T1B

52 meaningless titles out of 72

next you'll brag about having another 200+ non recognized titles in :

Jarts
hop scotch
leap frog
duck-duck-goose
Red Rover

Papa Willie wrote:Why don't you pussies come and play in the SEC?

Ring

Ring

Ring

Ring

CLICK


"We're sorry, but the Athletic Director cannot take this call at this time. He's on a very important call from the University of Central Northeastern Kenya. Please call back at another time, like say in 4 or 5 years. Please do not leave a message after the tone.

Papa Willie wrote:

Danimal wrote:Willie has thrown down the gauntlet in the '08 board-bitch contest!

Way to take the lead Willie, talk that shit.

No clue as to who you are.

Danimal is a long-time member of the CFB Forum, and a very solid poster to boot. What the hell have YOU ever contributed to this forum, you stupid fatbody?

Papa Willie wrote: As said previously - the Pac 10 has only 10 teams, so you guys pretty much HAVE to go outside a little bit.

Uhm, hate to break it to you... but the PAC plays 9 conference games a year.

That would mean it's the SEC and others that
HAVE to go outside a little bit."


But don't let facts and logic stand in the way of the oft-played SEC excuse making.

Papa Willie wrote:Do you think it's economically feasible for Pac 10 teams to play SEC teams 3-4 times a year? A simple yes or no shall suffice.

Nice try at a really shitty debate technique.

The "yes or no" is occasionally justified when someone evades a question. That hasn't come close to happening yet. With that in mind, you shouldn't start waving the white flag just yet.

Hmmm.... I wonder if the CFB fans across the country would rather tune in their TV to see an SEC powerhouse play a strong PAC team, or Middle Southwestern Guam University? Hmmmm.....

Wonder which one would garner better ratings, and the increased revenue that goes with that... hmmmm.... I wonder if that would offset the cost of 100 plave tickets to Los Angeles/Eugene/Seattle as opposed to the gas money they spend driving ten minutes up the street.... hmmmm.... tough economic question there.


I'm not saying every SEC team should schedule a H&H with a PAC team every single year. I don't recall anyone ever saying that. It would be nice if they did it say... at least once every 20 years, though -- something that most SEC teams are absolutely TERRIFIED of, apparently.

Papa Willie wrote:Why is it that you guys are convinced that the SEC teams are the ones that "don't want to play the Pac 10 teams"? I would seriously bet that it's a case of both sides saying "it's not feasible".

The AD's in the PAC always covertly leak out the info every time the SEC says "no."

And it happens a lot.


You aren't really trying to defend SEC OOC scheduling, are you? Pile-ons are always fresh. Completely indefensable position.

Papa Willie wrote:The Midwest won't claim Arkansas, and the Southeast doesn't want to, either.

A quick check of educational statistics places Arkansas firmly in the heart of the Southeastern USA... tell me you knew?

having 30+ national titles proves our program is top notch


sin,

Okie Light

champions in: cattle roping, hoe downs, steer wranglin, spittoon spittin(accuracy and Distance) !

Papa Willie wrote:

SoCalTrjn wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:

Who's your team again? Again - we play in the SEC. That's far more of a test than going on the road and playing a pussy Big 10 Team. :D

http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/rec ... eam=Auburn" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks to me like we've got a winning record against all other conferences. Sorry you spoke out of line.

Auburn is 5-3 vs the Pac 10 BUT they are 0-2 in games played vs the Pac 10 on the road (wasnt the point Mgo was making that Auburn isnt shit when they board a plane?)

Auburn has only ever played 1 game in a Big 10 stadium, a tie with Wisconsin

Vs the Big 12 Auburn is 11-15 (isnt that a losing record?) they have played at Texas 5 times and lost 4 of them, they were 0-1 @ Nebraska, 0-1 at Tamu and 1-0 @ Kansas St but in Big 12 stadiums, Auburn is 2-6.
2-8 on the road vs the Pac and the Big 12, the amazing part is that in 116 years, Auburn has only had the balls to play 11 games on the road vs Big 12, Big 10 and Pac 10 teams. Congrats, by the way, for that 12-0 mark vs the Sun Belt (with every game at home) that's no easy feat.

http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/rec ... eam=Auburn" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You seem to have a problem with reading statistics. Try again.

