T1B

Mebbe so Tom, I guess I can't really say what makes a sick, queer mind tick the way it does.

All that aside, it's even more difficult to figure why normal folks would want to cowtow to the gay agenda and accept deviant behavior.

War Wagon wrote:All that aside, it's even more difficult to figure why normal folks would want to cowtow to the gay agenda and accept deviant behavior.

No, it gets more difficult than that. Like trying to figure out why so many ardent anti-gay public figures turn out to be chute stuffers themselves.

Anytime I see somebody passionately flame up at the thought of gays, I feel uncomfortable and make sure my bum is out of considerable reach from you freaks.

War Wagon wrote:Mebbe so Tom, I guess I can't really say what makes a sick, queer mind tick the way it does.

Look within.

Tom In VA wrote:I don't know War Wagon, I tend to disagree. You might have a point and I don't doubt that there are some motivated by a sense of wanting to legitimize their "difference" socially. But everything I've heard seems to revolve around practical issues.

Exactly.

Now, about flat tax versus sales tax. What little I read gave tax breaks to businesses under both plans, so all anybody has to do is buy shit through their business and they can avoid bearing the burden of either, fairly. Rich people still get away with not paying anything close to what they should on taxes, and the 'savings' are passed on to us little people. Won't regular people be more affected by such a tax? I don't know, though. What are the benefits you've read of flat and sales taxes?

I think a solution which covers a lot of bases would be more inner city *and* suburban community gardening plans. I liked what Darryl Hannah did and was fighting for in Los Angeles -- I'm just pissed off she did it for illegal aliens instead of the poorer native citizens who lived there and were moved out for the industries who existed before the community garden plots took over after industry failed. But if that plan could be used for everybody, that's a great idea. People have a stake in what they grow, they can make a little money selling off extra, they'll eat better, and they'll feel better. People don't have to scrounge through the bruised bin at their local 'beer, canned goods and lotto tickets' just-off-the-boat owned joint. People will be in more control of what they put into their bodies.

How's the Huffy holding up these days? How's the PSI in those tires? When you park yourself on it, does your ass swallow the banana seat whole like it's a starving chimp?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

War Wagon wrote:All that aside, it's even more difficult to figure why normal folks would want to cowtow to the gay agenda and accept deviant behavior.

No, it gets more difficult than that. Like trying to figure out why so many ardent anti-gay public figures turn out to be chute stuffers themselves.

Anytime I see somebody passionately flame up at the thought of gays, I feel uncomfortable and make sure my bum is out of considerable reach from you freaks.

So you automatically assume that a "chute stuffer" would be attracted to your chute ? AND, AND, AAAAAAAAAAND it makes you feel uncomfortable ?

I don't know bro-hah, the stuffer crowd might just accuse you of a wee bit 'o latency going on there.




War Wagon,

The wife performing oral sex on me is deviant behavior in some circles. But I must say I certainly enjoy it when the wife is agreeable to a bit of deviation from the norm in that respect and I know she appreciates it when I return the deviant favor on her. Rubbing one out, is deviant in some circles, there goes the same. Sometimes I need to engage in that deviance to be able to walk in public (I get tired of telling people it's a cell phone in my pocket - but I am happy to see you, one of those old fashioned brick kinds too :twisted: ). Especially now with a kid and the action has slowed down considerably.

So there's plenty of deviance going around in my wonderful hetero world for me to really focus on anyone elses deviant behavior. In fact, I think paying more attention to somebody else's deviant behavior is pretty deviant of me to begin with.

It's all about my house.

Risa wrote:
Rich people still get away with not paying anything close to what they should on taxes

Arguable but not in this thread. Furthermore it would require research I suppose, if those figures are even kept anywhere except in the files of the CPAs who does said "rich peoples" taxes.

Tom In VA wrote:the stuffer crowd might just accuse you of a wee bit 'o latency

Hey, I'd rather be accused than take dick.


Count it!

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:the stuffer crowd might just accuse you of a wee bit 'o latency

Hey, I'd rather be accused than take dick.

Count it!

