Page 2 of 2

Re: PAC 10.... baby

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:41 pm
by Dinsdale
Mace wrote:Was the point of your drunken bet about whether Oregon State finishes in the top 25? Was that it? Well, dumbfuck, show me where I said they wouldn't finish in the top 25....can you?

Fist off... it was a "dry day" for me when I posted that. Yup, another swing and a miss.


But somehow claiming a top-20-to-25-BCS-team-to-be is a "shit team," stated ad nauseum, somehow gives you trollbode?


That's how you're trying to recover your cred here?

Really?


That's really where you're going here?


Apparently, your years on these boards isn't enough to overcome your feeble mind. I've had the honor with rolling with some of the greatest trollers any of these boards have ever seen (who shall remain nameless, but rest assured their trolling brilliance is still felt quite strongly to this day, even though their primary nics are distant memories)...


and you, sir, are no troller. Hell, you sign your shit troll posts with your own fucking name. To use a Macism...

EOS.

But in my years of hanging with the trolling-addicts on these forums, the Great Ones all shared one common trait... they never once came after-the-fact and claimed trollBODE.

Not once, in hundreds of instances. Their BODE spoke for itself. Here's another hint for you -- that whole "Claim it, and it will come" was facetious. No one ever intended for you to adopt it as a mantra.


Your whole "shit team" debacle fell apart before your very eyes, as more and more evidence of your stupidity piled up. It was thoroughly debunked. Then, and only then, did you start spinning with the "I was trolling" bit. I expect as much from At Least I'm Not Him... and few others. I guess my expectations of this place are too high. Never once has a real troller used it as an excuse to backtrack on the statements he made... those people have their ducks in a row before they start down that road... unlike yourself, who ended up falling back on "HA! I trolled you!"

That ain't the way it works, bud... and you know it.


When called out on your "troll attempt," you offered up falsehoods and the Transitive Theory. Beyond that... nada. Didn't even make an attempt at anything beyond that.


But here's what you really seem to be missing out on -- I freaking lHATE Oregon State with a passion. That's the enemy, save for two occasions -- when they play a bowl, and when they play Washington. You really wouldn't have had to make much of a case for a "shit team" to get me to join the pile-on... I love that shit. The local/regional sports board pretty much consist of loud-mouthed Beaver Believers (yeah, that's actually what they call themselves) pretty much telling the world how Oklahoma, Nebraska, and ND combined don't have the winning-tradition that OS does... no, seriously. And that's what I, as a Ducks fan, put up with daily. So really, it takes so very little to get me to engage in a Beavers pile-on, it's almost automatic.

That said... your argument was so incredibly fucking feeble, I'm actually taking up those peoples' cause... because you really did suck that badly.

The only bright spot I see for you here is that the seemingly intelligent, insightful boy you miraculously raised wasn't around to wutness Daddy plungering himself for the ages.


So, why don't we just let it ride... or you can try and "troll" me and the PAC10 people here "yet again" by reconciling "shit team" with a top-20-25 BCS finish... go right ahead.


You truly have my sympathy on your recent problems with your physical health. But the mental problems they seemed to have spawned... you're on your own with those.

Re: PAC 10.... baby

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:02 pm
by Dinsdale
Mace wrote:But what, I ask once again, was the so-called "bet" all about? You know, the "deathmatch" thing? What exactly was it that you were claiming to be "right" about?

Dinsdale wrote:If OS finishes outside the Top 25 of the BCS final standings, I leave this board (T1B) for good.

If they crack the top 25, you're gone... forever. And your shitty trolls.

Is it the multi-syllabic words that are throwing you off? The advanced punctuation, like ellipses and parentheses?


Help me help YOU, Mace.

This is no longer about the PAC or anything else -- it's become about how someone so feebleminded can hold a job or even get a computer to boot up all by himself.

The "ask once again" part is pretty fucking funny... since it's YOU who sidestepped the issue, and is avoiding it like the plague. Every time you "ask once again," I've reposted the question. It's YOU who has failed to answer it.

But tell me which part of that plain English you're struggling with, and I'll do my best to clear it up for you, and help explain to you why your own statements make you a tard, what with the arguing with yourself about "shit teams" and whatnot.


And yes... I DO realize that whichever route you take here besides avoiding my question requires you to admit you're wrong. And yes, that was quite by design. But the beauty of it was that I didn't even have to create a false-dilemma to do so... nope, I'm just taking advantage of the corner you've painted yourself so deeply into.


So, top-25 BCS teams qualify as "shit teams"...


YES OR NO?


Since you seem to struggle badly in these situations, I'll again help -- "yes or no" questions have two acceptable answers -- "yes" or "no." Seems a pretty simple request that you answer a very simple yes or no question, since it's directly related to earlier statements you made.

Of course, it doesn't really matter wwhich way you go, does it? You either admit to making false statements (which you're already played the "trolling" card, so put it back on the bottom of the deck, where it belongs), or admitting that your statements are asinine, and completely against the grain of... well, the entire CFB world.


But again, it wasn't me who painted you into a corner -- the blame for that falls squarely on you. I was just handing you the paintbrush to do it.

More sincere advice -- the correct order-of-operations is: Brain, and THEN keyboard... Brain, THEN keyboard. Maybe you should put a little post-it note on your monitor with those words on it, to help you avoid situations like this in the future.


Or, you could just do what Mace does oh-so predictably every fucking time he's called out in any forum -- change the subject, attribute false statements to others, then claim "BODE" in another thread... it's your trademark.


My wager still stands-btw... but since you'll lose it regardless, I can see you trying these false claims of comprehension problems and your numerous changes to the subject. I'll look forward to your continued avoidance of both my wager, and the VERY simple yes or no question I asked... it's what you do... not that I blame you, I suppose, since backing up your retarded statements is a pretty fucking tall order for anyone, much less someone who is jealous of Shrubber's spine.

Re: PAC 10.... baby

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:43 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
I'd just like to point out for the record that the Big XII North is 3-0 in bowl games, while the South currently sits at 0-2. Even if they win out, they'll just be 2-2. I think this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the North has been underrated all season and is clearly a superior division to the South.

Re: PAC 10.... baby

Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:12 am
by Dinsdale
Speaking of the PAC...

I'm suprised I haven't seen a Trojan melt yet.

Looks like Sarkisian just took DC Nick Holt to UDub with him. Also looks like he's trying to take the rest of the USC staff with him.

Anyone catch during the Rose Bowl broadcast where the announcers said something like "Carroll has so much trust in Sark, he wanted him to stay through the Rose Bowl"?

Guess he couldn't trust him to not gut his crew on the way out the door.

But what does it say about Petey that all his underlings are jumping ship like rats... to head to a winless freaking program?


This is cool, though. We can never have too much hatred flowing between the PAC10 coaching staffs. But does sharing a mutual enemy in Petey mean that the ARCHRIVAL Fuskies aren't quite as hated, following the "my enemy's enemy is my friend"?

I don't think so.

Fuck conference championship games -- I say we throw Belittle, Sark, Cheaty, Tedford, and a few choice coordinators into a ring for a giant battle royale for all the marbles...

an event at which Erickson can sell beers ringside.

Winner gets the Rose Bowl.