Is that the website that gave Auburn the 2004 National Title and provoked the John Deere Parade?

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/di ... s_conf.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Papa Willie wrote:I would LOVE to see the SEC play the Pac 10. Hell- 2-3 games a year per each team. Why is it that you guys are convinced that the SEC teams are the ones that "don't want to play the Pac 10 teams"?

two to three game each year, per team? why don't the conferences just merge? all we want to see is sec teams play teams from other bcs conferences. you can start with the big xii and work your way westward.

to answer your question about why we're convinced it's the sec who says no, we collectively point to the intersectional games that involve the acc, big east, big ten, big xii, and the pac 10, but curiously not the sec.

Sudden Sam wrote:I sure don't see too many Pac 10 schools playing in Auburn, Gainesville or Columbia either.

the pac 10 is a very successful athletic conference. i imagine that's because their ad's are insanely stupid:

pac 10 ad: we're interested in scheduling a home-and-home with you.

sec ad: how 'bout you just come here twice? make sure it's a down year for you guys.

pac 10 ad: ok.

Papa Willie wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:The Midwest won't claim Arkansas, and the Southeast doesn't want to, either.

A quick check of educational statistics places Arkansas firmly in the heart of the Southeastern USA... tell me you knew?

A quick check of actual southerners will tell you otherwise. You think we'd be dumb enough to claim fucking Clinton?

So even though you fucked Clinton, youre not going to claim it?

man, tell that cheerios joke again.

Nobody ever said the SEC was the worst, just the biggest cowards.

Its easy to point at records when one conference has 4 automatic wins per team because they all stayed at home and played 1aa, d2 or sun belt teams. Every conference will go .500 in conference play, its the out of conference games that determine a conferences strength, the SEC has proven year in and year out that they will not travel for OOC games and then they say they cant afford to do so, what are they spending the money on, all those 35,000 dollar homes and trailers?
Nothing the SEC will ever do in backyard bowl games, regular season win-loss records and rankings will ever make up for their gutless scheduling in the eyes of College Football fans across America. Go play in front of 70-100 thousand hostile fans 2 or 3 thousand miles from campus and then get back to us, other wise, shut up.

What am I a Polygamist? I have been married for 14 years to "the HS Sweetheart" though she went to UC Irvine after HS and I to USC. We have 2 sons (11 and 10) and have been pretty happy with eachother. Certainly dont have a fiance in a Mississippi trailer or anything. Though the mistaken identity has been fun.

Maybe you should keep grasping at straws there Auburn fan, so far all you have shown is that you hide behind the merits of other teams in the conference to make up for the fact that your team has had no accomplishments worth meriting

What am I a Polygamist?

I've given this a lot of thought lately, and I'm ready to sign up for a religion that will compel me to gain more wives. Why the hell not?

what I was suggesting was the amount of travel for OOC games teams do and the distance they go.
Just looked at the first 4 Pac 10 teams alphabetically and over the last 10 years they played 11 out of 33, 9 out of 32, 15 out of 33 and 10 out of 32 OOC games on the road, roughly 35% of their OOC games were played on the road and the teams traveled as far as Zona going to Purdue, ASU going to North Carolina, Cal going to Tennessee and Oregon going to Michigan.
On the other hand you have the SEC playing only 54 of 384 OOC (14%) on the road and the overwhelming majority of those 54 games were in state. And similar to the Pac 10, when they have had to travel further than their states border, the SEC teams have won less than 15% of the games, the Pac has actually had a higher winning percentage after traveling

If you guys are right and the SEC is so superior to everyone else, why dont they travel to other teams stadiums and prove it?

Papa Willie wrote:Maybe because schools are closer together in the East? Not our fault you live in an area secluded by cocks and cum!