Well played. How about a virtual slap on the ass in a macho hetero football player protected by a butt pad kind of way ?


Nah, I'll just hand out a RACK

R-Jack wrote:The only thing queers actually want with legal marriage is the tax breaks.

Wrong, dumbshit.

And they have every right to those tax breaks, as well as all the other rights & privileges that any other married couple enjoys. The 14th Amendment out front should have told you that.

War Wagon wrote: So Jsc, we can put you down as a fudge packing queer, right?

Dude, it's Jsc.


When the whole gay marriage thing started to look like an inevitability, he got on board, bought up some gayass S&M gear, started cruising gay bars, and came on gay messageboards and told everyone how he'd been rooting for gaymarriage for years and years, and how it's always been one of his favorite causes, citing the reason as something about knowing someone who went to Evergreen State College at one time.

You aren't born gay. But after your 47th colonoscopy, you start to "ponder."

-Jsc

No doubt.

So many male docotors have shoved stuff up Jsc's ass, the gay community has made him an honorary member.

Dinsdale wrote:

War Wagon wrote: So Jsc, we can put you down as a fudge packing queer, right?

Dude, it's Jsc.


When the whole gay marriage thing started to look like an inevitability, he got on board, bought up some gayass S&M gear, started cruising gay bars, and came on gay messageboards and told everyone how he'd been rooting for gaymarriage for years and years, and how it's always been one of his favorite causes, citing the reason as something about knowing someone who went to Evergreen State College at one time.

Like Vito Spatafore you mean? It's probably just his blood pressure medication fucking with his mind.



Maybe the wytches could ensue some hilarity or something, imo

Dinsdale wrote:No doubt.

So many male docotors have shoved stuff up Jsc's ass, the gay community has made him an honorary member.

He who lives with a male roommate says what? Come on, man...projection is also a form of latency. Except it's more likely active in your case. Yes?

That study doesn't prove much only that - blood flows to the penis.

Shit, if I haven't had any lately or haven't rubbed one out or anything the night before - if I shift in my chair reading .NET code or SQL code , my "circumference" increases. Bullshit study.

Or maybe I just really am a fucking geek.

Jsc810 wrote: "If you want proof, I can probably get a letter from my doctor."

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:"A note from your doctor sayin' you don't like to suck cock?"

I see Risa is trying to sway poll votes by pandering to the Kansas City Contingent.


IKYABWAI?


Really?

Dinsdale wrote:No doubt.

So many male docotors have shoved stuff up Jsc's ass, the gay community has made him an honorary member.

...and innocent dogs pay with their lives. This sucks for Ricky Santorum and me, who regard those dogs as romantic possibilities.

You don't really have to cajole a dog into tongue-scrubbing your pipe. Train 'em right, and it's a finger-snap away.

Now that gays can marry, folks like me are excited about the inevitable acceptance of our proclivities.

Heck, Mrs. Wolfman is probably a deviant. We've all seen pictures of the dude. Either she's into some twisted stuff, or she keeps him at bay with a rolled-up Syracuse/Rutgers program.

Ever done it doggy licking style in a dumpater?

That's just gross.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: Anytime I see somebody passionately flame up at the thought of gays, I feel uncomfortable and make sure my bum is out of considerable reach from you freaks.

Umm... not the thought of gays, the legality of gay marriage. That's bullshit, is it not?

Less passion over here and more an abject, steely eyed intolerance towards an intolerable lifestyle being accepted at the statehouse level.

PSUFAN wrote:

Wolfman wrote:I'd like to enter into a group marriage with my cat, so that I can get extra get tax breaks and benefits. Hell, I want to marry the trees in my back yard for the same reasons. Now tell me that marriage has to be between two humans but not between one man and one woman ??
Where do we end this circus ??

Does this mean your engagement with Paul Harvey is off? Get well soon, Wolfie.

LOL

Inter-racial marriage is accepted, now. Why not let the gays have their way. At least they can't reproduce. And they are more suceptable to disease.

All fags should die. Just sayin.

A few pictures from this eventful day.

IndyFrisco wrote:All fags should die. Just sayin.

Why? did they touch your penis?

