MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Killian wrote:Much of this had to do with the last administration but if this one proves to be as nutless as the last, I will do the same things if they don't appear to want to succeed at the highest level.
I sincerely doubt ND has ever
not wanted to succeed at the highest level. They have made some poor personnel decisions and some of the recruiting classes haven't panned out, but that'll happen.
I question whether less support and booster dollars truly helps a program, especially when good coaches don't come cheap these days. This may not be the case in pro sports, where some team owners don't care how the team is doing as long as they're profiting, but ND will always be committed to winning...or trying to win.
I get what you're saying, and I don't disagree. But at the same time, I think you might be picking around the edges of Killian's wording more than anything else. Allow me to explain.
Around the time I graduated, the NCAA passed a measure, I think it was called Proposition 48. Under that rule, student-athletes had to have test scores above a certain minimum and high school GPA's above a certain minimum in core subjects. A player who failed to meet those requirements could be admitted, but would lose their first year of eligibility. For most kids, the problem was the test scores -- high schools had a way of inflating grades to benefit the student in question, who often would be the school's celebrity. ND took a few kids who were Prop 48'ers. I know for a fact that Father Malloy was mortified by that, and decided that it would stop. Maybe a noble stance in principle, but in hindsight it was not the most well-reasoned decision he came up with. Among the group of Prop 48'ers who got in before Malloy was President were Tony Rice and Chris Zorich, both of whom turned out to be outstanding ambassadors of Notre Dame's football program.
There was also the unfortunate choice of wording Father Malloy used when he once referred to Stanford as one of Notre Dame's "aspirational peers." Don't get me wrong, there's nothing in the world wrong with wanting your school to be the best academic institution it possibly can be. But many took that as a statement that Malloy would willingly sacrifice the football program -- one of the elements of Notre Dame with which the public most closely identifies it -- in order to improve ND's USN&WR rankings. I happen to agree that such a conclusion takes Malloy's statement WAAAAY out of context, but certainly he could have chosen his wording better.
On a more concrete level, Malloy's two AD hirings left much to be desired. His first (Wadsworth) was a C-, graded on a curve. His second (White) was an unmitigated disaster at ND, F-.
Underpinning all of this was the sentiment among many that ND's football program was being sold out by, of all things, one of its own (Malloy was a monogram winner as a student at ND, albeit in basketball rather than in football. Fwiw, Wadsworth also was a monogram winner as a student at ND, in football.) I personally wouldn't go quite that far, but Malloy's stewardship of the athletic department in general, and of the football program in particular, was not nearly as effective as it could have been.