Funny that this area is surrounded by cocks and cum when the South is full of the states with the highest Aids per capita ratios.

http://www.statemaster.com/graph/hea_ai ... e-all-ages" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

1 District of Columbia: 179.2
#2 New York: 39.7
#3 Florida: 33.5
#4 Maryland: 26.1
#5 Louisiana: 22.4
#6 New Jersey: 21.2
#7 Delaware: 18.9
#8 Georgia: 18.6
#9 Connecticut: 18.4
#10 South Carolina: 18.1
#11 Mississippi: 16.5
#12 Texas: 14.7
#13 North Carolina: 13.3
#14 Illinois: 13.2
#15 Pennsylvania: 13.1
#16 Tennessee: 13.1
#17 Nevada: 13.1
#18 California: 13
#19 Rhode Island: 12.2
#20 Hawaii: 10.8
#21 Virginia: 10.7
#22 Alabama: 10.3
#23 Arizona: 9.8
#24 New Mexico: 9.6
#25 Massachusetts: 8.8
#26 Alaska: 8.4
#27 Oregon: 7.8
#28 Colorado: 7.3
#29 Washington: 7.2
#30 Missouri: 6.8
#31 Arkansas: 6.7
#32 Michigan: 6.5
#33 Indiana: 6.3
#34 Kentucky: 6.1
#35 Ohio: 5.8
#36 Oklahoma: 5.5
#37 West Virginia: 5.1
#38 Maine: 4.6
#39 Minnesota: 4.3
#40 Kansas: 4.2
#41 Nebraska: 3.9
#42 Wyoming: 3.6
#43 Utah: 3.3
#44 New Hampshire: 3.2
#45 Wisconsin: 3.2
#46 North Dakota: 2.7
#47 Vermont: 2.7
#48 Iowa: 2.2
#49 Idaho: 1.6
#50 South Dakota: 1.6
#51 Montana: 0.8
Weighted average: 13.7

more than half the states represented by the SEC have a higher AIDS rate than ANY state that the Pac 10 represents


Georgia has not left the South to play ANYONE in 42 years
Floridas last OOC game outside of their state was in September of 1991
Auburn hasnt won a road OOC game in a decade, but they have only played 2.

only 34 of 384 OOC games were played on the road, there is no excuse for that type of craven schedule making, no matter how you attempt to spin it

since 1998
USC is 5-1 in BCS Bowls 210 pf 126 PA (avg 35-21)
Auburn is 1-0 in BCS Bowls 16 PF 13 PA

since 1998 USC is 2-0 vs Auburn

USC 10 0 6 7 - 23
Auburn 0 0 0 0 - 0
(that would be the SCOREBOARD)

First Quarter
USC-Williams 5 pass from Leinart (Killeen kick), 12:38.
USC-FG Killeen 28, 3:21.

Third Quarter
USC-FG Killeen 42, 11:50.
USC-FG 34 Killeen, 7:22.

Fourth Quarter
USC-Dennis 14 run (Killeen kick), 13:51.

A-86,063.


USC Aub
First downs 16 11
Rushes-yards 36-123 36-43 (greatest backfield in college football history?)
Passing 192 121
Comp-Att-Int 17-30-1 12-26-1
Return Yards 11 90
Punts-Avg. 7-45.1 10-36.3
Fumbles-Lost 0-0 2-2
Penalties-Yards 4-43 4-30
Time of Possession 32:15 27:45

INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS

RUSHING-USC, Dennis 21-85, Washington 3-24, Bush 5-9, White 5-6, Leinart 2-(minus 1). Auburn, Williams 12-40, Brown 8-28, Campbell 16-(minus 25).

PASSING-USC, Leinart 17-30-1-192. Auburn, Campbell 12-26-1-121.

RECEIVING-USC, Williams 8-104, Byrd 3-63, Colbert 2-13, Smith 1-7, Guenther 1-6, Wyatt 1-5, Bush 1-(minus 6). Auburn, Obomanu 4-53, Taylor 4-43, McIntyre 3-25, Brown 1-0.

monkeys, poop, awesome.

funny you want to point out that USC kick fucked Auburn at Auburn 4 years ago but to argue that point you want to talk about a game 20 years ago.