Mister Bushice wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote:All fags should die. Just sayin.

Why? did they touch your penis?

Yeah. They did.

Dork.

[meds]As this fag law goes into effect, enjoy the increase in your insurance premiums.[/meds]

Back row - Mgo and Jsc tie the knot.

Dinsdale wrote:

War Wagon wrote: So Jsc, we can put you down as a fudge packing queer, right?

Dude, it's Jsc.


When the whole gay marriage thing started to look like an inevitability, he got on board, bought up some gayass S&M gear, started cruising gay bars, and came on gay messageboards and told everyone how he'd been rooting for gaymarriage for years and years, and how it's always been one of his favorite causes, citing the reason as something about knowing someone who went to Evergreen State College at one time.

This made me laugh. A lot.

IndyFrisco wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote:All fags should die. Just sayin.

Why? did they touch your penis?

Yeah. They did.

Dork.

[meds]As this fag law goes into effect, enjoy the increase in your insurance premiums.[/meds]

This is not a valid reason to want people dead, I suspect fags touched your penis.

Dr_Phibes wrote: I suspect fags touched your penis.

Yeah. They did.

Dork.

As I await for the liberal shit to make an appearance pointing out the irony in my original post vs. my long lasting faux pas, there is no bad reason for wishing the bodily-waste-packing deviants to extinguish themselves.

Oh, and there may be another valid reason to want people dead. 9/11 out front should have told ya. Then again, you may only care about eradicating the non-pole-smoking portion.

IndyFrisco wrote:
As I await "the truth" to make an appearance pointing out the irony in my original post vs. my long lasting faux pas,

You're quite versed in the "Freudian slip".... when it comes to the male Genitalia.

IndyFrisco wrote:there is no bad reason for wishing the bodily-waste-packing deviants to extinguish themselves.

Your homophobia is starting to flame

You might want to "tuck it" in....

I'm that much closer to rockin' some poodle's world. Zip-a-Bing!

Someone wanna remind me again why I'm supposed to give a shit about what people I don't know do with their genitalia in the privacy of their own homes?


Seems a little creepy to me.

Dinsdale wrote:Someone wanna remind me again why I'm supposed to give a shit about what people I don't know do with their genitalia in the privacy of their own homes?


Seems a little creepy to me.

Oh, its just the morality police. They have a penchent for wanting to get into everyone else's pants when they have problems with their own junk and/or how it connects to their brains. But hey it's rational, especially if God told them so.

RACK 88!

Well done.

RadioFan wrote:But hey it's rational, especially if God told them so.

Didn't God tell them to judge not and do unto others and shit, too?

Dins, just speaking for myself, I don't care what people do in their own private time or place.

Take a shot at addressing 88's post.

88 wrote:In enforcing this subdivision or any other provision of this Constitution, no
court of this State may impose upon the State of California or any
public entity, board, or official any obligation or responsibility
with respect to the use of pupil school assignment or pupil
transportation,

You can have my pupils when you can pry then from my COLD DEAD HANDS

sin,





:)



Yeah, I'm making a mockery, but WTF? Section1, article 1. skip the rest, except the STATES RIGHTS part.

But, I'll answer 88s questions.

1. What constitutional rights do people in California who want to marry more than one person at a time now have?

It's against the law in all states, but in some it's only a misdemeanor. You can move to Salt Lake City and give it a shot, though. I hear once you go mormon, you can't go back.

2. What constitutional rights do people in California who want to marry blood relatives (siblings, parents) now have?

Same as every other state. None. It's the fear of the "extra leg" thingy.

3. What constitutional rights do people in California who want to marry non-humans now have?

Marriage between humans and non-humans is not recognized by any state, but people have married animals as part of religious traditions, to bring good luck, or as punishment.
I think mace did it for all three reasons. He likes having his nuts nibbled raw. Dude LIVES on the edge.

So 88, feel free to buck tradition and fuck the family pet, bang your sister and your dad, and marry that hot cousin of yours that you've been jerking off to for so long. The wife will understand.

This is America, dammit. Land of the free, home of the depraved.