ice T once said, "a straight up mvscal move".