OK douche, once again you proved the point that when your team has done nothing you want to gravy train on the conferences accomplishments

Auburn is 0-for in OOC road wins in the last 10 years

Auburn is 0-for in road games vs Pac 10 schools

Auburn has won 1 National title in 116 years of football and that was 50 years ago

Fuck dude, youre like Trix without the titles

Edited cause I omitted some points the first time


Keep searching for justification somewhere Willie, I just recruited a 5-10 180 lb 12 year old left handed pitcher who has a mean streak and a 83 MPH fast ball... I have a PONY title to defend

I just recruited a 5-10 180 lb 12 year old left handed pitcher who has a mean streak and a 83 MPH fast ball... I have a PONY title to defend

And I get this terrible feeling that your main goal with him is to be wearing his shit on the tip of your dick by the day's end.

More likely that his main goal is to have him bean the best player on every opposing team.

War Wagon wrote:

I just recruited a 5-10 180 lb 12 year old left handed pitcher who has a mean streak and a 83 MPH fast ball... I have a PONY title to defend

And I get this terrible feeling that your main goal with him is to be wearing his shit on the tip of your dick by the day's end.

More likely that his main goal is to have him bean the best player on every opposing team.

well maybe not bean but give the kid something to think about, certainly prevent him from diging in

JayDuck wrote:Seriously racking my brain here trying to come up with a way that any rational person could vote Michigan ahead of Oregon at the end of this season.

Short answer (imho): the pollsters give far too much weight to bowl games in the final poll. Yeah, Oregon won their bowl game as well, but it wasn't as high profile a win as Michigan's was.

But M Club is also right. Final polls don't really matter unless there's a controversy over who is #1.

Sudden Sam wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Which settles this long-winded, monkey poopin', AIDS-stats, argument:

LSU is #1. No debate. They won it in every poll, game, etc.

No one else has any claim whatsoever. USC, by far, is the team that should keep their mouth shut. I had at one point decided that, yes, they were a team that had an argument, but the more I think about comparing a team with two triple-overtime losses to a team that lost to a 41 point underdog, HA! USC has less claim to the title than West Virginia, Georgia, or even Kansas!

I see what you're saying, Sam. Having said that, however, and this is not a knock against LSU's season, if I had had a vote in this year's AP poll, I probably would have voted for someone else. I'm not quite sure who, but someone other than LSU.

An agenda-driven vote? Sure, but I submit that's what it will take to get a playoff. And this season was the perfect vehicle for such a vote. Unfortunately, Division 1-A has made it clear that they will only be dragged into the 21st century kicking and screaming, if at all.

Hopefully in mine, Sam. Hopefully in mine.

Jsc810 wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:if I had had a vote in this year's AP poll, I probably would have voted for someone else. I'm not quite sure who, but someone other than LSU.

An agenda-driven vote? Sure, but I submit that's what it will take to get a playoff.

If the sole criteria of your vote is who deserves to be national champions this year, then who would it be?

Under the rules as they currently exist, LSU.

That being said, this was not an ordinary season. There is a crying need for a playoff right now, and this season, moreso than any other, proved it. That leads to the point that I would not have voted for LSU if I had a vote in the final AP poll.

Believe the Heupel wrote:So, Terry, what are your thoughts on jury nullification?

I see where you're going, but apples and oranges here. As it stands, the coaches are contractually obligated to vote for the winner of the BCS championship game as #1, so there's no risk of LSU losing a national championship just because a few AP voters take the opportunity to vote, essentially, for a playoff.

I don't know who I'd vote for, other than LSU. Oh wait, I'm a homer. I'd vote for Wisconsin.

Seriously, maybe we should have a T1B poll that mirrors the AP and see what we get. One man, one vote. I'm far too lazy to set up such a thing, BTW.

Jsc810 wrote:Also, I completely agree with you about the need for a playoff. Perhaps you could use your influence to sway two certain conferences who do not share your views, yet.

Two thoughts:

1. What influence?

2. You also seem to want me to use some of that "influence" to convince my alma mater to join one of those conferences. Doesn't that seem just a tad contradictory?

What the fuck was I thinking? "Mirrors the AP".

BWAHAHAHA!

Dinsdale wrote:Actually, you confused "legitimized" with "legitimated"... but who's counting?

Just like you confused Oregon with being better than Missouri and then whelched on the bet, Faggot.