Going back to this . . .
Van wrote:Here ya' go, Terry. This is my off-the-top-of-my-head take on what the conferences ought to look like...
Smashmouth 12
North
Michigan
Michigan St
Ohio St
Cincinnati
Wisky
Minnesota
South
ND
Indiana
Purdue
Northwestern
Illinois
Iowa
I'm thinking back to 2003 here, when it looked like ND might have to join a conference, and all options pretty much were on the table.
Back then, on one of the ND homer boards, one of the posters suggested that ND join the Big Ten, with the following divisional alignment:
Great Lakes Division
Iowa
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Ohio State
Wisconsin
Midwest Division
Illinois
Indiana
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Penn State
Purdue
Right around the same time, Babs started a post at TOT suggesting that ND join the Big Ten, and positing the North/South alignment favored by Michigan and tOSU. I countered with this alignment, which Babs pooh-poohed, suggesting that "his" made more geographic sense (which, I suppose, it does, but geography ain't everything when it comes to college football conferences, let alone divisions within a conference ('sup, ACC Atlantic and Coastal Divisions).
Anyhoo, this isn't really worlds apart from what you suggested. Replace Cincinnati in the conference with Penn State (which corresponds to real world), then swap Penn State and Iowa within the divisions. If you don't like the division names (admittedly, Iowa in the "Great Lakes" Division is a bit of a reach, as is tOSU -- the northern part of that state, sure, but tOSU is in Columbus -- and Penn State in the "Midwest" Division as well), change them. But leave the alignments intact.
Of course, it'll never happen for any number of reasons, but what say you?